The federal response to the AIDS epidemic
References (9)
- et al.
Health policy and the politics of health care
Project on the Federal Social Role
Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations and Human Resources of the Committee on Government Operations
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (9)
Pandemic uncertainties and fiscal procyclicality: A dynamic non-linear approach
2021, International Review of Economics and FinanceCitation Excerpt :One of the key concerns while managing this menace is to understand how much of the burden is to be undertaken by the public health authorities and how much to be left to the private participants of the market. Lee and Arno (1986) discuss that there was inadequate federal funding for research, treatment, and community-based services during the time of the AIDS epidemic in the United States. Ideological obstinacy and bureaucratic hassles had led to reduced coordination in policy-making and funds were re-allocated from already existing healthcare programs to serve the purpose of AIDS.
The consequence of COVID-19: How the United States moved from security provider to security consumer
2020, International AffairsThe discordance between evidence and health policy in the United States: The science of translational research and the critical role of diverse stakeholders
2018, Health Research Policy and SystemsPriority-setting ethics in public health
2002, Journal of Public Health Policy
Copyright © 1986 Published by Elsevier B.V.