Skip to main content

Small Ship Detection on Optical Satellite Imagery with YOLO and YOLT

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Information and Communication (FICC 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1130))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Actually, the use of deep learning in object detection gives good results, but this performance decreases when there are small objects in the image. In this work, is presented a comparison between the last version of You Only Look Once (YOLO) and You Only Look Twice (YOLT) on the problem of detecting small objects (ships) on optical satellite imagery. Two datasets were used: High-Resolution Ship Collection (HRSC) and Mini Ship Data Set (MSDS), the last one was built by us. The mean object’s width for HRSC and MSDS are 150 and 50 pixels, respectively. The results showed that YOLT is good only for small objects with 76,06% of Average Precision (AP), meanwhile, YOLO reached 69,80% in the MSDS dataset. Moreover, in the case of the HRSC dataset where have objects of different sizes, YOLT obtained a 40% of AP against 75% of YOLO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., Zitnick, C.L.: Microsoft COCO: common objects in context. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 740–755. Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fu, K., Li, Y., Sun, H., Yang, X., Xu, G., Li, Y., Sun, X.: A ship rotation detection model in remote sensing images based on feature fusion pyramid network and deep reinforcement learning. Remote Sens. 10(12), 1922 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dong, C., Liu, J., Xu, F.: Ship detection in optical remote sensing images based on saliency and a rotation-invariant descriptor. Remote Sens. 10(3), 400 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, S., Zhang, Z., Li, B., Li, C.: Multiscale rotated bounding box-based deep learning method for detecting ship targets in remote sensing images. Sensors 18(8), 2702 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang, X., Sun, H., Sun, X., Yan, M., Guo, Z., Fu, K.: Position detection and direction prediction for arbitrary-oriented ships via multitask rotation region convolutional neural network. IEEE Access 6, 50839–50849 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, R., Yao, J., Zhang, K., Feng, C., Zhang, J.: S-CNN-based ship detection from high-resolution remote sensing images. In: International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 41 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, S., Wu, R., Xu, K., Wang, J., Sun, W.: R-CNN-based ship detection from high resolution remote sensing imagery. Remote Sens. 11(6), 631 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, Y., Cui, H.-Y., Kuang, Z., Li, G.-Q.: Ship detection and classification on optical remote sensing images using deep learning, vol. 12, p. 05015. EDP Sciences (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ma, M., Chen, J., Liu, W., Yang, W.: Ship classification and detection based on CNN using GF-3 SAR images. Remote Sens. 10(12), 2043 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao, H., Zhang, W., Sun, H., Xue, B.: Embedded deep learning for ship detection and recognition. Future Internet 11(2), 53 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eggert, C., Brehm, S., Winschel, A., Zecha, D., Lienhart, R.: A closer look: small object detection in faster R-CNN. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pp. 421–426. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, X., Sun, H., Fu, K., Yang, J., Sun, X., Yan, M., Guo, Z.: Automatic ship detection in remote sensing images from google earth of complex scenes based on multiscale rotation dense feature pyramid networks. Remote Sens. 10(1), 132 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Corbane, C., Pecoul, E., Demagistri, L., Petit, M.: Fully automated procedure for ship detection using optical satellite imagery. In: Remote Sensing of Inland, Coastal, and Oceanic Waters, vol. 7150. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Inggs, M.R., Robinson, A.D.: Ship target recognition using low resolution radar and neural networks. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 35(2), 386–393 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bi, F., Zhu, B., Gao, L., Bian, M.: A visual search inspired computational model for ship detection in optical satellite images. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 9(4), 749–753 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shi, H., Zhang, Q., Bian, M., Wang, H., Wang, Z., Chen, L., Yang, J.: A novel ship detection method based on gradient and integral feature for single-polarization synthetic aperture radar imagery. Sensors 18(2), 563 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng, G., Han, J.: A survey on object detection in optical remote sensing images. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 117, 11–28 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, Z.K., Weng, L.B., Yang, Y.P., et al.: A high resolution optical satellite image dataset for ship recognition and some new baselines (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Redmon, J., Farhadi, A.: YOLOv3: an incremental improvement. arXiv (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Redmon, J., Farhadi, A.: YOLO9000: better, faster, stronger. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.08242 (2016)

  21. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., Farhadi, A.: You only look once: unified, real-time object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 779–788 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., Malik, J.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 580–587 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Girshick, R.: Fast R-CNN. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.08083 (2015)

  24. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., Sun, J.: Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 91–99 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.-Y., Berg, A.C.: SSD: single shot multibox detector. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 21–37. Springer (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Uijlings, J.R.R., Van De Sande, K.E.A., Gevers, T., Smeulders, A.W.M.: Selective search for object recognition. Int. J. Comput. Vision 104(2), 154–171 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, Z., Yuan, L., Weng, L., Yang, Y.: A high resolution optical satellite image dataset for ship recognition and some new baselines. In: ICPRAM, pp. 324–331 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Van Etten, A.: You only look twice: rapid multi-scale object detection in satellite imagery. CoRR, abs/1805.09512 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Van Etten, A.: Satellite imagery multiscale rapid detection with windowed networks. CoRR, abs/1809.09978 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Everingham, M., Eslami, S.M.A., Van Gool, L., Williams, C.K.I., Winn, J., Zisserman, A.: The Pascal visual object classes challenge: a retrospective. Int. J. Comput. Vision 111(1), 98–136 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported from Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa Contract: IBA-0032-2017-UNSA, like part of the project “Detection of industrial fishing vessels within 5 miles of the Arequipa Region using high performance computing and satellite images”. Thanks to the CiTeSoft Contract: EC-0003-2017-UNSA for the equipment and the resources bring to the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eveling Castro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nina, W., Condori, W., Machaca, V., Villegas, J., Castro, E. (2020). Small Ship Detection on Optical Satellite Imagery with YOLO and YOLT. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds) Advances in Information and Communication. FICC 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1130. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39442-4_49

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics