Skip to main content

Method for the Interpretation of RMR Variability Using Gaussian Simulation to Reduce the Uncertainty in Estimations of Geomechanical Models of Underground Mines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Leadership (AHFE 2020)

Abstract

The application of conventional techniques, such as kriging, to model rock mass is limited because rock mass spatial variability and heterogeneity are not considered in such techniques. In this context, as an alternative solution, the application of the Gaussian simulation technique to simulate rock mass spatial heterogeneity based on the rock mass rating (RMR) classification is proposed. This research proposes a methodology that includes a variographic analysis of the RMR in different directions to determine its anisotropic behavior. In the case study of an underground deposit in Peru, the geomechanical record data compiled in the field were used. A total of 10 simulations were conducted, with approximately 6 million values for each simulation. These were calculated, verified, and an absolute mean error of only 3.82% was estimated. It is acceptable when compared with the value of 22.15% obtained with kriging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barton, N., Lien, R., Lunde, J.: Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech. Felsmechanik Mécanique des Roches 6(4), 189–236 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bieniawski, Z.T.: Engineering classification of jointed rock masses. Civ. Eng. S. Afr. 15(12), 335–343 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bieniawski: Exploration for rock engineering. 97–106 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deere, D.U.: The rock quality designation (RQD) index in practice. 91–101 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cartaya, M.: Caracterizacion geomecánica de macizos rocosos en obras subterráneas de la región oriental del país (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferrari, F., Apuani, T., Giani, G.P.: Rock mass rating spatial estimation by geostatistical analysis. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 70, 162–176 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Paithankar, A., Chatterjee, S.: Grade and tonnage uncertainty analysis of an african copper deposit using multiple-point geostatistics and sequential gaussian simulation. Nat. Resour. Res. 27(4), 419–436 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kova, Z., Cvetkovi, M., Parlov, J.: Gaussian simulation of nitrate concentration distribution in the Zagreb aquifer. J. Maps 13(2), 727–732 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Perez, M.S., et al.: Estudio comparativo entre sistemas de clasificación geomecánica en un depósito tipo Pórfido. Boletín Ciencias la Tierra 43, 34–44 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eivazy, H., Esmaieli, K., Jean, R.: Modelling geomechanical heterogeneity of rock masses using direct and indirect geostatistical conditional simulation methods. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 50(12), 93–103 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pinheiro, M., Emery, X., Miranda, T., Vallejos, J.: Truncated gaussian simulation to map the spatial heterogeneity of rock mass rating. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49(8), 3371–3376 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang, N., Yongzhi, W., Hui, Z., Sheng, Y.: Construction and application of 3D geological models for attribute-oriented. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. 18(4), 315–322 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vatcher, J., McKinnon, S.D., Sjöberg, J.: Developing 3-D mine-scale geomechanical models in complex geological environments, as applied to the Kiirunavaara Mine. Eng. Geol. 203, 140–150 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pinheiro, M., Vallejos, J., Miranda, T., Emery, X.: Geostatistical simulation to map the spatial heterogeneity of geomechanical parameters: a case study with rock mass rating. Eng. Geol. 205, 93–103 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Safikhani, M., Asghari, O., Emery, X.: Assessing the accuracy of sequential gaussian simulation through statistical testing. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 31(2), 523–533 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozturk, H., Erkayaoglu, M.: Interpretation of variability of rock mass rating by geostatistical analysis: a case study in Western Turkey. Arab. J. Geosci. 11(13), 344 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Novak Zelenika, K., Vidaček, R., Ilijaš, T., Pavić, P.: Application of the deterministical and stochastical geostatistical methods in petrophysical modeling, case study Upper Pannonian reservoir, Sava depression. Geol. Croat. 70(2), 105–114 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayer, J.M., Stead, D.: A comparison of traditional, step-path, and geostatistical techniques in the stability analysis of a large open pit. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 50(4), 927–949 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Raymundo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rodriguez-Vilca, J., Paucar-Vilcañaupa, J., Pehovaz-Alvarez, H., Raymundo, C., Mamani-Macedo, N., Moguerza, J.M. (2020). Method for the Interpretation of RMR Variability Using Gaussian Simulation to Reduce the Uncertainty in Estimations of Geomechanical Models of Underground Mines. In: Kantola, J., Nazir, S., Salminen, V. (eds) Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Leadership. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1209. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50791-6_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50791-6_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50790-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50791-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics