Skip to main content

Analyzing Students’ Behavior in a MOOC Course: A Process-Oriented Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Cognition, Learning and Games (HCII 2020)

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), are one of the most disruptive trends along the last 12 years. This is evidenced by the number of students enrolled since their emergence with over 101 million people taking one of the more than 11,400 MOOCs available. However, the approval rate of students in these types of courses is only about 5%. This has led to a great deal of interest among researchers in studying students’ behavior in these types of courses. The aim of this article is to explore the behavior of students in a MOOC. Specifically, to study students learning sequences and extract their behavioral patterns in the different study sessions. To reach the goal, using process mining techniques, process models of N = 1,550 students enrolled in a MOOC in Coursera were obtained. As a result, two groups of students were classified according to their study sessions, where differences were found both in the students’ interactions with the MOOC resources and in the way the lessons were approached on a weekly basis. In addition, students who passed the course repeated the assessments several times until they passed, without returning to review a video-lecture in advance. The results of this work contribute to extend the knowledge about students’ behavior in online environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bergman, J., Sams, A.: How the flipped classroom was born. The Daily Riff Online (2011). http://www.thedailyriff.com/articles/how-the-flipped-classroom-is-radically-transforming-learning-536.php

  2. Pérez-Álvarez, R., Maldonado, J.J., Rendich, R., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Sapunar, D.: Observatorio MOOC UC: la Adopción de MOOCs en la Educación Superior en América Latina y Europa. In: Actas la Jorn. MOOCs en español en EMOOCs 2017, vol. 2017, pp. 5–14 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shah, D.: By the numbers: MOOCs in 2019. Class Central (2020). https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2019/

  4. Kizilcec, R.F., Cohen, G.L.: Eight-minute self-regulation intervention raises educational attainment at scale in individualist but not collectivist cultures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 4348–4353 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kizilcec, R.F., Piech, C., Schneider, E.: Deconstructing disengagement: Analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferguson, R., Clow, D.: Examining engagement: analysing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses (MOOCs). In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Normandi Atiaja Atiaja, L., Segundo Guerrero Proenza, R.: MOOCs: origin, characterization, principal problems and challenges in higher education. J. E-Learn. Knowl. Soc. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alonso-Mencía, M.E., Alario-Hoyos, C., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Delgado Kloos, C.: Self-regulated learning in MOOCs: lessons learned from a literature review. Educ. Rev. 72, 319–345 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kizilcec, R.F., Morales, N., Munoz-Gama, J.: Mining theory-based patterns from Big data: identifying self-regulated learning strategies in massive open online courses. Comput. Human Behav. 80, 179–196 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fincham, O.E., Gasevic, D.V., Jovanovic, J.M., Pardo, A.: From study tactics to learning strategies: an analytical method for extracting interpretable representations. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 12, 59–72 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Geigle, C., Zhai, C.X.: Modeling MOOC student behavior with two-layer hidden Markov models. In: L@S 2017 - Proceedings of the 4th (2017) ACM Conference on Learning at Scale (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Matcha, W., et al.: Detection of learning strategies: a comparison of process, sequence and network analytic approaches (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davis, D., Seaton, D., Hauff, C., Houben, G.-J.: Toward large-scale learning design (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pashler, H., Wagenmakers, E.J.: Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: a crisis of confidence? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 528–530 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cole, M.: The cultural context of learning and thinking: an exploration in experimental anthropology (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., Mirriahi, N.: Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. Internet High. Educ. 33, 74–85 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mukala, P., Buijs, J., Leemans, M., Van Der Aalst, W.: Learning analytics on coursera event data: a proceb mining approach. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Van den Beemt, A., Buijs, J., Van der Aalst, W.: Analysing structured learning behaviour in massive open online courses (MOOCs): an approach based on process mining and clustering. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 19(5) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. de Barba, P.G., Malekian, D., Oliveira, E.A., Bailey, J., Ryan, T., Kennedy, G.: The importance and meaning of session behaviour in a MOOC. Comput. Educ. 146(2019), 103772 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Romero, M., Usart, M.: The time factor in MOOCS: time-on-task, interaction temporal patterns, and time perspectives in a MOOC. In: CSEDU 2014 - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sapunar-Opazo, D., Pérez-Álvarez, R., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M.: Analyzing learners’ activity beyond the MOOC. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Joksimović, S., Baker, R.S., Hatala, M.: Penetrating the black box of time-on-task estimation. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tough, A.: The Adult’s learning projects: a fresh approach to theory (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  24. van Eck, M.L., Lu, X., Leemans, S.J.J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: PM2: a process mining project methodology. In: Zdravkovic, J., Kirikova, M., Johannesson, P. (eds.) CAiSE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9097, pp. 297–313. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Maldonado, J.J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Bermeo, J.L., Muñoz, L., Pacheco, G., Espinoza, I.: Flipping the classroom with MOOCs. A pilot study exploring differences between self-regulated learners. In: 12th Latin American Conference on Learning Objects and Technologies, LACLO 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Günther, C.-A., Rozinat, A.: Disco: discover your processes. In: Demonstration Track 10th International Conference Business Process Management (BPM 2012), vol. 940, pp. 40–44 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maldonado, J.J., Palta, R., Vázquez, J., Bermeo, J.L., Pérez-sanagustín, M., Munoz-gama, J.: Exploring differences in how learners navigate in MOOCs based on self-regulated learning and learning styles (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mukala, P., Buijs, J., Leemans, M., van der Aalst, W.: Exploring students’ learning behaviour in MOOCs using process mining techniques. In: Computing Conference (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guo, P.J., Reinecke, K.: Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs. In: L@S 2014 - Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Learning at Scale (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sonnenberg, C., Bannert, M.: Discovering the effects of metacognitive prompts on the sequential structure of SRL-processes using process mining techniques. J. Learn. Anal. 2(1), 72–100 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Alharbi, A., Paul, D., Henskens, F., Hannaford, M.: An investigation into the learning styles and self-regulated learning strategies for computer science students. In: ASCILITE 2011 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mukala, M.P., Buijs, J.C.A.M., Leemans, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Learning analytics on coursera event data. In: Simpda (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been co-funded by Dirección de Investigación de la Universidad de Cuenca (DIUC), Cuenca-Ecuador, under the project “Analítica del aprendizaje para el estudio de estrategias de aprendizaje autorregulado en un contexto de aprendizaje híbrido” (DIUC_XVIII_2019_54). We want also to thanks to the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile and Dirección de Educación en Ingeniería - DEI.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Maldonado-Mahauad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bernal, F., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Villalba-Condori, K., Zúñiga-Prieto, M., Veintimilla-Reyes, J., Mejía, M. (2020). Analyzing Students’ Behavior in a MOOC Course: A Process-Oriented Approach. In: Stephanidis, C., et al. HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Cognition, Learning and Games. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12425. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60128-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60128-7_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60127-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60128-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics