Skip to main content

Efficacy of Blended Learning in the Teaching of Basic Surgical Skills in Medical Students at a Public University in Peru Between 2018 and 2022

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Research in Technologies, Information, Innovation and Sustainability (ARTIIS 2023)

Abstract

The objective of the research was to evaluate the efficacy of a Blended learning (B-learning) intervention to improve basic surgical skills in human medicine students at a public university in Lima, Peru. A quasi-experimental pretest/posttest study was carried out among enrolled in the Surgery course at Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (Peru). The achievement of basic surgical skills related to biosafety, tying, and suturing using simulators of low to intermediate complexity were evaluated. The McNemar´s and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for result analysis. The results showed that the intervention improved biosafety surgical skills (including handwashing, clothing, glove usage), as well as knot-making and suturings (p < 0.05). Observation revealed challenges with fine psychomotor skills and ergonomic risk factors. Interviews yielded positive reactions, significant learning, and motivation for continuous learning. Left-handed students reported serious procedural difficulties, indicating a need for more targeted training. Teachers provided audiovisual materials contributing to the achievement of basic surgical skills. The incorporation of b-learning into the learning process in basic surgical techniques significantly increase students’ skills. Further refinement of the model for left-handed students and ongoing training for teachers in virtual material design is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Down, B., Morris, S., Kulkarni, S., Mohiuddin, K.: Effectiveness of a multisession combined near-peer and faculty-led surgical skills course on self-perceived ability to perform basic surgical skills. Ann. Med. Surg. 57, 153–156 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.07.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Peel, J.K., Schlachta, C.M., Alkhamesi, N.A.: A systematic review of the factors affecting choice of surgery as a career. Can. J. Surg. 61(1), 58–67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.008217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumins, N.H., Qin, V.L., Driscoll, E.C., Morrow, K.L., Kashyap, V.S., Ning, A.Y., et al.: Computer-based video training is effective in teaching basic surgical skills to novices without faculty involvement using a self-directed, sequential and incremental program. Am. J. Surg. 221(4), 780–787 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruiz-Gómez, J.L., Martín-Parra, J.I., González-Noriega, M., Redondo-Figuero, C.G., Manuel-Palazuelos, J.C.: Simulation as a surgical teaching model. Cir. Esp. (English Ed) 96(1), 12–17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2017.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vallée, A., Blacher, J., Cariou, A., Sorbets, E.: Blended learning compared to traditional learning in medical education: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 22(8), e16504 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2196/16504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Funke, K., Bonrath, E., Mardin, W.A., Becker, J.C., Haier, J., Senninger, N., et al.: Blended learning in surgery using the Immedea Simulator. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 398(2), 335–340 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-0987-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Bonn, S.M., Grajek, J.S., Schneider, A., Oberhoffner, T., Mlynski, R., Weiss, N.M.: Interactive live-stream surgery contributes to surgical education in the context of contact restrictions. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 279(6), 2865–2871 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-021-06994-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Placencia Medina, M.D., Valencia, J.S., Valcárcel Saldaña, M.A., Somocurcio Vilchez, J.G., Carreño Escobedo, J.R., Villarreal Valerio, J.A, et al.: Primera experiencia de Blended-learning para fortalecer habilidades quirúrgicas básicas en estudiantes de Medicina Humana de una Universidad Nacional en Perú. En Callaos, J., Horne, E.J., Martinez Lopez, B., Sanchez, A. (eds.), CISCI 2019 - Decima Octava Conferencia Iberoamericana en Sistemas, Cibernetica e Informatica 2019, vol.2, pp. 71–76. International Institute of Informatics and Systemics, IIIS

    Google Scholar 

  9. Waldenfels, B.: Phenomenology of experience in Edmund Husserl. Arete 29(2), 409–426 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18800/earring.201702.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Piza Burgos, N.D., Amaiquema Márquez, F.A., Beltrán Baquerizo, G.E.: Methods and techniques in qualitative research. Some necessary precisions. Conrad 15(70), 455–459 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reeves, S., Peller, J., Goldman, J., Kitto, S. Ethnography in qualitative educational research: AMEE Guide No. 80. Med. Teacher 35(8), e1365–e1379 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.804977

  12. Gaxiola-García, M.A., Kushida-Contreras, B.H., Sánchez-Mendiola, M.: Teaching surgical skills: relevant educational theories (second part). Res. Med. Educ. 11(42), 95–105 (2022). https://doi.org/10.22201/fm.20075057e.2022.42.22433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gagnon, M.P., Gagnon. J., Desmartis, M., Njoya, M.: The impact of blended teaching on knowledge, satisfaction, and self-directed learning in nursing undergraduates: a randomized, controlled trial. Nurs. Educ. Perspect 34(6), 377–382 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5480/10-459

  14. Moon, H., Hyun, H.S.: Nursing students’ knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy in blended learning of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. Educ. 19, 414 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1848-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, J., Zhou, J., Wang, Y., Qi, G., Xia, C., Mo, G., et al.: Blended learning in basic medical laboratory courses improves medical students’ abilities in self-learning, understanding, and problem solving. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 44(1), 9–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00076.201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Luo, P., et al.: A WeChat-based competence and performance checklist in basic surgical skills course for military medical acade-my undergraduates. BMC Med. Educ. 22(1), 858 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03939-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaughn, C.J., Kim, E., O’Sullivan, P., et al.: Peer video review and feedback improve performance in basic surgical skills. Am. J. Surg. 211, 355–360 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wright, A.S., McKenzie, J., Tsigonis, A., Jensen, A.R., Figueredo, E.J., Kim, S., et al.: A structured self-directed basic skills curriculum results in improved technical performance in the absence of expert faculty teaching. Surgery 151, 808–814 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bock, A., Modabber, A., Kniha, K., Lemos, M., Rafai, N., Hölzle, F.: Blended learning modules for lectures on oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 56(10), 956–961 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.10.281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Acaroglu, E., Assous, M., Bransford, R., Dal Oglio Da Rocha, LG., Falavigna, A., France, J.: Evaluation of blended online learning in three spinal surgery educational courses. J. Eur. CME 11(1), 2014042 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/21614083.2021.2014042

  21. Zambrano Sánchez, G., Montedesoca Coloma, L., Morales López, T., Tarupi Montenegro, W.: Medical students’ perception of the use of simulated patients as a strategy for training in comprehensive patient management. Educ. Medica 21(2), 123–126 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2018.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Oliveros, A., Mertz, V., Corvetto, M., Delfino, A., De La Fuente, R.: Transformación de los contenidos teóricos del programa de especialidad de anestesiología en un diplomado de formato b-learning. Investigación en Educación Médica 4(14), e14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-5057(15)30053-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, Q., Peng, W., Zhang, F., Hu, R., Li, Y., Yan, W.: The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 18(1), e2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martinez, E.T., Martin, J.I., Magadan. C., Lopez, A., Fernandez, R., Regaño, S., et al.: Influence of previous experience on the benefits of laparoscopic surgical training based on simulation. Cir. Esp. 97 (6), 314–319 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2019.06.001

  25. León Ferrufino, F., Varas Cohen, J., Buckel Schaffner, E., Crovari Eulufi, F., Pimentel Mül-ler, F., Martínez Castillo, J., et al.: Simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Cir. Esp. 93(1), 4–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2014.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Betsch, D., Gjerde, H., Lewis, D., Tresidder, R., Gupta, R.R.: Ergonomics in the operating room: it doesn’t hurt to think about it, but it may hurt not to! Can. J. Ophthalmol. 55(3 Suppl 1), 17–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2020.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Catanzarite, T., Tan-Kim, J., Whitcomb, E.L., Menefee, S.: Ergonomics in surgery: a review. Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. 24(1), 1–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000456. PMID: 28914699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vázquez-Reyes, J.M., Rodríguez-Guillén, J.H., Cortés-Algara, A., González-Ramírez, P.A., Millán-Hernández, M.: Ten tips for future medical specialty professors. FEM 22(5), 245–326 (2019). https://doi.org/10.33588/fem.225.1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. González-Rubio, R., Latasa Zamalloa, P., Aginagalde Llorente, A.H., Peremiquel-Trillas, P., Ruiz-Montero, R., Gullón, P., et al.: Competencias para Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública: propuestas tras un proceso comparativo y participativo. Educ Medica 22(2), S62–S69 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2019.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

To the students, teachers, administrative staff and authorities of the Vicerrectorado de Investigación y Posgrado, UNMSM (VRIP-UNMSM). The research was part of the project A19010022, year 2019, approved and financed by the VRIP-UNMSM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos H. Contreras-Pizarro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Placencia-Medina, M.D. et al. (2024). Efficacy of Blended Learning in the Teaching of Basic Surgical Skills in Medical Students at a Public University in Peru Between 2018 and 2022. In: Guarda, T., Portela, F., Diaz-Nafria, J.M. (eds) Advanced Research in Technologies, Information, Innovation and Sustainability. ARTIIS 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1935. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48858-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48858-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48857-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48858-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics