Skip to main content

Robust Consensus: A New Measure for Multicriteria Robust Group Decision Making Problems Using Evolutionary Approach

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (ICAISC 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8467))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In fuzzy group decision making problems, we often use multiobjective evolutionary optimization. The optimizers search through the whole search space and provide a set of nondominated solutions. But, sometimes the decision makers express their prior preferences using fuzzy numbers. In this case, the optimizers search in the preferred soft region and provide solutions with higher consensus. If perturbation in the decision variable space is unavoidable, we also need to search for robust solutions. Again, this perturbation affects the degree of consensus of the solutions. This leads to search for solutions those are robust to their degree of consensus. In this work, we address these issues by redefining consensus and proposing a new measure called robust consensus. We also provide a reformulation mechanism for multiobjective optimization problems. Our experimental results show that the proposed method is capable of finding robust solutions having robust consensus in the specified soft region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Binh, T.T., Korn, U.: An evolution strategy for the multiobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (Mendel 1996), Brno, Czech Republic, pp. 23–28. Citeseer (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bui, L.T., Abbass, H.A., Barlow, M., Bender, A.: Robustness against the decision-maker’s attitude to risk in problems with conflicting objectives. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 16(1), 1–19 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cabrerizo, F.J., Moreno, J.M., Pérez, I.J., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks. Soft Computing 14(5), 451–463 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K., Gupta, H.: Introducing robustness in multi-objective optimization. Evolutionary Computation 14(4), 463–494 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deb, K., et al.: Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, vol. 2012. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Durillo, J., Nebro, A., Alba, E.: The jmetal framework for multi-objective optimization: Design and architecture. In: CEC 2010, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 4138–4325 (July 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Durillo, J.J., Nebro, A.J.: jmetal: A java framework for multi-objective optimization. Advances in Engineering Software 42, 760–771 (2011), http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965997811001219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 78(1), 73–87 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: Linguistic measures based on fuzzy coincidence for reaching consensus in group decision making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 16(3), 309–334 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 32(3), 394–402 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Herrera-Viedma, E., Martinez, L., Mata, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 13(5), 644–658 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hsu, H.M., Chen, C.T.: Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 79(3), 279–285 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Krohling, R.A., Campanharo, V.C.: Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: A case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea. Expert Systems with Applications 38(4), 4190–4197 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu, J., Ma, J., Zhang, G., Zhu, Y., Zeng, X., Koehl, L.: Theme-based comprehensive evaluation in new product development using fuzzy hierarchical criteria group decision-making method. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 58(6), 2236–2246 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu, J., Zhang, G., Ruan, D.: Intelligent multi-criteria fuzzy group decision-making for situation assessments. Soft Computing 12(3), 289–299 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Nag, K., Pal, T.: A new archive based steady state genetic algorithm. In: 2012 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xiong, J., Tan, X., Yang, K.W., Chen, Y.W.: Fuzzy group decision making for multiobjective problems: Tradeoff between consensus and robustness. Journal of Applied Mathematics 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, G., Ma, J., Lu, J.: Emergency management evaluation by a fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 23(4), 517–527 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm. In: Giannakoglou, K., Tsahalis, D., Periaux, J., Papailou, P., Fogarty, T. (eds.) Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimization and Control with Applications to Industrial Problems, EUROGEN 2001, Athens, Greece, pp. 95–100 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 3(4), 257–271 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nag, K., Pal, T., Pal, N.R. (2014). Robust Consensus: A New Measure for Multicriteria Robust Group Decision Making Problems Using Evolutionary Approach. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. ICAISC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8467. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07173-2_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07173-2_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07172-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07173-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics