Abstract
Innovation has always been along with great uncertainty, and companies that are seeking to develop new products or services should be flexible in their resources to cope with uncertainty. Presenting new goods, commodities or services mostly requires the expenditure of huge amount of both financial and human resources which, in turn, can endanger the company’s status in the market if it fails to fulfill the product requirements. In this way, firms increasingly realize that a flexible workforce helps mitigate downside risks and offers opportunities for achieving superior and innovative performance. Therefore, considering flexible investing plan such as real options reasoning can be regarded as one of top priority for innovative firms. In this regard, the primary and major question of the study will be whether real options reasoning or thinking as a strategy for uncertainty reduction matter when innovative firms are looking to increase their rate of radical and incremental innovative performance in rapidly changing and unpredictable environments? Through a comprehensive literature review, we will attempt to find out whether adaptive capability exercises a mediating role between real options reasoning and innovative performance? Also, the capacity of firms to create and exploit new knowledge is critical for innovative outputs. In other words, a firm’s innovation performance is an outcome of increases in its knowledge base and the success of real options thinking mostly depends on organizational ability to evaluate and utilize outside information and knowledge. Thus we will investigate the moderate effects of absorptive capacity on the relationship between real options thinking and innovative performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220. doi:10.1002/smj.157.
Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. (2008). The moderating role of environmental dynamism between firm emotional capability and performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(2), 230–252. doi:10.1108/09534810810856453.
Aragón-Correa, J. A., García-Morales, V. J., & Cordón-Pozo, E. (2007). Leadership and organizational learning’s role on innovation and performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(3), 349–359. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.09.006.
Arthur, J. B., & Huntley, C. L. (2005). Opportunity and constraint: Organizations’ learning from the operating and competitive experience of industries. The Academy of Management Executive, 48(6), 1159–1170. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/20159735?.
Banbury, C. M., & Mitchell, W. (1995). The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 161–182. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160922.
Barnett, M. L. (2007). Making sense of real options reasoning: An engine of choice that backfires? Organizational Decision Making, 914, 1–17.
Barnett, M. L. (2008). An attention-based view of real options reasoning. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 606–628. doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.32465698.
Beneito, P. (2006). The innovative performance of in-house and contracted R&D in terms of patents and utility models. Research Policy, 35(4), 502–517. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.007.
Bergh, D. D., & Lim, E. N. -K. (2008). Learning how to restructure: Absorptive capacity and improvisational views of restructuring actions and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 593–616. doi:10.1002/smj.676.
Black, F., & Scholes, M. S. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637–654. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jpolec/v81y1973i3p637-54.html.
Blonigen, B. A., & Taylor, C. T. (2003). R&D intensity and acquisitions in high-technology industries: Evidence from the US electronic and electrical equipment industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(1), 47–70. doi:10.1111/1467-6451.00112.
Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2002). Patents, real options and firm performance. The Economic Journal, 112(478), C97–C116. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00022.
Bourgeois, L. J., III. (1980). Strategy and environment: A conceptual integration. The Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 25–39. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/257802.
Bowman, E. H., & Hurry, D. (1993). Strategy through the option lens: An integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 760–782.
Carrillo, J. E., & Gaimon, C. (2000). Improving manufacturing performance through process change and knowledge creation. Management Science, 46(2), 265–288. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/2634763?.
Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68–82. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470.
Chakravarthy, B. S. (1982). Adaptation: A promising metaphor for strategic management. The Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 35–44. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/257246.
Coff, R. W., & Laverty, K. J. (2001). Real options on knowledge assets: Panacea or Pandora’s box? Business Horizons, 44(6), 73–79. doi:10.1016/S0007-6813(01)80076-8.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/2393553.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/256406.
Dishman, P., & Pearson, T. (2003). Assessing intelligence as learning within an industrial marketing group: A pilot study. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(7), 615–620. doi:10.1016/S0019-8501(03)00030-0.
Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty (Vol. 14, p. 468). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Driouchi, T., & Bennett, D. J. (2012). Real options in management and organizational strategy: A review of decision-making and performance implications. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(1), 39–62. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00304.x.
Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313. doi:10.2307/2392145.
Dutton, J. E., & Ashford, S. J. (1993). Selling issues to top management. The Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 397–428. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/258903.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E.
Fichman, R. G. (2004). Real options and IT platform adoption: Implications for theory and practice. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 132–154. doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0021.
Fichman, R. G., Keil, M., & Tiwana, A. (2005). Beyond valuation: “Options thinking” in IT project management. California Management Review, 47(2), 74–96. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/product/a/an/CMR304-PDF-ENG?cm_sp=doi-_-case-_-CMR304-PDF-ENG&referral=00103.
Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation (3rd ed., p. 470). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/The-Economics-Industrial-Innovation-Edition/dp/0262561131.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/20159573.
Glazer, R. (1991). Marketing in an information-intensive environment: Strategic implications of knowledge as an asset. Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 1–19. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/1251953.
Glazer, R., & Weiss, A. M. (1993). Marketing in turbulent environments: Decision processes and the time-sensitivity of information. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 509–521. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3172694.
Goll, I., & Rasheed, A. A. (2004). The moderating effect of environmental munificence and dynamism on the relationship between discretionary social responsibility and firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 41–54. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000013862.14941.4e.
Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32, 1365–1379. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/ner/maastr/urnnbnnlui27-4270.html.
Hartmann, M., & Hassan, A. (2006). Application of real options analysis for pharmaceutical R&D project valuation—Empirical results from a survey. Research Policy, 35(3), 343–354. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.005.
Huchzermeier, A., & Loch, C. H. (2001). Project management under risk: Using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R&D. Management Science, 47(1), 85–101. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.1.85.10661. Retrieved March 07, 2013, from http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035239263&origin=inward&txGid=C485C2381E902733ED43DB7C6549C02B.aqHV0EoE4xlIF3hgVWgA:1.
Hult, G. T. M., Craighead, C. W., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2010). Risk uncertainty and supply chain decisions: A real options perspective. Decision Sciences, 41(3), 435–458. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00276.x.
Ingram, P., & Baum, J. A. C. (1997). Opportunity and constraint: Organizations’ learning from the operating and competitive experience of industries. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 75–98. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<75::AID-SMJ922>3.0.CO;2-6.
Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989. doi:10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00086-2.
Janney, J. J., & Dess, G. G. (2004). Can real-options analysis improve decision-making? Promises and pitfalls. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(4), 60–75. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/4166124.
Kim, D. J., & Kogut, B. (1996). Technological platforms and diversification. Organization Science, 7(3), 283–301. Retrieved from http://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/bkogut/files/1996_OrgSci_Kim_Kogut.pdf.
Kogut, B., & Kulatilaka, N. (1994). Options thinking and platform investments: Investing in opportunity. California Management Review, 36(2), 53–71. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41165744.
Kogut, B., & Kulatilaka, N. (2001). Capabilities as real options. Organization Science, 12(4), 744–758. Retrieved from http://people.bu.edu/nalink/papers/orgscience.pdf.
Koussis, N., Martzoukos, S. H., & Trigeorgis, L. (2006). Real R&D options with time-to-learn and learning-by-doing. Annals of Operations Research, 151(1), 29–55. doi:10.1007/s10479-006-0127-3.
Krychowski, C., & Quélin, B. V. (2010). Real options and strategic investment decisions: Can they be of use to scholars? The Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(2), 65–78. Retrieved from http://amp.aom.org/content/24/2/65.full.
Lahiri, N., & Narayanan, S. (2013). Vertical integration, innovation, and alliance portfolio size: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34(9), 1042–1064. doi:10.1002/smj.2045.
Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S. (2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833–863. doi:10.5465/AMR.2006.22527456.
Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L.
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. doi:10.1002/smj.507.
Lavie, D. (2006). Capability reconfiguration: An analysis of incumbent responses to technological change. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 153–174. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=744126.
Li, Y., James, B. E., Madhavan, R., & Mahoney, J. T. (2007). Real options: Taking stock and looking ahead. Advances in Strategic Management, 24, 31–66. doi:10.1016/S0742-3322(07)24002-1.
Li, G., & Rajagopalan, S. (2008). Process improvement, learning, and real options. Production and Operations Management, 17(1), 61–74. doi:10.3401/poms.1070.0008.
Li, Y., Wei, Z., Zhao, J., Zhang, C., & Liu, Y. (2012). Ambidextrous organizational learning, environmental munificence and new product performance: Moderating effect of managerial ties in China. International Journal of Production Economics. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.11.008.
Luehrman, T. A. (1998). Strategy as a portfolio of real options—Harvard Business review. Harward Business Review, 76(5), 89–99. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/1998/09/strategy-as-a-portfolio-of-real-options/ar/1.
Majd, S., & Pindyck, R. S. (1987). Time to build, option value, and investment decisions. Journal of Financial Economics, 18(1), 7–27. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(87)90059-6.
Maritan, C. A., & Alessandri, T. M. (2007). Capabilities, real options, and the resource allocation process. In J. J. Reuer & T. W. Tong (Eds.), Real options theory (Advances in strategic management, Vol. 24, pp. 307–332). Bingley: Emerald. doi:10.1016/S0742-3322(07)24011-2.
McGrath, R. G. (1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13–30. doi:10.5465/AMR.1999.1580438.
McGrath, R. G., Ferrier, W. J., & Aubrey L. Mendelow. (2004). Response: Real options as engines of choice and heterogeneity. The Academy of Management Review. Retrieved March 07, 2013, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20159011.
McGrath, G., & Nerkar, A. (2004). Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1), 1–21. doi:10.1002/smj.358.
Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(1), 141–183. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/3003143.
Miller, K. D., & Arikan, A. T. (2004). Technology search investments: Evolutionary, option reasoning, and option pricing approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 25(5), 473–485. doi:10.1002/smj.392.
Miller, K. D., & Folta, T. B. (2002). Option value and entry timing. Strategic Management Journal, 23(7), 655–665. doi:10.1002/smj.244.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1–25. doi:10.1002/smj.4250030102.
Miller, K. D., & Shapira, Z. (2004). An empirical test of heuristics and biases affecting real option valuation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3), 269–284. doi:10.1002/smj.374.
Oke, A., Walumbwa, F. O., & Myers, A. (2012). Innovation strategy, human resource policy, and firms’ revenue growth: The roles of environmental uncertainty and innovation performance. Decision Sciences, 43(2), 273–302. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2011.00350.x.
Pandza, K., Horsburgh, S., Gorton, K., & Polajnar, A. (2003). A real options approach to managing resources and capabilities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(9), 1010–1032. doi:10.1108/01443570310491756.
Pisano, G. P. (1994). Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 85–100. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150907.
Podoynitsyna, K., Song, M., van der Bij, H., & Weggeman, M. (2013). Improving new technology venture performance under direct and indirect network externality conditions. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 195–210. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.04.004.
Prajogo, D. I., & Ahmed, P. K. (2006). Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R&D Management, 36(5), 499–515. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00450.x.
Reuer, J. J., & Leiblein, M. J. (2000). Downside risk implications of multinationality and international joint ventures. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 203–214. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/1556377.
Rothaermel, F. T., & Hess, A. M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18(6), 898–921. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0291.
Russell, R. D., & Russell, C. J. (1992). An examination of the effects of organizational norms, organizational structure, and environmental uncertainty on entrepreneurial strategy. Journal of Management, 18(4), 639–656. doi:10.1177/014920639201800403.
Sanchez, R. (1995). Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 135–159. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160921.
Scott, W. R. (2002). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed., p. 430). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/Organizations-Rational-Natural-Systems-Edition/dp/013016559X.
Sharfman, M. P., & Dean, J. W., Jr. (1997). Flexibility in strategic decision making: Informational and ideological perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 34(2), 191–217. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00048.
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 273–292. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.23466005.
Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2005). Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 346–357. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/20159660.
Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407911.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/sici?sici=0143-2095(199708)18:7<509:DCASM>2.0.CO;2-#.
Tiwana, A., & Mark Keil, R. G. F. (2006). Information systems project continuation in escalation situations: A real options model. Decision Sciences, 37(3), 357–390. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.150.1914.
Tong, T. W., Reuer, J. J., & Peng, M. W. (2008). International joint ventures and the value of growth options. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 1014–1029.
Trigeorgis, L. (1993). Real options and interactions with financial flexibility. Financial Management, 22(3), 202–224. Retrieved from http://www.mendeley.com/catalog/real-options-interactions-financial-flexibility-3/.
Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation (p. 427). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/Real-Options-Managerial-Flexibility-Allocation/dp/026220102X.
Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3069443.
Tuominen, M., Rajala, A., & Möller, K. (2004). How does adaptability drive firm innovativeness? Journal of Business Research, 57(5), 495–506. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00316-8.
Utterback, J. M. (1971). The process of technological innovation within the firm. The Academy of Management Journal, 14(1), 75–88. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/254712.
Verdu, A. J., Tamayo, I., & Ruiz-Moreno, A. (2012). The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between real options and technological innovation in high-tech firms. Technovation, 32(9–10), 579–590. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2012.06.001.
Wang, C.-H. (2011). The moderating role of power asymmetry on the relationships between alliance and innovative performance in the high-tech industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(7), 1268–1279. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.017.
Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31–51. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x.
Wang, H., & Lim, S. S. (2008). Real options and real value: The role of employee incentives to make specific knowledge investments. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 701–721. doi:10.1002/smj.681.
Yang, M., & Blyth, M. (2007). Modeling investment risks and uncertainties with real options approach. Working paper. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.118.6560.
Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809–825. doi:10.1002/smj.482.
Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2010). How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 224–231. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jahanshahi, A.A., Zhang, S.X. (2015). Real Options Reasoning and Innovative Performance in the Context of Dynamic Capabilities. In: Brem, A., Viardot, É. (eds) Adoption of Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14523-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14523-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14522-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14523-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)