Zusammenfassung
Es existieren zahlreiche Mythen zum Schwangerschaftsabbruch, die Betroffene verunsichern können. Eine starke Tabuisierung des Themas führt dazu, dass weder ungewollt Schwangere noch die durchführenden Ärztinnen darüber reden. Dadurch können sich Mythen halten und verfestigen. In diesem Kapitel werden einige der Mythen benannt und widerlegt.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
AMRC (2011) Induced abortion and mental health: a systematic review of the mental health outcomes of induced abortion, including their prevalence and associated factors. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, London
APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion (2008) Report of the apa task force on mental health and abortion. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
Rocca CH, Samari G,Foster DG, Gould H, Kimport K (2020) Emotions and decision rightness over five years following an abortion: an examination of decision difficulty and abortion stigma. Soc Sci & Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed. 2019.112704. (13. Januar 2020)
More on Koop's study of abortion. Fam Plann Perspect 22(1):36–39. PMID: 2323405. (1990 Jan-Feb). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2323405/
RCOG Fetal Awareness: Review of research and recommendations for practice published: 25/06/2010. Zugegriffen: 9. Mai 21
Statistisches Bundesamt. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Gesundheit/Schwangerschaftsabbrueche/. Zugegriffen: 11. März 2021
Comendant R, Hodorogea S, Sagaidac I (2014) Complications and safety. In: Rowlands S (Hrsg) Abortion care. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Voigt M, Henrich W, Zygmunt M, Friese K, Straube S, Briese V (2009) Is induced abortion a risk factor in subsequent pregnancy? J Perinat Med 37:144–149. Copyright by Walter de Gruyter, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPM.2009.001
Oliver-Williams C, Fleming M, Monteath K, Wood AM, Smith GCS (2013) Changes in association between previous therapeutic abortion and preterm birth in Scotland, 1980 to 2008: a historical cohort study. PLoS Med 10(7):e1001481. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001481
Gerdts C, Dobkin L, Greene Foster D, Bimla Schwar E (2016) Side effects, physical health consequences, and mortality associated with abortion and birth after an unwanted pregnancy. Womens Health Issues 26(1):55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Nov 11.c. (Jan-Feb 2016)
Holmlund S, Kauko T, Matomäki J et al (2016) Induced abortion - impact on a subsequent pregnancy in first-time mothers: a registry-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 16:325. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1109-3
Beral V et al (2004) Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83.000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries. Lancet 363:1007–1016
Prof. Dr. med.Alexander Scharf; Praxis für Pränatalmedizin, Darmstadt; Vortrag: FOKO, Düsseldorf 2019
Trussell J (2011) Contraceptive efficacy. In: Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Nelson AL, Cates W, Kowal D, Policar M (Hrsg) Contraceptive technology: twentieth revised edition. Ardent Media, New York
Furedi A (2016) The moral case of abortion. ISBN-13: 978-1137411181
Belfield T (2014) Myths and misinformation. In: Rowlands S (Hrsg) Abortion Care. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maeffert, J., Tennhardt, C. (2021). Mythen zum Schwangerschaftsabbruch. In: Schwangerschaftsabbruch und gestörte Frühschwangerschaft. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63517-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63517-9_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63516-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63517-9
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)