Skip to main content

Media, Fear of Crime, and Authority: Focus Groups in Lima (Perú)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Communication and Smart Technologies (ICOMTA 2021)

Abstract

Lima’s news agenda focuses on the media’s exposure and coverage of crime. This paper aims to analyze the relationship between news consumption, fear of crime, and trust in authority. To this end, twelve focus group discussions were conducted with residents of Lima. The findings revealed significant vicarious fear: respondents admitted to feeling greater fear for their children and other relatives as they remembered recent news reports. Additionally, the focus groups related news consumption to a paucity of trust in authority and evidenced a subjective consonance with their environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Socioeconomic levels (SES) are categories formulated by the Peruvian Association of Market Intelligence Companies (APEIM), an entity that groups together market research and public opinion pollsters in Peru. Socioeconomic levels in Peru encompass five levels: A, B, C, D, E; SES A owns the most resources and the SES E has the least resources.

References

  1. Martín-Barbero, J.: Pistas para entre-ver medios y mediaciones. Signo y pensamiento 21(41), 13–20 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sherman, A., Etchegaray, N.: Consumo de noticias y temor al delito en Chile. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 19(1), 563–575 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rodríguez, J., Quinde, M.: Miedo al delito y medios de comunicación tradicionales: un estudio exploratorio con universitarios venezolanos. Espacio Abierto 25(2), 145–165 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kessler, G., Focás, B.: Responsables del temor? Medios y sentimiento de inseguridad en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad 249, 137–148 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferraro, K.F., Grange, R.L.: The measurement of fear of crime. Sociol. Inq. 57(1), 70–97 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1987.tb01181.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Narváez, M.: La identificación del miedo al delito: Un límite conceptual en el método de medición. Revista Crítica Penal y Poder 8, 94–119 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haynes, S., Rader, N.: Concerns about crime for self and others. an analysis of individual and contextual effects. Crim. Justice Rev. 40(3), 303–321 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kanashiro, L., Dammert, L., Hernández, W.: Percepción de inseguridad: Determinantes y narrativas. [pdf] Consorcio de investigación económica y social. bit.ly/38WE0Bf. Accessed 21 March 2021

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hernández, W.: Costos sociales de la victimización en América Latina: Percepción de inseguridad, capital social y percepción de la democracia. Lat. Am. Res. Rev. 54(4), 835–853 (2019). https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Información (INEI): Estadística de Seguridad Ciudadana, no. 6 [pdf]. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Información. https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/boletines/informe_seguridad_ciudadana.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2021

  11. Kanashiro, L.: Entre el miedo y la ira. Prácticas de seguridad en los sectores de menores recursos en Lima, Perú. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales 66(241), 317–345 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2020.241.69997

  12. Hernández, W., Dammert, L., Kanashiro, L.: Fear of crime examined through diversity of crime, social inequalities and social capital: an empirical evaluation in Peru. Aust. N. Z. J. Criminol. 53(4), 515–535 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865820954466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tufró, M.: Mediatización(es) de las prácticas políticas. Los vecinos, la “inseguridad” y el ecosistema mediático. La Trama de la Comunicación 20(2), 145–161 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCombs, M.: A look at agenda-setting: past, present and future. Journal. Stud. 6(4), 543–557 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. McCombs, M., Shaw, D.L., Weaver, D.H.: New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Commun. Soc. 17(6), 781–802 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Focás, B.: Inseguridad: En busca del rol de los medios de comunicación. La Trama de la Comunicación 17, 163–174 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Garcés-Prettel, M., Arroyave-Cabrera, J., Blatar-Moreno, A.: Professional autonomy and structural influences: exploring how homicides, perceived insecurity, aggressions against journalists, and inequalities affect perceived journalistic autonomy in Colombia. Int. J. Commun. 14, 3054–3075 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wong, J., Harraway, V.: Media presentation of homicide: examining characteristics of sensationalism and fear of victimization and their relation to newspaper article prominence. Homicide Stud. 24(4), 333–352 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767919896391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dammert, L., Lunecke, A.: Violencia y temor: análisis teórico-empírico en doce comunas del país. Centro de Estudios de Seguridad Ciudadana, Santiago (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Triana Sánchez, J.: Percepción de inseguridad en polígonos geográficos prioritarios en Acapulco. Espiral Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad 24(70), 221–249 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Killias, M., Clerici, C.: Different measures of vulnerability in their relation to different dimensions of fear of crime. Br. J. Criminol. 40(3), 437–450 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sampson, R.J.: Analytic approaches to disorder. Br. J. Sociol. 60(1), 83–93 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sampson, R.J., Groves, W.B.: Community structure and crime: testing social-disorganization theory. Am. J. Sociol. 94(4), 774–802 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Krueger, R., Casey, M.: Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Sage, London (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Onwuegbuzie, J., Dickinson, W., Leech, N., Zoran, A.: Un marco cualitativo para la recolección y análisis de datos en la investigación basada en grupos focales. Paradigmas 3(1), 127–157 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cyr, J.: The unique utility of focus groups for mixed-methods research. Polit. Sci. Polit. 54(4), 1038–1042 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651700124X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guerrero, L., Xicola, J.: New approaches to focus groups. In: Methods in Consumer Research, vol. 1, pp. 49–77. Woodhead Publishing (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102089-0.00003-0

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lilian Kanashiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kanashiro, L., Dammert, L., Hernández, W. (2022). Media, Fear of Crime, and Authority: Focus Groups in Lima (Perú). In: Rocha, Á., Barredo, D., López-López, P.C., Puentes-Rivera, I. (eds) Communication and Smart Technologies. ICOMTA 2021. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 259. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5792-4_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics