Abstract
The quality of administrative, academic, and extension processes is influenced by the management of technology in universities. Smart technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing, the Internet of things (IoT), and big data continue to emerge with great prominence. Universities must use tools that connect learning with the use of new technologies, bridging gaps with the outside world. Smart education is provided by an educational environment supported by smart technologies and devices. A smart university is primarily based on the integration of smart technologies into the educational process. The emergence of this concept allows the application of a large number of components that involve the adaptation of the traditional educational model using these technologies. Many of the ideas of adoption in Latin American universities generate demotivation toward change and do not imply the expected impact in their processes. One way to prevent this situation is to monitor the adoption process itself. The generation of tools that can measure the level of adoption by universities is a necessity as smart technologies are incorporated and become more powerful. Focusing on the users of the processes is an objective of adoption measurement. A User-Centered Smart University Model is the goal of this transformation process, established on factors such as an individual’s perception, safety and risks, and organizational support.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
A. Abushakra, D. Nikbin, Extending the UTAUT2 Model to Understand the Entrepreneur Acceptance and Adopting Internet of Things (IoT) (Springer International Publishing, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21451-7
A. Adamkó et al., Intelligent and Adaptive Services for a Smart Campus. in 5th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications, CogInfoCom 2014–Proceedings (2014), pp. 505–509. https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom.2014.7020509
A.M. Al-momani et al., A review of factors influencing customer acceptance of internet of things services. 11(1), 54–67 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJISSS.2019010104
A.M. Al-momani et al., Factors that influence the acceptance of internet of things services by customers of telecommunication companies in Jordan. 30(4), 51–63 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2018100104
M. Al-ruithe et al, Sciencedirect procedia science direct current state of cloud computing adoption—an empirical study in major public sector organizations current state of cloud computing adoption—of Saudi Arabia (KSA) An empirical study in major public S Procedia Comput. Sci. 110, 378–385 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.06.080
A. Alamri, Harnessing the power of big data analytics in the cloud to support learning analytics in mobile learning environment Comput. Human Behav (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.002
S. Alqassemi. et al., Maturity Level of Cloud Computing at HCT. in ITT 2017—Information Technology Trends Exploring Current Trends Information Technology Conference Proceedings 2018-January Itt, 5–8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/CTIT.2017.8259558
I. Arpaci, Antecedents and consequences of cloud computing adoption in education to achieve knowledge management. Comput. Human Behav. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.024
Y. Atif et al., Building a smart campus to support ubiquitous learning. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 6(2), 223–238 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-014-0226-y
F. Authors, Adoption of internet of things ( IOT ) based wearables for elderly healthcare—a behavioural reasoning theory (BRT) approach (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-12-2017-0048
F. Authors, An exploratory study of Internet of Things (IoT) adoption intention in logistics and supply chain management—a mixed research approach (2016)
P Brous et al., The dual effects of the Internet of Things (IoT): A systematic review of the benefits and risks of IoT adoption by organizations. Int. J. Inf. Manage (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.008
F.H. Cerdeira Ferreira, R. Mendes de Araujo, Campus Inteligentes: Conceitos, aplicações, tecnologias e desafios. Relatórios Técnicos do DIA/UNIRIO. 11(1), 4–19 (2018)
R.A. Choix et al, Factores determinantes en la adopción de tecnologías de información (TI) en las pymes. VinculaTégica EFAN (2015)
M. Coccoli et al., Smarter universities: A vision for the fast changing digital era. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 25(6), 1003–1011 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2014.09.007
S. Das, The early bird catches the worm—first mover advantage through IoT adoption for Indian Public sector retail oil outlets. The early bird catches the worm—first mover advantage. J. Glob. Inf. Technol. Manag. 00(00), 1–29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2019.1679588
Z.Y. Dong et al., Smart campus: definition, framework, technologies, and services. IET Smart Cities. 2(1), 43–54 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-smc.2019.0072
T. Dybå et al., Applying Systematic Reviews to Diverse Study Types: An Experience Report. in Proceedings—1st International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2007 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.21
E.E. Grandón et al., Internet de las Cosas : Factores que influyen su adopción en Pymes chilenas Internet of Things : Factors that influence its adoption among Chilean SMEs (2020)
T. Granollers i Saltiveri, MPIu+a. Una metodología que integra la Ingeniería del Software, la Interacción Persona-Ordenador y la Accesibilidad en el contexto de equipos de desarrollo multidisciplinares (2004).
C.D. Guerrero et al., IoT: Una aproximación desde ciudad inteligente a universidad inteligente. Rev. Ingenio UFPSO. 13(1), 1–12 (2017)
S. Jose et al., Disruptive architectural technology in engineering education. Procedia Comput. Sci. 172, 641–648 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.083
S. Jose et al., Nurturing engineering skills and talents, a disruptive methodology in engineering education. Procedia Comput. Sci. 172, 568–572 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.069
Y. Kao et al., An exploration and confirmation of the factors influencing adoption of IoT-based wearable fitness trackers (2019)
Y. Khamayseh et al., Integration of Wireless Technologies in Smart University Campus Environment: Framework Architecture (2015) https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=psyc11&NEWS=N&AN=2015-00124-004, https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2015010104
U. Lleida, de: Departament de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics Universitat de Lleida Lleida, julio 2004. Screen (2004)
M.V. López Cabrera et al., Factors that enable the adoption of educational technology in medical schools. Educ. Medica. 20(xx), 3–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2017.07.006
J. Lorés, T. Granollers, Ingeniería de la Usabilidad y de la Accesibilidad aplicada al diseño y desarrollo de sitios web (2004)
G. Maestre-Góngora, Revisión de literatura sobre ciudades inteligentes: una perspectiva centrada en las TIC. Ingeniare. 19(19), 137–149 (2016)
G. Maestre-Gongora, R.F. Colmenares-Quintero, Systematic mapping study to identify trends in the application of smart technologies. Iber. Conf. Inf. Syst. Technol. Cist. 1–6 (2018). https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2018.8398638
E.M. Malatji, The Development of a Smart Campus—African Universities Point of View. In: 2017 8th International Renewable Energy Congress, IREC 2017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/IREC.2017.7926010
J. Mariano, G. Romano, Introducción a la IPO (Metro, 2008)
A.V. Martín García et al., Factores determinantes de adopción de blended learning en educación superior. Adapta ción del modelo UTAUT. Educ. XX1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.17.2.11489
M. Mital et al., Technological forecasting & social change adoption of internet of things in India : A test of competing models using a structured equation modeling approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1–8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.001
A. Mukherjee, N. Dey, Smart Computing with Open Source Platforms. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351120340
L Muñoz López et al., El Estudio y Guía Metodológica sobre Ciudades Inteligentes ha sido dirigido y coordinado por el equipo del ONTSI Deloitte (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
U. Nasir, Cloud computing adoption assessment model (CAAM). 44(0), 34–37 (2011)
D. Nikbin, A. Abushakra, Internet of Things Adoption: Empirical Evidence From An Emerging Country. in Communications in Computer and Information Science. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21451-7_30
F. Nikolopoulos, Using UTAUT2 for Cloud Computing Technology Acceptance Modeling (2017)
K. Njenga et al., Telematics and Informatics The cloud computing adoption in higher learning institutions in Kenya : Hindering factors and recommendations for the way forward. Telemat. Inf. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.007
P. Palos-Sanchez et al., Models of adoption of information technology and cloud computing in organizations. Inf. Tecnol. 30(3), 3–12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642019000300003
G. Perboli et al., A new taxonomy of smart city projects. Transp. Res. Procedia. 3, 470–478 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.028
F.M. Pérez et al., Smart university: hacia una universidad más abierta, https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=676751, (2016)
K. Petersen et al., Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. in 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2008 (2008). https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/ease2008.8
P. Pinheiro, C. Costa, Adoption of Cloud Computing Systems. 127–131 (2014)
P. Pornphol, T. Tongkeo, Transformation From a Traditional University into A Smart University (2008). https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3178167, https://doi.org/10.1145/3178158.3178167
P. Priyadarshinee et al., Understanding and predicting the determinants of cloud computing adoption: A two staged hybrid SEM—neural networks approach. Comput. Human Behav. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.027
R.D. Raut et al., Analyzing the factors influencing cloud computing adoption using three stage hybrid SEM-ANN-ISM (SEANIS) approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.020
O. Revelo Sanchez et al., Gamification as a didactic strategy for teaching/learning programming: a systematic mapping of the literature. Rev. Digit. LAMPSAKOS. (2018). https://doi.org/10.21501/21454086.2347
D Rico-Bautista et al., Analysis of the potential value of technology: Case of universidad Francisco de paula santander Ocaña. RISTI—Rev. Iber. Sist. e Tecnol. Inf. E17, 756–774 (2019)
D. Rico-Bautista et al., Caracterización de la situación actual de las tecnologías inteligentes para una Universidad inteligente en Colombia/Latinoamérica. RISTI—Rev. Iber. Sist. e Tecnol. Inf. E27, 484–501 (2020)
D. Rico-Bautista, Conceptual framework for smart university J. Phys. Conf. Ser. (2019)
D. Rico-Bautista et al., Smart University: A Review from the Educational and Technological View of Internet of Things. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (2019), pp. 427–440
D. Rico-Bautista et al., Smart University: Key Factors for An Artificial Intelligence Adoption Model. in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (2020)
D. Rico-Bautista et al., Smart University: Strategic map since the adoption of technology. RISTI—Rev. Iber. Sist. e Tecnol. Inf. 2020, E28, 711–724 (2020)
D. Rico-Bautista et al., Smart University: Big Data Adoption Model. in 2020 9th International Conference on Software Process Improvement, CIMPS 2020 - Applications in Software Engineering (2020)
D. Rico-Bautista et al., Smart University: IoT Adoption Model. in Proceedings of the Fourth World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability, WorldS4 2020 (2020)
D.W. Rico-Bautista, Conceptual framework for smart university. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1409, 012009 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1409/1/012009
Rjab, A. Ben, S. Mellouli, Smart cities in the era of artificial intelligence and internet of things. 1, 1–10 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209380
M. Rohs, J. Bohn, Entry points into a smart campus environment-overview of the ETHOC system. Distrib. Comput. Syst. Work. 1–7 (2003)
H.M. Sabi et al., Conceptualizing a model for adoption of cloud computing in education. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 36(2), 183–191 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.010
B. Sánchez-Torres et al., Smart Campus: Trends in cybersecurity and future development. Rev. Fac. Ing. 27, 47, (2018). https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v27.n47.2018.7807
F.P. Sejahtera et al., Information & Management Factors influencing effective use of big data : A research framework. Inf. Manag. 103146 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.02.001
H. Shaikh et al., A Conceptual Framework for Determining Acceptance of Internet of Things (IoT) in Higher Education Institutions of Pakistan. in 2019 International Conference on Information Science Communication Technology (2019), 1–5
C. Shaoyong et al., UNITA : A Reference Model of University IT Architecture. in ICCIS ‘16 Proc. 2016 International Conference on Information System (2016), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3023924.3023949
B. Sivathanu, Adoption of internet of things (IOT) based wearables for healthcare of older adults—a behavioural reasoning theory (BRT) approach. J. Enabling Technol. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-12-2017-0048
H. Vasudavan, User Perceptions in Adopting Cloud Computing in Autonomous Vehicle (2018), 151–156
M.C. Vega-Hernández et al., Multivariate characterization of university students using the ICT for learning. Comput. Educ. 121, 124–130 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.004
M.S. Viñán-Ludeña et al., Smart University: An Architecture Proposal for Information Management Using Open Data for Research Projects. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1137 AISC, March, 172–178 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40690-5_17
J. Vuorio et al., Enhancing User Value of Educational Technology by Three Layer Assessment (2017),220–226. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131085.3131105
M. Zapata-ros, La universidad inteligente La transición de los LMS a los Sistemas Inteligentes de Aprendizaje en Educación Superior The smart university. 57, 10, 1–43 (2018)\
Applied Machine Learning for Smart Data Analysis. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429440953
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rico-Bautista, D., Collazos, C.A., Guerrero, C.D., Maestre-Gongora, G., Medina-Cárdenas, Y. (2021). Latin American Smart University: Key Factors for a User-Centered Smart Technology Adoption Model. In: Joshi, A., Nagar, A.K., Marín-Raventós, G. (eds) Sustainable Intelligent Systems. Advances in Sustainability Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4901-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4901-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4900-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4901-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)