Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Firm size and the adoption of flexible automation

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data on the diffusion of flexible automation systems in the Italian metalworking industry are used to point out the role of size for the adoption of complex, systemic innovations. Plant and firm sizes turn out to be positively correlated to adoption rates. Moreover, adoption is more likely, ceteris paribus, in plants which are part of large industrial groups. This pattern applies in general, and is particularly remarkable for more advanced solutions. In this light, guidelines for industrial policies that focus on financial support, the diffusion of industrial standards, and the correction of asymmetries in the availability of know-how and skills are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bessant, J. and B. Haywood, 1985, ‘The Introduction of Flexible Manufacturing Systems as an Example of CIM’, Innovation Research Group, Brighton Polytechnic.

  • Bessant, J. and B. Haywood, 1987, ‘Flexible Manufacturing Systems and the Small to Medium Sized Firms’, Innovation Research Group, Brighton Polytechnic.

  • Cainarca, G. C., M. G. Colombo, and S. Mariotti, 1989, ‘An Evolutionary Pattern of Innovation Diffusion: The Case of Flexible Automation’, Research Policy 18 (2), 59–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, M. G. and S. Mariotti, 1985, ‘Note economiche sull'automazione flessibile’, Economia e Politica Industriale 48, 61–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S., 1979, The Diffusion of Process Innovations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diwan, R., 1989, ‘Small Business and the Economics of Flexible Automation’, Small Business Economics 1 (1), 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., 1987, Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. and C. Perez, 1988, ‘Structural Crisis and Adjustment: Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour’, in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson and G. Silverberg (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter Publishers, 38–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollard, M., G. Margirier, and A. Rosanvallon, 1986, ‘L'automatisation avancée de la production dans les activités d'usinage’, TREP-D, Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, M. and J. D. Goldhar, 1984, ‘The Strategic Implications of the Factory of the Future’, Sloan Management Review (summer), 29–37.

  • Kelley, M. and H. Brooks, 1988, ‘The State of Computerized Automation in U.S. Manufacturing’, Center for Business and Government, Harvard University.

  • Meredith, J., 1987, ‘The Strategic Advantages of New Manufacturing Technologies for Small Firms’, Strategic Management Journal 8, 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. and S. G. Winter, 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northcott, J., W. Kuetsch, and B.De Lestapis, 1985, ‘Microelectronics in Industry: an International Comparison’, Policy Study Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, C., 1983, ‘Structural Change and the Assimilation of New Technologies in the Economic and Social System’, Futures 15, 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, C., 1985, ‘Microelectronics, Long Waves and World Structural Change: New Perspective for Developing Countries’, World Development 17, 441–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. P. and C. Sabel, 1984, The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, C., 1985, ‘The Management of New Manufacturing Technology: Eight Propositions’, Proceedings of the conference Production Systems: Scientific, Economic, Strategic Approach, Paris, April.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Elettronica, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci, 32, 20133, Milano, Italy

    Massimo G. Colombo

  2. Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy

    Gian Carlo Cainarca & Sergio Mariotti

Authors
  1. Gian Carlo Cainarca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Massimo G. Colombo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sergio Mariotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Financial support for this paper was provided by the Ministero della Pubblica Istruzione (MPI 40% research funds). Grants from the Fondazione Mauro and the CNR research project ‘Tecnologie Meccaniche’ are also acknowledged. The research took advantage of the FLAUTO database, set up at the Laboratorio di Economia dei Processi di Automazione, MIP-Politecnico di Milano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cainarca, G.C., Colombo, M.G. & Mariotti, S. Firm size and the adoption of flexible automation. Small Bus Econ 2, 129–140 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389673

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389673

Keywords

Search

Navigation