Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Plagiarism, Cheating and Research Integrity: Case Studies from a Masters Program in Peru

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plagiarism is a serious, yet widespread type of research misconduct, and is often neglected in developing countries. Despite its far-reaching implications, plagiarism is poorly acknowledged and discussed in the academic setting, and insufficient evidence exists in Latin America and developing countries to inform the development of preventive strategies. In this context, we present a longitudinal case study of seven instances of plagiarism and cheating arising in four consecutive classes (2011–2014) of an Epidemiology Masters program in Lima, Peru, and describes the implementation and outcomes of a multifaceted, “zero-tolerance” policy aimed at introducing research integrity. Two cases involved cheating in graded assignments, and five cases correspond to plagiarism in the thesis protocol. Cases revealed poor awareness of high tolerance to plagiarism, poor academic performance, and widespread writing deficiencies, compensated with patchwriting and copy-pasting. Depending on the events’ severity, penalties included course failure (6/7) and separation from the program (3/7). Students at fault did not engage in further plagiarism. Between 2011 and 2013, the Masters program sequentially introduced a preventive policy consisting of: (i) intensified research integrity and scientific writing education, (ii) a stepwise, cumulative writing process; (iii) honor codes; (iv) active search for plagiarism in all academic products; and (v) a “zero-tolerance” policy in response to documented cases. No cases were detected in 2014. In conclusion, plagiarism seems to be widespread in resource-limited settings and a greater response with educational and zero-tolerance components is needed to prevent it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfaro-Tolosa, P., Mayta-Tristan, P., & Rodriguez-Morales, A. J. (2013). Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: A Latin American perspective. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 29(2), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allchin, D. (1999). Values in science: An educational perspective. Science & Education, 8, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, R. M., de Albuquerque Rocha, K., Catelani, F., Fontes-Pereira, A. J., & Vasconcelos, S. M. (2015). Plagiarism allegations account for most retractions in major latin American/Caribbean databases. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9714-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ana, J., Koehlmoos, T., Smith, R., & Yan, L. L. (2013). Research misconduct in low- and middle-income countries. PLoS Medicine, 10(3), e1001315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. S., Horn, A. S., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists’ misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 853–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barret, R., Malcolm, J., & Lyon, C. (2003). Are we ready for large scale use of plagiarism detection tools? In 4th Annual LTSN-ICS Conference, 2003. http://www.ics.heacademy.ac.uk/Events/conf2003/Ruth%20Barrett.pdf. Accessed Jan 2012.

  • Braunschweiger, P., & Goodman, K. W. (2007). The CITI program: An international online resource for education in human subjects protection and the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 861–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. (2010). Journals step up plagiarism policing. Nature, 466(7303), 167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, C., Zhao, H., & McHugh, M. K. (2012). Publication ethics and the emerging scientific workforce: Understanding “Plagiarism” in a global context. Academic Medicine, 87(1), 51–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catanzaro, M., Miranda, G., Palmer, L., & Bajak, A. (2014). South American science: Big players. Nature, 510(7504), 204–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Science Engineering and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2009). On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. S. (2003). The role of culture in research misconduct. Accountability in Research, 10(3), 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, B. A., & Zigmond, M. J. (2011). Educational approaches for discouraging plagiarism. Urologic Oncology, 29(1), 100–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieger, M. C. (2007). Ghostwriters and commerce of scientific papers on the internet: science at risk. Revista Da Associacao Medica Brasileira, 53(3), 247–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitman, E., & Litewka, S. (2011). International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees. Urologic Oncology, 29(1), 104–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitman, E., Olsen, C. H., Anestidou, L., & Bulger, R. E. (2007). New graduate students’ baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 838–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in contex. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huamani, C., Dulanto-Pizzorni, A., & Rojas-Revoredo, V. (2008). ‘Copy and paste’ in undergraduate research: Abusing Internet. Anales de la Facultad de Medicina, 69(2), 117–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalichman, M. W. (2007). Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 870–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krstic, S. B. (2015). Research integrity practices from the perspective of early-career researchers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1181–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litewka, S., Goodman, K., & Braunschweiger, P. (2008). The ClTI program: An alternative for research ethics education in Latin America. Acta Bioethica, 14(1), 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett-Hopper, G., Komarraju, M., Weston, R., & Dollinger, S. J. (2007). Is plagiarism a forerunner of other deviance? Imagined futures of academically dishonest students. Ethics and Behavior, 17(3), 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. E. (2012). Culture and unethical conduct: Understanding the impact of individualism and collectivism on actual plagiarism. Management Learning, 43(3), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (2005). Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 219–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeever, L. (2006). Online plagiarism detection services-saviour or scourge? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2003). In other (People’s) words: Plagiarism by university students—literature and lessons. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2004). Rebels without a clause: Towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(3), 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pupovac, V., & Fanelli, D. (2015). Scientists admitting to plagiarism: A meta-analysis of surveys. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1331–1352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, S. C., & Crosby, J. R. (2001). Are “tomorrow’s doctors” honest? Questionnaire study exploring medical students’s attitudes and reported behaviour on academic misconduct. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 322, 274–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, E., & Lolas, F. (2011). The topic of research integrity in Latin America. Bioethikos, 5(4), 362–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roig, M. (2009). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. http://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/plagiarism/. Accessed 12 Sept 2011.

  • Rojas-Revoredo, V., Huamani, C., & Mayta-Tristan, P. (2007). Plagiarism in undergraduate publications: Experiences and recommendations. Revista Medica de Chile, 135, 1087–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, G., Bonanno, H., Krass, I., Scouller, K., & Smith, L. (2009). Undergraduate and postgraduate pharmacy students’ perceptions of plagiarism and academic honesty. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(6), 105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldana-Gastulo, J. J., Quezada-Osoria, C. C., Pena-Oscuvilca, A., & Mayta-Tristan, P. (2010). High frequency of plagiarism in medical thesis from a Peruvian public university. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica, 27(1), 63–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, S. B., & Guffey, D. M. (2001). Truth, consequences and culture: A comparative examination of cheating and attitudes about cheating among U.S. and U.K. students. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCImago Research Group. (2015). SCImago Institution Rankings. Ranking Iberoamericano SIR 2015. http://www.scimagoir.com/pdf/iber_new/SIR%20Iber%202015%20HE.pdf. Accessed 2015 Mar 19.

  • Smith, R. (2000). What is research misconduct. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 30, 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steneck, N. H., & Bulger, R. E. (2007). The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 830–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swazey, J., Anderson, M., & Louis, K. (1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist, 81, 542–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tantaleán Odar, R. M. (2014). ¡¿Ya podemos plagiar?! Crítica a las resoluciones No 191-2009 y 288-2009-CODACUN. Derecho y Cambio Social, Año XI(36), 23.

  • Taradi, S. K., Taradi, M., Knezevic, T., & Dogas, Z. (2010). Students come to medical school prepared to cheat: A multi-campus investigation. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(1), 666–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titus, S. L., Wells, J. A., & Rhoades, L. J. (2008). Repairing research integrity. Nature, 453, 980–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. (2009). Reglamento Disciplinario. http://www.upch.edu.pe/portal/images/stories/files/REGLAMENTO_DISCIPLINARIO.pdf.

  • Van Noorden, R. (2014). The impact gap: South America by the numbers. Nature, 510(7504), 202–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos, S., Leta, J., Costa, L., Pinto, A., & Sorenson, M. E. (2009). Discussing plagiarism in Latin American science. EMBO Reports, 10(7), 677–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadja-Johnston, V. A., Handal, P. J., Brawer, P. A., & Fabricatore, A. N. (2001). Academic dishonesty at the graduate level. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2001). Academic integrity as an institutional issue. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the training Grant 2D43 TW007393-06 awarded to AGL by the Fogarty International Center of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andres G. Lescano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: all authors had financial support from the NIH Fogarty International Center for the submitted work; all authors had paid teaching positions at Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the U.S. Government.

Additional information

Copyright Statement One author of this manuscript is an employee of the U.S. Government. This work was prepared as part of his duties. Title 17 U.S.C. § 105 provides that ‘Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.’ Title 17 U.S.C. § 101 defines a U.S. Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person’s official duties. The Corresponding Author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on behalf of all authors, a worldwide license to the Publishers and its licensees in perpetuity, in all forms, formats and media (whether known now or created in the future), to (i) publish, reproduce, distribute, display and store the Contribution, (ii) translate the Contribution into other languages, create adaptations, reprints, include within collections and create summaries, extracts and/or, abstracts of the Contribution, (iii) create any other derivative work(s) based on the Contribution, (iv) to exploit all subsidiary rights in the Contribution, (v) the inclusion of electronic links from the Contribution to third party material wherever it may be located; and, (vi) license any third party to do any or all of the above.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carnero, A.M., Mayta-Tristan, P., Konda, K.A. et al. Plagiarism, Cheating and Research Integrity: Case Studies from a Masters Program in Peru. Sci Eng Ethics 23, 1183–1197 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9820-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9820-z

Keywords

Navigation