Abstract
Psychostimulant-induced conditioned activity is characterized by the presence of a hyperactivity in drug-free rats exposed to an environment previously paired with the effects of a psychostimulant. According to the habituation hypothesis, conditioned activity arises not through a Pavlovian conditioning process but rather because rats under the effects of the psychostimulant would be unable to habituate normally to the environment paired with these effects. This hypothesis predicts that conditioned activity should not develop in a previously habituated environment. This prediction was tested using a within-subject design. In this design, conditioned activity is evidenced when a group of rats, following a vehicle injection, was more active in a previously amphetamine-paired environment than in a previously vehicle-paired environment. The drug-environment pairing involved administering rats withd-amphetamine (1.25 mg/kg; SC) immediately prior to their placement in one of two distinctive environments. On alternate days, the rats received the vehicle and were placed in the other environment. With this design, it was found that: a) conditioned activity developed in a previously habituated environment; b) its magnitude was independent of the number of amphetamine-environment pairings (two, four or eight pairings); c) this development of conditioned activity did not result from a forgetting of the habituated environment due to a state-dependent retention of the habituation. Taken together, these results do not support the habituation hypothesis of psychostimulant-induced conditioned activity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed SH, Stinus L, Le Moal M, Cador M (1993) Controlling interindividual differences in the unconditioned response to amphetamine in the study of environment-dependent sensitization. Behav Pharmacol 4:355–365
Ahmed SH, Cador M, Le Moal M, Stinus L (1995) Amphetamine-induced conditioned activity: comparison with novelty-induced activity and role of the basolateral amygdala. Behav Neurosci 109:723–733
Antelman SM, Chiodo LA (1983) Amphetamine as a stressor. In: Creese I (ed) Stimulants: neurochemical, behavioral and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York, pp 269–299
Barr GA, Sharpless NS, Cooper S, Shiff S, Paredes W, Bridger WH (1983) Classical conditioning, decay and extinction of cocaine-induced hyperactivity and stereotypy. Life Sci 33:1341–1351
Beninger RJ, Hahn BL (1983) Pimozide blocks establishment but not expression of amphetamine-produced environment-specific conditioning. Science 220:1304–1306
Brown EE, Fibiger HC (1993) Differential effects of excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala on cocaine-induced conditioned locomotion and conditioned place preference. Psychopharmacology 113:123–130
Damianopoulos, EN Carey RJ (1992a) Conditioning, habituation and behavioral reorganization factors in chronic cocaine effects. Behav Brain Res 49:149–157
Daminanopoulos EN, Carey RJ (1992b) Pavlovian conditioning of CNS drug effect. A critical review and new experimental design. Rev Neurosci 3:65–77
File SE (1977) Effects of parachlorophenylalanine and amphetamine on habituation to exploration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6:151–156
Gold LH, Swerdlow NR, Koob GF (1988) The role of the mesolimbic dopamine in conditioned locomotion produced by amphetamine. Behav Neurosci 102:544–552
Groves PM, Thompson RF (1970) Habituation: a dual-process theory. Psychol Rev 77:419–450
Hinde RA (1970) Behavioural habituation. In: Horn G, Hinde RA (eds) Short-term changes in neural activity and behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–40
Hinson RE, Poulos CX (1981) Sensitization to the behavioral effects of cocaine: modification by Pavlovian conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:559–562
Hoffman DC, Wise RA (1992) Locomotor-activating effects of the D2 agonist bromocriptine show environment-specific sensitization following repeated injections. Psychopharmacology 107:277–284
Hughes RN, Greig AM (1976) Effects of caffeine, methamphetamine and methylphenidate on reactions to novelty and activity in rats. Neuropharmacology 15:673–676
Lubow RE (1989) Latent inhibition and conditioned attention theory. Cambridge University Press, New York
Martin-Iverson MT, McManus DJ (1990) Stimulant-conditioned locomotion is not affected by blockade of D1 and/or D2 dopamine receptors during conditioning. Brain Res 521:175–184
Mazurski EJ, Beninger RJ (1987) Environment-specific conditioning and sensitization with (+)-amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 27:61–65
Mazurski EJ, Beninger RJ (1991) Effects of selective drugs for dopaminergic D1 and D2 receptors on conditioned locomotion in rats. Psychopharmacology 105:107–112
Mckintosh NJ (1987) Neurobiology, psychology and habituation. Behav Res Ther 25:81–97
Pickens RW, Crowder WF (1967) Effects of CS-US interval on conditioning of drug response, with assessment of speed of conditioning. Psychopharmacologia 11:88–94
Poncelet M, Dangoumau L, Soubrié P, Simon P (1987) Effects of neuroleptic drugs, clonidine and lithium on the expression of conditioned excitation in rats. Psychopharmacology 92:393–397
Post RM, Lockfeld A, Squillace K, Contel NR (1981) Drug-environment interaction: context dependency of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization. Life Sci 28:755–760
Robbins TW, Iversen SD (1973) A dissociation of the effects ofd-amphetamine on locomotor activity and exploration in rats. Psychopharmacologia 28:155–164
Schiff SR (1982) Conditioned dopaminergic activity. Biol Psychiatry 17:135–154
Stewart J, Vezina P (1988) Conditioning and behavioral sensitization. In: Kalivas PW, Barnes CD (eds) Sensitization in the nervous system. The Telford Press, Caldwell, pp 207–224
Thompson RF, Spencer WA (1966) Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of the neuronal substrates of behavior. Psychol Rev 73:16–43
Tilson HA, Rech RH (1973) Conditioned drug effects and absence of tolerance tod-amphetamine induced motor activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1:149–153
Wimer RE, Fuller JL (1965) The effects ofd-amphetamine sulphate on three exploratory behaviours. Can J Psychol 19:94–103
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmed, S.H., Oberling, P., Sandner, G. et al. Amphetamine-induced conditioned activity does not result from a failure of rats to habituate to novelty. Psychopharmacology 123, 325–332 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246642
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246642