Skip to main content
Log in

A novel approach to the geometric feasibility analysis for fast assembly tool reasoning

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A product assembly or disassembly is completed by means of proper tools. The selection of feasible tools is an important process in planning a complete assembly or disassembly sequence. A key tooling consideration in assembly or disassembly planning is to reason the available space for a tool application during the assembly or disassembly of a product. Currently, assembly tool reasoning about space mainly depends on simulation-based or user-interactive approaches because of its computational complexity. These approaches are inappropriate in dealing with various what-if scenarios regarding assembly or disassembly planning in a rapid product development. They also depend on users’ expertise or experience in assembly or disassembly. This paper presents a novel approach to the geometric feasibility analysis for fast assembly tool reasoning. Techniques described in this paper are advantageous not only in the aid of generating a complete assembly or disassembly plan but also in the efficient support of such systems as computer-aided assembly planning (CAAP), design for manufacturing (DFM), design for assembly (DFA), design for disassembly (DFD), and computer-aided tool selection (CATS).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang S, Shen W, Ghenniwa H (2004) A review of internet-based product information sharing and visualization. Comput Ind 54:1–15

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Homen De Mello LS, Sanderson AC (1991) A correct and complete algorithm for the generation of mechanical assembly sequences. IEEE Trans Robot Automat 7:228–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller JM, Hoffman RL (1989) Automatic assembly planning with fasteners. Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, AZ, Scottsdale, pp 69–74

  4. Wilson HR (1998) Geometric reasoning about assembly tools. Artificial Intelligence 98:237–279

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta S, Paredis C, Brown PF (1998) Micro planning for mechanical assembly operations. Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 239–246

  6. Lazzerini B, Marcelloni F (2000) A genetic algorithm for generating optimal assembly plans. Artif Intell Eng 14:319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuo TC (2000) Disassembly sequence and cost analysis for electromechanical products. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 16:43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tseng HE, Li RK (1999) A novel means of generating assembly sequences using the connector concept. J Intell Manuf 10:423–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yin ZP, Ding H, Li HX, Xiong YL (2003) A connector-based hierarchical approach to assembly sequence planning for mechanical assemblies. Comput Aided Des 35:37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Léon JC, Rejneri N, Debarbouillé G (2001) Assembly/Disassembly Simulation early during a Design process. Proc ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, pp 1–9

  11. Tseng HE, Li JD, Chang YH (2004) Connector-based approach to assembly planning using a genetic algorithm. Int J Prod Res 42(11):2243–2261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Spyridi AJ, Requicha AAG (1990) Accessibility analysis for the automatic inspection of mechanical parts by coordinate measuring machines. Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 1284–1289

  13. Jackman J, Park DK (1998) Probe orientation for coordinate measuring machine systems using design models. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 14:229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim CP, Menq CH (1994) CMM feature accessibility and path generation. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 32(3):597–618

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Limaiem A, ElMaraghy HA (1997) A general method for analyzing the accessibility of features using concentric spherical shells. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spitz SN, Spyridi AJ, Requicha AAG (1999) Accessibility analysis for planning of dimensional inspection with coordinate measuring machines. IEEE Trans Robot Automat 15(6):714–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Spitz SN, Requicha AAG (2000) Accessibility analysis using computer graphics hardware. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 6(3):208–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harris JW, Stocker H (1998) Handbook of mathematics and computational science. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Vince J (1995) Virtual reality system. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  20. Watson TR (1999) Data management (database and organization). Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Snap-on tools Web catalog (2004) http://buy1.snapon.com/catalog /catalog.asp?id=1. Cited 04 Nov 2004

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research is supported by National Science and Engineering Research Canada (NSERC) Research Grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingjin Peng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, C., Peng, Q. A novel approach to the geometric feasibility analysis for fast assembly tool reasoning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31, 125–134 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0173-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0173-z

Keywords

Navigation