Abstract
It is well established that the in-phase pattern of bimanual coordination (i.e. a relative phase of 0°) is more stable than the antiphase pattern (i.e., a relative phase of 180°), and that a spontaneous transition from antiphase to in-phase typically occurs as the movement frequency is gradually increased. On the basis of results from relative phase perception experiments, Bingham (Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 75–79, 2001; Ecol Psychol 16:45–53, 2004; Advances in psychology 135: time-to-contact. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 421–442, 2004) proposed a dynamical model that consists of two phase driven oscillators coupled via the perceived relative phase, the resolution of which is determined by relative velocity. In the present study, we specifically test behavioral predictions from this last assumption during a unimanual visuo-motor tracking task. Different conditions of amplitudes and frequencies were designed to manipulate selectively relative phase and relative velocity. While the known effect of phase and frequency were observed, relative phase variability was not affected by the different conditions of relative velocity. As such, Bingham’s model assumption that instability in relative phase coordination is brought about by relative velocity that affects the resolution of the perceived relative phase has been invalidated for the case of rhythmic unimanual visuo-motor tracking. Although this does not rule out the view that relative phase production is constrained by relative phase perception, the mechanism that would be responsible for this phenomenon still has to be established.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bingham GP (2001) A perceptually driven dynamical model of rhythmic limb movement and bimanual coordination. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 75–79
Bingham GP (2004a) A perceptually driven dynamical model of bimanual rhythmic movement (and phase perception). Ecol Psychol 16:45–53
Bingham GP (2004b) Another timing variable composed of state variables: phase perception and phase driven oscillators. In: Hecht H, Savelsbergh GJP (eds) Advances in psychology 135: time-to-contact. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 421–442
Bingham GP, Schmidt RC, Zaal FT (1999) Visual perception of the relative phasing of human limb movements. Percept Psychophys 61:246–258
Bingham GP, Zaal FT, Shull JA, Collins DR (2001) The effect of frequency on the visual perception of relative phase and phase variability of two oscillating objects. Exp Brain Res 136:543–552
Buekers MJ, Bogaerts HP, Swinnen SP, Helsen WF (2000) The synchronization of human arm movements to external events. Neurosci Lett 290:181–184
Carson RG (2005) Neural pathways mediating bilateral interactions between the upper limbs. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 49:641–662
Carson RG, Kelso JA (2004) Governing coordination: behavioural principles and neural correlates. Exp Brain Res 154:267–274
de Bruyn B, Orban GA (1988) Human velocity and direction discrimination measured with random dot patterns. Vision Res 28:1323–1335
de Rugy A, Salesse R, Oullier O, Temprado JJ (2006) A neuro-mechanical model for interpersonal coordination. Biol Cybern 94:427–443
Fisher NI (1993) Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kelso J (1981) On the oscillatory basis of movement. Bul Psychon Soc 18:63
Kelso JAS (1984) Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 15:R1000–R1004
Pierce CA, Block RA, Aguinis H (2004) Cautionary note of reporting eta-squared values from multifactor ANOVA designs. Educ Psychol Meas 64:916–924
Russell DM, Sternad D (2001) Sinusoidal visuomotor tracking: intermittent servo-control or coupled oscillations? J Mot Behav 33:329–349
Schmidt RC, Bienvenu M, Fitzpatrick PA, Amazeen PG (1998) A comparison of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination: coordination breakdowns and coupling strength. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:884–900
Schmidt RC, Carello C, Turvey MT (1990) Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16:227–247
Snowden RJ, Braddick OJ (1991) The temporal integration and resolution of velocity signals. Vision Res 31(5):907–914
Stins JF, Michaels CF (2000) Stimulus-response compatibility for absolute and relative spatial correspondence in reaching and in button pressing. Q J Exp Psychol A 53:569–589
Swinnen SP (2002) Intermanual coordination: from behavioural principles to neural-network interactions. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:348–359
Temprado JJ, Laurent M (2004) Attentional load associated with performing and stabilizing a between-persons coordination of rhythmic limb movements. Acta Psychol (Amst) 115:1–16
Wimmers RH, Beek PJ, van Wieringen PCW (1992) Phase transitions in rhythmic tracking movements: A case of unilateral coupling. Hum Mov Sci 11:217–220
Zaal FT, Bingham GP, Schmidt RC (2000) Visual perception of mean relative phase and phase variability. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26:1209–1220
Acknowledgments
This work was founded by The Australian Research Council, a University of Queensland Travel Award, and support from the UMR Mouvement et Perception, CNRS-Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Rugy, A., Oullier, O. & Temprado, JJ. Stability of rhythmic visuo-motor tracking does not depend on relative velocity. Exp Brain Res 184, 269–273 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1180-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1180-0