References
Chiaravalloti A, Danieli R, Abbatiello P, Di Pietro B, Travascio L, Cantonetti M, et al. Factors affecting intrapatient liver and mediastinal blood pool 18F-FDG standardized uptake value changes during ABVD chemotherapy in Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:1123–32. doi:10.1007/s00259-014-2703-0.
Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:11S–20S.
Larson SM, Erdi Y, Akhurst T, Mazundar M, Macapinlac HA, Finn RD, et al. Tumor treatment response based on visual and quantitative changes in global tumor glycolysis using PET-FDG imaging: the visual response score and the change in total lesion glycolysis. Clin Positron Imaging. 1999;2:159–71.
Laffon E, de Clermont H, Lamare F, Marthan R. Estimating the amount of FDG uptake in physiological tissues. Nucl Med Biol. 2014;41:707–20. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.
Shankar LK, Hoffman JM, Bacharach S, Graham MM, Karp J, Lammertsma AA, et al. Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1059–66.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
A reply to these comments can be found at DOI 10.1007/s00259-014-2926-0
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laffon, E., de Clermont, H., Lamare, F. et al. Liver SUV versus stage in Hodgkin’s lymphoma: the total amount of uptake may play a role in the inverse relationship. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42, 164–165 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2925-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2925-1