Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this prospective study was to compare scan time, image quality, signal-to-noise Ratio (SNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of simultaneous multi-slice accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging with motion-correction (DWI SMS Moco) to standard diffusion-weighted imaging (sDWI) in free-breathing abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pediatric and young adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).
Material and methods
16 patients (7 male and 9 female, 12–41 years old) with CF were examined prospectively in a single-center from November 2020 to March 2021 on a 1.5 Tesla clinical MR scanner. The characteristics of overall image quality and delimitability of mesenteric lymph nodes were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale by two experienced pediatric radiologists independently from each other. Quantitative parameters with SNR and ADC values were assessed in 8 different locations and compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results
The acquisition time for DWI SMS Moco was 32% shorter than for sDWI. Regarding quality comparison, overall image quality and delimitability of mesenteric lymph nodes were significant higher in DWI SMS Moco (p ≤ 0.05 for both readers). The readers preferred DWI SMS Moco to sDWI in all cases (16/16). Mean SNR values from DWI SMS Moco and sDWI were similar in 7 from 8 locations. The ADC values showed no significant difference between DWI SMS Moco and sDWI in any of the evaluated locations (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
The DWI SMS Moco improves overall image quality and delimitability of mesenteric lymph nodes compared to sDWI with similar SNR and ADC values and a distinguished reduction of scan time in free-breathing by one third. We conclude that MRI with DWI SMS Moco could be helpful in monitoring the effect of the high-efficiency modulator (HEM) therapy in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients homozygous or heterozygous for F508del in the abdomen.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is routine in central nervous system (CNS) diagnostics [1], whole-body imaging (WBI) [2], in oncological questions [3] and suspected inflammatory processes [4]. In abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion-weighted sequences can reliably detect lesions and provide functional information on tumor tissue, like cellular density [5,6,7]. Frequently, a DWI with evaluation of the corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is included in most abdominal MRI protocols [8]. However, the use of DWI in abdominal imaging can be problematic due to respiratory motion artefacts, and due to greatly prolonged acquisition times in combination with respiratory gating [9], which is intensified in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients who suffer from irregular breathing patterns in the supine position during abdominal MR examinations [10, 11]. Therefore, reduced acquisition time of DWI scans is of major importance for CF patients.
The simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) acquisition technique was developed to reduce acquisition time by simultaneous excitation and acquisition of multiple slices [12,13,14,15,16]. An additional non-rigid motion correction (Moco) in DWI with SMS technique could optimize image quality [17,18,19].
Recently, major advances in care and improved therapy with highly effective modulator (HEM) options have reduced the morbidity and mortality of pulmonary involvement of cystic fibrosis significantly [20,21,22,23]. CF patients are able to live well into their sixth decade of life [24, 25]. In that context, abdominal complications [26], including hepatic, pancreatic and gastrointestinal malignancy [27,28,29,30], are increasing. Monitoring of abdominal complications of CF [31] could be improved with native MRI diagnostics, including DWI [32].
To date, DWI SMS Moco has been used primarily to evaluate adult patient with liver metastasis from neuroendocrine tumors (NET) [33], and DWI SMS Moco has achieved higher spatial resolution and has been shown to be accurate in identifying lesions [33].
In this study, we compare the scan time, the image quality, SNR and ADC values of DWI SMS Moco to sDWI in free-breathing abdominal MRI in pediatrics and young adolescent patient with CF.
Materials and methods
Study design
To report and publish the study results of this prospective single-center observational study all patients, adults and, in case of children and adolescents, their custodial parents needed to give written informed consent after they were informed about the MRI examination. Approval from local Ethics Committee was obtained and the study was registered in the national trials register. We examined consecutively CF patients between November 2020 and March 2021. MRI of the upper abdomen was indicated clinically within the scope of evaluation for abdominal pain.
Image acquisition
MRI was performed on a 1.5 T system (MAGNETOM Aera; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using a vendor-supplied 18-channel anterior surface body coil, in combination with 32-channel spine coil. All patients received a standard native upper abdominal examination protocol with coronal and transversal half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo imaging (HASTE), transversal T1-weighted imaging with water-fat separation based on the Dixon method, and diffusion-weighted sequences (DWI). Transversal DWI of the upper abdomen included two different acquisition protocols in free-breathing technique without navigator-controlled triggering. Both, the sDWI and DWI SMS Moco protocols were identical, except for the latter using SMS and motion correction and for some parameters like the number of slices concatenations being allowed to vary in order to compensate for the reduced repetition time (TR) enabled by SMS. As all examinations were clinically indicated, some variations in the protocols were allowed. In particular, the protocols were adapted to the different patient sizes. The integrated image processing in the DWI SMS Moco prototype focuses on a better alignment and combination of the multiple repetitions acquired in conventional DWI that originate from the different diffusion directions, diffusion weightings as well as the averages to increase SNR. Motion correction in DWI SMS Moco was implemented in the reconstruction environment of the scanner and executed as part of the image reconstruction. Once all averages for a given b-value and slice position were available, a keyframe was selected within this set by choosing the acquisition with the lowest overall standard deviation compared to all other images with the same b-value and slice position. After pairwise registering all images to this keyframe, averages with same diffusion direction were adaptively combined as complex-valued images and following magnitude extraction, trace-weighted images were calculated and then also pairwise registered using the lowest b-value as reference. This ensures that the trace-weighted images are also aligned before subsequently calculating the ADC maps. Detailed sequence parameters of the sDWI and the DWI SMS Moco are summarized in Table 1. Both measurements were performed using diffusion gradients applied in four directions with b-values of 50, 400 and 800 s/mm2.
Assessment of image quality
For qualitative analysis, two pediatric radiologist, one 10 years of experience and the other 15 years in abdominal imaging (PCK and KG), evaluated the image quality of b800 image and ADC image of the sDWI and DWI SMS Moco independently. The readers were blind to patient and sequence data. Image quality of b800 images and corresponding ADC maps were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 not interpretable, 2 bad, 3 fair, 4 good and 5 very good). The following image quality criteria were assessed: overall image quality and delimitability of mesenteric lymph nodes.
Quantitative assessment of SNR and ADC
The SNR and ADC values were determined by region-of-interest (ROI) assessment. For this purpose, a circular ROI with a maximum area of approximately 1 cm2 was manually positioned in 8 different representative localizations using Mint lesion™ software (Mint Medical GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany), a workflow optimized software solution. If the contiguous tissue of the corresponding structure was not large enough, the size of the ROI was adjusted accordingly. Furthermore, ROIs were located in homogeneous tissue regions so that the standard deviation of the individual ROI’s could be used as a noise measure for SNR calculation [34]. Measurements were made in parenchyma of left and right kidney, in liver segment V and IVa, in lower back muscles, in spleen and in head and tail sections of pancreas. Because of automatic conformity checks by the MINT lesion™ software, identical ROI positioning was ensured in the b800 image and ADC image in both the standard DWI and the DWI with SMS. For each ROI, mean value, standard deviation (SD) minimum and maximum value were recorded automatically by MINT lesion™ software.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using the Python programming language (Python Software Foundation, https://www.python.org/) and the Statsmodels [35] and Pingouin packages [36].
Mean Ratings, ADC and SNR were expressed as mean and standard deviation. We used descriptive statistics to summarize the population characteristics and image findings. Image quality scores of standard and simultaneous multi-slice DWI were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Interrater agreement was calculated by intraclass correlation (ICC).
Results
Clinical characteristics
A total of 16 children and young adolescents suffering CF were included in the study. The average acquisition time for free-breathing sDWI was 3:39 min ± 25 s, compared with 2:27 min ± 13 s for DWI SMS Moco. Further clinical parameters of all examined patients are summarized in Table 2.
Qualitative analyses—subjective image quality
Intraclass correlation ICC
Assessing the reliability of ratings by a two-way mixed intraclass correlation model pointed to a high correlation between the two raters' quantitative assessments. The high ICC of 0.71 to 1.0 in the observations indicates the low variance between the assessment values of the two readers. Table 3 shows the ICC values of the observed categories image quality and delimitability of the mesenteric lymph nodes, respectively in the b800 image and in the ADC map of sDWI and DWI SMS Moco.
Mean ratings
The mean ratings of DWI SMS Moco were classified better in all four categories compared to the sDWI. These four categories were overall image quality in b-values of 800 (b800) (3.75 ± 0.43 vs 3.03 ± 0.68, p < 0.01), overall image quality in ADC map (3.47 ± 0.61 vs 2.88 ± 0.54, p < 0.05), delimitability of the mesenteric lymph nodes in b800 (3.84 ± 0.57 vs 3.31 ± 0.63, p < 0.05), and delimitability of the mesenteric lymph nodes in ADC map (3 ± 0.35 vs 2.88 ± 0.48, p < 0.05) (Table 4 and Fig. 1). Due to the high agreement of the values of the intraclass correlation of the interrater variability between reader 1 and 2, the values for the mean rating were combined.
Both readers classified the image quality in the b800 image and the ADC map both in the sDWI and in the DWI SMS Moco as predominantly good or fair and rather rarely in the sDWI (b800 and ADC map) and DWI SMS Moco (ADC map) as bad, and none of the cases as not interpretable. The DWI SMS Moco showed only fair or good in the b800 image regarding image quality (Figs. 1, 2 and 3).
Quantitative analysis
SNR
The SNR showed no significant difference in 7 out of 8 locations in the comparison between sDWI and DWI SMS Moco. In the parenchyma of the right kidney, the SNR of the DWI SMS Moco was significantly better than in the standard DWI (23.9 ± 4.1 versus 17.8 ± 2.9, p < 0.01) (Figs. 4 and 5, Table 5).
ADC values
The ADC values (in × 10−3mm2/s) showed no significant difference between sDWI and DWI SMS Moco in the eight different locations (Figs. 6, 7 and Table 6).
Discussion
DWI SMS Moco is highly suited for pediatric and young adult patients with cystic fibrosis. It is faster than and superior in image quality compared to standard DWI in abdominal imaging.
Various studies reviewed the application of DWI with SMS technique in whole-body [37], prostate [38], rectum [39] and breast [40,41,42]. Almost exclusively, these studies refer to adult patients and healthy volunteers. For the first time, we investigated in our study DWI with SMS technique in pediatric and young adult patients with cystic fibrosis.
The simultaneous excitation of multiple slices shortens the scan-time of the diffusion-weighted sequence and improves the performance of the MRI examination of the abdomen [43, 44]. The faster acquisition time makes the examination more comfortable and reduces artefacts due to motion in the bowel or general restlessness. This is an advantage for patients who cannot lie still for long such as, especially, pediatric patients, severely ill patients and patients with disturbed breathing like patients suffering from cystic fibrosis.
Our results showed that the acquisition time of DWI using SMS and Moco is 32% faster than standard DWI. The reduction of the acquisition time of DWI in SMS technique has already been shown by several studies including whole-body imaging and different regions and organs of the abdomen as liver, spleen, pancreas and pelvic lymphnodes [15, 43, 45,46,47,48]. Thus, our results are in accordance with a recently published study by Tabari et al. [49]. This study examined 33 children and adolescents with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) with DWI and SMS in abdominal MRI to detect and monitor focal solid and cystic renal lesions. This study revealed a 55% reduction in scan time. But the image quality was only approximately identical [49]. Recently, Boss et al. investigated in their study ten healthy volunteers underwent DWI of the upper abdomen at 3 T. They were able to reduce scan time approximately 45% with DWI and SMS without reducing SNR but with minimally reduced image quality at the liver dome [16].
In contrast, in our study the image quality by using motion correction in the DWI with SMS was improved significantly. Both, the overall image quality and the delimitability of mesenteric lymph nodes were better using DWI with SMS and motion correction compared to the standard DWI. So, DWI with SMS and motion correction seems to be a powerful modern diffusion-weighted sequence for abdominal imaging which may be helpful especially in children with reduced compliance. There is only one comparable paper in the literature so far by Xu et al. [33]. These authors used MRI to examine the liver of 15 adult patients with metastases of a neuroendocrine tumor. They were able to demonstrate that DWI with SMS and motion correction had significantly higher overall image quality and significantly fewer artefacts than conventional DWI. The observed excellent delimitability of lymphnodes in our study could help to better visualize inflammatory activity in the abdomen, especially for CF patients [50]. According to a study by Meeker et al. using a colonized CF mouse model, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) seem to play an important role regarding to the adaptive immune response in inflammatory processes in the gut [51]. Additionally, Radmard et al. could demonstrate in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) that the ADC value of MLN could predict disease activity [52]. Therefore, additional abdominal MRI examinations with DWI and SMS and Moco in CF patients seem promising, especially for monitoring the response to therapy with modern highly effective modulators [53].
In the quantitative analysis, the signal-to-noise ratio of the DWI with SMS and motion correction compared to the standard DWI was identical in 7 of 8 localizations and even significantly higher in the parenchyma of the right kidney. Moreover, our results showed no significant differences in ADC values between DWI with SMS and motion correction compared to standard DWI. This is in contrast to some previous studies [33, 43]. Several authors have demonstrated significantly lower ADC values in DWI with SMS compared to standard DWI [43, 54, 55]. In contrast, Xu was able to show significantly higher ADC values in the DWI with SMS and motion correction compared to the standard DWI [33]. Therefore, our result is not consistent with the results of Taron and Xu [33, 43]. A possible explanation for this could be the minimal difference in repetition time (TR) between standard DWI and DWI with SMS and motion correction [55] for most of the used protocols. In our study, the median TR for the standard DWI was 2600 and for the DWI with SMS and motion correction 2000. As Taron et al. already explained in their study, a low TR can lead to a signal reduction due to T1 saturation effects in the higher b-values [56]. This is important to consider with DWI SMS as application of SMS only leads to a reduction of scan time if the TR is reduced accordingly. As shown by Ogura et al. in phantom measurements at 3 Tesla tissues with a long T1 could produce erroneous ADC values when acquired with very short TR [57]. As also demonstrated by Ogura et al. such effects become most significant when the TR is becoming shorter or close to the T1 relaxation time of the tissue of interest. Reference T1 values for the tissues of interest in this study are in the range between 700 and 1400 ms and thus smaller than the TR of the SMS sequence [58]. Most importantly, we have shown that when keeping TR comparable between non-SMS and SMS acquisition the same ADC values are obtained. Obtaining reliable ADC values is an important tool for tissue characterization in modern MRI imaging for monitoring and differentiating between various tumors and inflammations [59,60,61,62]. For 2D multi-slice acquisitions, we thus recommend adjusting the number of slice concatenation, i.e. the segmentation of the slice stack into multiple blocks, to avoid a significant reduction of the TR when using SMS.
Consequently, SMS DWI Moco could be an interesting approach for further studies on MRI examinations of the abdomen in young CF patients under HEM [63]. The pancreas and liver of young CF patients can show early changes with fatty deposits, fibrosis and remodeling processes due to the chronic inflammation. This increases the risk of malignant neoplasms in the liver and pancreas [64, 65]. Using DWI with SMS and motion correction as a high-resolution MRI sequence with shorter acquisition time in free breathing could significantly increase the sensitivity for detecting suspicious lesions (Fig. 8).
There are several limitations in this study. First, a certain disadvantage of the study is the small number of 16 patients examined. Second, similar to Xu's work, we acquired both standard and DWI with SMS and motion correction in free breathing. There was no comparison of diffusion-weighted sequences with other breathing schemes as respiratory-triggered mode or breath-hold mode. Because CF patients with pulmonary complications sometimes have very shallow and irregular breathing, an additional sequence with respiratory navigation, which has a significantly longer scan time, or another sequence in breath-hold technique would not have been feasible for the patients. Therefore, we deliberately avoided such additional sequences in this study. Third, this study focused only on DWI images and thus did not allow for comparison regarding diagnostic performance between DWI and other non–DWI sequences. Further studies should explore such comparisons.
Conclusion
DWI with SMS and motion-correction can provide better overall image quality and delimitability of mesenteric lymph nodes in shorter acquisition time to standard DWI in an examination protocol for abdominal MRI. Therefore, DWI SMS Moco could improve preventive abdominal MRI as a quick, safe and non-invasive approach to evaluate effects in pediatric and young adolescent CF patients under highly effective modulator therapy.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- IQ:
-
Image quality
- SNR:
-
Signal-to-noise
- ADC:
-
Apparent diffusion coefficient
- DWI SMS Moco:
-
Diffusion-weighted imaging with simultaneous multi-slice and motion-correction
- sDWI:
-
Standard diffusion weighted imaging
- CF:
-
Cystic fibrosis
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- CNS:
-
Central nervous system
- WBI:
-
Whole-body imaging
- CFTR:
-
Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator
- HEM:
-
Highly effective modulator
- SMS:
-
Simultaneous multi-slice
- ROI:
-
Region-of-interest
- CFRD:
-
Cystic fibrosis related diabetes
- CFRLD:
-
Cystic fibrosis related liver disease
References
Carney O, Falzon A, MacKinnon AD (2018) Diffusion-weighted MRI in paediatric neuroimaging. Clin Radiol 73 (12):999-1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2018.07.101
Tunariu N, Blackledge M, Messiou C, Petralia G, Padhani A, Curcean S, Curcean A, Koh DM (2020) What's New for Clinical Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) in the 21st Century. Br J Radiol 93 (1115):20200562. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200562
Messina C, Bignone R, Bruno A, Bruno A, Bruno F, Calandri M, Caruso D, Coppolino P, Robertis R, Gentili F, Grazzini I, Natella R, Scalise P, Barile A, Grassi R, Albano D (2020) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Oncology: An Update. Cancers (Basel) 12 (6). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061493
Chaturvedi A (2021) Pediatric skeletal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, part 2: current and emerging applications. Pediatr Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05028-5
Taffel MT, Johnson EJ, Chandarana H (2017) Diffusion Quantification in Body Imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 26 (6):243-249. https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000144
Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M (1988) Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168 (2):497-505. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.168.2.3393671
Daldrup-Link HE, Theruvath AJ, Baratto L, Hawk KE (2021) One-stop local and whole-body staging of children with cancer. Pediatr Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05076-x
Moore WA, Khatri G, Madhuranthakam AJ, Sims RD, Pedrosa I (2014) Added value of diffusion-weighted acquisitions in MRI of the abdomen and pelvis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202 (5):995-1006. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9563
Rosenkrantz AB, Oei M, Babb JS, Niver BE, Taouli B (2011) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen at 3.0 Tesla: image quality and apparent diffusion coefficient reproducibility compared with 1.5 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 33 (1):128-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22395
Stahl M (2020) [Clinical presentation of lung disease in cystic fibrosis]. Radiologe 60 (9):774-780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-020-00728-9
Shakkottai A, O'Brien LM, Nasr SZ, Chervin RD (2018) Sleep disturbances and their impact in pediatric cystic fibrosis. Sleep Med Rev 42:100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2018.07.002
Dai E, Ma X, Zhang Z, Yuan C, Guo H (2017) Simultaneous multislice accelerated interleaved EPI DWI using generalized blipped-CAIPI acquisition and 3D K-space reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 77 (4):1593-1605. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26249
Porter DA, Heidemann RM (2009) High resolution diffusion-weighted imaging using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging, parallel imaging and a two-dimensional navigator-based reacquisition. Magn Reson Med 62 (2):468-475. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22024
Mani M, Jacob M, McKinnon G, Yang B, Rutt B, Kerr A, Magnotta V (2020) SMS MUSSELS: A navigator-free reconstruction for simultaneous multi-slice-accelerated multi-shot diffusion weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med 83 (1):154-169. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27924
Runge VM, Richter JK, Heverhagen JT (2017) Speed in Clinical Magnetic Resonance. Invest Radiol 52 (1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000330
Boss A, Barth B, Filli L, Kenkel D, Wurnig MC, Piccirelli M, Reiner CS (2016) Simultaneous multi-slice echo planar diffusion weighted imaging of the liver and the pancreas: Optimization of signal-to-noise ratio and acquisition time and application to intravoxel incoherent motion analysis. Eur J Radiol 85 (11):1948-1955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.002
Marami B, Scherrer B, Afacan O, Warfield SK, Gholipour A (2016) Motion-Robust Reconstruction based on Simultaneous Multi-Slice Registration for Diffusion-Weighted MRI of Moving Subjects. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 9902:544-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46726-9_63
Marami B, Scherrer B, Khan S, Afacan O, Prabhu SP, Sahin M, Warfield SK, Gholipour A (2019) Motion-robust diffusion compartment imaging using simultaneous multi-slice acquisition. Magn Reson Med 81 (5):3314-3329. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27613
Riedel Ne Steinhoff M, Setsompop K, Mertins A, Bornert P (2021) Segmented simultaneous multi-slice diffusion-weighted imaging with navigated 3D rigid motion correction. Magn Reson Med. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28813
Egan ME (2020) Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance receptor modulator therapy in cystic fibrosis, an update. Curr Opin Pediatr 32 (3):384-388. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000892
Corriveau S, Sykes J, Stephenson AL (2018) Cystic fibrosis survival: the changing epidemiology. Curr Opin Pulm Med 24 (6):574-578. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000000520
Elborn JS, Bell SC, Madge SL, Burgel PR, Castellani C, Conway S, De Rijcke K, Dembski B, Drevinek P, Heijerman HG, Innes JA, Lindblad A, Marshall B, Olesen HV, Reimann AL, Sole A, Viviani L, Wagner TO, Welte T, Blasi F (2016) Report of the European Respiratory Society/European Cystic Fibrosis Society task force on the care of adults with cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J 47 (2):420-428. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00592-2015
Balfour-Lynn IM, King JA (2020) CFTR modulator therapies - Effect on life expectancy in people with cystic fibrosis. Paediatr Respir Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2020.05.002
MacKenzie T, Gifford AH, Sabadosa KA, Quinton HB, Knapp EA, Goss CH, Marshall BC (2014) Longevity of patients with cystic fibrosis in 2000 to 2010 and beyond: survival analysis of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation patient registry. Ann Intern Med 161 (4):233-241. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-0636
Keogh RH, Szczesniak R, Taylor-Robinson D, Bilton D (2018) Up-to-date and projected estimates of survival for people with cystic fibrosis using baseline characteristics: A longitudinal study using UK patient registry data. J Cyst Fibros 17 (2):218-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2017.11.019
Demeyer S, De Boeck K, Witters P, Cosaert K (2016) Beyond pancreatic insufficiency and liver disease in cystic fibrosis. Eur J Pediatr 175 (7):881-894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-016-2719-5
Gabel ME, Galante GJ, Freedman SD (2019) Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disease in Cystic Fibrosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 40 (6):825-841. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697591
Neglia JP, FitzSimmons SC, Maisonneuve P, Schoni MH, Schoni-Affolter F, Corey M, Lowenfels AB (1995) The risk of cancer among patients with cystic fibrosis. Cystic Fibrosis and Cancer Study Group. N Engl J Med 332 (8):494-499. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199502233320803
McWilliams RR, Petersen GM, Rabe KG, Holtegaard LM, Lynch PJ, Bishop MD, Highsmith WE (2009) Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutations and risk for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer:NA-NA. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24697
Plant BJ, Goss CH, Plant WD, Bell SC (2013) Management of comorbidities in older patients with cystic fibrosis. Lancet Respir Med 1 (2):164-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70025-0
Debray D, Narkewicz MR, Bodewes F, Colombo C, Housset C, de Jonge HR, Jonker JW, Kelly DA, Ling SC, Poynard T, Sogni P, Trauner M, Witters P, Baumann U, Wilschanski M, Verkade HJ (2017) Cystic Fibrosis-related Liver Disease: Research Challenges and Future Perspectives. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 65 (4):443-448. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000001676
Mentzel HJ, Renz DM (2020) [Abdominal imaging in cystic fibrosis]. Radiologe 60 (9):831-838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-020-00703-4
Xu J, Cheng YJ, Wang ST, Wang X, Jin ZY, Qian TY, Zhu JX, Nickel MD, Xue HD (2021) Simultaneous multi-slice accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging with higher spatial resolution for patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumours. Clin Radiol 76 (1):81 e11-81 e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2020.08.024
Henkelman RM (1985) Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. Med Phys 12 (2):232-233. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595711
Skipper S, Perktold J (2010) Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference.
Vallat R (2018) Pingouin: statistics in Python. Journal of Open Source Software 3:1026. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01026
Taron J, Schraml C, Pfannenberg C, Reimold M, Schwenzer N, Nikolaou K, Martirosian P, Seith F (2018) Simultaneous multislice diffusion-weighted imaging in whole-body positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging for multiparametric examination in oncological patients. Eur Radiol 28 (8):3372-3383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5216-y
Weiss J, Martirosian P, Notohamiprodjo M, Kaufmann S, Othman AE, Grosse U, Nikolaou K, Gatidis S (2018) Implementation of a 5-Minute Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Protocol for Prostate Cancer in Men With Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Before Biopsy. Invest Radiol 53 (3):186-190. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000427
Park JH, Seo N, Lim JS, Hahm J, Kim MJ (2020) Feasibility of Simultaneous Multislice Acceleration Technique in Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Rectum. Korean J Radiol 21 (1):77-87. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0406
McKay JA, Church AL, Rubin N, Emory TH, Hoven NF, Kuehn-Hajder JE, Nelson MT, Ramanna S, Auerbach EJ, Moeller S, Bolan PJ (2020) A Comparison of Methods for High-Spatial-Resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Breast MRI. Radiology 297 (2):304-312. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200221
Ohlmeyer S, Laun FB, Palm T, Janka R, Weiland E, Uder M, Wenkel E (2019) Simultaneous Multislice Echo Planar Imaging for Accelerated Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions. Invest Radiol 54 (8):524-530. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000560
Song SE, Woo OH, Cho KR, Seo BK, Son YH, Grimm R, Liu W, Moon WK (2021) Simultaneous Multislice Readout-Segmented Echo Planar Imaging for Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Patients With Invasive Breast Cancers. J Magn Reson Imaging 53 (4):1108-1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27433
Taron J, Martirosian P, Erb M, Kuestner T, Schwenzer NF, Schmidt H, Honndorf VS, Weibeta J, Notohamiprodjo M, Nikolaou K, Schraml C (2016) Simultaneous multislice diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: Analysis of different breathing schemes in comparison to standard sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 44 (4):865-879. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25204
Taron J, Martirosian P, Schwenzer NF, Erb M, Kuestner T, Weiss J, Othman A, Notohamiprodjo M, Nikolaou K, Schraml C (2016) Scan time minimization in hepatic diffusion-weighted imaging: evaluation of the simultaneous multislice acceleration technique with different acceleration factors and gradient preparation schemes. MAGMA 29 (5):739-749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-016-0553-4
Zhang G, Sun H, Qian T, An J, Shi B, Zhou H, Liu Y, Peng X, Liu Y, Chen L, Jin Z (2019) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney: comparison between simultaneous multi-slice and integrated slice-by-slice shimming echo planar sequence. Clin Radiol 74 (4):325 e321-325 e328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2018.12.005
Kenkel D, Barth BK, Piccirelli M, Filli L, Finkenstadt T, Reiner CS, Boss A (2017) Simultaneous Multislice Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Kidney: A Systematic Analysis of Image Quality. Invest Radiol 52 (3):163-169. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000323
Taron J, Martirosian P, Kuestner T, Schwenzer NF, Othman A, Weiss J, Notohamiprodjo M, Nikolaou K, Schraml C (2018) Scan time reduction in diffusion-weighted imaging of the pancreas using a simultaneous multislice technique with different acceleration factors: How fast can we go? Eur Radiol 28 (4):1504-1511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5132-1
Ciritsis A, Rossi C, Marcon M, Van VDP, Boss A (2018) Accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging for lymph node assessment in the pelvis applying simultaneous multislice acquisition: A healthy volunteer study. Medicine (Baltimore) 97 (32):e11745. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011745
Tabari A, Machado-Rivas F, Kirsch JE, Nimkin K, Gee MS (2020) Performance of simultaneous multi-slice accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing focal renal lesions in pediatric patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Pediatr Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04798-8
Pal S, Gasheva OY, Zawieja DC, Meininger CJ, Gashev AA (2020) Histamine-mediated autocrine signaling in mesenteric perilymphatic mast cells. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 318 (3):R590-R604. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00255.2019
Meeker SM, Mears KS, Sangwan N, Brittnacher MJ, Weiss EJ, Treuting PM, Tolley N, Pope CE, Hager KR, Vo AT, Paik J, Frevert CW, Hayden HS, Hoffman LR, Miller SI, Hajjar AM (2020) CFTR dysregulation drives active selection of the gut microbiome. PLoS Pathog 16 (1):e1008251. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008251
Radmard AR, Eftekhar Vaghefi R, Montazeri SA, Naybandi Atashi S, Hashemi Taheri AP, Haghighi S, Salehnia A, Dadgostar M, Malekzadeh R (2018) Mesenteric lymph nodes in MR enterography: are they reliable followers of bowel in active Crohn's disease? Eur Radiol 28 (10):4429-4437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5441-z
Goralski JL, Stewart NJ, Woods JC (2021) Novel imaging techniques for cystic fibrosis lung disease. Pediatr Pulmonol 56 Suppl 1:S40-S54. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.24931
Chen X, Qin L, Pan D, Huang Y, Yan L, Wang G, Liu Y, Liang C, Liu Z (2014) Liver diffusion-weighted MR imaging: reproducibility comparison of ADC measurements obtained with multiple breath-hold, free-breathing, respiratory-triggered, and navigator-triggered techniques. Radiology 271 (1):113-125. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13131572
Obele CC, Glielmi C, Ream J, Doshi A, Campbell N, Zhang HC, Babb J, Bhat H, Chandarana H (2015) Simultaneous Multislice Accelerated Free-Breathing Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Liver at 3T. Abdom Imaging 40 (7):2323-2330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0447-3
Dietrich O, Heiland S, Sartor K (2001) Noise correction for the exact determination of apparent diffusion coefficients at low SNR. Magn Reson Med 45 (3):448-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2594(200103)45:3<448::aid-mrm1059>3.0.co;2-w
Ogura A, Hayakawa K, Miyati T, Maeda F (2011) Imaging parameter effects in apparent diffusion coefficient determination of magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 77 (1):185-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.06.031
de Bazelaire CM, Duhamel GD, Rofsky NM, Alsop DC (2004) MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. Radiology 230 (3):652-659. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2303021331
Wang Y, Miller FH, Chen ZE, Merrick L, Mortele KJ, Hoff FL, Hammond NA, Yaghmai V, Nikolaidis P (2011) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of solid and cystic lesions of the pancreas. Radiographics 31 (3):E47-64. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.313105174
Granata V, Fusco R, Sansone M, Grassi R, Maio F, Palaia R, Tatangelo F, Botti G, Grimm R, Curley S, Avallone A, Izzo F, Petrillo A (2020) Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of pancreatic cancer with quantitative parameter extraction by means of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion kurtosis imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 13:1756284819885052. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756284819885052
Inan N, Arslan A, Akansel G, Anik Y, Demirci A (2008) Diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191 (4):1115-1121. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3754
Choi SY, Kim SH, Kang TW, Song KD, Park HJ, Choi YH (2016) Differentiating Mass-Forming Autoimmune Pancreatitis From Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma on the Basis of Contrast-Enhanced MRI and DWI Findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206 (2):291-300. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.14974
Rowbotham NJ, Smith S, Leighton PA, Rayner OC, Gathercole K, Elliott ZC, Nash EF, Daniels T, Duff AJA, Collins S, Chandran S, Peaple U, Hurley MN, Brownlee K, Smyth AR (2018) The top 10 research priorities in cystic fibrosis developed by a partnership between people with CF and healthcare providers. Thorax 73 (4):388-390. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210473
Munck A, Languepin J, Debray D, Lamireau T, Abely M, Huet F, Maudinas R, Michaud L, Mas E (2015) Management of pancreatic, gastrointestinal and liver complications in adult cystic fibrosis. Rev Mal Respir 32 (6):566-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmr.2014.12.008
Oermann CM, Al-Salmi Q, Seilheimer DK, Finegold M, Tatevian N (2005) Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas in an adolescent with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Dev Pathol 8 (3):391-396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10024-005-4114-5
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the editing assistance during revision of Dr AJ Davis (English Experience Language Services, Jena, Germany) by editing this article and would like to thank Thomas Lehmann for statistical support throughout this project.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KG: conceptualization, investigation, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing. P-CK: investigation, writing—review & editing. TO: investigation, formal analysis. MDN, H-JM, MK: validation, writing—review & editing. UT: validation. ML: validation, writing—review & editing, supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Glutig, K., Krüger, PC., Oberreuther, T. et al. Preliminary results of abdominal simultaneous multi-slice accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging with motion-correction in patients with cystic fibrosis and impaired compliance. Abdom Radiol 47, 2783–2794 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03549-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03549-7