Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of amniotic membrane on the healing of normal and high-risk colonic anastomoses in rats

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bacground

This study was aimed at examining whether or not the addition of amniotic membrane to a sutured colonic anastomosis improves its healing.

Material and methods

Ninety female Sprague Dawley rats were used in the study. Ten served as controls for bursting pressure measurement, while the other 80 animals were divided into four groups: Anastomosis group (NA), high-risk anastomosis group (HRA), anastomosis plus amniotic membrane group (NA-AM), and high-risk anastomosis plus amniotic membrane group (HRA-AM). The last two groups had amniotic membrane covering their anastomoses. Anastomotic evaluation was carried out on the third (NA3, HRA3, NA-AM3, and HRA-AM3, respectively) and seventh (NA7, HRA7, NA-AM7, and HRA-AM7, respectively) postoperative days. The main outcome measures were gross anastomotic healing, adhesion formation, mechanical strength, hydroxyproine content, and parameters of histopathological healing.

Results

Anastomotic dehiscence rate was 66.7%, 40%, 20%, and 10% in group HRA7, HRA3, NA7, and NA3, respectively. However, there was no significant difference between groups regarding the dehiscence rate. The adhesion scores were significantly higher in groups NA3 and HRA3 compared with groups NA-AM3 and HRA-AM3, respectively (p < 0.05, p < 0.001). Bursting pressure was significantly higher in groups with amniotic membrane compared without amniotic membrane (p < 0.05, for all comparison). Inflammatory cell infiltration was significantly lower in groups with amniotic membrane compared with groups without amniotic membrane (p < 0.05, for all both comparisons). Neoangiogenesis was significantly higher in the NA-AM3 and HRA-AM3 groups compared with the NA3 (p < 0.01) and HRA3 (p < 0.05) groups, respectively. Fibroblast activity was significantly higher in groups NA-AM3 and NA-AM7 compared with groups NA3 (p < 0.05) and NA7 (p < 0.05), respectively. Collagen deposition and hydroxyproline concentrations were significantly higher in groups with amniotic membrane compared with groups without amniotic membrane (p < 0.05, for all both comparisons).

Conclusion

The covering of both normal and high-risk colonic anastomoses with amniotic membrane provides a beneficial effect over conventional suturing of healing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thornton FJ, Barbul A (1997) Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am 77:549–573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nursal TZ, Anarat R, Bircan S et al (2004) The effect of tissue adhesive, octyl-cyanoacrylate, on the healing of experimental high-risk and normal colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 187:28–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kanellos I, Zacharakis E, Christoforidis E et al (2002) Low anterior resection without protective colostomy. Tech Coloproctol 6:153–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tuson JR, Everett WG (1990) A retrospective study of colostomies, leaks and strictures after colorectal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 5:44–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanellos I, Blouhos K, Demetriades H et al (2004) The failed intraperitoneal colon anastomosis after colon resection. Tech Coloproctol 8(Suppl 1):s53–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goligher JC, Graham NG, De Dombal FT (1970) Anastomotic dehiscence after anterior resection of rectum and sigmoid. Br J Surg 57:109–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanellos I, Mantzoros I, Demetriades H et al (2004) Healing of colon anastomoses covered with fibrin glue after immediate postoperative intraperitoneal administration of 5-fluorouracil. Dis Colon Rectum 47:510–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozel SK, Kazez A, Akpolat N et al (2006) Does a fibrin-collagen patch support early anastomotic healing in the colon? An experimental study. Tech Coloproctol 10:233–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bourne GL (1960) The microscopic anatomy of the human amnion and chorion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 79:1070–1073

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Toda A, Okabe M, Yoshida T et al (2007) The potential of amniotic membrane/amnion-derived cells for regeneration of various tissues. J Pharmacol Sci 105:215–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dua HS, Gomes JA, King AJ, et al The amniotic membrane in ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol 49:51-77

  12. Subrahmanyam M (1995) Amniotic membrane as a cover for microskin grafts. Br J Plast Surg 48:477–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tseng SC, Li DQ, Ma X et al (1999) Suppression of transforming growth factor-beta isoforms, TGF-beta receptor type II, and myofibroblast differentiation in cultured human corneal and limbal fibroblasts by amniotic membrane matrix. J Cell Physiol 179:325–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mermet I, Pottier N, Sainthillier JM et al (2007) Use of amniotic membrane transplantation in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 15:459–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Talmi YP, Sigler L, Inge E et al (1991) Antibacterial properties of human amniotic membranes. Placenta 12:285–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rinastiti M, Harijadi SAL, Sosroseno W (2006) Histological evaluation of rabbit gingival wound healing transplanted with human amniotic membrane. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:247–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis JW (1910) Skin transplantation with a review of 550 cases at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Johns Hopkins Med J 15:307

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bose B (1979) Burn wound dressing with human amniotic membrane. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 61:444–447

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Faulk WP, Matthews R, Stevens PJ et al (1980) Human amnion as an adjunct in wound healing. Lancet 31:1156–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Samandari MH, Yaghmaei M, Ejlali M et al (2004) Use of amnion as a graft material in vestibuloplasty: a preliminary report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97:574–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nisolle M, Donnez J (1992) Vaginoplasty using amniotic membranes in cases of vaginal agenesis or after vaginectomy. J Gynecol Surg 8:25–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Szabo A, Haj M, Waxsman I et al (2000) Evaluation of seprafilm and amniotic membrane as adhesion prophylaxis in mesh repair of abdominal wall hernia in rats. Eur Surg Res 32:125–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kelekci S, Uygur D, Yilmaz B et al (2007) Comparison of human amniotic membrane and hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose membrane for prevention of adhesion formation in rats. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276:355–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zohar Y, Talmi YP, Finkelstein Y et al (1987) Use of human amniotic membrane in otolaryngologic practice. Laryngoscope 97:978–980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Byrne DJ, Hardy J, Wood RA et al (1992) Adverse influence of fibrin sealant on the healing of high-risk sutured colonic anastomoses. J R Coll Surg Edinb 37:394–398

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. van der Ham AC, Kort WJ, Weijma IM et al (1992) Effect of antibiotics in fibrin sealant on healing colonic anastomoses in the rat. Br J Surg 79:525–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Phillips JD, Kim CS, Fonkalsrud EW et al (1992) Effects of chronic corticosteroids and vitamin A on the healing of intestinal anastomoses. Am J Surg 163:71–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bergman I, Loxley R (1963) Two improved and simplified methods for the spectrophotometric determination of hyroxyproline. Analyt Chem 35:1961–1965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hillan K, Nordlinger B, Ballet F et al (1988) The healing of colonic anastomoses after early intraperitoneal chemotherapy: an experimental study in rats. J Surg Res 44:166–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Christensen H, Oxlund H (1994) Growth hormone increases the collagen deposition rate and breaking strength of left colonic anastomoses in rats. Surgery 116:550–556

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Barbul A (2005) Wound healing. In: Brunicardi FC (ed) Schwart’z Principles of Surgery, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 223–248

    Google Scholar 

  32. Waninger J, Kauffmann GW, Shah IA et al (1992) Influence of the distance between interrupted sutures and the tension of sutures on the healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 163:319–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Parsons SL, Watson SA, Brown PD et al (1997) Matrix metalloproteinases. Br J Surg 84:160–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Witte MB, Barbul A (1997) General principles of wound healing. Surg Clin North Am 77:509–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim JS, Kim JC, Na BK et al (2000) Amniotic membrane patching promotes healing and inhibits proteinase activity on wound healing following acute corneal alkali burn. Exp Eye Res 70:329–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee SH, Tseng SC (1997) Amniotic membrane transplantation for persistent epithelial defects with ulceration. Am J Ophthalmol 123:303–312

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Park WC, Tseng SC (2000) Modulation of acute inflammation and keratocyte death by suturing, blood, and amniotic membrane in PRK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2906–2914

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Solomon A, Rosenblatt M, Monroy D et al (2001) Suppression of interleukin 1alpha and interleukin 1beta in human limbal epithelial cells cultured on the amniotic membrane stromal matrix. Br J Ophthalmol 85:444–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hao Y, Ma DH, Hwang DG et al (2000) Identification of antiangiogenic and antiinflammatory proteins in human amniotic membrane. Cornea 19:348–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bennett JP, Matthews R, Faulk WP (1980) Treatment of chronic ulceration of the legs with human amnion. Lancet 31:1153–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Koizumi NJ, Inatomi TJ, Sotozono CJ et al (2000) Growth factor mRNA and protein in preserved human amniotic membrane. Curr Eye Res 20:173–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kobayashi N, Kabuyama Y, Sasaki S et al (2002) Suppression of corneal neovascularization by culture supernatant of human amniotic cells. Cornea 21:62–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shao C, Sima J, Zhang SX et al (2004) Suppression of corneal neovascularization by PEDF release from human amniotic membranes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:1758–1762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Christensen H, Chemnitz J, Christensen BC et al (1995) Collagen structural organization of healing colonic anastomoses and the effect of growth hormone treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 38:1200–1205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Martens MF, Hendriks T (1991) Postoperative changes in collagen synthesis in intestinal anastomoses of the rat: differences between small and large bowel. Gut 32:1482–1487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Haciyanli M, Fuzun M, Unek T et al (2001) Does the administration route of leucovorin have any influence on the impairment of colonic healing caused by intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil treatment? Eur Surg Res 33:80–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Uludag.

Additional information

This study was presented as an oral presentation in the 18th World Congress of the International Association of Surgeons, Gastroenterologists, and Oncologists.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uludag, M., Citgez, B., Ozkaya, O. et al. Effects of amniotic membrane on the healing of normal and high-risk colonic anastomoses in rats. Int J Colorectal Dis 24, 809–817 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0691-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0691-5

Keywords

Navigation