Skip to main content
Log in

Semen characteristics of the Indian Red Jungle Fowl (Gallus gallus murghi)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Indian Red Jungle Fowl is a wild native gallus subspecies of Southern Asia. Semen has never been studied in this species. In order to better know the male reproductive capacities, experiments were conducted to study the semen characteristics, impact of ejaculate collection frequencies, and timing of collection on sperm quality parameters. Mean sperm concentration 800 million/mL, total sperm per ejaculate (0.015 billion), motility (63.5 %), live/total sperm (92.4 %), intact acrosome (75.5 %), and plasma membrane integrity (89.2 %) were recorded. Percentage of abnormal sperm (head, mid-piece, and tail) was 8.1 % and recovered mainly mid-piece abnormalities. The motile sperm percentage was positively correlated with intact acrosomes (r = 0.34) and plasma membrane integrity (r = 0.41). Total sperm per ejaculate (billion) was maximum at 72 h of collection followed by 24 and 48 h of collection. Daily and weekly sperm production (billion) was found maximum at 24 h of collection compared to 12, 48, and 72 h of collection. Sperm motility was higher at 24, 48, and 72 h of collection compared to 12 h of collection, but the number of live sperm were higher at 12 h of collection compared to 24, 48, and 72 h. Sperm concentration was better in the morning time, while the values for sperm viability and plasma membrane integrity were higher in the semen collected at evening time. In conclusion, the Indian Red Jungle Fowl shows a semen production quantitatively relatively low for the species as compared to domestic chicken and contrasted parameters of quality. The semen production is affected by the frequency of collection with an optimum for a daily collection preferentially held in the evening period. These results may now be used for artificial insemination and conservation program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adeyemo GO, Longe OG, Adejumo DO (2007) The reproductive performance of broiler cocks fed cottonseed cake-based diets. Int J Poult Sci 6:140–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajayi FO, Agaviezor BO, Ajuogu PK (2011) Semen characteristics of three strains of local cocks in the humid tropical environment of Nigeria. Int J Anim Vet Adv 3:125–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkan S, Baran A, Ozdas OB, Evecen M (2002) Morphological defects in turkey semen. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 26:1087–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Bah AS, Chandhari SUR, Al-Amin JD (2001) Semen characteristics of local breeder cocks in the Sahel Region of Nigeria. Revue Elev Med Vet Pays Trop 54:153–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakst MR, Cecil HC (1997) Techniques for semen evaluation, semen storage, and fertility determination. 3 Sperm viability. I. Nigrosin/eosin stain for determining live/dead and abnormal sperm counts. The Poultry Science Association, Inc, Savoy, Illinois, pp 29–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili SF, Renden JA (1984) Fluorometric determination of avian spermatozoa viability and concentration. Poult Sci 63:2275–2277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgili SF, Renden JA, Sexton TJ (1985) The influence of staining techniques and examiners on evaluation of the morphology of fowl spermatozoa. Poult Sci 64:2358–2361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blesbois E, Grasseau I, Seigneurin F, Mignon-Grasteau S, Jalme SM, Mialon Richard MM (2008) Predictors of success of semen cryopreservation in chickens. Theriogenology 69:252–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brillard JP, De-Reviers M (1981) Testis development and daily sperm output in guinea-fowl raised under constant daily photoperiod. Reprod Nutr Develop 21:1105–1112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows WH, Quinn JP (1935) A method of obtaining spermatozoa from the domestic fowl. Poult Sci 14:251–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows WH, Quinn JP (1937) The collection of spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey. Poult Sci 6:19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delacour J (1951) The pheasants of the world. Country Life Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • De-Reviers M (1972) Evaluation of the spermatic reserves in the deferent duct of domestic fowl. Ann Biol Anim Bioch Biophys 12:13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De-Reviers M (1980) Photoperiodism, testis development and sperm production in the fowl. 9th Int Congr Reprod AI Madrid 2:518–526

    Google Scholar 

  • De-Reviers M, Williams J (1981) Predicting the adult daily output after the first ejaculates in cockerels raised under different photoschedules. Reprod Nutr Develop 21:1113–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue AM, Garner DL, Donoghue DJ, Johnson LA (1995) Viability assessment of turkey sperm using fluorescent staining and flow cytometric analysis. Poult Sci 74:1191–1200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue AM, Garner DL, Donoghue DJ, Johnston LA (1996) Flow cytometric assessment of the membrane integrity of fresh and stored turkey sperm using a combination of hypo-osmotic stress and fluorescent staining. Theriogenology 46:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson J, Larson G, Gunnarsson U, Bedhom B, Tixier-Boichard M, Strömstedt L, Wright D, Jungerius A, Vereijken A, Randi E, Jensen P, Andersson L (2008) Identification of the yellow skin gene reveals a hybrid origin of the domestic chicken. PLoS Genet 4:e1000010

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Etchu KA, Egbunike GN (2002) Effects of processed sweet potato on the performance of broiler birds in the humid tropics during the rainy season. Trop Anim Prod Investig 5:67–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan YK, Tsang CL, Peng HK (1988) Studies on the reciprocal cross between Taiwan Country chicken and White Leghorn: 4. the resistance ability to the cecal coccidiosis (Eimeria tenella). J Agric For 37:9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote RH (1978) Factors influencing the quantity and quality of semen harvested from bulls, rams, boars and stallions. J Anim Sci 47:1–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Froman DP, Feltmann AJ, Rhoads ML, Kirby JD (1999) Sperm mobility: a primary determinant of fertility in the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Biol Reprod 61:400–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Genome Sequence Center (2006) http://www.arkive.org/tracker/http://genome.wustl.edu/genome.cgi?Genome=Gallus%200, http://www.arkive.org/tracker/http://www.iucnredlist.org

  • Ghonim AIA, Awad AL, El-sawy MA, Fatouh MH, Zenat AI (2009) Effect of frequency of semen collection, dilution rate and insemination dose on semen characteristics and fertility of Domyati ducks. Egypt Poul Sci 29:1023–1045

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham JK, Kunze E, Hammerstedt RH (1990) Analysis of sperm cell viability, acrosomal integrity, and mitochondrial function using flow cytometry. Biol Reprod 43:55–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2008) IUCN red list. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalme M, Lecoq R, Seigneurin F, Blesbois E, Plouzeau E (2003) Cryopreservation of semen from endangered pheasants: the first step towards a cryobank for endangered avian species. Theriogenology 59:875–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jianzhong L, Zhang Y (2006) Methods and effects of Hongshan cock spermatozoa cryopreservation. Wuhan Uni J Natural Sci 11:447–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsgard PA (1999) The pheasants of the world: biology and natural history, 2nd edn. Smithsonian Press, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake PE (1966) A cytochemical examination of spermatozoa of the domestic fowl. Res Vet Sci 7:121–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madeddu M, Berlinguer F, Ledda M, Leoni GG, Satta V, Succu S, Rotta A, Pasciu V, Zinellu A, Muzzeddu M, Carru C, Naitana S (2009) Ejaculate collection efficiency and post-thaw semen quality in wild-caught Griffon vultures from the Sardinian population. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 7:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik A, Haron A, Yusoff W, Bukar R, Nesa M, Kasim A (2013) Evaluation of the ejaculate quality of the red jungle fowl, domestic chicken and bantam chicken in Malaysia. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 37:564–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantovani C, Cerolini S, Bellagamba F, Mangiagalli MG, Cavalchini LG (1993) Evaluation of pheasant semen production during the reproductive season. Reprod Nutr Dev 33:503–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marzoni M, Cabras S, Guerzilov VT, Romboli I (2000) Effect of dietary vitamin E supplementation on fertilizing ability of pheasant semen following artificial insemination. Br Poult Sci 41:18–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mc-Daniel GR, Sexton TJ (1977) Frequency of semen collection in relation to semen volume, sperm concentration and fertility in the chicken. Poult Sci 56:1989–1993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nwagu BI, Rekwot PI, Abubakar BY, Oni OO, Adeyinka IA, Egbuedo UC (1996) Semen characteristics of Rhode Island red and white breeder cocks. Nigerian J Anim Prod 23:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker HM, Yeatman JB, Schultz CD, Zumwalt CD, McDaniel CD (2000) Use of a sperm analyzer for evaluating broiler breeder males. 2. Selection of young broiler breeder roosters for the sperm quality index increases fertile egg production. Poult Sci 79:771–777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partykaa AE, Lukaszewiczb NW (2012) Effect of cryopreservation on sperm parameters, lipid peroxidationand antioxidant enzymes activity in fowl semen. Theriogenology 77:1497–1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters SO, Shoyebo OD, Ilori BM, Ozoje MO, Ikeobi CON, Adebambo OA (2008) Semen quality traits of seven strains of chickens raised in the humid tropics. Int J Poult Sci 7:949–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzari T, Birkhead TR (2001) For whom does the hen cackle? The function of postoviposition cackling. Anim Behav 61:601–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Wilson K (2003) Soay rams target reproductive activity towards promiscuous females’ optimal insemination period. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2073–2078

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prieto MT, Campo JL, Santiago-Moreno J (2011) Relationship among fluctuating asymmetry, morphological traits, and sperm quality in layers. Poult Sci 90:2845–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbani MG, Sasanami T, Mori M, Yoshizaki N (2006) Sperm–egg interaction is mediated by a sperm-associated body in quail. Dev Growth Differ 48:33–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz A, Aleem M, Ijaz A, Saeed M, Latif A (2004) Effect of collection frequency on the semen quality of broiler breeder. Br Poult Sci 45:823–827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saacke RG, Marshall CE, Vinson WE, O’Connor ML, Chandler JE, Mullins J, Amann RP, Wallace RA, Vincel WN, Kellgren WC (1980) Semen quality and heter-ospermic insemination in cattle. Proc 9th International Congress Anim Reprod and AI Pp 285

  • Saeid JM, Al-Soudi KA (1975) Seasonal variation in semen characteristics of White Leghorn, New Hampshire and indigenous chicken in Iraq. Br Poult Sci 16:97–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santayana G (1985) Artificial insemination. In: Campbell JR, Lastey J (eds) The science of animals that serve humanity, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill Inc, New York, p 295

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago-Moreno J, Lopez-Sebastian A, Castano C, Coloma MA, Gomez-Brunet A, Toledano-Diaz A, Prieto MT, Campo JL (2009) Sperm variables as predictors of fertility in Black Castellana roosters; use in the selection of sperm donors for genome resource banking purposes. Span J Agric Res 7:555–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton TJ, Giesen AF (1982) Beltsville poultry semen extender. 6. Holding turkey semen for 6 h at 15 C. Poult Sci 61:1202–1208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snook RR (2005) Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. Trends Ecol Evol 20:46–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart SG, Bausek N, Wohlrab F, Schneider WJ, Horrocks AJ, Wishart GJ (2004) Species specificity in avian sperm: perivitelline interaction. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 137:657–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Subhani A, Awan MS, Anwar M, Ali U, Dar NI (2010) Population status and distribution pattern of Red Jungle Fowl (Gallus gallus murghi) in Deva Vatala National Park, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan: a pioneer study. Pak J Zool 42:701–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuncer PB, Kinet H, Ozdogan N, Demiral OO (2006) Evaluation of some spermatological characteristics in Denizli cocks. J Fac Vet Med Univ Erciyes 3:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahraddeen D, Butswat ISR, Kalla DJU, Sir SM, Bukar MT (2005) Effect of frequency of ejaculation on semen characteristics in two breeds of turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) raised in a tropical environment. Int J Poult Sci 4:217–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemjanis R (1970) Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques in Animal Reproduction, 2nd ed. Pp 149

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. A. Rakha.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Gortázar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rakha, B.A., Ansari, M.S., Hussain, I. et al. Semen characteristics of the Indian Red Jungle Fowl (Gallus gallus murghi). Eur J Wildl Res 61, 379–386 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-015-0904-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-015-0904-x

Keywords

Navigation