Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implications of collection patterns of botanical specimens on their usefulness for conservation planning: an example of two neotropical plant families (Moraceae and Myristicaceae) in Peru

  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated the usefulness of herbarium collection databases for assessing patterns of species diversity and distribution based on a dataset from the flowering plant families Moraceae and Myristicaceae from the Peruvian Amazon. For Moraceae, a total of 3523 collections were used representing 134 species. The Myristicaceae were represented by 2113 collections of 46 species. We evaluated the distribution of collections based on 252 grid cells (0.5° size) covering all lowland rainforest in the Peruvian Amazon. We found that collections were concentrated in a few cells and that species diversity clearly increases in relation to collection density. Moraceae were collected in only 45% and Myristicaceae in only 31% of the 252 grid cells. Fifty percent of the collections came from just six and three cells, respectively. Most species were represented by only a small number of collections and collected only in a few grid cells, meaning a few widespread common species tend to dominate the collection records. Not surprisingly, most collections were made close to towns and transport routes. We evaluated the usefulness of rarefaction curves and diversity estimators for comparing diversity between regions. These techniques seem to be of little use for botanical collections due to violations of underlying assumptions. Problems such as accuracy of geographic and taxonomic data and strong bias in the spatial representation of the whole dataset are important to consider when basing conservation analysis, planning, and decision-making on seemingly large databases of biodiversity collections and are discussed in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • C. Azevedo-Rams and U. Galatti, Patterns of amphibian diversity in Brazilian Amazonia: conservation implications. Biol. Conserv. 103 (2002) 103-111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Balmford, J.L. Moore, T. Brooks, N. Burgess, L.A. Hansen, P. Williams and C. Rahbek, Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science 291 (2001) 2616-2619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BIODAMAZ. 2002. Peru Digital 1.0. Diversidad Biológica de la Amazonía Peruana (BIODAMAZ).

  • F.A. Bisby, The quiet revolution: biodiversity informatics and the internet. Science 289 (2000) 2309-2312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Chazdon, R.K. Colwell, J.S. Denslow and M.R. Guariguata, Statistical methods for estimating species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rain forests of NE Costa Rica. In: F. Dallmeier and J.A. Comiskey (eds.) Forest Biodiversity ResearchMonitoring and Modeling: Conceptual Background and Old World Case Studies. Paris: Parthenon Publishing (1998) pp. 285-309

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell R.K. 2005. EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 7.5. URL: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates.

  • R.K. Colwell and J.A. Coddington, Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 345 (1994) 101-118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R. Condit, N. Pitman, E.G. Leigh, J. Chave, J. Terborgh, R.B. Foster, P. Nunez, S. Aguilar, R. Valencia, G. Villa, H.C. Muller-Landau, E. Losos and S.P. Hubbell, Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295 (2002) 666-669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • S.D. Davis, V.H. Heywood and A.C. Hamilton, Centres of Plant Diversity: A Guide and Strategy for their Conservation. Cambridge, UK: World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF) and IUCN – World Conservation Union (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.L. Edwards, M.A. Lane and E.S. Nielsen, Interoperability of biodiversity databases: biodiversity information on every desktop. Science 289 (2000) 2312-2314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ArcGIS 8.3. Redlands: Environmental Systems Research InstituteInc. (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Ferrier, G. Watson, J. Pearce and M. Drielsma, Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. I. Species-level modelling. Biodivers. Conserv. 11 (2002) 2275-2307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Forero and S. Mori, The Organization for Flora Neotropica. Brittonia 47 (1995) 379-393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V.A. Funk, M.F. Zermoglio and N. Nasir, Testing the use of specimen collection data and GIS in biodiversity exploration and conservation decision making in Guyana. Biodivers. Conserv 8 (1999) 727-751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.H. Gentry, Neotropical floristic diversity – phytogeographical connections between Central and South-Americapleistocene climatic fluctuations, or an accident of the Andean Orogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 69 (1982) 557-593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.H. Gentry, Tree species richness of upper Amazonian forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85 (1998) 156-159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N.J. Gotelli and R.K. Colwell, Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4 (2001) 379-391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.C. Honorio and C.R. Reynel, Vacíos en la colección de la flora de los Bosques Húmedos del Perú. Lima: Herbario de la Facultad de Ciencias Forestales Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • INRENA. 2003. Mapa de Áreas Naturales Protegidas del Perú. Versión Digital. Instituto Nacional de Recursos Naturales.

  • W. Jetz and C. Rahbek, Geographic range size and determinants of avian species richness. Science 297 (2002) 1548-1551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • W.J. Kress, W.R. Heyer, P. Acevedo, J. Coddington, D. Cole, T.L. Erwin, B.J. Meggers, M. Pogue, R.W. Thorington, R.P. Vari, M.J. Weitzman and S.H. Weitzman, Amazonian biodiversity: assessing conservation priorities with taxonomic data. Biodivers. Conserv. 7 (1998) 1577-1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Laihonen, R. Kalliola and J. Salo, The biodiversity information clearing-house mechanism (CHM) as a global effort. Environ. Sci. Policy 7 (2004) 99-108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.S.Y. Lee, A worrying systematic decline. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15 (2000) 346-346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • B.A. Loiselle, C.A. Howell, C.H. Graham, J.M. Goerck, T. Brooks, K.G. Smith and P.H. Williams, Avoiding pitfalls of using species distribution models in conservation planning. Conserv. Biol. 17 (2003) 1591-1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Margules, R.L. Pressey and P.H. Williams, Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation. J. Biosci. 27 (2002) 309-326

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R.A. Mittermeier, N. Myers, J.B. Thomsen, G.A.B. da Fonseca and S. Olivieri, Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conserv. Biol. 12 (1998) 516-520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.A. Mori, Neotropical floristics and inventory: who will do the work?. Britonnia 44 (1992) 372-375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Myers, R.A. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G.A.B. da Fonseca and J. Kent, Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403 (2000) 853-858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • B.W. Nelson, C.A.C. Ferreira, M.F. Dasilva and M.L. Kawasaki, Endemism centers, refugia and botanical collection density in Brazilian Amazonia. Nature 345 (1990) 714-716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Olson, E. Dinerstein, E.D. Wikramanayake, N.D. Burgess, G.V.N. Powell, E.C. Underwood, J.A. D’Amico, I. Itoua, H.E. Strand, J.C. Morrison, C.J. Loucks, T.F. Allnutt, T.H. Ricketts, Y. Kura, J.F. Lamoreux, W.W. Wettengel, P. Hedao and K.R. Kassem, Terrestrial ecoregions of the worlds: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51 (2001) 933-938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Pennisi, Taxonomic revival. Science 289 (2000) 2306-2308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • F.T. Petersen, R. Meier and M. Nykjaer, Testing species richness estimation methods using museum label data on the Danish Asilidae. Biodivers. Conserv. 12 (2003) 687-701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O.L. Phillips and P.H. Raven, A strategy for sampling neotropical forests. In: A.C. Gibson (ed.) Neotropical Biodiversity and Conservation. Los Angeles: Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden,University of California (1997) pp. 141-165

    Google Scholar 

  • N.C.A. Pitman, J.W. Terborgh, M.R. Silman, P. Nunez, D.A. Neill, C.E. Ceron, W.A. Palacios and M. Aulestia, Dominance and distribution of tree species in upper Amazonian terra firme forests. Ecology 82 (2001) 2101-2117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.F. Ponder, G.A. Carter, P. Flemons and R.R. Chapman, Evaluation of museum collection data for use in biodiversity assessment. Conserv. Biol. 15 (2001) 648-657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.T. Prance, Floristic inventory of the tropics: where do we stand?. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 64 (1977) 659-684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.T. Prance, The use of phytogeographic data for conservation planning. In: P.L. Forey, C.J. Humphries and R.I. Vane-Wright (eds.) Systematics and Conservation Evaluation. Oxford: Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (1994) pp. 145-163

    Google Scholar 

  • G.T. Prance, H. Beentje, J. Dransfield and R. Johns, The tropical flora remains undercollected. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 87 (2000) 67-71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.H. Raven, Tropical floristics tomorrow. Taxon 37 (1988) 549-560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Reddy and L.M. Davalos, Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa. J. Biogeogr. 30 (2003) 1719-1727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Systematic Agenda 2000: Charting the Biosphere. New York, NY: American Museum of Natural History (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Soberon and A.T. Peterson, Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 359 (2004) 689-698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.M. Soberon, J.B. Llorente and L. Onate, The use of specimen-label databases for conservation purposes: an example using Mexican Papilionid and Pierid butterflies. Biodivers. Conserv. 9 (2000) 1441-1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. ter Steege, M.J. Jansen-Jacobs and V.K. Datadin, Can botanical collections assist in a national protected area strategy in Guyana?. Biodivers. Conserv. 9 (2000a) 215-240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. ter Steege, N. Pitman, D. Sabatier, H. Castellanos, P. Van der Hout, D.C. Daly, M. Silveira, O. Phillips, R. Vasquez, T. Van Andel, J. Duivenvoorden, A.A. De Oliveira, E.K. Renske, R. Lilwah, R. Thomas, J. Van Essen, C. Baider, P. Maas, S. Mori, J. Terborgh, P. Nuez, H. Mogollon and W. Morawetz, A spatial model of tree α-diversity and tree density for the Amazon. Biodivers. Conserv. 12 (2003) 2255-2277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. ter Steege, D. Sabatier, H. Castellanos, T. Van Andel, J. Duivenvoorden, A.A. De Oliveira, R. Ek, R. Lilwah, P. Maas and S. Mori, An analysis of the floristic composition and diversity of Amazonian forests including those of the Guiana Shield. J. Tropical Ecol. 16 (2000b) 801-828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.W. Thomas, Conservation and monographic research on the flora of Tropical America. Biodivers. Conserv. 8 (1999) 1007-1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Tuomisto, K. Ruokolainen and M. Yli-Halla, Dispersal, environmentand floristic variation of western Amazonian forests. Science 299 (2003) 241-244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • P.H. Williams, G.T. Prance, C.J. Humphries and K.S. Edwards, Promise and problems in applying quantitative complementary areas for representing the diversity of some neotropical plants (families DichapetalaceaeLecythidaceaeCaryocaraceaeChrysobalanaceae and Proteaceae). Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 58 (1996) 125-157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.O. Wilson, A global biodiversity map. Science 289 (2000) 2279-2279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Janovec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tobler, M., Honorio, E., Janovec, J. et al. Implications of collection patterns of botanical specimens on their usefulness for conservation planning: an example of two neotropical plant families (Moraceae and Myristicaceae) in Peru. Biodivers Conserv 16, 659–677 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-3373-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-3373-9

Keywords

Navigation