Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Facilitating Collaboration with Problem Structuring Methods: A Case Study of an Inter-Organisational Construction Partnership

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the potential of inter-organisational collaboration to create ‘collaborative advantage’ among participant organisations, not all collaborations realise this potential due to the complexities and challenges faced by potential collaborators. To address these difficulties and increase the likelihood of collaborative success, different forms of intervention approaches for fostering inter-organisational collaboration has been advocated by collaboration researchers and practitioners. These intervention approaches all facilitate interaction and consensus formation among the participants. However their ‘added value’ is procedural rather than substantive in nature. They do not incorporate tools which can enable participants to structure the complexity of the web of factors that are implicated in their collaboration, and thus make it more manageable. This paper argues that problem structuring methods (PSMs), a family of model-based approaches to group decision and negotiation support, are a form of intervention which can provide a balanced attention to both the process and the content of inter-organisational collaboration, and reports the experience of applying a particular PSM to an inter-organisational collaborative partnership in the UK construction industry. Drawing on the rich data generated from the intervention, the paper discusses the impact of the PSM in supporting the joint appreciation activities carried out by collaborators to address their problematic situation. Implications of the experience for the research and practice of PSMs within collaborative contexts are then presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackermann F, Franco LA, Gallupe B and Parent M (2005). Group support systems for multi-organizational collaboration: reflections on process and content. Group Dec Negot 14: 307–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C and Schon DA (1974). Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Barringer BR and Harrison JS (2000). Walking a tightrope: creating value through interorganizational relationships. J Manage 26(3): 367–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beech N and Huxham C (2003). Cycles of identity formation in collaboration. Int Stud Manage Org 33(3): 28–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett P, Bryant J, Howard N (2001) Drama theory and confrontation analysis. In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J (eds) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Wiley, Chichester pp 225–248

  • Berger PL and Luckmann T (1966). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown L (1983). Managing conflict at organizational interfaces. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant J (2004). Exploring inter-organisational relationships in the health service: an immersive drama approach. Eur J Oper Res 152(3): 655–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson J and Anderson S (2000). Applying large-group interaction methods in the planning and implementation of major change efforts. Public Admin Rev 60(2): 143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S and Kennedy W (1988). Managing public dispute: a practical guide to handling conflict and reaching agreements. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P and Scholes J (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman M (2001). Action research in the UK construction industry: the B-hive project. IFIP WG 8.2 working conference on realigning research and practice in information systems development. Boise, Idaho

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman M, Rosenhead J (2004) Planning in the face of politics: reshaping children’s health services in inner London. In: Sainfort F, Brandeau M, Pierskalla W (eds) Handbook of OR/MS applications in health care. Kluwer, Boston, MA

  • Geus A (1988). Planning as learning. Harvard Bus Rev 66(2): 70–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz Y (1996). The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: initial conditions or learning processes. Strateg Manage J 17: 55–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz Y and Hamel G (1998). Alliance Advantage. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton JE and Duncan RB (1987). The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strateg Manage J 8(3): 279–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden C (1990) Managing the environment as a means to managing complexity. In: Eden C, Radford J (eds) Tackling strategic problems: the role of group decision support. Sage, London, pp 154–161

  • Eden C (1995). On evaluating the performance of “wide-band” GDSS’s. Eur J Oper Res 81(2): 302–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden C, Ackerman F (2001) SODA: the principles. In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J (eds) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Wiley, Chichester, pp 21–41

  • Eden C, Ackermann F (2004) Use of ‘Soft OR’ models by clients: what do they want from them? In: Pidd M (ed) Systems modelling: theory and practice. Wiley, Chichester, pp 146–163

  • Eden C, Jones S, Sims D and Smithin T (1981). The intersubjectivity of issues and issues of intersubjectivity. J Manage Stud 18(1): 37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden C, Jones S and Sims D (1983). Messing about in problems: an informal structured approach to their identification and management. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan J (1998). Re-thinking construction: report of the construction industry task force. DETR, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery M and Purser R (1996). The search conference: a powerful method for planning organizational change and community action. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkener D and De Rond M (2000). Cooperative strategy: economic, business and organizational issues. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco LA (2005) Problem structuring methods for collaboration. Unpublished PhD thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science. University of London, London

  • Franco LA (2006). Forms of conversation and problem structuring methods: a conceptual development. J Oper Res Soc 57(7): 813–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco LA (2007). Assessing the impact of problem structuring methods in multi-organisational settings: an empirical investigation. J Oper Res Soc 58(6): 760–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco LA, Cushman M and Rosenhead J (2004). Project review and learning in the UK construction industry: embedding a problem structuring method within a partnership context. Eur J Oper Res 152(3): 586–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend J (1990) Handling organizational complexity in group decision support. In: Eden C, Radford J (eds) Tackling strategic problems: the role of group decision support. Sage, London, pp 18–28

  • Friend J (2006). Partnership meets politics: managing within the maze. Int J Public Sector Manage 19(3): 261–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friend J, Hickling A (2005) Planning under Pressure: the strategic choice approach, 3rd ed. Elsevier

  • Glaser BG (1993). Basics of grounded theory. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray B (1985). Conditions Facilitating Interorganizational Collaboration. Hum Relations 38(10): 911–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray B (1989). Collaborating: finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray B (1997) Framing and reframing of intractable environmental disputes. In: Lewicki R, Shepard B, Bies R (eds) Research on negotiation in organizations vol. 6, pp 163–188

  • Gray B (2000). Assessing inter-organizational collaboration: multiple conceptions and multiple methods. In: Faulkner, D and De Rond, M (eds) Cooperative strategy: economic, busin ess and organizational issues., pp 243–260. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray B and Clyman D (2003). Difficulties in fostering cooperation in multiparty negotiations: complexity, social dilemmas and frame discrepancies. In: West, MA, Tjosvold, D, and Smith, KG (eds) International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working., pp 401–422. Wiley, Chichester

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati R (1999). Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strateg Manage J 20(5): 397–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati R, Nohria N and Akbar Z (2000). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue. Strateg Manage J 21(3): 203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1984). The theory of communicative action, vol 1. Beacon Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G (1991). Competition for competence and interorganizational learning. Strateg Manage J 12: 83–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy C (1994). Interorganizational domains: the case of refugee systems. J Appl Behav Sci 30(3): 278–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy C and Phillips N (1998). Strategies of engagement: lessons from the critical examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain. Organ Sci 9(2): 217–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy C, Phillips N and Lawrence T (1998). Distinguishing trust and power in interorganizational relations: forms and facades of trust. In: Lane, C and Bachmann, R (eds) Trust within and between organizations: conceptual issues and empirical applications., pp 65–87. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy C, Lawrence T and Grant D (2005). Discourse and collaboration: the role of conversations and collective identity. Acad Manage Rev 30(1): 58–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan K (1988). Joint ventures and competitive strategy. Strateg Manage J 9(2): 141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey P (1996). Consensus-building across difficult divisions: new approaches to collaborative strategy making. Plann Pract Res 11(2): 207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey P (1997). Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickling A (1990) ‘Decision Spaces’: a scenario about designing appropriate rooms for group decision management. In: Eden C, Radford J (eds) Tackling strategic problems: the role of group decision support. Sage, London, pp 169–177

  • Holmqvist M (2003). A dynamic model of intra- and interorganizational learning. Organ Stud 24(1): 95–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horlick-Jones T and Rosenhead J (2002). Investigating risk organizations and decision support through action research. Risk Manage 4(4): 45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horlick-Jones T, Rosenhead J, Georgiou I, Ravetz J and Lofstedt R (2001). Decision support for organizational risk management by problem structuring. Health Risk Soc 3(2): 141–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchby I and Wooffitt R (1998). Conversation Analysis. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham C (1990) On trivialities in process. In: Eden C, Radford J (eds) Tackling strategic problems: the role of group decision support. Sage, London, pp 162–168

  • Huxham C (1991). Facilitating collaboration: issues in multi-organizational group decision support in voluntary, informal collaborative settings. J Oper Res Soc 42(12): 1037–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham C (1996a). Creating collaborative advantage. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham C (1996). Group decision support for collaboration. In: Huxham, C (eds) Creating collaborative advantage, pp 141–151. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham C and Cropper S (1994). From many to one and back: an exploration of the components of facilitation. OMEGA 22(1): 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham C and Vangen S (2000). Ambiguity, complexity and dynamics in the membership of collaboration. Hum Relat 53(6): 771–806

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxham C and Vangen S (2005). Managing to collaborate: the theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen A and Crossan MM (1995). Believing is seeing: joint ventures and organizational learning. J Manage Stud 32(5): 595–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M (1982). The nature of soft systems thinking: the work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland. J Appl Syst Anal 9: 17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M (2000). Systems approaches to management. Kluwer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R and Nti K (1998). Differential learning and interaction in alliance dynamics: a process and outcome discrepancy model. Organ Sci 9(3): 356–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane P and Lubatkin M (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strateg Manage J 19: 461–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham M (1994). Constructing the team: final report of the government/industry review of procurement and contractual arrangements in the UK construction industry. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki R, Gray B and Elliott M (2005). Making sense of intractable environmental problems: concepts and cases. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • McCaffrey D, Faerman S and Hart D (1995). The appeal and difficulties of participative systems. Organ Sci 6(6): 603–627

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann JE (1983). Design guidelines for social problem-solving interventions. J Appl Behav Sci 19(2): 177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milward H (1982). Interorganizational policy systems and research in public organizations. Admin Soc 13(4): 457–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1992). Recent developments in critical management science. J Oper Res Soc 43(1): 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J and Rosenhead J (2004). Problem structuring methods in action. Eur J Oper Res 152(3): 530–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton A, Ackermann F and Belton V (2003). Technology-driven and model-driven approaches to group decision support: focus, research philosophy and key concepts. Eur J Inf Syst 12(2): 110–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhr T (1997). Atlas.ti: short user’s manual. Scientific Software Development, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocasio W (1997). Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strateg Manage J 18: 187–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne SP (2000). Public-private partnerships: theory and practice in international perspective. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne R and Hagedoorn J (1997). The institutionalization and evolutionary dynamics of interorganizational alliances and networks. Acad Manage J 40(2): 261–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen H (1997). Open space technology: a user’s guide. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervan GP (1998). A review of research in group support systems: leaders, approaches and directions. Decis Support Syst 23: 149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pervan GP and Atkinson DJ (1995). GDSS research: and overview and historical analysis. Group Decis Negot 4: 475–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew A (1977). Strategy formulation as a political process. Int Stud Manage Organ 7: 78–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips L (1984). A theory of requisite decision models. Acta Psychologica 56(1–3): 29–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips N, Lawrence TB and Hardy C (2000). Interorganizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. J Manage Stud 37(1): 23–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW, Koput KW and Smith-Doerr L (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin Sci Quart 41(1): 116–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt J, Gordon P and Plamping D (1999). Working whole systems: practice and theory in networks of organisations. King’s Fund, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Psathas G (1995). Conversation analysis: the study of talk in interaction. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • (2001). Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman J (1997). Resolving identity-based conflict: in organisations, nations and communities. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell WJ and Sullivan RL (2005). Practicing organization development: a guide for consultants. Pfeiffer Wiley, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton T (1997). The effects of partner and relationship characteristics on alliance outcomes. Acad Manage J 40(2): 443–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH (1998) Process consultation revisited: building the helping relationship. Addison Wesley

  • Simonin BL (1997). The importance of collaborative know-how: an empirical test of the learning organization. Acad Manage J 40(5): 1150–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A and Corbin J (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan H and Skelcher C (2002). Working across boundaries: collaboration in public services. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have P (1999). Doing conversation analysis: a practical guide. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist E (1983). Referent organizations and the development of interorganizational domains. Hum Relat 36(3): 269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner B (1983). The use of grounded theory for the qualitative analysis of organizational behaviour. J Manage Stud 20(3): 333–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers G (1995). The art of judgement: a study of policy making (centenary edition). Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbord M and Janoff S (2000). Future search: an action guide to find common ground in organizations and communities. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Westcombe M, Franco LA and Shaw D (2006). Where next for PSMs—a grassroots revolution. J Oper Res Soc 57(7): 776–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westley FR and Vredenburg H (1991). Strategic bridging: the collaboration between environmentalists and business in the marketing of green products. J Appl Behav Sci 27(1): 65–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White L (1996). Development options for a rural community in Belize: alternative development and operational research. Int Trans Oper Res 1(4): 453–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White L (2006). Evaluating problem structuring methods: developing an approach to show the value and effectiveness of PSM interventions. J Oper Res Soc 57(7): 842–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott H (1989). OR as a problem situation: from soft systems methodology to critical science. In: Jackson, M, Keys, P and Cropper, S (eds) Operational research and the social sciences, pp 65–78. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood D and Gray B (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. J Appl Behav Sci 27(2): 139

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK

    L. Alberto Franco

Authors
  1. L. Alberto Franco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Alberto Franco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franco, L.A. Facilitating Collaboration with Problem Structuring Methods: A Case Study of an Inter-Organisational Construction Partnership. Group Decis Negot 17, 267–286 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9093-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-007-9093-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation