Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Epicardial versus endocardial permanent pacing in adults with congenital heart disease

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Permanent pacing (PM) in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) presents unique challenges—with little known about the long-term outcomes.

Methods

Pacemaker complications and reinterventions were reviewed over a 38-year period and were grouped by epicardial or endocardial approaches.

Results

The average age at intervention was 37 ± 19 years for 106 patients and 259 PM procedures were performed (2.4 ± 2 per patient). From the first PM procedure, patients were followed for 11.6 ± 14 years. The most common indications for initial PM intervention were heart block (25%) and sinus node dysfunction (20%), yet reintervention was driven primarily by lead failure (49%). Endocardial systems were initially implanted in 73 patients (67%). Epicardial pacing was more common in patients with complex CHD (p = 0.006), cyanosis (p < 0.001), residual shunts (0.01), or Ebstein’s anomaly (p = 0.01). Fifty-one devices (28%) developed lead or generator complications. Epicardial systems were most likely to develop lead failure (p < 0.0001), predominantly in the ventricular lead (p < 0.0001). Endocardial systems were found to be more durable than the epicardial systems (p = 0.023), and Ebstein’s anomaly or an epicardial system was an independent predictor of lead failure.

Conclusions

Permanent pacing in CHD is associated with considerable morbidity and the need for repeat intervention, especially in those with Ebstein’s anomaly. Epicardial pacing systems appear to have a higher incidence of lead failure and are significantly less durable in this group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brickner, M. E., Hillis, L. D., & Lange, R. A. (2000). Congenital heart disease in adults. First of two parts. The New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 256–263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walker, F., Siu, S. C., Woods, S., et al. (2004). Long-term outcomes of cardiac pacing in adults with congenital heart disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 43, 1894–1901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, M. I., Bush, D. M., Vetter, V. L., et al. (2001). Permanent epicardial pacing in pediatric patients: Seventeen years of experience and 1200 outpatient visits. Circulation, 103, 2585–2590.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Batra, A. S., & Balaji, S. (2006). Pacing in adults with congenital heart disease. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 4, 663–670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berul, C. I., & Cecchin, F. (2003). Indications and techniques of pediatric cardiac pacing. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 1, 165–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khairy, P., Landzberg, M. J., Gatzoulis, M. A., et al. (2006). Transvenous pacing leads and systemic thromboemboli in patients with intracardiac shunts: A multicenter study. Circulation, 113, 2391–2397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sachweh, J. S., Vazquez-Jimenez, J. F., Schondube, F. A., et al. (2000). Twenty years experience with pediatric pacing: Epicardial and transvenous stimulation. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 17, 455–461.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Warnes, C. A., Liberthson, R., Danielson, G. K., et al. (2001). Task force 1: The changing profile of congenital heart disease in adult life. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 37, 1170–1175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Paul, T. B. A., & Saul, J. (2003). Invasive electrophysiology and pacing. In: M. A. Gatzoulis, G. D. Webb, & P. E. F. Daubeney (Eds.), Diagnosis and management of adult congenital heart disease (517 p). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; xi.

  10. Allen, M. R., Hayes, D. L., Warnes, C. A., & Danielson, G. K. (1997). Permanent pacing in Ebstein's anomaly. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 20, 1243–1246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Balmer, C., Fasnacht, M., Rahn, M., Molinari, L., & Bauersfeld, U. (2002). Long-term follow up of children with congenital complete atrioventricular block and the impact of pacemaker therapy. Europace, 4, 345–349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wiegand, U. K., Bode, F., Bonnemeier, H., et al. (2003). Long-term complication rates in ventricular, single lead VDD, and dual chamber pacing. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 26, 1961–1969.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eberhardt, F., Bode, F., Bonnemeier, H., et al. (2005). Long term complications in single and dual chamber pacing are influenced by surgical experience and patient morbidity. Heart, 91, 500–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Esperer, H. D., Singer, H., Riede, F. T., et al. (1993). Permanent epicardial and transvenous single- and dual-chamber cardiac pacing in children. Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, 41, 21–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Trohman, R. G., Kim, M. H., & Pinski, S. L. (2004). Cardiac pacing: The state of the art. Lancet, 364, 1701–1719.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fortescue, E. B., Berul, C. I., Cecchin, F., et al. (2004). Patient, procedural, and hardware factors associated with pacemaker lead failures in pediatrics and congenital heart disease. Heart Rhythm, 1, 150–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Noiseux, N., Khairy, P., Fournier, A., & Vobecky, S. J. (2004). Thirty years of experience with epicardial pacing in children. Cardiology in the Young, 14, 512–519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weindling, S. N., Saul, J. P., Gamble, W. J., et al. (1998). Duration of complete atrioventricular block after congenital heart disease surgery. The American Journal of Cardiology, 82, 525–527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gross, G. J., Chiu, C. C., Hamilton, R. M., Kirsh, J. A., & Stephenson, E. A. (2006). Natural history of postoperative heart block in congenital heart disease: Implications for pacing intervention. Heart Rhythm, 3, 601–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Daliento, L., Angelini, A., Ho, S. Y., et al. (1997). Angiographic and morphologic features of the left ventricle in Ebstein's malformation. The American Journal of Cardiology, 80, 1051–1059.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Celermajer, D. S., Dodd, S. M., Greenwald, S. E., Wyse, R. K., & Deanfield, J. E. (1992). Morbid anatomy in neonates with Ebstein's anomaly of the tricuspid valve: Pathophysiologic and clinical implications. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 19, 1049–1053.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Saxena, A., Lee, A. H., & Fong, L. V. (1993). Functional and histological abnormalities of the left ventricle in Ebstein's anomaly of the tricuspid valve. Indian Heart Journal, 45, 135–136.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Glikson, M., von Feldt, L. K., Suman, V. J., & Hayes, D. L. (1994). Clinical surveillance of an active fixation, bipolar, polyurethane insulated pacing lead, Part I: The atrial lead. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 17, 1399–1404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beaufort-Krol, G. C., Mulder, H., Nagelkerke, D., Waterbolk, T. W., & Bink-Boelkens, M. T. (1999). Comparison of longevity, pacing, and sensing characteristics of steroid-eluting epicardial versus conventional endocardial pacing leads in children. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 117, 523–528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Christopher John McLeod, Christine H. Attenhofer Jost, Carole A. Warnes, Linda Hyberger, Heidi M. Connolly, Samuel J. Asirvatham, David L. Hayes & Naser M. Ammash

  2. Division of Cardiovascular Operation, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Joseph A. Dearani

  3. Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    David Hodge II

Authors
  1. Christopher John McLeod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christine H. Attenhofer Jost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carole A. Warnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David Hodge II
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Linda Hyberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Heidi M. Connolly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Samuel J. Asirvatham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Joseph A. Dearani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. David L. Hayes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Naser M. Ammash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naser M. Ammash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McLeod, C.J., Jost, C.H.A., Warnes, C.A. et al. Epicardial versus endocardial permanent pacing in adults with congenital heart disease. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 28, 235–243 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-010-9494-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-010-9494-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation