Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Institutional persistence, income inequality, and individual attitudes

  • Published:
The Journal of Economic Inequality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aspects of institutional quality vary substantially across countries, but are quite persistent over time. Further, institutional quality is correlated with income inequality, even among democracies. To account for these regularities, we offer a model where individual attitudes, toward inequality or trust in government, feature in voters’ preferences. The model displays path dependence, whereby inequality and institutional quality feed each other. It is suggested that this may explain the long shadow of historical legacies of postcolonial experiences. Simple correlations of reported attitudes using data from the World Values Surveys are consistent with the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, D.: Oligarchic versus democratic societies. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 6, 1–44 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J.: Why did the west extend the franchise? Democracy, inequality, and growth in historical perspective. Q. J. Econ. 115(4), 1167–1199 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J.: Persistence of power, elites, and institutions. Am. Econ. Rev. 98, 267–293 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J.: Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Development. In: Aghion, P., Durlauf, S. (eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth, pp. 386–472. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Naidu, S., Restrepo, P., and Robinson, J.A.: Democracy does cause growth. J. Polit. Econ (2019 forthcoming)

  • Alesina, A., Cozzi, G., Mantovan, N.: The Evolution of Ideology, Fairness, and Redistribution. Econ. J. 122(565), 1244–1261 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, S.O., Boeckh K., Hainz C., Woessmann L.: The Empire Is Dead, Long Live the Empire! Long-Run Persistence of Trust and Corruption in the Bureaucracy. Econ. J. (2014)

  • Cervellati, M., Fortunato, P., Sunde, U.: Hobbes to Rousseau: inequality, institutions and development. Econ. J. 118, 1354–1384 (2008a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervellati, M., Fortunato, P., Sunde, U.: Are all democracies equally good? The role of interactions between political environment and inequality for rule of law. Econ. Lett. 99(3), 552–556 (2008b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, A., Gradstein, M.: Inequality and institutions. Rev. Econ. Stat. 89, 454–465 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engerman, S., Sokoloff, K.: Factor endowments, institutions, and differential paths of growth among New World economies: a view from economic historians of the United States. In: Haber, S. (ed.) How Latin America Fell behind. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Epp, D., Borghetto E.: Economic Inequality and Legislative Agendas in Europe. mimeo. (2018)

  • Gershman, B.: The two sides of envy. J. Econ. Growth, Forthcoming. 19, 407–438 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glomm, G., Ravikumar, B.: Public versus private Investment in Human Capital: endogenous growth and income inequality. J. Polit. Econ. 100, 818–834 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein, M.: Inequality, democracy, and the protection of property rights. 2007. Econ. J. 117, 252–269 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein, M.: Institutional traps and economic growth. Int. Econ. Rev. 49, 1043–1066 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosfeld, I., Zhuravskaya, E.: Cultural vs. economic legacies of empires: evidence from the partition of Poland. J. Comp. Econ. 43, 55–75 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, H., Kim, M.: Swords or plowshares? A theory of the security of claims to property. J. Polit. Econ. 103, 1275–1288 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICRG: www.prsgroup.com (2018)

  • Inglehart, R., Haerpfer C., Moreno A., Welzel C., Kizilova K., Diez-Medrano J., Lagos M., Norris P., Ponarin E. & Puranen B. et al. (eds.): World Values Survey: All Rounds-Country-Pooled Datafile http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDoc umentationWVL.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute (2014)

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M: Mastruzzi Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996-2008. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4978 (2009)

  • Kuziemko, I., Norton, M.I., Saez, E., Stantcheva, S.: How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 105, 1478–1508 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H.L.S., Zou, H.: Explaining international and intertemporal variations in income inequality. Econ. J. 108, 26–43 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, A., Nyberg, S., Weibull, J.: Social norms and economic incentives in the welfare state. Q. J. Econ. 114, 1–35 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litina, A.: Great expectations: the persistent effect of institutions on culture. mimeo. (2014)

  • Rajan, R.: Rent preservation and the persistence of underdevelopment. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 1, 178–218 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonin, K.: Why the rich may favor poor protection of property rights. J. Comp. Econ. 31, 715–731 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank: World Development Indicators. www.worldank.org (2018)

  • World Inequality Report: World Inequality Lab. www.wid.world (2018)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Gianmarco León, Joan Martínez, Tareena Musaddiq, Vanessa Rios, two anonymous referees and the editor, Guillermo Cruces for very helpful comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are obviously ours.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Chong.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 41 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chong, A., Gradstein, M. Institutional persistence, income inequality, and individual attitudes. J Econ Inequal 17, 401–413 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-019-09414-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-019-09414-w

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation