Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Comparative Effects of Teacher Versus Peer-Scaffolding on EFL Learners’ Incidental Vocabulary Learning and Reading Comprehension: A Socio-Cultural Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 19 August 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Drawing on sociocultural theory, and multiple empirical studies conducted on the effectiveness of scaffolding on second or foreign language learning, the authors investigated the application of various forms of scaffolding (i.e., teacher versus peer-scaffolding) on EFL learners’ incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension performance through a sociocultural perspective. To this end, 60 EFL learners out of one-hundred were selected through the administration of an Oxford Placement Test from three language institutes and divided into 3 groups (two experimental and one control group) each including 20 intermediate EFL learners. The first experimental group received teacher-scaffolding instruction, the second experimental group received peer-scaffolding instruction and the control group received traditional instruction with no scaffolding. The vocabulary and reading comprehension pre-tests were administered to the three groups. At the end of the experiment, the vocabulary and reading comprehension post-tests were administered. The descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and the inferential statistics (a One-way ANOVA) were run to analyze the collected data. The results showed that both experimental groups had better performance than the control group and there was a significant difference between teacher-scaffolding and peer-scaffolding in both vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension performance and the peer-scaffolding group had a better performance than the teacher-scaffolding group. This research provided some implications about different types of scaffolding for language teachers and syllabus designers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Afzali, K., Tavangar, M., Amouzadeh, M., & Rasekh, A. E. (2011). The strategic needs of Iranian students in reading literary and non-literary texts: A dialogic approach. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 13(3), 153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi Safa, M., & Rozati, F. (2016). The impact of scaffolding and non-scaffolding strategies on EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), 447–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi Safa, M., & Rozati, F. (2017). The impact of scaffolding and non-scaffolding strategies on the EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1118004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A. (1996). The past, present, and future of knowledge research: A reexamination of the role of knowledge in learning and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 89–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amerian, M., & Mehri, E. (2014). Scaffolding in sociocultural theory: Definition, steps, features, conditions, tools, and effective consideration. Scientific Journal of Review, 3(7), 756–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • AmiriSamani, E., & Khazayie, S. (2017). Scaffolding low-intermediate adult EFL learners to write. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(2), 216–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baleghizadeh, S. (2011). The impact of two instructional techniques on EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge: Flash cards versus word-Lists. MEXTESOL Journal, 35(2), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baradaran, A., & Sarfarazi, B. (2011). The impact of scaffolding on the Iranian EFL learners’ English academic writing. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), 2265–2273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, D., Quennerstedt, M., & Annerstedt, C. (2015). Inter-student interactions and student learning in health and physical education: A post-Vygotskian analysis. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 20(4), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2013.868875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. (1997). The philosophy and politics of learner autonomy Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 18–34). Longman.

  • Boyer, K. (2017). The relationship between vocabulary and reading comprehension in third grade students who are English language learners and reading below grade level. Mdsoar.org. Retrieved 4 July 2017, from https://mdsoar.org/handle/11603/3895

  • Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). Heinle & Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K., & Graves, M. (2004). Scaffolding students’ comprehension of text. International Reading Association, 58(6), 570–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira, L. C., Jones, L., & Smith, S. L. (2021). A language-based approach to content instruction (LACI) for multilingual learners: Six cs of scaffolding in first grade. Journal of Language, Identity & Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2021.1885409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, G. G. (2002). The case for direct explanation of strategies. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension Instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 28–41). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, E. S., Worthington, L. A., & Larkin, M. J. (1994). Effective teaching principles and the design of quality tools for educators. Unpublished Paper Commissioned by the Center for Advancing the Quality of Technology, Media, and Material, University of Oregon, pp 3–108.

  • Farhady, H. (2005). Language assessment: A linguametric perspective. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15434311laq0202_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., & Gilmore, A. (2018). Expert-novice interaction as the basis for L2 developmental activity: A SCT perspective. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 5(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.33621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghafar Samar, R., & Dehqan, M. (2013). Sociocultural theory and reading comprehension: The scaffolding of readers in an EFL context. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(3), 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford Dreyer, C. (1998). Improving learners’ reading comprehension by means of strategy instruction. Journal for Language Teaching, 31/(1), 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haghparast, S., & Mall-Amiri, B. (2015). The comparative effect of two scaffolding strategies on intermediate EFL learners’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 8(2), 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamidi, E., & Bagherzadeh, R. (2018). The logical problem of scaffolding in second language acquisition. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0059-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harraqi, M. (2017). Review of Aida Walqui’s scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. American Journal of Arts and Design, 2(3), 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, H. (2002). Scaffolding & cooperative learning. Human learning and instruction (pp. 23–69). City College of City University of New York.

  • Haruehansawasin, S., & Kiattikomol, P. (2018). Scaffolding in problem-based learning for low-achieving learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(3), 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1287045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, T. (2008). Helping students develop thinking skills through the problem-solving approach to teaching. The Ohio State University, Dr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K. E., & Pressley, M. E. (1997). Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Brookline Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izanlu, M., & Feyli, M. (2015). The effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical scaffolding on university students’ grammar acquisition. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching, 3(6), 106–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafari, S. (2019). The effect of scaffolding on the vocabulary improvement of EFL Iranian language learner. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences (IJELS), 4(2), 206–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasakaloglu, N. (2010). Prospective teachers’ usage of reading strategies. European Journal of Social Sciences, 2(16), 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G. (2000). Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development (NFLRC Net Work #19) [ HTMLdocument]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW19/.

  • Khajeh Khosravi, S. (2017). The effect of symmetrical scaffolding on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 2(4), 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khodamoradi, A., Iravani, H., & Jafarigohar, M. (2013a). The effect of teacher’s scaffolding and peers’ collaborative dialogue on the acquisition of English tenses in the zone of proximal development: A sociocultural perspective. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(2s), 336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khodamoradi, A., Iravani, H., & Jafarigohar, M. (2013b). The effect of teacher’s scaffolding and peers’ collaborative dialogue on the acquisition of English tenses in the zone of proximal development: A socio-cultural perspective. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(2), 22–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi, S. K. (2017). The effect of symmetrical scaffolding on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Psychological and Brain Sciences, 2(4), 95. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpbs.20170204.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y. C., Joshi, M., & Robinson, A. (2007). Tutorial dialogue as adaptive collaborative learning support. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 158, 383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33(2), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J., & Marsh, J. (2005). Making literacy real: Theories and practices for learning and teaching. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maibodi, A. H. (2008). Learning English through short stories. Iranian Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 2(1), 41–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri, S., & Mashhadi Heidar, D. (2019). Peer/teacher technology-enhanced scaffolding through process approach and Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge: A probe into self-regulation. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 38(3), 189–223. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2020.34379.2717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri, S., & Mashhadi Heidar, D. (2020). The sociological effects of peer/ teacher technology-enhanced scaffolding through process approach on young male vs female EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge. Sociological Studies of Youth, 11(38), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.22034/ssyj.2020.676245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maybin, J., Mercer, N., & Stierer, B. (1992). Scaffolding’ learning in the classroom. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking vVoices: The work of the national curriculum project (pp. 186–195). Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J. (2000). Scaffolding for success. [Electronic version] beyond technology, questioning, research and the information literate school community. Retrieved October 12, 2002, from http://fno.org/dec99/scaffold.html

  • Namaziandost, E., Rahimi Esfahani, F., & Ahmadi, S. (2019). Varying levels of difficulty in L2 reading materials in the EFL classroom: Impact on comprehension and motivation. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1615740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namaziandost, E., Razmi, M. H., Tilwani, S. A., & Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2021). The impact of authentic materials on reading comprehension, motivation, and anxiety among Iranian male EFL learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1892001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassaji, H., & Cumming, A. (2000). What’s in a ZPD? A case study of a young ESL student and teacher interacting through dialogue journals. Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 95–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1996). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through reading: A hierarchy of text-related exercise types. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52(1), 155–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poorahmadi, M. (2009). The effect of employing scaffolding strategies and classroom tasks in teaching reading comprehension. Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign Language and Literature, 1(3), 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (2002). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riazi, M., & Rezaii, M. (2011). Teacher-and peer-scaffolding behaviors: Effects on EFL students’ writing improvement. In Clesol 2010: Proceedings of the 12th national conference for community languages and ESOL (pp. 55–63).

  • Rose Mahan, K. (2020). The comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The Language Learning Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabani, K., Khatib, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: Instructional implications and teachers’ professional development. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoari, E., & Farrokhi, F. (2014). The effect of graphic organizer strategy on improving Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Iranian Journal of Research in ELT, 1, 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoebottom, P. (2013). The importance of vocabulary. Retrieved from http://esl.fis.edu/parent/advice/vocab.htm .

  • Singhal, D. (2001). Reading proficiency, reading strategies metacognitive awareness and L2 readers. The Reading Matrix, 1(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotiriadou, P., & Hill, B. (2015). Using scaffolding to promote sport management graduates’ critical thinking. Annals of Leisure Research, 18(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2014.925406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talebinejad, M. R., & Akhgar, F. (2015). The impact of teacher scaffolding on Iranian intermediate EFL learner’s listening comprehension achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(5), 110–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turuk, M. C. (2008). The relevance and implications of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory in the second language classroom. Annual Review of Education, Communication, and Language Sciences (ARECLS) 5(1): 244–262.

  • Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wyk, A. L. (2001). The development and implementation of an English language and literature programme for low-proficiency tertiary learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of the Free State).

  • Van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 457–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verenikina, I. (2003). Understanding scaffolding and the ZPD in educational research. Retrived from file:///D:/!A% 20Mami/AMy%20jobs/My%20job%2010/Jammaqale/Understanding_Scaffolding_and_the_ZPD_in_Education.pdf

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yongqi, G. P. (2003). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Person, task, context and strategies. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education, 17(22), 187–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehsan Namaziandost.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the Ethical Board of Iranian English language Institutions.

Consent to Participate

All participants provided written informed consent and they were fully understood the study purpose.

Informed Consent:

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in.the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original article has been revised due to 1st affiliation change.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jamali Kivi, P., Namaziandost, E., Fakhri Alamdari, E. et al. The Comparative Effects of Teacher Versus Peer-Scaffolding on EFL Learners’ Incidental Vocabulary Learning and Reading Comprehension: A Socio-Cultural Perspective. J Psycholinguist Res 50, 1031–1047 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09800-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-021-09800-4

Keywords

Navigation