Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Affordances of Augmented Reality in Science Learning: Suggestions for Future Research

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Augmented reality (AR) is currently considered as having potential for pedagogical applications. However, in science education, research regarding AR-aided learning is in its infancy. To understand how AR could help science learning, this review paper firstly has identified two major approaches of utilizing AR technology in science education, which are named as image-based AR and location-based AR. These approaches may result in different affordances for science learning. It is then found that students’ spatial ability, practical skills, and conceptual understanding are often afforded by image-based AR and location-based AR usually supports inquiry-based scientific activities. After examining what has been done in science learning with AR supports, several suggestions for future research are proposed. For example, more research is required to explore learning experience (e.g., motivation or cognitive load) and learner characteristics (e.g., spatial ability or perceived presence) involved in AR. Mixed methods of investigating learning process (e.g., a content analysis and a sequential analysis) and in-depth examination of user experience beyond usability (e.g., affective variables of esthetic pleasure or emotional fulfillment) should be considered. Combining image-based and location-based AR technology may bring new possibility for supporting science learning. Theories including mental models, spatial cognition, situated cognition, and social constructivist learning are suggested for the profitable uses of future AR research in science education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajanki A, Billinghurst M, Gamper H, Järvenpää T, Kandemir M, Kaski S et al (2011) An augmented reality interface to contextual information. Virtual Real 15(2–3):161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andújar JM, Mejias A, Marquez MA (2011) Augmented reality for the improvement of remote laboratories: an augmented remote laboratory. IEEE Trans Educ 54(3):492–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azuma R (1997) A survey of augmented reality. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 6:355–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajura M, Fuchs H, Ohbuchi R (1992). Merging virtual objects with the real world: Seeing ultrasound imagery within the patient. Commun ACM 36(7):52–62. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH ‘92, ACM Press, New York, pp 203–210

  • Broll W, Lindt I, Herbst I, Ohlenburg J, Braun AK, Wetzel R (2008) Toward next-gen mobile AR games. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 28(4):40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Edu Res 18(1):32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudell TP, Mizell DW (1992) Augmented reality: an application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. In: Proceedings of Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 659–669

  • Dunleavy M, Dede C, Mitchell R (2009) Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. J Sci Educ Technol 18(1):7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eursch A (2007) Increased safety for manual tasks in the field of nuclear science using the technology of augmented reality. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 3:2053–2059

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiner S, MacIntyre B, Seligmann D (1993) Knowledge-based augmented reality. Commun ACM 36(7):52–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha T, Lee Y, Woo W (2011) Digilog book for temple bell tolling experience based on interactive augmented reality. Virtual Real 15(4):295–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou HT (2010) Exploring the behavioural patterns in project-based learning with online discussion: quantitative content analysis and progressive sequential analysis. Turk Online J Edu Technol 9(3):52–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L, Smith R, Willis H, Levine A, Haywood K (2011) The 2011 horizon report. The New Media Consortium, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird PN (1980) Mental models in cognitive science. Cogn Sci 4:71–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerawalla L, Luckin R, Seljeflot S, Woolard A (2006) “Making it real”: exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Real 10(3–4):136–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer E (2008) Augmented learning: research and design of mobile educational games. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Koong Lin HC, Hsieh MC, Wang CH, Sie ZY, Chang SH (2011) Establishment and usability evaluation of an interactive AR learning system on conservation of fish. Turk Online J Edu Technol 10(4):181–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn MC (2003) Technology and science education: starting points, research programs, and trends. Int J Sci Educ 25(6):727–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin S, Diaz G, Sancristobal E, Gil R, Castro M, Peire J (2011) New technology trends in education: seven years of forecasts and convergence. Comput Educ 57(3):1893–1906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Gutiérrez J, Luís Saorín J, Contero M, Alcañiz M, Pérez-López DC, Ortega M (2010) Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Comput Graph 34(1):77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall R, Wetzel R, Löschner J, Braun A-K (2011) Using presence to evaluate an augmented reality location aware game. Pers Ubiquit Comput 15(1):25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram P, Kishino F (1994) A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans Inf Syst E77(12):1321–1329

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello DR (2001) Spatial cognition. In: Smelser NJ, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 14771–14775

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murray CD, Fox J, Pettifer S (2007) Absorption, dissociation, locus of control and presence in virtual reality. Comput Hum Behav 23(3):1347–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman DA (2004) Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez M, Quiros R, Núñez I, Carda JB, Camahort E (2008) Collaborative augmented reality for inorganic chemistry education. In: Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS/IASME international conference on engineering education, July 22–24, 2008. Heraklion, pp 271–277

  • O’Shea P, Mitchell R, Johnston C, Dede C (2009) Lessons learned about designing augmented realities. Int J Gaming Comput Mediat Simul 1(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea P, Dede C, Cherian M (2011) The results of formatively evaluating an augmented reality curriculum based on modified design principles. Int J Gaming Comput Mediat Simul 3(2):57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papagiannakis G, Singh G, Magnenat-Thalmann N (2008) A survey of mobile and wireless technologies for augmented reality systems. Comput Animat Virtual Worlds 19(1):3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pence HE (2011) Smartphones, smart objects, and augmented reality. Ref Libr 52(1):136–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich PR, Marx RW, Boyle RA (1993) Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Rev Educ Res 63(2):167–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H (2002) Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum E, Klopfer E, Perry J (2007) On location learning: authentic applied science with networked augmented realities. J Sci Educ Technol 16(1):31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutten N, van Joolingen WR, van der Veen JT (2011) The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Comput Educ 58(1):136–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salzman MC, Dede C, Bowen Loftin R, Chen J (1995) The design and evaluation of virtual reality-based learning environments. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ (special issue on education)

  • Schuemie MJ, van der Straaten P, Krijn M, van der Mast CAPG (2001) Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey. CyberPsychol Behav 4(2):183–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton B, Stevens R (2004) Using coordination classes to interpret conceptual change in astronomical thinking. In: Kafai Y, Sandoval W, Enyedy N, Nixon A, Herrera F (eds) Proceedings of the 6th international conference for the learning sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Mahweh, NJ

  • Squire KD, Jan M (2007) Mad city mystery: developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. J Sci Educ Technol 16(1):5–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squire K, Klopfer E (2007) Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. J Learn Sci 16(3):371–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland IE (1968) A head-mounted three dimensional display. Proc AFIPS Conf 33:756–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylaiou S, Mania K, Karoulis A, White M (2010) Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. Int J Hum Comput Stud 68(5):243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai MJ, Hou HT, Lai ML, Liu WY, Yang FY (2012) Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: an eye-tracking analysis. Comput Educ 58(1):375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky LS (1978) Chapter 6: Interaction between learning and development. In: Cole M (ed) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding of this research work is supported by the National Science Council, Taiwan, under grant numbers NSC 98-2511-S-011-005-MY3 and 99-2511-S-011-005-MY3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kun-Hung Cheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, KH., Tsai, CC. Affordances of Augmented Reality in Science Learning: Suggestions for Future Research. J Sci Educ Technol 22, 449–462 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9

Keywords

Navigation