Abstract
Radical science provides new insights and elaborates new concepts that depart significantly from past paradigms. Radical innovation creates entirely new markets or product classes, or leads to major product replacements within existing markets. After providing a brief summary of the scholarly debate concerning the identification and measure of radical science and innovation, we review three new contributions to the topic and suggest areas of future research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of innovation in technology. Technology Review, 80(7), 41–47.
Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1990). Innovation and small firms (p. 1990). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543.
Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64, 1–17.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. M. (2003). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996). Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 232–243.
Colombo, M. G., & Piva, E. (2008). Strengths and weaknesses of academic start-ups: A conceptual model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55, 1–13.
Dahlin, K. B., & Behrens, D. M. (2005). When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Research Policy, 34(5), 717–737.
Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422–1433.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162.
Freeman, C. (1992). The economics of hope: Essays on technical change and economic growth. London: Pinter.
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2002). The NBER patent-citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. In A. B. Jaffe & M. Trajtenberg (Eds.), Patent citations & innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Henderson, R. M. (1993). Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic industry. RAND Journal of Economics, 24(2), 248–270.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9–30.
Henderson, R. M., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1997). University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5(1), 19–50.
Klepper, S. (1997). Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 145–181.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mindruta, D. (2013). Value creation in university—Firm research collaborations: A matching approach. Strategic Management Journal, 34(6), 644–665.
Murray, F. (2004). The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life. Research Policy, 33, 643–659.
Mustar, P. (1997). How French academics create high tech companies: Conditions of success and failure of this form of relation between science and market. Science and Public Policy, 24(1), 37–43.
Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. The Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), 297–306.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Evolutionary theorizing in economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2), 23–46.
Nordhaus, W. D. (1969). Invention, growth, and welfare. A theoretical treatment of technological change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schneider, C., & Veugelers, R. (2010). On young highly innovative companies: Why they matter and how (not) to policy support them. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 969–1007.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tushman, M., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organization environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.
Utterback, J. M. (1994). Mastering the dynamics of innovation: How companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colombo, M.G., Franzoni, C. & Veugelers, R. Going radical: producing and transferring disruptive innovation. J Technol Transf 40, 663–669 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9361-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9361-z