Abstract
Digital media, especially mobile communication technologies, enable adolescents to explore and experiment with each other with only limited adult control. Conflicts between peers can be easily staged since nearly everybody can be reached at any time under the radar of authorities. Therefore, involvement in conflicts and bullying might depend on how adolescents use and behave online. In the present study, we provide a comprehensive picture of the role aspects of online communication play in long-term involvement in cyberbullying. We focused on a gender-specific perspective, as girls and boys were found to differ not only according to their online communication but also in their cyberbullying involvement. Using a two-wave panel survey of 1817 adolescents between 13 and 17 years (56 % female), we found that girls’ cyberbullying involvement (perpetration and victimization) could be traced back to more intensive online social activities and a higher amount of online contact with strangers. In contrast, for boys, only higher exposure to antisocial media content predicted higher levels of victimization over time. The findings indicate that certain patterns of online communication increase the cyberbullying risk over time. However, it needs to be noted that these risk factors vary between girls and boys.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the German school system, pupils are usually separated after 4th grade and, according to their school achievements, distributed to different types of schools with a three-part ranking of educational levels (lower-track, intermediate, and higher-track education schools).
We excluded two types of cyberbullying that Vandebosch and van Cleemput (2009) suggested due to conceptual difficulties.
Of the original eight items (see den Hamer and Konjin 2015), we excluded the four items referring to sexual risk behavior and substance use since the focus of our study was on online exposure to antisocial activities. Additionally, the item “…people who shoot at another person” had to be excluded since invariance testing revealed that girls’ and boys’ response probabilities were different for this specific question.
References
Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling (pp. 243–277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03.
Barlett, C. P. (2015). Anonymously hurting others online: The effect of anonymity on cyberbullying frequency. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(2), 70–79. doi:10.1037/a0034335.
Barlett, C. P., & Coyne, S. M. (2014). Meta-analysis of sex differences in cyber-bullying behavior: The moderating role of age. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 474–488. doi:10.1002/ab.21555.
Bryce, J., & Fraser, J. (2014). The role of disclosure of personal information in the evaluation of risk and trust in young peoples’ online interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 299–306. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.012.
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834.
Chen, L., Ho, S. S., & Lwin, M. O. (2016). A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: From the social cognitive and media effects approach. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444816634037.
den Hamer, A., & Konjin, E. A. (2015). Adolescents’ media exposure may increase their cyberbullying behavior: A longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56, 203–208. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.016.
den Hamer, A., Konjin, E. A., & Keijer, M. G. (2013). Cyberbullying behavior and adolescents’ use of media with antisocial content: A cyclic process model. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(2), 74–81. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0307.
Dittrick, C. J., Beran, T. N., Mishna, F., Hetherington, R., & Shariff, S. (2013). Do children who bully their peers also play violent video games? A Canadian national study. Journal of School Violence, 12(4), 297–318. doi:10.1080/15388220.2013.803244.
Dooley, J. J., Shaw, T., & Cross, D. (2012). The association between the mental health and behavioural problems of students and their reactions to cyber-victimization. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 275–289. doi:10.1080/17405629.2011.648425.
Dowell, E. B., Burgess, A. W., & Cavanaugh, D. J. (2009). Clustering of internet risk behaviors in a middle school student population. Journal of School Health, 79(11), 547–553. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00447.x.
Fanti, K. A., Demetriou, A. G., & Hawa, V. V. (2012). A longitudinal study of cyberbullying: Examining risk and protective factors. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 168–181. doi:10.1080/17405629.2011.643169.
Festl, R., & Quandt, T. (2013). Social relations and cyberbullying: The influence of individual and structural attributes on victimization and perpetration via the Internet. Human Communication Research, 39(1), 101–126. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01442.x.
Festl, R., Scharkow, M., & Quandt, T. (2013). Peer influence, internet use and cyberbullying: A comparison of different context effects among German adolescents. Journal of Children and Media, 7(4), 446–462. doi:10.1080/17482798.2013.781514.
Festl, R., Scharkow, M., & Quandt, T. (2015). The individual or the group: A multilevel analysis of cyberbullying in school classes. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 535–556. doi:10.1111/hcre.12056.
Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling. A second course (pp. 269–314). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
Gauntlett, D. (2008). Media, gender and identity. An introduction. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Heirman, W., & Walrave, M. (2008). Assessing concerns and issues about the mediation of technology in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2(2), article 1. Retrieved from http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2008111401&article=1.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
Hunt, C., Peters, L., & Rapee, R. M. (2012). Development of a measure of the experience of being bullied in youth. Psychological Assessment, 24, 156–165. doi:10.1037/a0025178.
Hurrelmann, K., & Richter, M. (2006). Risk behaviour in adolescence: the relationship between developmental and health problems. Journal of Public Health, 14(1), 20–28. doi:10.1007/s10389-005-0005-5.
Jessor, R. (1987). Problem-behavior theory, psychosocial development, and adolescent problem drinking. British Journal of Addiction, 82(4), 435–446.
Jessor, R. (1991). Risk behavior in adolescence: A psychosocial framework for understanding and action. Journal of Adolescent Health, 12, 597–605. doi:10.1016/1054-139X(91)90007-K.
Kopecký, K. (2011). Sexting among Czech preadolescents and adolescents. New Educational Review, 28(2), 39–48.
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: From the social cognitive and media effects approach. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137. doi:10.1037/a0035618.
Krasnova, H., Spiekermann, S., Koroleva, K., & Hildebrand, T. (2010). Online social networks: why we disclose. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 109–125. doi:10.1057/jit.2010.6.
Kwan, G. C. E., & Skoric, M. M. (2013). Facebook bullying: An extension of battles in school. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 16–25. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.014.
Lee, E., & Kim, M. (2004). Exposure to media violence and bullying at school: Mediating influences of anger and contact with delinquent friends. Psychological Reports, 95, 659–672. doi:10.2446/pr0.95.2.659-672.
Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Perrin, A., Stelper, R., Rainie, L., & Parker, K. (2015). Teens, social media & technology overview 2015: Smartphones facilitates shifts in communication landscape for teens. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/04/PI_TeensandTech_Update2015_0409151.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2015.
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Olafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Full Findings. London: EU Kids Online.
Livingstone, S., Hasebrink, U., & Görzig, A. (2012). Towards a general model of determinants of risk and safety. In S. Livingstone, L. Haddon, & A. Görzig (Eds.), Children, risk and safety on the Internet: Research and policy challenges in comparative perspective (pp. 323–338). Bristol: Policy Press.
Livingstone, S., Kirwil, L., Ponte, C., & Staksrud, E. (2014). In their own words: What bothers children online? European Journal of Communication, 29(3), 271–288. doi:10.1177/0267323114521045.
Mendle, J., Turkheimer, E., & Emery, R. E. (2007). Detrimental psychological outcomes associated with early pubertal timing in adolescent girls. Developmental Review, 27, 151–171. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.11.001.
Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Calussi, P. (2011). The measurement of cyberbullying: Dimensional structure and relative item severity and discrimination. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(5), 267–274. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0002.
Milosevic, T. (2015). Cyberbullying in US mainstream media. Journal of Children and Media, 9(4), 492–509. doi:10.1080/17482798.2015.1089300.
Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 602–611. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007.
Notten, N., & Nikken, P. (2014). Boys and girls taking risks online: A gendered perspective on social context and adolescents’ risky online behavior. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444814552379.
O’Brien, L., Albert, D., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Adolescents prefer more immediate rewards when in the presence of their peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 747–753.
Rosseel, Y. (2011). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
Sasson, H., & Mesch, G. (2014). Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behavior among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 32–38. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.025.
Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Göbel, K., Scheithauer, H., Brighi, A., Guarini, A., Tsorbatzoudis, H., et al. (2015). A comparison of classification approaches for cyberbullying and traditional bullying using data from six European countries. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 47–65. doi:10.1080/15388220.2014.961067.
Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisen, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26–32. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024.
Smith, S. L., Lachlan, K., & Tamborini, R. (2003). Popular video games: Quantifying the presentation of violence and its context. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(7), 58–76.
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., & Russell, S. (2008). Cyberbullying-its nature and impact in secondary school students. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x.
Sticca, F., Ruggieri, S., Alsaker, F., & Perren, S. (2013). Longitudinal risk factors for cyberbullying in adolescence. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 52–67. doi:10.1002/casp.2136.
Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. M. (2008). Communicating online: Adolescent relationships and the media. The Future of Children, 18, 119–146.
Thornberry, T. P., Bjerregaard, B., & Miles, W. (1993). The consequences of respondent attrition in panel studies: A simulation based on the Rochester Youth Development Study. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9(2), 127–158. doi:10.1007/BF01071165.
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277–287. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). The effects of instant messaging on the quality of adolescents’ existing friendships: A longitudinal study. Journal of Communication, 59, 121–127. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01405.x.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(1), 79–97. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.020.
Vandebosch, H., & van Cleemput, K. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media Society, 11(8), 1349–1371. doi:10.1177/1461444809341263.
Vanden Abeele, M. M. P. (2015). Mobile youth culture: A conceptual development. Mobile Media & Communication. doi:10.1177/2050157915601455.
Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2011). Cyberbullying: Predicting victimization and perpetration. Children and Society, 25(1), 59–72. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00260.x.
Wegge, D., Vandenbosch, H., Eggermont, S., & Pabian, S. (2014). Popularity through online harm: The longitudinal associations between cyberbullying and sociometric status in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence. doi:10.1177/0272431614556351.
Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2011). Sexting: A typology. Crimes Against Children Research Center. http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV231_Sexting%20Typology%20Bulletin_4-6-11_revised.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2015.
Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., & Mitchell, K. (2008). Is talking online to unknown people always risky? Distinguishing online interaction styles in a national sample of youth Internet users. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(3), 340–343. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0044.
Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2008). How risky are social networking sites? A comparison of places online where youth sexual solicitation and harassment occurs. Pediatrics, 121(2), 350–357. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-0693.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the participating students and schools.
Funding
The research leading to these results has received funding from the German Research Foundation (DFG) under Grant agreement no. QU 260/9-1.
Author’s Contributions
RF participated in the study design, conducted the field phase of the study, performed the measurement and the statistical analyses, and guided the interpretation of the data, as well as the coordination and drafting of the manuscript; TQ authored the funding application, participated in the design of the study and the interpretation of the data, and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
Before recruiting the schools, we checked that the study design and the questionnaire complied with valid ethical guidelines for school surveys and received approval from the federal Ministry of Education.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from parents as well as students. Students were informed about the aims of the questionnaire and that they could withdraw from participation at any time without negative consequences.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Festl, R., Quandt, T. The Role of Online Communication in Long-Term Cyberbullying Involvement Among Girls and Boys. J Youth Adolescence 45, 1931–1945 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0552-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0552-9