Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changing societies and four tasks of schooling: Challenges for strongly differentiated educational systems

  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changing labour markets, increased calls for selection and excellence, and increased diversity and individualisation have repercussions on how educational systems can prepare youth for work, optimise knowledge production, achieve equality of opportunity, and socialise students into active civic engagement. This paper discusses four central tasks of schooling and examines to what extent societal developments challenge education policy to deliver on the tasks at hand. Particular attention is given to the challenges Europe’s strongly diversified educational systems are currently facing. Both the Netherlands and Germany, for example, have been offering vocationally-oriented pathways alongside traditional academic higher education for some time. But today’s ongoing changes in job descriptions, mainly due to ever-accelerating technological developments, are causing a risk of skills obsolescence which can only be avoided by continuous upskilling and/or reskilling of a sufficiently flexible workforce. Overcoming differences of intelligence as well as differences of diverse socioeconomic, ethnic and linguistic backgrounds by way of education is another challenge, as is fostering “soft” skills and political awareness. This paper investigates the effectiveness of current education systems in preparing citizens for a functioning modern society.

Résumé

Quatre tâches fondamentales pour l’instruction dans des sociétés en mutation : défis aux systèmes éducatifs fortement différenciés – La transformation des marchés du travail, les appels croissants à la sélection et à l’excellence, la diversité et l’individualisation accrues ont des répercussions sur la manière dont les systèmes éducatifs peuvent préparer les jeunes au monde du travail, optimiser la production des connaissances, réaliser l’égalité des chances et socialiser les élèves à un engagement civique actif. L’auteur présente quatre tâches fondamentales pour l’instruction et examine dans quelle mesure l’évolution des sociétés empêche les politiques éducatives d’être à la hauteur de ces tâches. Il porte une attention particulière aux défis que rencontrent actuellement les systèmes éducatifs fortement différenciés en Europe. Les Pays-Bas et l’Allemagne par exemple proposent tous deux depuis un certain temps des filières à vocation professionnelle, parallèlement à l’enseignement universitaire traditionnel. Mais l’évolution actuelle des définitions de postes, due en grande partie à l’accélération constante des innovations technologiques, comporte le risque de l’obsolescence des compétences, qui ne peut être évitée que par l’actualisation permanente des compétences et/ou la requalification d’une main-d’œuvre suffisamment flexible. Surmonter les différences intellectuelles ainsi que celles entre les divers contextes socioéconomiques, ethniques et linguistiques par le biais de l’éducation constitue un autre défi, de même que la stimulation des qualités humaines et de la conscience politique. Cet article explore l’efficacité des systèmes éducatifs actuels à préparer les citoyens à une société moderne et opérationnelle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In statistical terminology, dispersion refers to the spread of values around the mean. Larger dispersions (i.e. larger variances) imply more inequality in terms of distribution of outcomes.

  2. In social science terminology, labour market signalling theory implies that employers are uncertain about the expected productivity of workers, and use signals, such as educational qualifications, to obtain more information.

  3. MBO stands for middelbaar beroepsonderwijs; intermediate-level vocational training.

  4. Generic skills, e.g. being able to read and write, to solve (mathematical and other) problems etc., facilitate (generate) further learning.

  5. The sociological concept of meritocracy refers to a reward principle whereby merits (e.g. educational certificates, ability, effort) lead to a better position within society and the effort of attaining these merits is rewarded for example in terms of a better salary than people without these merits receive.

  6. In sociological terminology, a positional good is a scarce good of which not the absolute amount, but the relative amount within a population is important.

  7. Émile Durkheim (1858–1917) is generally regarded as one of the founding fathers of sociology.

  8. The 16 countries plotted in Figure 2 are BEL = Belgium, CHE = Switzerland, CZE = Czech Republic, DNK = Denmark, FRA = France, DEU = Germany, HUN = Hungary, ISR = Israel, NLD = Netherlands, NOR = Norway, POL = Poland, PRT = Portugal, RUS = Russian Federation, SVK = Slovakia, SVN = Slovenia, ESP = Spain.

References

  • Allen, J., & De Grip, A. (2012). Does skill obsolescence increase the risk of employment loss? Applied Economics, 44(25), 3237–3245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H.-P. (1992). Is the German dual system a model for a modern vocational training system? A cross-national comparison of how different systems of vocational training deal with the changing occupational structure. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 33(3), 168–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bol, T., & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2013). Educational systems and the trade-off between labor market allocation and equality of educational opportunity. Comparative Education Review, 57(2), 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bol, T., Witschge, J., Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Dronkers, J. (2014). Curricular tracking and central examinations: Counterbalancing the impact of social background on student achievement in 36 countries. Social Forces. doi:10.1093/sf/sou003.

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Schooling in capitalist America revisited. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., Gintis, H., & Osborne, M. (2001). The determinants of earnings: A behavioral approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(4), 1137–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89, 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R. (1999). Beliefs, rational choice and Bayesian learning. Rationality & Society, 11(4), 463–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R. (2004). Social mobility in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R. (2005). Explaining cross-national variation in youth unemployment: Market and institutional factors. European Sociological Review, 21(2), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). Explaining educational differentials: Towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality & Society, 9(3), 275–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2001). Class, mobility and merit: The experience of two British birth cohorts. European Sociological Review, 17(2), 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (2007). Explaining change in social fluidity: Educational equalization and educational expansion in twentieth-century Sweden. American Journal of Sociology, 112(6), 1775–1810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunello, G., & Checchi, D. (2007). Does school tracking affect equality of opportunity? New international evidence. Economic Policy, 22(52), 781–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb-Clark, D. A., Sinning, M., & Stillman, S. (2012). Migrant youths’ educational achievement: The role of institutions. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 643(1), 18–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Witte, H., & Scheepers, P. (1999). Ideology in the low countries: Trends, models and lacunae. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duru-Bellat, M., & Suchaut, B. (2005). Organisation and context, efficiency and equity of educational systems: What PISA tells us. European Educational Research Journal, 4(3), 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duyvendak, J. W., & Hurenkamp, M. (2004). Kiezen voor de kudde. Lichte gemeenschappen en de nieuwe meerderheid [Choosing for the masses. Light communities and the new majority]. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.

  • ESS (European Social Survey). (2012a). ESS-1 2002 documentation report (6.3 ed.). Bergen: ESS Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services.

  • ESS (European Social Survey). (2012b). ESS-2 2004 documentation report (3.4 ed.). Bergen: ESS Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services.

  • ESS (European Social Survey) (2012c). ESS-3 2006 documentation report (Edition 3.4). Bergen: ESS Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services.

  • ESS (European Social Survey). (2012d). ESS-4 2008 documentation report (5.1 ed.). Bergen: ESS Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services.

  • Fend, H. (1974). Gesellschaftliche Bedingungen schulischer Sozialisation [Social conditions of educational socialisation]. Weinheim: Beltz.

  • Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Luijkx, R. (2004). More recent trends in intergenerational occupational class reproduction in the Netherlands 1970–2004: Evidence from an Expanded Database. Netherlands’ Journal of Social Sciences, 40(2), 114–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesthuizen, M., Solga, H., & Künster, R. (2011). Context matters: Economic marginalization of low-educated workers in cross-national perspective. European Sociological Review, 27(2), 264–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. (1996a). Class analysis and the reorientation of class theory: The case of persisting differentials in educational attainment. British Journal of Sociology, 47(3), 481–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. (1996b). Problems of “meritocracy”. In R. Erikson & J. O. Jonsson (Eds.), Can education be equalized? The Swedish case in comparative perspective (pp. 255–287). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J. H. (2002). Globalisation and social class. West European Politics, 25(3), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., Woessmann, L., & Zhang, L. (2011). General education, vocational education, and labor-market outcomes over the life-cycle. Working Paper No. 17504. National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19(4), 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillmert, S., & Jacob, M. (2003). Social inequality in higher education. Is vocational training a pathway leading to or away from university? European Sociological Review, 19(3), 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (2007). How far merit selection? Social stratification and the labour market. British Journal of Sociology, 58(3), 367–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (Ed.). (2013). Determined to succeed? Performance versus choice in educational attainment. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Mills, C. (2005). Education, employers and class mobility. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 23, 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M., & Kraaykamp, G. (2003). Dropout and downward mobility in the educational career: An event-history analysis of ethnic schooling differences in the Netherlands. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9(3), 265–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, L. (2008). Jobs with equality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo, S. (2009). Diversity and distrust: Civic education in a multicultural democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S. L. (2005). On the edge of commitment: Educational attainment and race in the United States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, W., & Gangl, M. (2003). Transitions from education to work in Europe—the integration of youth into EU Labour markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, R. G., & Junn, J. (1998). Civic education. What makes students learn. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2006). Education at a glance 2006: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2007). Education at a glance 2007: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesch, D. (2006). Coming to grips with a changing class structure: An analysis of employment stratification in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. International Sociology, 21(2), 263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osler, A., & Starkey, H. (2003). Learning for cosmopolitan citizenship: Theoretical debates and young people’s experiences. Educational Review, 55(3), 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peschar, J. L., & Wesselingh, A. A. (1999). Onderwijssociologie: een inleiding (2nd revised ed.). Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solga, H. (2002). “Stigmatization by negative selection”: Explaining less-educated people’s decreasing employment opportunities. European Sociological Review, 18(2), 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift, A. (2001). Political philosophy: A beginners’ guide for students and politicians. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Dam, G. T. M., & Volman, M. L. L. (2003). A life jacket or an art of living: Inequality in social competence education. Curriculum Inquiry, 33(2), 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2011). Skill and education effects on earnings in 18 countries: The role of national educational institutions. Social Science Research, 40(4), 1078–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Hofstede, S. (2007). Cultural capital or relative risk aversion? Two mechanisms for educational inequality compared. British Journal of Sociology, 58, 391–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Mijs, J. (2007). Onderwijsdifferentiatie en ongelijkheid: Nederland in vergelijkend perspectief [Educational differentiation and Inequality: The Netherlands in comparative perspective]. Report for the Dutch Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.

  • Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Mijs, J. J. B. (2010). Achievement inequality and the institutional structure of educational systems: A comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Van Tubergen, F. (2007). Ethnicity, schooling, and merit in the Netherlands. Ethnicities, 7(3), 416–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Velden, R. K. W. (2006). Generiek of specifiek opleiden? [General or specific education?]. Inaugural Lecture. Maastricht: Maastricht University.

  • Van Kemenade, J. A. (Ed.). (1981). Onderwijs: bestel en beleid [Education: System and policy]. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.

  • Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolbers, M. H. J. (2007). Patterns of labour market entry. A comparative perspective on school-to-work transitions in 11 European countries. Acta Sociologica, 50(3), 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, A. (2002). Does education matter? Myths about education and economic growth. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, E. N. (2006). Does education really help? Skill, work and inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study has been supported by a research programme “Educational Systems and Four Central Functions of Education”, subsidised by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, grant number 411-10-920.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herman G. van de Werfhorst.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van de Werfhorst, H.G. Changing societies and four tasks of schooling: Challenges for strongly differentiated educational systems. Int Rev Educ 60, 123–144 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-014-9410-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-014-9410-8

Keywords

Navigation