Abstract
We use data on Spanish dual-earner couples to analyze the relationship between time allocation patterns and women’s life satisfaction. In line with evidence from other countries, we find that part-time jobs yield (on average) higher levels of life satisfaction than do full-time jobs. This paper shows that life satisfaction is affected by the combination of paid work time and unpaid responsibilities. In particular, being responsible for most of the housework reduces life satisfaction for full-time female workers. An analysis by subgroups reveals that having a part-time job and doing most of the housework is associated with greater life satisfaction but only among women with caring responsibilities, without a university education, or with self-reported conservative values. Finally, we explore the role of mismatches between actual and preferred time allocation. Women with part-time jobs are more (resp. less) likely to report mismatches in working (resp. housework) time than are women with full-time jobs. The type of time mismatch that most penalizes working women’s subjective well-being is actually doing less housework than desired. This evidence could help explain the observed “life satisfaction penalty” on full-time female workers. Overall, our findings underscore the continued dominance of traditional gender norms in Spanish households.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Time use patterns may affect several measures of subjective well-being—for instance, job satisfaction, leisure satisfaction, and marital happiness. Here we are interested in satisfaction with life as a whole. This measure has been shown to be an aggregate of satisfaction with different domains of life (Van Praag et al. 2003; Rojas 2006).
Employees without small children are entitled to submit a request to reduce their number of working hours, but employers may cite business needs in refusing such requests.
The strata were obtained by crossing the Autonomous Community and the population size of the household's county of residence. Within each stratum, the first-stage units are census sections, the second-stage units are private households, and the third-stage units are the individually selected working adults, one from each household.
We restrict the sample to these periods because the questionnaire was modified in 2005; the changes affected some of the variables being analyzed, such as housework allocation pattern.
The threshold of working hours that distinguishes full-time from part-time workers varies among countries, but it is usually either 30 or 35 h per week. According to the Spanish Statistical Office, part-time jobs cannot exceed 35 h per week and full-time jobs cannot require fewer than 30 h per week.
Estimated coefficients for these other explanatory variables are available from the authors upon request.
Since reported housework patterns reflect the perceptions of respondents, we cannot rule out the possibility that this result is due to unobservable factors that both reduce women's life satisfaction and increase their perception that they bear the bulk of housework. Additional data on couples' time use are needed before a robust relationship between these variables can be established.
Using the 2002 family module of the International Social Survey, Luengo-Prado and Sevilla (2013) show that about 33 % of men and 39 % of women disagree with the following statement: "A man's job is to earn money; a woman's job is to look after the home and family".
References
Akerlof, G., & Kranton, R. (2000). Economics and identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715–753.
Akerlof, G., & Kranton, R. (2010). Identity economics. How identity shape our work, wages and well-being. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Álvarez, B., & Miles, D. (2003). Gender effect on housework allocation: Evidence from Spanish two-earner couples. Journal of Population Economics, 16(2), 227–242.
Bardasi, E., & Gornick, J. C. (2008). Working for less? Women’s part-time wage penalties across countries. Feminist Economics, 14(1), 37–72.
Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Berger, E. M. (2013). Happy working mothers? Investigating the effect of maternal employment on life satisfaction. Economica, 80(317), 23–43.
Bergh, J. (2007). Gender attitudes and modernization processes. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(1), 5–23.
Bertrand, M., J. Pan, and E. Kamenica (2013). Gender identity and relative income within households. NBER Working Paper 19023.
Blázquez, M., & Martín, N. (2009). Part-time employment: A comparative analysis of Spain and the Netherlands. European Journal of Law and Economics, 28(3), 223–256.
Booth, A. L., & Van Ours, J. C. (2008). Job satisfaction and family happiness: The part-time work puzzle. The Economic Journal, 118(526), 77–99.
Booth, A. L., & Van Ours, J. C. (2009). Hours of work and gender identity: Does part-time work make the family happier? Economica, 76(301), 176–196.
Booth, A. L., & Van Ours, J. C. (2013). Part-time jobs: What women want? Journal of Population Economics, 26(1), 263–283.
Burda, M. C., Hamermesh, D. S., & Weil, P. (2013). Total work and gender: facts and possible explanations. Journal of Population Economics, 26(1), 239–261.
Chang, W. C. (2011). Identity, gender, and subjective well-being. Review of Social Economy, 69(1), 97–121.
Clark, A. E. (1997). Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy at work? Labour Economics, 4(4), 341–372.
Clark, A. E. (2001). What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data. Labour Economics, 8(2), 223–242.
Commission, European. (2014). Report on progress on equality between women and men in 2013. Brussels: Commision Staff Working Document.
Constant, A.F. and S. Otterbach (2011). Work hours constraints: Impacts and policy implications. IZA Policy Paper No. 35.
Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 25–46.
Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.
Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., & Mansfield, L. R. (2012). Whistle while you work: A review of the life satisfaction literature. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1038–1083.
Eurofound, (2011). European company survey 2009: Part-time work in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission. (2010). Flexible working time arrangements and gender equality. A comparative review of 30 European countries. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
Eurostat, (2008). The life of women and men in Europe. A statistical portrait. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Fan, P. L., & Marini, M. M. (2000). Influences on gender-role attitudes during the transition to adulthood. Social Science Research, 29(2), 258–283.
Fernández-Kranz, D. and N. Rodríguez-Planas (2011b). Unintended effects of a family-friendly law in a segmented labor market. IZA Discussion Papers 5709, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
Fernández-Kranz, D., & Rodríguez-Planas, N. (2011). The part-time penalty in a segmented labor market. Labour Economics, 18(5), 591–606.
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2013). Happiness economics. SERIEs, 4(1), 35–60.
Fortin, N. M. (2005). Gender role attitudes and the labour market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21, 416–438.
Fortin, N.M. (2009). Gender role attitudes and women’s labor market participation: opting out, AIDS, and the persistent appeal of housewifery. Working Paper, University of British Columbia.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.
Frisco, M. L., & Williams, K. (2003). Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual-earner households. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 51–73.
Gash, V. (2008). Constraints or preferences? Identifying answers from part-time workers’ transitions in Denmark, France and the United Kingdom. Work, Employment & Society, 22(4), 655–674.
Gash, V., Mertens, A., & Gordo, L. R. (2012). The influence of changing hours of work on women’s life satisfaction. The Manchester School, 80(1), 51–74.
Giménez-Nadal, J. I., & Sevilla-Sanz, A. (2011). The time-crunch paradox. Social Indicators Research, 102(2), 181–196.
Golden, L., Henly, J. R., & Lambert, S. (2013). Work schedule flexibility: A contributor to happiness? Journal of Social Research & Policy, 4(2), 107–135.
Greenstein, (1996). Gender ideology and perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: Effects on marital happiness. Social Forces, 74(3), 1029–1042.
Hamermesh, D. S., & Lee, J. (2007). Stressed out on four continents: Time crunch or yuppie kvetch? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 374–383.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide. Gender equality and cultural change around the world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, R., & Welzed, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy: the human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.
Lee, G. R., Seccombe, K., & Shehan, C. L. (1991). Marital status and personal happiness: An analysis of trend data. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 839–844.
Lucas, R., Clark, A., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527–539.
Lucas, R., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616–628.
Luechinger, S., Meier, S., & Stutzer, A. (2010). Why does unemployment hurt the employed? Evidence from the life satisfaction gap between the public and the private sector. The Journal of Human Resources, 45(4), 998–1045.
Luengo-Prado, M. J., & Sevilla, A. (2013). Time to cook: Expenditure at retirement in Spain. The Economic Journal, 123(569), 764–789.
Lundberg, S., & Pollack, R. A. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 101(6), 988–1010.
Luttmer, E. (2005). Neighbours as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(3), 963–1002.
MacDonald, M., Phipps, S., & Lethbridge, L. (2005). Taking its toll: The influence of paid and unpaid work on women’s well-being. Feminist Economics, 11(1), 63–95.
Manning, A., & Petrongolo, B. (2008). The part-time pay penalty for women in Britain. Economic Journal, 118, F28–F51.
Martínez, P., Carrasco, M. J., Aza, G., Blanco, A., & Espinar, I. (2011). Family gender role and guilt in Spanish dual-earner families. Sex Roles, 65(11–12), 813–826.
McElroy, M. B., & Horney, M. J. (1981). Nash bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review, 22(2), 333–349.
Mencarini, L., & Sironi, M. (2012). Happiness, housework and gender inequality in Europe. European Sociological Review, 28(2), 203–219.
Otterbach, S. (2010). Mismatches between actual and preferred work time: empirical evidence of hours constraints in 21 countries. Journal of Consumer Policy, 33(2), 143–161.
Rojas, M. (2006). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4), 467–497.
Schneider, D. (2012). Gender deviance and household work: The role of occupation. American Journal of Sociology, 117(4), 1029–1072.
Sevilla-Sanz, A. (2010). Household division of labor and cross-country differences in household formation rates. Journal of Population Economics, 23(1), 225–249.
Sevilla-Sanz, A., Giménez-Nadal, J. I., & Fernández, C. (2010). Gender roles and the division of unpaid work in Spanish households. Feminist Economics, 16(4), 137–184.
Sousa-Poza, A., & Sousa-Poza, A. A. (2000). Well-being at work: A cross-national analysis of the levels and determinants of job satisfaction. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 29(6), 517–538.
Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. (2006). Does marriage make people happy or do happy people get married. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 326–347.
Suitor, J. J. (1991). Marital quality and satisfaction with the division of household labor across the family life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 221–230.
Van der Meer, P. H., & Wielers, R. (2013). What makes workers happy? Applied Economics, 45(3), 357–368.
Van Praag, B. M., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(1), 29–49.
Vella, F. (1994). Gender roles and human capital investment: the relationship between traditional attitudes and female labour market performance. Economica, 61(242), 191–211.
Wooden, M., Warren, D., & Drago, R. (2009). Working time, mismatch and subjective well-being. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(1), 147–179.
Wunder, C. and G. Heineck (2012). Working time preferences, hours mismatch and well-being of couples: Are there spillovers? IZA Discussion Paper No. 6786.
OECD (2014). OECD family database, OECD, Paris. www.oecd.org/social/family/database.
Zimmerman, A., & Easterlin, R. (2006). Happily ever after? Cohabitation, marriage and divorce, and happiness in Germany. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 511–528.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Grant No. ECO2011-25661.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 8.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Álvarez, B., Miles-Touya, D. Time Allocation and Women’s Life Satisfaction: Evidence from Spain. Soc Indic Res 129, 1207–1230 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1159-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1159-3