Skip to main content
Log in

Creating a model of the dynamics of socio-technical groups

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Individuals participating in technologically mediated forms of organization often have difficulty recognizing when groups emerge, and how the groups they take part in evolve. This paper contributes an analytical framework that improves awareness of these virtual group dynamics through analysis of electronic trace data from tasks and interactions carried out by individuals in systems not explicitly designed for context adaptivity, user modeling or user personalization. We discuss two distinct cases to which we have applied our analytical framework. These two cases provide a useful contrast of two prevalent ways for analyzing social relations starting from electronic trace data: either artifact-mediated or direct person-to-person interactions. Our case study integrates electronic trace data analysis with analysis of other, triangulating data specific to each application. We show how our techniques fit in a general model of group informatics, which can serve to construct group context, and be leveraged by future tool development aimed at augmenting context adaptivity with group context and a social dimension. We describe our methods, data management strategies and technical architecture to support the analysis of individual user task context, increased awareness of group membership, and an integrated view of social, information and coordination contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amelung C.: Using social context and E-learner identity as a framework for an E-learning notification system. Int. J. E-Learn. 6(4), 501–517 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Anaya A.R., Boticario J.G.: Content-free collaborative learning modeling using data mining. User Model. User Adap. Inter. 21(1–2), 181–216 (2011). doi:10.1007/s11257-010-9095-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A.: Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blincoe, K., Valetto, G., Goggins, S.: Leveraging task contexts for managing developers’ coordination. In: ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1351–1360. ACM, Seattle (2012)

  • Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G.: Network analysis of two mode data. Soc. Netw. 19(3), 243–269 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J.S., Duguid P.: The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt A., Conati C.: Probabilistic student modelling to improve exploratory behaviour. User Model. User Adapt. Inter. 13(3), 269–309 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll J.M., Rosson M.B., Convertino G., Ganoe C.H.: Awareness and teamwork in computer supported collaborations. Inter. Comput. 18, 21–46 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J.M., Rosson, M.B., Farooq, U., Xiao, L.: Beyond being aware. Inf. Organ. 162–185 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2009.04.004

  • Carroll J.M., Neale D.C., Isenhour P.L., Rosson M.B., McCrickard D.S.: Notification and awareness: synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity. Int. J. Human Comput. Stud. 58, 605–632 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cataldo, M., Wagstrom, P.A., Herbsleb, J.D., Carley, K.M.: Identification of coordination requirements: implications for the design of collaboration and awareness tools. In: ACM Conference On Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 353–362. ACM, Banff Canada (2006)

  • Cohen, J., Dolan, B., Dunlap, M., Hellerstein, J.M., Welton, C.: MAD skills: new analysis practices for big data. Proc. VLDB Endow. 2(2), 1481–1492 (2009). http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1687576

  • Cosley, D., Ludford, P., Terveen, L.: Studying the effect of similarity in online task-focused interactions. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 321–329. ACM SIGGROUP, Sanibel Island (2003)

  • Crowston, K., Wei, K., Li, Q., Howison, J.: Core and periphery in free/libre and open source software team communications. HICSS’06. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 6, pp. 118a–118a. Hawaii International Conference, Hawaii (2006)

  • Crowston, K., Wiggins, A., Howison, J.: Analyzing leadership dynamics in distributed group communications. In: HICSS-43, pp. 1–10. HICSS, Hilton (2010)

  • Dourish P.: Where the Action Is: Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P.: Where the footprints lead: tracking down other roles for social navigation. In: Designing Information Spaces: The Social Navigation Approach, pp. 273–292. Springer, New York (2003)

  • Dourish P.: What we talk about when we talk about context. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 8, 19–30 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P.: Re-Space-ing place: “Place” and “Space” ten years on. In: CSCW ’06, pp. 299–308. Banff (2006)

  • Dourish, P., Button, G.: Technomethodology: paradoxes and possibilities. In: Proceedings of CHI96 Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 13–18. CHI96, Vancouver (1996)

  • Erickson T., Kellogg W.A.: Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Trans. Comput. Human Inter. 7, 59–83 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galison P.: Trading Zone: Coordinating action and belief. In: The Science Studies Reader. Routledge, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggins, S.: Exploring small group collaboration and creativity in 3D virtual worlds. In: ACM Group ’07, pp. 137–146. ACM, Sanibel Island (2007)

  • Goggins S., Erdelez S.: Collaborative information behavior in completely online groups. In: Foster, J. (eds) Collaborative Information Behavior: User Engagement and Communication Sharing, pp. 109–126. ISI Global, Hershey (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goggins, S., Laffey, J., Tsai, I.-C.: Cooperation and groupness: community formation in small online collaborative groups. In: Proceedings of the ACM Group Conference 2007, pp. 206–215. ACM, New York (2007)

  • Goggins, S., Laffey, J., Galyen, K.: Social ability in online groups: representing the quality of interactions in social computing environments. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Science and Engineering, pp. 667–674. IEEE, Wellington (2009)

  • Goggins, S., Galyen, K., Laffey, J.: Network analysis of trace data for the support of group work: activity patterns in a completely online course. In: ACM Group 2010, pp. 107–116. ACM, New York (2010a)

  • Goggins, S.P., Laffey, J., Amelung, C., Gallagher, M.: Social intelligence in completely online groups. In: IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, pp. 500–507. IEEE, Wellington (2010b)

  • Goggins, S., Laffey, J., Amelung, C.: Context aware CSCL: moving toward contextualized analysis. In: CSCL 2011, pp. 591–596. CSCL, Crete (2011a)

  • Goggins S.P., Laffey J., Gallagher M.: Completely online group formation and development: small groups as socio-technical systems. Inf. Technol. People 24(2), 104–133 (2011b). doi:10.1108/09593841111137322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goggins, S., Laffey, J., Galyen, K., Mascaro, C.: Group awareness in completely online learning groups: identity, structure, efficacy and performance. Int. J. Comput. Support. Cooper. Work. 1, 3 (2011c)

  • Goggins, S., Mascaro, C., Mascaro, S.: Relief after the 2010 Haiti earthquake: participation and leadership in an online resource coordination network. In: ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 57–66. ACM, Bellevue (2012a)

  • Goggins, S.P., Mascaro, C., Valetto, G.: Group informatics: a methodological approach and ontology for understanding socio-technical groups. In: JASIS&T, pp. 48–56. University of Latvia, Latvia (2012b)

  • Gonzalez V.M., Nardi B., Mark G.: Ensembles: understanding the instantiation of activities. Inf. Technol. People 22(2), 109–131 (2009). doi:10.1108/09593840910962195

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M.: Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91(3), 481 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S., Dourish, P.: Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 67–76. ACM, New York (1996)

  • Howison J., Wiggins A., Crowston K.: Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12(2), 2 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B.A.: Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design (Acting with Technology). The MIT Press, Cambridge (2006). http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html%3FASIN=0262112981%26tag=ws%26lcode=xm2%26cID=2025%26ccmID=165953%26location=/o/ASIN/0262112981%253FSubscriptionId=0NM5T5X751JWT17C4GG2

  • Kay J.: The um toolkit for reusable, long term user models. User Model. User Adapt. Inter. 4(3), 149–196 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G., Murphy, G.C.: Using task context to improve programmer productivity. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, pp. 1–11. ACM, New York (2006)

  • Kobsa A.: Generic user modeling systems. User Model. User Adapt. Inter. 11(1), 49–63 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kobsa, A.: Generic user modeling systems. In: The adaptive web, pp. 136–154. Springer, New York (2007)

  • Konstan, J.A., Reidl, J.: Collaborative filtering: supporting social navigation in large, crowded infospaces. In: Designing Information Spaces: The Social Navigation Approach, pp. 43–82. Springer, New York (2003)

  • Laffey J., Amelung C., Goggins S.: A context awareness system for online learning: design based research. Int. J. E-Learn. 8(3), 313–330 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee C.P.: Boundary negotiating artifacts: unbinding routine of boundary objects and embracing Chaos in collaborative work. Comput. Support. Cooper. Work 16, 307–339 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, C.: Big data: how do your data grow?. Nature, 455(7209), 28–29 (2008). http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v455/n7209/full/455028a.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney-Krichmar D., Preece J.: A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community. ACM Trans. Comput. Human Inter. (TOCHI) 12(2), 201–232 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascaro, C., Goggins, S.P.: Brewing up citizen engagement: the coffee party on facebook. In: Communities & Technologies, pp. 11–20. Drexel University, Philadelphia (2011)

  • Mitchell, J.C.: Social networks in urban situations: analyses of personal relationships in Central African towns. Humanities Press International (1969). http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=8RrpAAAAIAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=african+social+networks&ots=nnO3VuOiWL&sig=C2wNoTiD1C9tTLiNpLprZOxdo4c

  • Nardi B.: Context and Consciousness. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi B.: Placeless organizations: collaborating for transformation. Mind Cult. Act. 14(1–2), 5–22 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B.A., O’Day, V.: Information ecologies: using technology with heart. The MIT press, Cambridge (2000). http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=6d1VwyZhQRQC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=nardi+information+ecologies&ots=B-W822rXfJ&sig=BsjY51IPZaHEC8MGHwmwyEegnos

  • Nardi B., Whittaker S., Schwarz H.: Networkers and their activity in intensional networks. Comput. Support. Cooper. Work 11, 205–242 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde M., Shaffer D.W.: Us, ourselves and we: thoughts about social (self-) categorization. SIGGROUP Bull. 24(3), 19–24 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Star S.L., Griesemer J.R.: Institutional ecology, ’translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1939. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19, 387–420 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde M., Reinecke L., Pape B., Janneck M.: Community-building with web-based systems—investigating a hybrid community of students. Comput. Support. Cooper. Work 13, 471–499 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terveen L., McDonald D.W.: Social matching: a framework and research agenda. ACM Trans. Comput. Human Inter. 12(3), 401–434 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagstrom, P., Herbsleb, J.D., Kraut, R., Mockus, A.: The impact of commercial organizations on volunteer participation in an online community. Acad. Manag. Ann. Meet. 65–72 (2010)

  • Wenger E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press, New York (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann A., Specht M., Lorenz A.: Personalization and context management. User Model. User Adap. Inter. 15(3–4), 275–302 (2005). doi:10.1007/s11257-005-1092-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean P. Goggins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goggins, S.P., Valetto, G., Mascaro, C. et al. Creating a model of the dynamics of socio-technical groups. User Model User-Adap Inter 23, 345–379 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-012-9122-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-012-9122-3

Keywords

Navigation