Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The evolution of competitive strategies in annual plants

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Annual plants are common in disturbed habitats. It is frequently assumed that because these habitats often have low-plant density, competition is not important in shaping the ecological strategies of annual plants. We test for competitive strategies in genotypes of the short-lived annual plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Genotypes were grown in treatments with or without conspecific competitors. We measured size at reproduction and fitness (fruit production) at final development. We estimated competitive ability in each genotype at first reproduction (the ability to maintain size in the presence of competitors) and at final development (the ability to maintain fruit production in the presence of competitors). Genotypes showed relatively high competitive ability measured as fruit production at final development, but most genotypes had low competitive ability measured as size at reproduction. Our results suggest that competition has been important in the evolution of strategies in these genotypes but vegetative size is not a strong predictor of competitive ability. Rather, competitive ability is determined by the capacity to reproduce efficiently in the presence of competitors. The competitive strategies expressed across these genotypes suggest that competition has been a selective force in these plants, and that a fast life history is not equivalent to an “r-strategy.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarssen LW, Schamp BS, Pither J (2006) Why are there so many small plants? Implications for species coexistence. J Ecol 94:569–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrieu E, Debussche M, Thompson JD (2007) Size-dependent reproduction and gender modification in the hermaphroditic perennial plant Paeonia officinalis. Int J Plant Sci 168:435–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell G (1976) On breeding more than once. Am Nat 100:57–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonser SP, Aarssen LW (1996) Meristem allocation: a new classification theory for adaptive strategies in herbaceous plants. Oikos 77:347–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonser SP, Aarssen LW (2009) Interpreting reproductive allometry: individual strategies of allocation explain size-dependent reproduction in plant populations. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 11:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonser SP, Geber MA (2005) Growth form evolution and shifting habitat specialization in annual plants. J Evol Biol 18:1009–1018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonser SP, Ladd B, Monro K, Hall MD, Forster MA (2010) The adaptive value of functional and life history traits across fertility treatments in an annual plant. Ann Bot 106:979–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan HS, Pigliucci M (2002) Shade-induced plasticity and its ecological significance in wild populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology 83:1965–1980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B (1994) Evolution in age-structured populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1993) Life history invariants. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL, Schaffer WM (1973) Life history consequences of natural selection: Cole’s result revisited. Am Nat 107:791–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coomes DA, Rees M, Turnbull L, Ratcliffe S (2002) On the mechanisms of coexistence among annual plant species, using neighbourhood techniques and simulation modes. Plant Ecol 163:23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley EJ, Ingland B, Winkler J, Tonsor SJ (2009) Inflorescences contribute more than rosettes to lifetime carbon gain in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 96:786–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Turkington R, Olsvig-Whittaker L, Dyer AR (2001) Density dependence in an annual plant community: variation among life history stages. Ecol Monogr 71:423–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetative processes. John Wiley & Sons, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP, Thompson K, Hunt R, Hodgson JG, Cornelissen JHC, Rorison IH, Hendry GAF, Ashenden TW, Askew AP, Band SR, Booth RE, Bossard CC, Campbell BD, Cooper JEL, Davison AW, Gupta PL, Hall W, Hand DW, Hannah MA, Hillier SH, Hodkinson DJ, Jalili A, Liu Z, Mackey JML, Matthews N, Mowforth MA, Neal AM, Reader RJ, Reiling K, Ross-Fraser W, Spencer RE, Sutton F, Tasker DE, Thorpe PC, Whitehouse J (1997) Integrated screening validates primary axes of specialisation in plants. Oikos 79:259–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch J, Scheiner SM, Fox GA (2002) The ecology of plants. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kays S, Harper JL (1974) The regulation of plant and tiller density in a grass sward. J Ecol 62:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd B, Facelli JM (2008) Priority effects produced by plant litter result in non-additive competitive effects. Oecologia 157:687–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lessin LM, Dyer AR, Goldberg DE (2001) Using upper boundary constraints to quantify competitive response of desert annuals. Oikos 92:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin JM, Rees M (2002) Coexistence and relative abundance in annual plant assemblages: the roles of competition and colonization. Am Nat 160:452–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Neytcheva NS, Aarssen LW (2008) More plant biomass results in more offspring production in annuals, or does it? Oikos 117:1298–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen L, Sammul M, Mägi M (2006) On the indices of plant–plant competition and their pitfalls. Oikos 112:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1970) On r- and K-Selection. Am Nat 104:592–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn G, Keough M (2003) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose KE, Atkinson RL, Turnbull LA, Rees M (2009) The costs and benefits of fast living. Ecol Lett 12:1379–1384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffers K, Tielbörger K (2006) Ontogenetic shifts in interactions among annual plants. J Ecol 94:336–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J, Stinchcombe JR, Heschel MS, Huber H (2003) The adaptive evolution of plasticity: phytochrome-mediated shade avoidance responses. Integr Comp Biol 43:459–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor DR, Aarssen LW, Loehle C (1990) On the relationship between r/K selection and environmental carrying capacity: a new habitat templet for plant life history strategies. Oikos 58:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull LA, Rees M, Crawley MJ (1999) Seed mass and the competition/colonization tradeoff: a sowing experiment. J Ecol 87:899–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull LA, Coomes D, Hector A, Rees M (2004) Seed mass and the competition/colonization tradeoff: competitive interactions and special patterns in a guild of annual plants. J Ecol 92:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermuelen PJ, Steufer JF, Anten NPR, During HJ (2009) Carbon gain in the competition for light between genotypes of the clonal herb Potentilla reptans. J Ecol 97:508–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Violle C, Richarte J, Navas ML (2006) Effects of litter and standing biomass on growth and reproduction of two annual species in a Mediterranean old-field. J Ecol 94:196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinig C, Johnston JA, Willis CG, Maloof JN (2007) Antagonistic multilevel selection on size and architecture in variable density settings. Evolution 61:58–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank K. Monro for help with the data collection. An anonymous reviewer provided helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. This research was supported by a UNSW Vice Chancellor’s Research and Teaching Fellowship, a Faculty Research Grant and an Early Career Researcher Grant to Stephen P. Bonser.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia

    Stephen P. Bonser & Brenton Ladd

Authors
  1. Stephen P. Bonser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brenton Ladd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen P. Bonser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonser, S.P., Ladd, B. The evolution of competitive strategies in annual plants. Plant Ecol 212, 1441–1449 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9919-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9919-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation