Skip to main content
Log in

Latin American Research on Bariatric Surgery: a Bibliometric Study

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We performed a bibliometric analysis of Latin American documents published between 1984 to 2019 in Scopus-indexed journals. A total of 1856 documents were analyzed. The annual scientific production was 64 documents per year, with an annual increase rate of 15.9%. The countries with the highest scientific production on BS were Brazil (64.7%) and Chile (14.5%). Most of the publications were original (76.6%) and review articles (11.9%). The journal with the highest publication record was “Obesity Surgery” (25.8%). The extra-regional collaboration was mainly with the USA. In conclusion, Latin American scientific production on BS has shown a significant increase in recent years. However, more participation is needed, fostering intra-regional collaboration and involving universities and health institutions in BS research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Welbourn R, Hollyman M, Kinsman R, Dixon J, Liem R, Ottosson J, Ramos A, Våge V, al-Sabah S, Brown W, Cohen R, Walton P, Himpens J Bariatric surgery worldwide: baseline demographic description and one-year outcomes from the fourth IFSO global registry report 2018. Obes Surg 2019;29(3):782–795.

  2. Krishnaswami S, Stephens CQ, Yang GP, Nwomeh BC, Swaroop M, Nadler EP, Holterman AX, Simeone DM, Kingham TP, Merchant N, Orloff SL An academic career in global surgery: a position paper from the Society of University Surgeons Committee on Academic Global Surgery. Surgery. 2018;163(4):954–960.

  3. Ozsoy Z, Demir E. The evolution of bariatric surgery publications and global productivity: a bibliometric analysis. Obes Surg. 2018;28(4):1117–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Herrera MF, Valencia A, Cohen R. Bariatric/metabolic surgery in Latin America. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114(6):852–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Raan AFJ. The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments. Tech Theor Prax. 2003;12(1):20–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L. Scientometrics in a changing research landscape: Bibliometrics has become an integral part of research quality evaluation and has been changing the practice of research. EMBO Rep. 2014;15(12):1228–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aminian A, Daigle CR, Brethauer SA, et al. Citation classics: top 50 cited articles in bariatric and metabolic surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(5):898–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yazdani K, Nejat S, Rahimi-Movaghar A, et al. Scientometrics: review of concepts, applications, and indicators. Iran J Epidemiol. 2015;10(4):78–88.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmad SS, Ahmad SS, Kohl S, et al. The hundred most cited articles in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(5):900–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dabi Y, Darrigues L, Katsahian S, et al. Publication trends in bariatric surgery: a bibliometric study. Obes Surg. 2016;26(11):2691–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, et al. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang Y, Zhu D, Lv Q, et al. Early insights on the emerging sources citation index (ESCI): an overlay map-based bibliometric study. Scientometrics. 2017;111(3):2041–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huh S. How to add a journal to the international databases, science citation index expanded and MEDLINE. Arch Plast Surg. 2016;43(6):487–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, et al. A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106(4):531–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen NT, Brethauer SA, Morton JM, et al. The ASMBS textbook of bariatric surgery. 2nd ed. Switzerland: Springer; 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Roldan-Valadez E, Salazar-Ruiz SY, Ibarra-Contreras R, et al. Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics. Ir J Med Sci. 2019;188(3):939–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Softwa re survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boyack KW. Thesaurus-based methods for mapping contents of publication sets. Scientometrics. 2017;111(3):1141–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paolino L, Pravettoni R, Epaud S, et al. Comparison of surgical activity and scientific publications in bariatric surgery: an epidemiological and bibliometric analysis. Obes Surg. 2020;30:3822–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vioque J, Ramos JM, Navarrete-Muñoz EM, et al. A bibliometric study of scientific literature on obesity research in PubMed (1988-2007). Obes Rev. 2010;11(8):603–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. The World Bank Group. World Development Indicators [Internet]. USA: WBG; 2020. Available online: datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/.

  22. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030. Paris, France: UNESCO; 2015.

  23. Education First. EF English Proficiency Index: a ranking of 100 countries and regions by english skills. USA: EF; 2019. Available online: https://www.ef.edu/__/~/media/centralefcom/epi/downloads/full-reports/v9/ef-epi-2019-english.pdf.

  24. Huamaní C, González AG, Curioso WH, et al. Redes de colaboración y producción científica sudamericana en medicina clínica, ISI Current Contents 2000-2009. Rev Médica Chile. 2012;140(4):466–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zacca-González G, Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, Vargas-Quesada B, de Moya-Anegón F. Bibliometric analysis of regional Latin America’s scientific output in public health through SCImago Journal & Country Rank. BMC Public Health 2014;14:632.

  26. Ozsoy Z, Demir E. Which bariatric procedure is the most popular in the world? A Bibliometric Comparison Obes Surg. 2018;28(8):2339–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Steffen R. The history and role of gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2008;4(Suppl. 3):S7–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pories WJ, Swanson MS, MacDonald KG, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995;222(3):339–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cartes-Velásquez V R, Moraga C J, Aravena T P, Manterola D C. Impacto y visibilidad de la Revista Chilena de Cirugía tras su indización en las bases de datos SciELO e ISI: Análisis bibliométrico. Rev Chil Cir 2012;64(6):511–515.

  30. Krauskopf M, Krauskopf E. Una mirada epistemométrica de la Revista Médica de Chile y su aporte al conocimiento en Medicina. Rev Médica Chile agosto de. 2008;136(8):1065–72.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Padilha MI, Brüggemann O, Costa R, et al. Internationalization of knowledge and the enhancement of the quality and visibility of scientific Brazilian journals. Texto Amp Contexto - Enferm. 2014;23(3):517–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Coura JR, Willcox LC. Impact factor, scientific production and quality of Brazilian medical journals. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2003;98(3):293–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sancho R, Morillo F, De Filippo D, et al. Indicadores de colaboración científica inter-centros en los países de América Latina. Interciencia. 2006;31(4):284–92.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cortés VD. Medir la producción científica de los investigadores universitarios: la bibliometría y sus límites. Rev Educ Super. 2007;36(142):43–65.

    Google Scholar 

  35. López MP, Taborga AM. Dimensiones internacionales de la ciencia y la tecnología en América Latina. Latinoam Rev Estud Latinoam. 2013;56:27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao N, Tao K, Wang G, et al. Global obesity research trends during 1999 to 2017: a bibliometric analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(4):e14132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders. 5th IFSO Global Registry Report 2019. UK: IFSO & Dendrite Clinical Systems ltd; 2019. Available online: https://www.ifso.com/pdf/5th-ifso-global-registry-report-september-2019.pdf.

  39. Søreide K, Alderson D, Bergenfelz A, et al. Strategies to improve clinical research in surgery through international collaboration. Lancet. 2013;382(9898):1140–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, et al. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA. 2009;302(10):1092–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was self-funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CJTH and CMM provided the idea and analysis of data. All the authors discussed the results, critically commented on the manuscript at all stages, and prepared and approved its final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos J. Toro-Huamanchumo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent does not apply.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 67 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toro-Huamanchumo, C.J., Morán-Mariños, C., Salazar-Alarcon, J.L. et al. Latin American Research on Bariatric Surgery: a Bibliometric Study. OBES SURG 31, 1869–1876 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05058-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05058-2

Keywords

Navigation