Abstract
This study examines how the interactive use of management control systems (iMCS) affects process and organizational innovation. Firstly, it is postulated that iMCS directly influences the development of process and organizational innovations. Secondly, we argue in favor of a moderating role of iMCS in the relationship between innovation and financial performance. Most studies of MCS and innovation have focused on new product development. However, process and organizational innovations follow innovation patterns that clearly differ from product innovation. The research model is empirically examined using data collected from a survey of 230 firms. Results from a structural model tested applying Partial Least Squares regression, controlling for size, family ownership, R&D, and product innovation, reveal that iMCS fosters process and organizational innovation. Results also suggest that iMCS could play a moderator role in the relationship between process innovation and financial performance. These findings highlight the role of iMCS in process and organizational innovation, expanding previous literature on Simons’ Levers of Control and innovation. The results are also discussed with regard to their managerial implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This structure avoids contravening Luft and Shields’ (2003) position on moderating variables.
The agrifood industry is the largest Spanish industrial sector by GDP. It also presents a percentage of innovative companies consistently higher than in the whole of the Spanish economy and similar to that observed in industry in general.
We conducted a systematic literature review through the EBSCO database and searched for documents that use the words “Control systems” or “Management control systems” or “Management accounting systems” or “Performance measurement systems” and “product innovation” in their abstracts. Ten papers were found. We repeated the process with the expressions “process innovation” (two papers were found) and “organizational innovation” (no paper was found) instead of product innovation. Then, we added the term “interactive” and repeated the same process for each type of innovation. This time three papers were found for “product innovation” and no paper was found for “process innovation” and “organizational innovation”.
Firms belonging to National Classification of Economics Activities (CNAE) 10 and 11.
The SABI database contains the economic and financial information on more than 600,000 Spanish and Portuguese firms, and is widely used and accepted for scientific studies (Bisbe and Malagueño 2012).
After deletion of erroneous observations (CNAE not coincident or companies with no activity).
\(e = \sqrt {\frac{{K^{2} xPxQ\left( {N - 1} \right)}}{{n\left( {N - 1} \right)}}}\) where e = sample error; K = value for assigning the confidence level, K = 1.96 for a confidence level of 95 %; P and Q = data confidence values. For a confidence level of 95 % P = Q and they take values of 0.5; N = sample population and n = sample size.
Interactive use of MCS = MAX (Average of Interactive use of Cost Accounting, Average of Interactive use of BSC, Average of Interactive use of Budget System).
References
Aravind D (2012) Learning and innovation in the context of process-focused management practices: the case of an environmental management system. J Eng Technol Manag 29(3):415–433
Argyris C, Schön DA (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Amsterdam
Armbruster H, Bikfalvi A, Kinkel S, Lay G (2008) Organizational innovation: the challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation 28:644–657
Baer M, Frese M (2003) Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J Organ Behav 24:45–68
Basaglia S, Caporarello L, Magni M, Pennarola F (2009) Individual adoption of convergent mobile phone in Italy. Rev Manag Sci 3(1):1–18
Bisbe J, Malagueño R (2009) The choice of interactive control systems under different innovation management modes. Eur Account Rev 18(2):371–405
Bisbe J, Malagueño R (2012) Using strategic performance measurement systems for strategy formulation: does it work in dynamic environments? Manag Account Res 23(4):296–311
Bisbe J, Otley DT (2004) The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Account Organ Soc 29(8):709–737
Bisbe J, Bastita-Foguet J-M, Chenhall RH (2007) Defining management accounting constructs: a methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification. Account Organ Soc 32:789–820
Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Q J Econ 122(4):1351–1408
Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2010) Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? J Econ Perspect 24(1):203–224
Bunduchi R, Weisshaar C, Smart AU (2011) Mapping the benefits and costs associated with process innovation: the case of RFID adoption. Technovation 31(9):505–521
Camison C, Villar-Lopez A (2014) Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. J Bus Res 67:2891–2902
Capon N, Farley JU, Lehmann DR, Hulbert JM (1992) Profiles of product innovators among large US manufacturers. Manag Sci 38(2):157–169
Cardinal L (2001) Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: the use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organ Sci 12(1):19–36
Casadesus-Masanell R, Ricart JE (2010) From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Plan 43(2–3):195–215
Chang S-J, Van Witteloostuijn A, Eden L (2010) From the editors: common method variance in international business research. J Int Bus Stud 41(2):178–184
Chenhall RH (2003) Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Account Organ Soc 28:127–168
Chenhall RH, Langfield-Smith K (1998) The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: and empirical investigation using a system approach. Account Organ Soc 23(3):243–264
Chenhall RH, Kallunki J-P, Silvola H (2011) Exploring the relationships between strategy, innovation, and management control systems: the roles of social networking, organic innovative culture, and formal controls. J Manag Account Res 123(1):99–128
Chesbrough H (2007) Business model innovation: it’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy Leadersh 35(6):12–17
Chin WW (1998) Issues and opinion on structural equation modelling. Manag Inf Syst Q 22(1):7–16
Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR (2003) A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and voice mail emotion/adoption study. Inf Syst Res 14(2):189–217
Daft RL (1978) Essentials of organizations theory and design. South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati
Damanpour F (1991) Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad Manag J 34:555–590
Damanpour F, Evan WM (1984) Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of organizational lag. Adm Sci Q 29:392–409
Damanpour F, Gopalakrishnan S (2001) The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations. J Manag Stud 38(1):45–65
Damanpour F, Szabat KA, Evan WM (1989) The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance. J Manag Stud 26(6):587–601
Daniel SJ, Reitsperger WD (1992) Management control systems for quality: an empirical comparison of the US and Japanese electronics industries. J Manag Account Res 4:64–78
Davila T (2000) An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems’ design in new product development. Account Organ Soc 25(4–5):383–409
Davila T, Epstein MJ, Shelton R (2006) Making innovation work: how to manage it, measure it and profit from it. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Davila A, Foster G, Li M (2009a) Reasons for management control systems adoption: insights from product development systems choice by early-stage entrepreneurial companies. Account Organ Soc 34(3–4):322–347
Davila A, Foster G, Oyon D (2009b) Accounting and control, entrepreneurship and innovation: venturing into new research opportunities. Eur Account Rev 18(2):281–311
Dillman DA (2000) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Dunk AS (2011) Product innovation, budgetary control, and the financial performance of firms. Br Account Rev 43(2):102–111
Edquist C (2001) Innovation policy: a systemic approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ettlie JE (1988) Taking charge of manufacturing: how companies are combining technological and organizational innovations to compete. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Ettlie JE, Reza EM (1992) Organizational integration and process innovation. Acad Manage J 35(4):795–827
Fahy J (2002) A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment. Int Bus Rev 11(1):57–77
Fleck J (1994) Learning by trying: the implementation of configurational technology. Res Policy 23(6):637–652
Franco-Santos M, Lucianetti L, Bourne M (2012) Contemporary performance measurement systems: a review of their consequences and a framework for research. Manag Account Res 23(1):79–119
Ganter A, Hecker A (2013) Deciphering antecedents of organizational innovation. J Bus Res 66(5):575–584
Ganter A, Hecker A (2014) Configurational paths to organizational innovation: qualitative comparative analyses of antecedents and contingencies. J Bus Res 67:1285–1292
Gomez-Conde J, Lopez-Valeiras E, Ripoll-Feliu V, Gonzalez-Sanchez MB (2013) Management control systems and ISO certification as resources to enhance internationalization and their effect on organizational performance. Agribusiness 29(3):392–405
Gopalakrishnan S, Bierly P, Kessler EH (1999) A reexamination of product and process innovations using a knowledge-based view. J High Technol Manag Res 10(1):147–166
Govindarajan VA (1988) Contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level: integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy. Acad Manag J 31(4):828–853
Hall M (2008) The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance. Account Org Soc 33(2–3):141–163
Harman HH (1967) Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Hashem G, Tann J (2007) The adoption of ISO 9000 standards within the Egyptian context: a diffusion of innovation approach. Total Qual Manag Bus 18(6):631–652
Helm R, Mark A (2012) Analysis and evaluation of moderator effects in regression models: state of art, alternatives and empirical example. Rev Manag Sci 6(4):307–332
Henri JF (2006) Management control systems and strategy: a resource-based perspective. Account Organ Soc 31(6):529–558
Hervas-Oliver JL, Sempere-Ripoll F (2014) Disentangling the influence of technological process and product innovations. J Bus Res. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.010
Hervas-Oliver JL, Sempere-Ripoll F, Boronat-Moll C (2014) Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: a misleading debate? Small Bus Econ. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9567-3
Ittner CD, Larcker DF, Randall T (2003) Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Account Organ Soc 28(7–8):715–741
Klomp L, Van Leeuwen G (2001) Linking innovation and firm performance: a new approach. Int J Econ Bus 8(3):343–364
Kraus S, Pohjola M, Koponen A (2012) Innovation in family firms: an empirical analysis linking organizational and managerial innovation to corporate success. Rev Manag Sci 6(3):265–286
Laitinen EK (2001) Management accounting change in small technology companies: towards a mathematical model of the technology firm. Manag Account Res 12(4):507–541
Lin LH (2009) Effects of national culture on process management and technological innovation. Total Qual Manag Bus 20(12):1287–1301
Llach J, Castro R, Bikfalvi A, Marimon F (2012) The relationship between environmental management systems and organizational innovations. Hum Factor Ergon Manuf 22(4):307–316
Luft J, Shields MD (2003) Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research. Account Organ Soc 28(2–3):169–249
Malmi T, Brown D (2008) Management control systems as a package—Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Manag Account Res 19:287–300
McGill ME, Slocum JW Jr, Lei D (1992) Management practices in learning organizations. Organ Dyn 21(1):5–17
Merchant KA, Otley DT (2006) A review of the literature on control and accountability. In: Chapman CS, Hopwood AG, Shields MD (eds) Handbook of management accounting research. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 785–802
Moll MJ, Birkinshaw J (2009) The sources of management innovation: when firms introduce new management practices. J Bus Res 62:1269–1280
Mueller J (2012) The interactive relationship of corporate culture and knowledge management: a review. Rev Manag Sci 6(2):183–201
Murat Ar I, Baki B (2011) Antecedents and performance impacts of product versus process innovation: empirical evidence from SMEs located in Turkish science and technology parks. Eur J Innov Manag 14(2):172–206
Naranjo-Gil D, Hartmann F (2007) Management accounting systems, top management team heterogeneity and strategic change. Account Organ Soc 32(7–8):735–756
Naranjo-Gil D, Hartmann F, Maas VS (2008) Top management team heterogeneity, strategic change and operational performance. Br J Manage 19:222–234
Nieto M (2007) The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation 27(6/7):367–377
Nieto MJ, Santamaría L (2010) Technological collaboration: bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms. J Small Bus Manag 48(1):44–69
O’Sullivan D, Dooley L (2009) Applying innovation. SAGE Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks
OECD, Eurostat (2005) Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd edn. OECD, Paris
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903
Prajogo DI, Ahmed PK (2006) Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R D Manage 36(5):499–515
Prajogo DI, Sohal AS (2001) TQM and innovation: a literature review and research framework. Technovation 21:539–558
Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the black box: technology and economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sainio LM, Ritala P, Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P (2012) Constituents of radical innovation-exploring the role of strategic orientations and market uncertainty. Technovation 32(11):591–599
Sim KL, Killough LN (1998) The performance effects of complementarities between manufacturing practices and management accounting systems. J Manag Account Res 10:325–346
Simonetti R, Archibugi D, Evangelista R (1995) Product and process innovations: how are they defined? How are they quantified? Scientometrics 32:77–89
Simons R (1991) Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems. Strateg Manage J 12:49–62
Simons R (1995) Levers of control: how managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Simons R (2000) Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Stadler C (2011) Process innovation and integration in process-oriented settings: the case of the oil industry. J Prod Innov Manag 28(1):44–62
Su S, Baird K, Schoch H (2014) The moderating effect of organizational life cycle stages on the association between the interactive and diagnostic approaches to using controls with organizational performance. Manag Account Res. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2014.09.001
Tang J, Pee LG, Iijima J (2013) Investigating the effects of business process orientation on organizational innovation performance. Inf Manag 50(8):650–660
Utterback JM, Abernathy WJ (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3(6):639–656
Verhees FJHM, Meulenberg MTG (2004) Market orientation, innovativeness, product innovation, and performance in small firms. J Small Bus Manag 42(2):134–154
Verhees FJHM, Meulenberg MTG, Penning JME (2010) Performance expectations of small firms considering radical product innovation. J Bus Res 63(7):772–777
Widener SK (2007) An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Account Organ Soc 31(3):405–431
Wolfe RA (1994) Organizational innovation: review, critique and suggested research directions. J Manag Stud 31(3):405–431
Ylinen M, Gullkvist B (2012) The effects of tolerance for ambiguity and task uncertainty on the balanced and combined use of project controls. Eur Account Rev 21(2):395–415
Ylinen M, Gullkvist B (2014) The effects of organic and mechanistic control in exploratory and exploitative innovations. Manag Account Res 25(1):93–112
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the participants and anonymous reviewers at the XVI AECA Conference (Spanish Association of Accounting and Business Administration). Granada Spain, September 2011; at the 18th Workshop on Accounting and Management Control–Raymond Konopka Memorial, Baeza, Jaén, Spain, February 2013 and at the 36th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association, Paris, France, May 2013, for their insightful comments and suggestions. Jacobo Gomez-Conde is grateful to Catedra AECA Carlos Cubillo (2013-2014) and Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (ECO2013-48328-C3-2-P) for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
1.1 Interactive use of management control systems
Balanced scorecard (as for cost accounting and budget systems)
Is balanced scorecard used in your company? [yes/no]. If so:
-
(1)
…is used for result control (1) or continuous learning (5)
-
(2)
…is used to promote efficiency of internal operations (1) or to enhance creative responses to environmental changes (5).
-
(3)
…information is discussed face-to-face with team managers rarely (1) or continuously (5).
-
(4)
managers only discuss this tool face-to-face with their executive team when there are deviations (1) or managers always debate on this tool with their executive team (5)
1.2 Innovation
1.2.1 Process innovation
Please rate [Scale: (1), low and (5), high)] the extent to which new process incorporated are
-
(1)
Important in company results.
-
(2)
A novelty for the market.
1.2.2 Organizational innovation
Please rate [Scale: (1), low and (5), high)] the extent to which changes in business organization (introduction of new management systems, new forms of work development, new exterior relationships, new forms of employee training, etc.) are
-
(1)
Important in company results.
-
(2)
A novelty for the market.
1.3 Financial performance
Relative to your expectations, rate [Scale: (1), low and (5), high)] your degree of compliance (on average over the last 3 years) with performance goals on:
-
(1)
Sales.
-
(2)
Profit.
-
(3)
ROA.
Appendix 2
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lopez-Valeiras, E., Gonzalez-Sanchez, M.B. & Gomez-Conde, J. The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on process and organizational innovation. Rev Manag Sci 10, 487–510 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-015-0165-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-015-0165-9
Keywords
- Process innovation
- Organizational innovation
- Financial performance
- Management accounting systems
- Performance measurement systems
- Management control systems