Abstract
Measurement instruments of early childhood teachers’ mathematical pedagogical content knowledge (MPCK) have to consider the special characteristics of early childhood teaching. Early childhood teaching includes some planned activities but in contrast to learning in school, it is often motivated and generated by situations which unfold spontaneously in play and everyday activities. Therefore, and to respect that early childhood teachers as experts in their field may fail to explain their knowledge explicitly but indeed show implicit knowledge in their daily work, a measurement approach related to concrete situations seems to be suitable. While there are qualitative MPCK interview-instruments following this approach, there is still a lack of standardized instruments suitable for large-scale studies. As a first proposal to approach this gap, we developed a paper–pencil test with multiple-choice items measuring MPCK, and respecting early childhood teachers’ implicit knowledge. The test is based on descriptions of four typical kindergarten situations. Linked to each situation, we developed a set of items measuring professional knowledge concerning mathematical abilities of children and two multiple-choice items measuring professional knowledge of adaptive mathematical learning activities. The 39 items were piloted with a sample (N = 149) of pre- and in-service early childhood teachers. The results show validity evidence related to the test content, response processes, the internal structure of the test, as well as convergent evidence. Therefore, the test provides a suitable first approach to measure early childhood teachers’ MPCK, while addressing their implicit knowledge.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Hereinafter, implicit and tacit knowledge are used synonymously.
Depaepe et al. (2013) included 3 studies with preschool teachers in their review. Two of these studies were case studies, not focusing on measuring MPCK in general.
References
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Anders, Y., & Rossbach, H.-G. (2015). Preschool teachers’ sensitivity to mathematics in children’s play: The influence of math-related school experiences, emotional attitudes, and pedagogical beliefs. Journal of Research in Childhood Education,29(3), 305–322.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education,59, 389–407.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal,47, 133–180.
Benz, C., Peter-Koop, A., & Grüßing, M. (2015). Frühe mathematische Bildung. Heidelberg: Springer.
Blömeke, S., Felbrich, A., Müller, C., Kaiser, G., & Lehmann, R. (2008). Effectiveness of teacher education. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education,40, 719–734.
Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015a). Beyond dichotomies. Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie,223(1), 3–13.
Blömeke, S., Jenßen, L., Dunekacke, S., Suhl, U., Grassmann, M., & Wedekind, H. (2015b). Leistungstests zur Messung der professionellen Kompetenz frühpädagogischer Fachkräfte. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie,29(3–4), 177–191.
Bromme, R. (1992). Der Lehrer als Experte. Zur Psychologie des professionellen Wissens. Münster: Waxmann.
Bromme, R. (2001). Teacher expertise. In N. Smelser & P. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Behavioral Sciences. Volume: Education (pp. 15459–15465). London: Pergamon.
Bruns, J., Eichen, L., & Gasteiger, H. (2017). Structure of early childhood educators’ math-related competence. In B. Kaur, W. K. Ho, T. L. Toh, & B. H. Choy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 185–192). Singapore: PME.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.
Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research,12, 229–238.
Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education,34, 12–25.
Dunekacke, S., Jenßen, L., & Blömeke, S. (2015). Mathematikdidaktische Kompetenz von Erzieherinnen und Erziehern. Validierung des KomMa-Leistungstests durch die videogestützte Erhebung von Performanz. In S. Blömeke & O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia (Eds.), Kompetenzen von Studierenden (Zeitschrift für Pädagogik Beiheft, Bd. 61, pp. 80–99). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
Gasteiger, H. (2012). Fostering early mathematical competencies in natural learning situations—Foundation and challenges of a competence-oriented concept of mathematics education in kindergarten. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik,33(2), 181–201.
Gasteiger, H., & Benz, C. (2018a). Enhancing and analyzing kindergarten teachers’ professional knowledge for early mathematics education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior,51, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.01.002.
Gasteiger, H., & Benz, C. (2018b). Mathematics Education competence of professionals in early childhood education—A theory-based competence model. In C. Benz, A. S. Steinweg, H. Gasteiger, P. Schöner, H. Vollmuth, & J. Zöllner (Eds.), Mathematics Education in the Early Years. Results from the POEM 3 Conference, 2016 (pp. 69–91). Cham: Springer.
Ginsburg, H. P. (2016). Helping early childhood educators to understand and assess young children’s mathematical minds. ZDM Mathematics Education,48(7), 941–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0807-7.
Ginsburg, H. P., Lee, J. S., & Boyd, J. S. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it. Social policy report. Giving child and youth development knowledge away, 3–23.
Kucharz, D., Mackowiak, K., Dieck, M., Kauertz, A., Rathgeb-Schnierer, E., & Ziroli, S. (2014). Theoretischer Hintergrund und aktueller Forschungsstand. In D. Kucharz, K. Mackowiak, M. Dieck, A. Kauertz, E. Rathgeb-Schnierer, & S. Ziroli (Eds.), Professionelles Handeln im Elementarbereich (PRIMEL). Eine deutsch-schweizerische Videostudie (pp. 11–48). Münster: Waxmann.
Lee, J. (2010). Exploring kindergarten teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics. International Journal of Early Childhood,42(1), 27–41.
Lindmeier, A. (2011). Modeling and measuring knowledge and competencies of teachers: A threefold domain-specific structure model for mathematics. Münster: Waxmann.
Lindmeier, A., Hepberger, B., Heinze, A., & Moser Opitz, E. (2016). Modeling cognitive dispositions of educators for early mathematics education. In C. Csikos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitányi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 219–226). Szeged (Hungary): PME.
McCray, J. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge for preschool mathematics: Relationships to teaching practices and child outcomes. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Chicago: Erikson Institute.
McCray, J., & Chen, J.-Q. (2012). Pedagogical content knowledge for preschool mathematics: Construct validity of a new teacher interview. Journal of Research in Childhood Education,26(3), 291–307.
Neubrand, M. (2018). Conceptualizations of professional knowledge for teachers of mathematics. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education,50, 601–612.
Neuweg, G. (2015). Das Schweigen der Könner. Gesammelte Schriften zum impliziten Wissen. Münster: Waxmann.
Oppermann, E., Anders, Y., & Hachfeld, A. (2016). The influence of preschool teachers’ content knowledge and mathematical ability beliefs on their sensitivity to mathematics in children’s play. Teaching and Teacher Education,58, 174–184.
Peter-Koop, A., & Grüßing, M. (2014). Early enhancement of kindergarten children potentially at risk in learning school mathematics—Design and findings of an intervention study. In U. Kortenkamp, C. Benz, B. Brandt, G. Krummheuer, S. Ladel, & R. Vogel (Eds.), Early Mathematics Learning (pp. 307–322). New York: Springer.
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal Knowledge: Towards A Post-Critical Philosophy. Corr. Ed. London: Routledge.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Garden City: Doubleday and Co.
Robitzsch, A., Kiefer, T., & Wu, M. (2019). TAM: Test analysis modules. R package version 3.2-24.
Rothe, H.-J., & Schindler, M. (1996). Expertise und Wissen. In H. Gruber & A. Ziegler (Eds.), Expertiseforschung (pp. 35–57). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. Hants: Arena, Ashgate.
Schuler, S., Wittmann, G. Levin, A., & Bönig, D. (2017). Das intendierte Handeln in offenen Lehr-Lern-Situationen als Indikator für die mathematikbezogene Kompetenz von ErzieherInnen und GrundschullehrerInnen. In S. Schuler, C. Streit, & G. Wittmann (Eds.), Perspektiven mathematischer Bildung im Übergang vom Kindergarten zur Grundschule (pp. 223–237). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12950-7_15.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher,15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. (2015). PCK: its genesis and exodus. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education (pp. 3–13). New York: Routledge.
Smith, K. H. (2000). Early childhood teachers’ pedagogical knowledge in mathematics: A quantitative study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
van Oers, B. (2010). Emergent mathematical thinking in the context of play. Educational Studies in Mathematics,74(1), 23–37.
Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and Selecting Key Competencies (pp. 45–65). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach. New York: Psychology Press.
Wittmann, G. & Levin, A. (2016). Elementarmathematisches und mathematikdidaktisches Wissen. In G. Wittmann, A. Levin, & D. Bönig (Eds.). AnschlussM. Anschlussfähigkeit mathematikdidaktischer Überzeugungen und Praktiken von ErzieherInnen und GrundschullehrerInnen (pp. 70–101; 150–151). Münster, New York: Waxmann.
Funding
This work was supported by the German Center of Mathematics Teacher Education and the Germany Telekom Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gasteiger, H., Bruns, J., Benz, C. et al. Mathematical pedagogical content knowledge of early childhood teachers: a standardized situation-related measurement approach. ZDM Mathematics Education 52, 193–205 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01103-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01103-2