Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mathematical pedagogical content knowledge of early childhood teachers: a standardized situation-related measurement approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Measurement instruments of early childhood teachers’ mathematical pedagogical content knowledge (MPCK) have to consider the special characteristics of early childhood teaching. Early childhood teaching includes some planned activities but in contrast to learning in school, it is often motivated and generated by situations which unfold spontaneously in play and everyday activities. Therefore, and to respect that early childhood teachers as experts in their field may fail to explain their knowledge explicitly but indeed show implicit knowledge in their daily work, a measurement approach related to concrete situations seems to be suitable. While there are qualitative MPCK interview-instruments following this approach, there is still a lack of standardized instruments suitable for large-scale studies. As a first proposal to approach this gap, we developed a paper–pencil test with multiple-choice items measuring MPCK, and respecting early childhood teachers’ implicit knowledge. The test is based on descriptions of four typical kindergarten situations. Linked to each situation, we developed a set of items measuring professional knowledge concerning mathematical abilities of children and two multiple-choice items measuring professional knowledge of adaptive mathematical learning activities. The 39 items were piloted with a sample (N = 149) of pre- and in-service early childhood teachers. The results show validity evidence related to the test content, response processes, the internal structure of the test, as well as convergent evidence. Therefore, the test provides a suitable first approach to measure early childhood teachers’ MPCK, while addressing their implicit knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hereinafter, implicit and tacit knowledge are used synonymously.

  2. Depaepe et al. (2013) included 3 studies with preschool teachers in their review. Two of these studies were case studies, not focusing on measuring MPCK in general.

References

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anders, Y., & Rossbach, H.-G. (2015). Preschool teachers’ sensitivity to mathematics in children’s play: The influence of math-related school experiences, emotional attitudes, and pedagogical beliefs. Journal of Research in Childhood Education,29(3), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education,59, 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal,47, 133–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz, C., Peter-Koop, A., & Grüßing, M. (2015). Frühe mathematische Bildung. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blömeke, S., Felbrich, A., Müller, C., Kaiser, G., & Lehmann, R. (2008). Effectiveness of teacher education. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education,40, 719–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J., & Shavelson, R. J. (2015a). Beyond dichotomies. Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie,223(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blömeke, S., Jenßen, L., Dunekacke, S., Suhl, U., Grassmann, M., & Wedekind, H. (2015b). Leistungstests zur Messung der professionellen Kompetenz frühpädagogischer Fachkräfte. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie,29(3–4), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R. (1992). Der Lehrer als Experte. Zur Psychologie des professionellen Wissens. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromme, R. (2001). Teacher expertise. In N. Smelser & P. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Behavioral Sciences. Volume: Education (pp. 15459–15465). London: Pergamon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, J., Eichen, L., & Gasteiger, H. (2017). Structure of early childhood educators’ math-related competence. In B. Kaur, W. K. Ho, T. L. Toh, & B. H. Choy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 185–192). Singapore: PME.

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research,12, 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education,34, 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunekacke, S., Jenßen, L., & Blömeke, S. (2015). Mathematikdidaktische Kompetenz von Erzieherinnen und Erziehern. Validierung des KomMa-Leistungstests durch die videogestützte Erhebung von Performanz. In S. Blömeke & O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia (Eds.), Kompetenzen von Studierenden (Zeitschrift für Pädagogik Beiheft, Bd. 61, pp. 80–99). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.

  • Gasteiger, H. (2012). Fostering early mathematical competencies in natural learning situations—Foundation and challenges of a competence-oriented concept of mathematics education in kindergarten. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik,33(2), 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasteiger, H., & Benz, C. (2018a). Enhancing and analyzing kindergarten teachers’ professional knowledge for early mathematics education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior,51, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasteiger, H., & Benz, C. (2018b). Mathematics Education competence of professionals in early childhood education—A theory-based competence model. In C. Benz, A. S. Steinweg, H. Gasteiger, P. Schöner, H. Vollmuth, & J. Zöllner (Eds.), Mathematics Education in the Early Years. Results from the POEM 3 Conference, 2016 (pp. 69–91). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. P. (2016). Helping early childhood educators to understand and assess young children’s mathematical minds. ZDM Mathematics Education,48(7), 941–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0807-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. P., Lee, J. S., & Boyd, J. S. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it. Social policy report. Giving child and youth development knowledge away, 3–23.

  • Kucharz, D., Mackowiak, K., Dieck, M., Kauertz, A., Rathgeb-Schnierer, E., & Ziroli, S. (2014). Theoretischer Hintergrund und aktueller Forschungsstand. In D. Kucharz, K. Mackowiak, M. Dieck, A. Kauertz, E. Rathgeb-Schnierer, & S. Ziroli (Eds.), Professionelles Handeln im Elementarbereich (PRIMEL). Eine deutsch-schweizerische Videostudie (pp. 11–48). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2010). Exploring kindergarten teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics. International Journal of Early Childhood,42(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindmeier, A. (2011). Modeling and measuring knowledge and competencies of teachers: A threefold domain-specific structure model for mathematics. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindmeier, A., Hepberger, B., Heinze, A., & Moser Opitz, E. (2016). Modeling cognitive dispositions of educators for early mathematics education. In C. Csikos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitányi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 219–226). Szeged (Hungary): PME.

  • McCray, J. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge for preschool mathematics: Relationships to teaching practices and child outcomes. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Chicago: Erikson Institute.

  • McCray, J., & Chen, J.-Q. (2012). Pedagogical content knowledge for preschool mathematics: Construct validity of a new teacher interview. Journal of Research in Childhood Education,26(3), 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubrand, M. (2018). Conceptualizations of professional knowledge for teachers of mathematics. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education,50, 601–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuweg, G. (2015). Das Schweigen der Könner. Gesammelte Schriften zum impliziten Wissen. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppermann, E., Anders, Y., & Hachfeld, A. (2016). The influence of preschool teachers’ content knowledge and mathematical ability beliefs on their sensitivity to mathematics in children’s play. Teaching and Teacher Education,58, 174–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter-Koop, A., & Grüßing, M. (2014). Early enhancement of kindergarten children potentially at risk in learning school mathematics—Design and findings of an intervention study. In U. Kortenkamp, C. Benz, B. Brandt, G. Krummheuer, S. Ladel, & R. Vogel (Eds.), Early Mathematics Learning (pp. 307–322). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal Knowledge: Towards A Post-Critical Philosophy. Corr. Ed. London: Routledge.

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Garden City: Doubleday and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robitzsch, A., Kiefer, T., & Wu, M. (2019). TAM: Test analysis modules. R package version 3.2-24.

  • Rothe, H.-J., & Schindler, M. (1996). Expertise und Wissen. In H. Gruber & A. Ziegler (Eds.), Expertiseforschung (pp. 35–57). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. Hants: Arena, Ashgate.

  • Schuler, S., Wittmann, G. Levin, A., & Bönig, D. (2017). Das intendierte Handeln in offenen Lehr-Lern-Situationen als Indikator für die mathematikbezogene Kompetenz von ErzieherInnen und GrundschullehrerInnen. In S. Schuler, C. Streit, & G. Wittmann (Eds.), Perspektiven mathematischer Bildung im Übergang vom Kindergarten zur Grundschule (pp. 223–237). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12950-7_15.

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher,15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (2015). PCK: its genesis and exodus. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education (pp. 3–13). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. H. (2000). Early childhood teachers’ pedagogical knowledge in mathematics: A quantitative study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta.

  • van Oers, B. (2010). Emergent mathematical thinking in the context of play. Educational Studies in Mathematics,74(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and Selecting Key Competencies (pp. 45–65). Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmann, G. & Levin, A. (2016). Elementarmathematisches und mathematikdidaktisches Wissen. In G. Wittmann, A. Levin, & D. Bönig (Eds.). AnschlussM. Anschlussfähigkeit mathematikdidaktischer Überzeugungen und Praktiken von ErzieherInnen und GrundschullehrerInnen (pp. 70–101; 150–151). Münster, New York: Waxmann.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the German Center of Mathematics Teacher Education and the Germany Telekom Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hedwig Gasteiger.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gasteiger, H., Bruns, J., Benz, C. et al. Mathematical pedagogical content knowledge of early childhood teachers: a standardized situation-related measurement approach. ZDM Mathematics Education 52, 193–205 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01103-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01103-2

Keywords

Navigation