Abstract
Middle income countries have always faced the challenge of how to move from commodity production to more knowledge-intensive activities. The current globalization process is turning this middle income dilemma into a possible middle income trap. To understand better how countries can achieve broad-based upgrading to confront the middle income trap, we develop an analytical framework that links the macroeconomic context with microeconomic behavior and mesoeconomic conditions contingent upon path dependency and global circumstances. This capabilities-based approach draws from structuralist and evolutionary economic thought and global value chain analysis. We use the approach to analyze the particular set of factors that have enabled or constrained upgrading efforts under a liberal trade and investment regime in five small latecomers: Chile, the Dominican Republic, Jordan, Ireland, and Singapore. The country analyses demonstrate that strategic, pro-active, and coherent government policies for capability advancement are a key determinant of upgrading in open economies, both at the country level and in the development of “pockets of excellence.”
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramovitz M. Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. The Journal of Economic History. 1986;46(2):385–406.
Abramovitz M. The search for the sources of growth: areas of ignorance, old and new. J Econ Hist. 1993;53(2):217–43.
Abugattas L, Paus E. Policy space for a capability-centered development strategy for Latin America. In: Shadlen K, Sanchez-Ancochea D, editors. Responding to globalization in the Americas. The political economy of hemispheric integration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008. p. 113–43.
Abugattas L, Paus E. Mobilizing Public Resources for a New Development Strategy in the Age of Globalization. In: Khan S, Christiansen J, editors. Markets as means rather than masters. Towards a new developmentalism. London: Routledge; 2010.
Amsden A. The rise of “the rest”. In: Challenges to the West from late-industrializing economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Archibugi D, Coco A. A new indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCo). World Dev. 2004;32(4):629–54.
Arvis J-F, et al. Trade logistics in the global economy. In: The Logistics Performance Index and its indicators. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2010.
Asian Development Bank. Asia 2050. In: Realizing the Asian Century. Manila: Asian Development Bank; 2011.
Birkenshaw J, Hood N. Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Acad Manage Rev. 1998;23(4):773–95.
Cadot, Olivier, Carrère, Céline, and Vanessa Strauss-Kahn. Export diversification: what’s behind the hump? CERDI, Working Paper E 2009.34. 2009. http://publi.cerdi.org/ed/2009/2009.34.pdf
Cassen R. Education and training for manufacturing development. In: Godfrey M, editor. Skill development for international competitiveness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 1997. p. 169–200.
Chang H-J. Bad samaritans. The myth of free trade and the secret history of capitalism. New York: Bloomsbury Press; 2008.
Cimoli M, Porcile G, Rovira S. Structural change and the BOP constraint: why did Latin America fail to converge. Camb J Econ. 2010;34:389–411.
Cimoli M, Dosi G, Stiglitz JE. The political economy of capabilities accumulation: the past and future of policies of industrial development. In: Cimoli M, Dosi G, Stiglitz JE, editors. Industrial policy and development. The political economy of capabilities accumulaton. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 1–16.
Dahlman C. “Technology, globalization and international competitiveness: challenges for developing countries,” in DESA. ed. Industrial development for the 21st century: sustainable development perspectives. New York: United Nations; 2007. pp. 29–83.
Dahlman CJ. Growth and development in china and India: the role of industrial policy in rapid catch-up. In: Cimoli M, Dosi G, Stiglitz J, editors. Industrial policy and development. The political economy of capability accumulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 303–35.
Dicken P. Global shift: transforming the world economy. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 1998.
Dosi G. Technological change and industrial transformation. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 1984.
Dowrick S, Golley J. Trade openness and growth: who benefits? Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2004;20(1):38–56.
Dutta S. The Global Innovation Index 2011. In: Accelerating growth and development. Fountainebleau: INSEAD; 2011.
Dutta S, Mia I. Global information technology report, 2010–2011. Fountainebleau: World Economic Forum and INSEAD. 2011.
Eichengreen B, Park D, Shin K. When fast growing economies slow down: international evidence and implications for China. NBER working paper 16919. 2011.
Figuereido PN. Government policies and sources of latecomer firms’ capability building: a learning story from Brazil. Oxford Development Studies. 2008;36(1):59–88.
Goerg H, Greenaway D. Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? World Bank Research Observer. 2004;19(2):171–97.
Hausmann R, Hwang J, Rodrik D. What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth. 2007a;12:1–25.
Hausmann R, Klinger B. The structure of the product space and the evolution of comparative advantage. Working paper no. 146. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Center for International Development. 2007.
Humphrey J, Schmitz H. Governance and upgrading: linking industrial clusters and global value chain research. Working paper no. 120. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex. 2000.
Imbs J, Wacziarg R. Stages of diversification. Am Econ Rev. 2003;93(1):63–86.
Kemeny T. Does foreign direct investment drive technological upgrading? World Dev. 2010;38(11):1543–54.
Kuroda, Haruhiko. Opportunities and challenges of middle income transitions, Beijing, March 11. 2011. http://www.adb.org/Documents/Speeches/2011/ms2011014.asp
Lall S. The technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports, 1985–98. Oxford Development Studies. 2000;28(3):337–69.
Lall S. Technology and Industrial development in the Era of Globalization. In: Chang HJ, editor. Rethinking development economics. London: Anthem Press; 2003. p. 277–98.
Lall S. Rethinking Industrial strategy: the role of the state in the face of globalization. In: Gallager K, editor. Putting development first. London: Zed Books; 2005. p. 33–68.
Lee, K. How can Korea be a role model for catch-up development? A capability-based view. Research paper no. 2009/34. World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University. 2009.
Lim W. Comment on growth identification and facilitation. In: Lin JY, editor. New structural economics. A framework for rethinking development and policy. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2011. p. 201–4.
Lin JY, Monga C. Growth identification and facilitation: the role of the state in the dynamics of structural change. In: Lin JY, editor. New structural economics. A framework for rethinking development and policy. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2011. p. 143–90.
Lin, JY. New structural economics. A framework for rethinking development. Washington, DC: World Bank. 2011.
Lundvall B-A, Johnson B, Andersen ES, Dalum B. National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research Policy. 2002;31:213–31.
Marin A, Bell M. Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment (FDI): the active role of MNC subsidiaries in Argentina in the 1990s. Journal of Development Studies. 2006;42(4):678–97.
McMillan M, Rodrik, D. Globalization, structural change and productivity growth. NBER working paper 17143, June. 2011.
NEAC (National Economic Advisory Council). New economic model for Malaysia. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Federal Government Administrative Center; 2010.
Nelson R, Winter S. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1982.
Ocampo JA, Rada C, Taylor L. Growth and policy in developing countries. A Structuralist Approach. New York: Columbia University Press; 2009.
Ocampo JA, Vos R. Uneven economic development. London: Zed Books; 2008.
Ohno, K. Avoiding the middle income trap. Renovating industrial policy formulation in Vietnam. ASEAN Economic Bulletin. 2009;26(1):25–43.
Palma JG. Flying geese and waddling ducks: the different capabilities of East Asia and Latin America to ‘demand-adapt’ and ‘supply-upgrade their export productive capacity. In: Mario Cimoli, Giovanni Dosi, Stiglitz JE, editors. Industrial policy and development. The political economy of capabilities accumulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 203–38.
Paus E. Foreign investment, development and globalization. In: Can Costa Rica become Ireland? New York: Palgrave-Macmillan; 2005.
Paus, E. The rise of China: implications for Latin American development. Development Policy Review. 2009;27:419–56.
Paus, E. The uneven development of local technological capabilities in Costa Rica. Background paper for the skills and employability department. Geneva: International Labor Organization. 2010.
Paus, E. Latin America’s middle income trap. Americas Quarterly. Winter. 2011. pp. 71–76.
Pietrobelli C, Rabellotti R, editors. Upgrading to compete. Global value chains, clusters, and SMEs in Latin America. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank; 2006.
Reinert E. How rich countries got rich and why poor countries stay poor. New York: Public Affairs; 2007.
Rodrik, D. The future of economic convergence. Paper presented at the Jackson Hole Symposium of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 25–27 Aug. 2011a
Rodrik, D. Comments. In: Lin J, editor. New structural economics. A framework for rethinking development and policy. 2011b. pp. 53–56.
Schrank A. Homeward bound? Interest, identity, and investor behavior in a Third World export platform. Am J Sociol. 2008;114(1):1–34.
Sen A. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
Shanghai Daily. How China can avoid trap of middle income. 2011. http://www.shanghaidaily.com/article/print.asp?id=469178
Shapiro H, Taylor L. The state and industrial policy. World Dev. 1990;18(6):861–78.
UNCTAD. World investment report, 2005. New York: United Nations; 2005.
UNIDO. Industrial development report 2009. Vienna: UNIDO; 2009.
Weiss LJ, Hobson M. States and economic development. In: A comparative historical analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 1995.
World Bank. East Asia and Pacific economic update: robust recovery, rising risks. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2010.
Yusuf S. Innovative East Asia. In: The future of growth. New York: A World Bank Publication, Oxford University Press; 2003.
Yusuf S, Nabeshima K. Can Malaysia escape the middle income trap?” World Bank Development Research Group. Policy Research working paper 4971. 2009.
Zoellick, R. The big questions China has to answer. Financial Times. 1 Sept. 2011.
Acknowledgments
I gratefully acknowledge grant support from the Latin American Studies Association and the Mellon Foundation for a series of working meetings of the members of the middle income trap project. I am indebted to my colleagues in the project for their contributions to this article. I thank the anonymous outside referees and Barbara Stallings for their constructive comments and Bochao Zhao for her excellent research assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paus, E. Confronting the Middle Income Trap: Insights from Small Latecomers. St Comp Int Dev 47, 115–138 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-012-9110-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-012-9110-y