Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Driver’s EEG Given Take-Over Alarm in SAE Level 3 Automated Driving in a Simulated Environment

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As partially automated driving vehicles are set to be mass produced, there is an increased necessity to research situations where such partially automated vehicles become unable to drive. Automated vehicles at SAE Level 3 cannot avoid a take-over between the human driver and vehicle system. Therefore, how the system alerts a human driver is essential in situations where the vehicle autonomous driving system is taken over. The present study delivered a take-over transition alert to human drivers using diverse combinations of visual, auditory, and haptic modalities and analyzed the drivers’ brainwave data. To investigate the differences in indexes according to the take-over transition alert type, the independent variable of this study, the nonparametric test of Kruskal-Wallis was performed along with Mann-Whitney as a follow-up test. Moreover, the pre/post-warning difference in each index was investigated, and the results were reflected in ranking effective warning combinations and their resulting scores. The visual-auditory-haptic warning scored the highest in terms of various EEG indexes, to be the most effective type of take-over transition alert. Unlike most preceding studies analyzing post-take-over-alert human drivers’ response times or vehicle behavior, this study investigates drivers’ brainwave after the take-over warning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baek, S., Yun, H. and Yang, J. H. (2019). How do humans respond when automated vehicles request an immediate vehicle control take-over?. Automotive UI’19 (Accepted).

  • Borojeni, S. S., Chuang, L., Heuten, W. and Boll, S. (2016). Assisting drivers with ambient take-over requests in highly automated driving. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications., Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

  • Chae, S., Kyung, G., Park, S., Nam, K., Lee, K. and Lee, Y. H. (2012). A study on the relationship between emotions and brain signals evoked by head-up display images. Proc. Autumn Conf. Ergonomics Society of Korea, Pyeongchang, Korea.

  • Cho, K. and Moon, J. (2014). Direction for support of MOTIE R&D in autonomous driving vehicle. J. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers36, 7, 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, L. L., Glatz, C. and Krupenia, S. (2017). Using EEG to understand why behavior to auditory in-vehicle notifications differs across test environments. Proc. 9th ACM Int. Conf. Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Oldenburg, Germany.

  • Gold, C., Dambock, D., Lorenz, L. and Bengler, K. (2013). “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?. Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting57, 1, 1938–1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, M., Lee, K. and Dyre, B. P. (2017). Driver take over: A preliminary exploration of driver trust and performance in autonomous vehicles. Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting61, 1, 1969–1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, M. (2017). Emotions in driving. Emotions and Affect in Human Factors and Human-Computer Interaction. Academic Press. USA, 437–474.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. Y., Lee, J. H., Park, M. H., Choi, Y. H. and Park, Y. O. (2017). Trend in brain wave signal and application technology. Electronics and Telecommunications Trends32, 2, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S., Hwang, Y., Yoon, D., Choi, W. and Park, C. H. (2014). Driver workload characteristics analysis using EEG data from an urban road. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems15, 4, 1844–1849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Rhee, W., Choi, D., Jang, Y. J. and Yoon, Y. (2018). Characterizing driver stress using physiological and operational data from real-world electric vehicle driving experiment. Int. J. Automotive Technology19, 5, 895–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Yun, H., Kim, J., Baek, S., Han, H., FakhrHosseini, S. M., Vasey, E., Lee, O., Jeon, M. and Yang, J. H. (2019). Design for single-modal take-over request in SAE level 2 & 3 automated vehicle. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers27, 3, 171–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louw, T. and Merat, N. (2017). Are you in the loop? Using gaze dispersion to understand driver visual attention during vehicle automation. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 76, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naujoks, F., Mai, C. and Neukum, A. (2014). The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation 7 (Part I), Wurzburg, Germany, 431–438.

  • Park, C., Shahrdar, S. and Nojoumian, M. (2018). EEG-based classification of emotional state using an autonomous vehicle simulator. Proc. IEEE 10th Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop (SAM), Sheffield, UK.

  • Park, S. S., Hu, H. and Lee, W. S. (2010). A study on physiological signal changes due to distraction in simulated driving. J. Ergonomics Society of Korea29, 1, 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S. H., Kim, Y. W. and Ji, Y. G. (2019). The effects of takeover request modalities on highly automated car control transitions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 123, 150–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun, H., Kim, S. L., Lee, J. W. and Yang, J. H. (2018). Analysis of cause of disengagement based on U.S. California DMV autonomous driving disengagement report. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers26, 4, 464–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun, H. and Yang, J. H. (2019). Multi-modal warning design for take-over request in partially automated vehicle. European Transport Research Review (Under Review).

  • Yun, Y. (2016). Trend and issue of driver-vehicle interface for autonomous vehicle. J. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers38, 2, 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a grant (code 18TLRP-B131486-02) from Transportation and Logistics R&D Program funded by Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government. The corresponding author was partly supported by the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea, which was funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (2017R1A2B400 8615). The authors thank Hanna Yun, Jaewon Kim, and Sujin Baek for collecting and analyzing data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji Hyun Yang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J., Yang, J.H. Analysis of Driver’s EEG Given Take-Over Alarm in SAE Level 3 Automated Driving in a Simulated Environment. Int.J Automot. Technol. 21, 719–728 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-020-0070-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-020-0070-3

Key Words

Navigation