Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geoheritage Information for Geoconservation and Geotourism Through the Categorization of Landforms in a Karstic Landscape. A Case Study from Covalagua and Las Tuerces (Palencia, Spain)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a methodological procedure for organizing geoheritage information, aimed at geoconservation and geotourism planning and management in protected areas. This method has been applied in a real-life process to declare the Covalagua and Las Tuerces sites as protected areas in the province of Palencia, in Northern Spain. Although the emphasis is on geoconservation, due to the predominantly karstic characteristics of the studied landscape, the process explains a course of action for the inventory, assessment and diagnosis of geological and geomorphological information for land use planning and management, including geotourism provision. The preparation of the regulations which derived from that information flow is also explained. The inventory included the classification, mapping and description of landforms. The assessment was based on the interpretation of the information in terms of geoconservation and geotourism capacities and limitations, and included a specific analysis of the singularity and representativeness of a bogaz (labyrinth karst) and a sinkhole field. The information which came from that evaluation led to the diagnosis, and to the setting of the planning, use and management goals for the geo-resources. These guidelines were finally articulated as regulations. The procedure described is innovative from a methodological point of view, as it attempts to correct the most common problems found in this type of surveys: (a) the accumulation of a large quantity of geo-information of little use for planning and management purposes and (b) the very limited relationship between the geo-information included in the inventory and that included in the evaluation, diagnosis and regulations phases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnot RH, Grant K (1981) The application of a method of terrain analysis to functional land-capability assessment and aesthetic landscape appreciation. Landscape Plann 8:269–300. doi:10.1016/0304-3924(81)90017-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basconcillos J, Gallo PL, Salman K, Sánchez Fabián JA (2006) Guía de la reserva geológica de Las Loras. Piedra Abierta, Palencia

    Google Scholar 

  • Brilha JB (2002) Geoconservation and protected areas. Environ Cons 29:273–276. doi:10.1017/S0376892902000188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carcavilla L, López-Martínez J, Durán JJ, Arrese B, Berrio MP, Martín J, Ruiz R (2005) El patrimonio geológico en la declaración y zonificación de espacios naturales protegidos. Aplicación a la Sierra de Ayllón (Guadalajara, Castilla-La Mancha). In: Mata-Perelló JM, Gavaldá J (eds) Libro de Actas de la VI Reunión Nacional de la Comisión de Patrimonio Geológico, Sociedad Geológica de España y Museo de Geología Valentí Masachs, Madrid, pp 83–89

  • Carcavilla L, López-Martínez J, Durán JJ (2007) Patrimonio geológico y geodiversidad: investigación, conservación, gestión y relación con los espacios naturales protegidos. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Carcavilla L, Durán JJ, García-Cortés A, López-Martínez J (2009) Geological heritage and geoconservation in Spain: past, present and future. Geoheritage 1(2–4):75–91. doi:10.1007/s12371-009-0006-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cendrero A, Francés E, Díaz de Terán JR (1992) Geoenvironmental units as basis for the assessment, regulation and management of the Earth's Surface. In: Cendrero A, Lüttig G, Wolff FC (eds) Planning the use of the earth's surface. Springer, Berlin, pp 199–234

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling RK, Newsome D (eds) (2006) Geotourism. Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Martínez E, Fuertes Gutiérrez I (2008) Inventario de Lugares de Interés Geológico (LIG) de la provincia de Palencia (CD). Junta de Castilla y León, Fundación Patrimonio Natural, Valladolid

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuertes-Gutiérrez I, Fernández-Martínez E (2010) Geosites inventory in the Leon Province (Northwestern Spain): a tool to introduce geoheritage into regional environmental management. Geoheritage 2:57–75. doi:10.1007/s12371-010-0012-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Limón J, De Lucio JV, Múgica M (2000) Los espacios naturales protegidos del estado español en el umbral del siglo XXI. De la declaración a la gestión activa. Fundación Fernando González Bernáldez, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey AE, Cleaves ET (1991) Landscape analysis: theoretical considerations and practical needs. Environ Geol Water Sci 17(2):141–155. doi:10.1007/BF01701570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (2000) Geological interpretation and geoconservation promotion for tourists. In: Barretino D, Wimbledon WAP, Gallego E (eds) Geological heritage: its conservation and management. Sociedad Geologica de España, Instituto Tecnologico GeoMinero de Espana, ProGEO, Madrid, pp 127–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (2006) Geotourism and interpretation. In: Dowling R, Newsome D (eds) Geotourism, sustainability, impacts and opportunities. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 221–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (2007) Geotourism in Almeria Province, southeast Spain. Tourism: an Interdisciplinary Journal 55(3):259–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (2011) The English Origins of Geotourism (as a Vehicle for Geoconservation) and Their Relevance to Current Studies. Acta Geogr Slov 51–3. doi:10.3986/AGS51302

  • Hose TA (2012) 3Gs for modern geotourism. (this volume)

  • Junta de Castilla y León, GAMA (2010) Revisión y actualización de las bases para la ordenación, el uso y la gestión de los espacios naturales de Covalagua y Las Tuerces (Palencia). Junta de Castilla y León, Valladolid

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Duque JF, Godfrey A, Pedraza J, Díez A, Sanz MA, Carrasco RM, Bodoque JM (2003) Landform classification for land use planning in developed areas: an example in Segovia Province (Central Spain). Environ Manag 32(4):488–498. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-2848-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell CW (1991) Terrain evaluation, 2nd edn. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss MR (1985) Land processes and land classification. J Environ Manage 20:295–319. doi:10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80003-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega LI, Cuesta J, Preciado J (2008) Puntos de Interés Geológico de Burgos. Asociación Geocientífica de Burgos (AGB) y Diputación Provincial de Burgos, Burgos

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez Fabián JA (2005) Reserva Geológica de Las Loras. In: Taller Libre de Paisaje, Espacio Tangente, Foro Arte y Territorio and País Románico, Aguilar de Campoo, pp. 49–75

  • Santos L, Martín Duque JF, Díez Herrero A (2006) Aspectos geomorfológicos en las Directrices de Ordenación Territorial de Segovia y Entorno (DOTSE). Geomorfología y Territorio. Servicio de Publicaciones e Intercambio Científico, Santiago de Compostela, pp 945–961

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos L, Herrera PM (2010) Nuevas perspectivas en la planificación de Espacios Naturales en Castilla y León. El Plan de Ordenación de Las Tuerces y Covalagua (Palencia, España). In: VI Congreso Internacional de Ordenación del Territorio. FUNDICOT, Pamplona, pp 1–15

  • Serrano E, González Trueba JJ (2005) Assesment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Geomorphologie 3:197–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrington GE (2004) Organizing Information for Natural Resource Management. http://www.wecsa.com/Note1/mgmtinfo.html. Accessed 15 January 2011

  • Wolfert HP (1995) Use of the catena principle in geomorphological impact assessment: a functional approach. Z Geomorph NF 39(4):417–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld IS (1989) The land unit—a fundamental concept in landscape ecology, and its applications. Land Ecol 3:67–86. doi:10.1007/BF00131171

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work team for the PORN for Covalagua and Las Tuerces was formed by the Consejería de Medio Ambiente de la Junta de Castilla y León and technical consultants (Grupo de Alternativas Medio Ambientales, S.L.). Patricio Bariego, Javier Ezquerra, Luz M. Requejo, Pablo Zuazua, Victor M. Martínez and Mariano Torres were involved from the administrative branch and Pedro M. Herrera and Luis Santos chaired the technical committee. The Spanish research project CGL2010-21754-C02-01 provided the funding needed to complete the study. The authors would especially wish to thank Tom Hose for the invitation to write this paper and for his subsequent support, and we would also like to acknowledge the revision work made by the anonymous reviewers which improved the content and focus of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José F. Martín-Duque.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martín-Duque, J.F., Caballero García, J. & Carcavilla Urquí, L. Geoheritage Information for Geoconservation and Geotourism Through the Categorization of Landforms in a Karstic Landscape. A Case Study from Covalagua and Las Tuerces (Palencia, Spain). Geoheritage 4, 93–108 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-012-0056-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-012-0056-2

Keywords

Navigation