Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using mixed methods to assess food security and coping strategies: a case study among smallholders in the Andean region

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International organizations and national governments in resource-scarce settings regularly support programs for the control of animal diseases with the aim of improving smallholder food security. However, the impact of such disease control programs on smallholder food security remains unclear. Mixed methods designs that integrate the collection, analysis and interpretation of qualitative and quantitative data in a single study, are increasingly being used to achieve deeper explorations of complex topics. We propose a mixed methods design to assess the four pillars of food security and coping strategies among smallholders. The methodology is illustrated with a case study in the context of a transnational program for the control of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) in the Andean region, involving interviews with 632 smallholders in three countries. Quantitative data were analysed using multivariate analysis to describe smallholders’ profiles. Food Consumption Score (FCS) was calculated for each household. The qualitative phase involved developing themes to characterise these smallholders’ experiences using Thematic Analysis. Food acquisition capacity and coping strategies varied greatly across smallholders. Only nine (1.4%) of households had a FCS below the acceptable threshold, however, food stability was compromised across study areas. Household production, financial capacity, household demographics and food prices were the main factors influencing variation in food consumption. The case study presented here illustrates the use of a mixed methods approach to assess the four dimensions of food security and categorise key differences across smallholders during a single visit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, L. (2013). Comparing the value of protein sources fr maternal and child nutrition. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 34(2), 263–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barasa, M., Catley, A., Machuchu, D., Laqua, H., Puot, E., Tap Kot, D., et al. (2008). Foot-and-mouth disease vaccination in South Sudan: Benefit-cost analysis and livelihoods impact. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 55, 339–351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C. B. (2010). Measuring food insecurity. Science, 327, 825–828.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2013). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999–2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.

  • Bazeley, P. (2013). Codes and coding: Principles and practice. In J. Seaman (Ed.), Qualitative data analysis - practical strategies. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyden, J., & Bourdillon, M. (2011). Childhood poverty - Multidisciplinary approaches (Palgrave studies on Chidren and development). UK.

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in phycology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carletto, C., Zezza, A., Benerje, R. (2013). Towards better measurement of household food security: Harmonizing indicators and the role of household surveys. Global Food Security, 2, 30–40.

  • Coates, J., Wilde, P. E., Webb, P., Lorge Rogers, B., & Houser, R. F. (2006). Comparison of a qualitative and quantitative approach to developing a household food insecurity scale for Bangladesh. The Journal of Nutrition, 136, 1420S–1430S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, J., Swindale, A., & Bilinsky, P. (2007). Household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) for measurement of food access: Indicator guide. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project (FANTA). Washington DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (second edition ed.). California, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

  • Dror, D. K., & Allen, L. H. (2011). The importnace of milk and other animal-source foods for children in low-income countries. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 32(3), 227–243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F. (1993). Peasant economics (second edition ed.): Cambridge University press.

  • FAO (2008). Global programme for the prevention and control of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  • FAO (2011a). The progressive control pathway for FMD control (PCP-FMD): Principles, stage descriptions and standards. Rome, Italy: EuFMD, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Organization for Animal Health.

  • FAO. (2011b). Proyecto regional integrado Region Andina Control Progresivo de la Fiebre Aftosa. Chile: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GCP/RLA/178/SPA y GTFS/RLA/172/ITA.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2011c). World livestock 2011- livestock in food security. Rome: Foodand Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO and OIE (2012). The global foot and mouth disease control strategy. Strengthening animal health systems through improved control of major diseases: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Organization for Animal Health.

  • FAO IFAD and WFP (2013). The state of food insecurity in the world 2013. The multiple dimensions of food security Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  • FIVIMS. (2002). Measurement and assessment of food deprivation and undernutrition. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, D. (2014). Annual report - Ecuador 2013. Fighting hunger worldwide. Quito: World Food Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • HLPE (2013). Investigating in smallholder agriculture for food security. A report by the high level panel of experts on food security and nutrition of the committee on world food security. Rome.

  • Hoddinott, J. (1999). Chosing outcome indicators of household food security. Paper presented at the international food policy research institute, Washington D.C.

  • Hoddinott, J., & Yohanness, Y. (2002). Dietary diversity as food security indicator. Paper presented at the food consumption and nutrition division discussion paper, Washington D.C.

  • Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., & Westfall, P. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biomedical Journal, 50(3), 346–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husson, F., Josse, J., Le, S., & Mazet, J. (2013). FactoMineR: Multivariate exploratory data analysis and data mining with R. R package version 1.25. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=FactoMineR.

  • Jones, A. D., Ngure, F. M., Pelto, G., Young, S. L. (2013). What are we assessing when we measure food security? Compendium and review of current metrics. Advances in Nutrition, 4, 481–505.

  • Kennedy, G., Ballard, T., & Dop, M. C. (2013). Guiderlines for measuring household and individual dietary diversity. (pp. 60): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and European Union.

  • Knight-Jones, T. J. D., & Rushton, J. (2013). The economic impacts of foot and mouth disease - what are they, how big are they and where do they occur? Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 112(3–4), 161–173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Limon, G., Lewis, E. G., Chang, Y. M., Ruiz, H., Balanza, M. E., & Guitian, J. (2014). Using mixed methods to investigate factors influencing reporting of livestock diseases: A case study among smallholders in Bolivia. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 113, 185–196.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. J. (2005). Multivariate Statistical Methods: A primer: Chapman & Hall/CRC press.

  • Maxwell, D., & Caldwell, R. (2008). The coping strategies index. Field methods manual. (Vol. second edition): USAID, WFP, care, TANGO, Feinstein international Centre.

  • Mejia Acosta, A., & Haddad, L. (2014). The politics of success in the fight against malnutrition in Peru. Food Policy, 44, 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. P., & Allen, L. H. (2003). Nutritional importance of animal source foods. The Journal of Nutrition, 133, 3032S–3935S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, C. G., Murphy, S. P., Gewa, C., Grillenberg, M., & Bwibo, N. O. (2007). Meat suplementation improves growth, cognitive and behavioral outcomes in Kenyan children. The Journal of Nutrition, 137, 1119–1123.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Njuki, J., Poole, J., Johnson, N., Baltenweck, I., Pali, P., Lokman, Z., et al. (2011). Gender, Livestock and Livelihood indicators. Kenya: ILRI.

  • R Development Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing and graphics. In: R Foundation for Statistical Computing (Ed.), (Pp. available at: http://www.R-Project.Org/). Viena.

  • Randolph, T. F., Schelling, E., Grace, D., Nicholson, C. F., Leroy, L., Cole, D. C., et al. (2007). Invited review: Role of livestock in human nutrition and health for poverty reduction in developing countries. Journal of Animal Science, 85, 2788–2800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J., Viscarra, R., & Nair, S. (2006). Regional scan for the Central Andes (Bolivia, Ecuador & Peru). Serie title: Productive strategies for rural households to participate successfully in global economic process. IDRC and CRDI. Progress report. March 2006.

  • Sarkar, D., & Andrews, F. (2013). Extra Graphical Utilities Based on Lattice. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=latticeExtra.

  • Shiferaw, B., Kassie, M., Jaleta, M., & Yirga, C. (2014). Adoption of improved wheat varieties and impacts on household food security in Ethiopia. Food Policy, 44, 272–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, H. (2003). Economic constraints on production and consumption of animal source foods for nutrition in developing countries. The Journal of Nutrition, 133, 4054S–4060S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tusiime, H. A., Renard, R., & Smets, L. (2013). Food aid and household food security in a conflict situation: Empirical evidence from Northen Uganda. Food Policy, 43, 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2015). The 2030 Agenga for Sustainable Development Accessed October 2015.

  • UNICEF (2009). Tracking progress on child and maternal nutrition. A survival and development priority. New York, USA: United Nations Children’s fund (UNICEF).

  • UNICEF (2014). The state of the world's children 2014 in numbers. Every children counts. (pp. p. 116): UNICEF.

  • Upton, M. (2004). The role of livestock in economic development and poverty reduction. Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative (pp. 56): Food and Agriculture Organization.

  • VAM unit (2003). Comprehensive food security and vulnerability analysis (CFSVA). October 2014.

  • VAM unit. (2008). Food consumption analysis. Calculation and use of the food consumption score in food security analysis. Strengthening Emergency Needs Assessment Capacity (SENAC). Rome: United Nations World Food Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • World food summit (1996) World Food Summit Plan of Action. In: Rome Declaration on World Food Security and World Food Summit Plan of Action, Rome, Italy, 13–17 (pp. 43p).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). The authors would like to thank the smallholders who took part in the study as well as interviewers in the three countries. We also thank Bryony A. Jones and Hannah R. Holt for helpful comments on an early draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgina Limon.

Ethics declarations

Competing of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest. The funders did not have a role in the analysis and interpretation of the data, but have given feedback at different stages of writing.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Limon, G., Fournié, G., Lewis, E.G. et al. Using mixed methods to assess food security and coping strategies: a case study among smallholders in the Andean region. Food Sec. 9, 1019–1040 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0713-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0713-z

Keywords

Navigation