Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automated long-term dynamic monitoring using hierarchical clustering and adaptive modal tracking: validation and applications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Historical buildings demand constant surveying because anthropogenic (e.g., use, pollution or traffic vibration) and natural or environmental hazards (e.g., environmental changes or earthquakes) can endanger their existence and safety. Particularly, in the Andean region of South America, earthen historical constructions require special attention and investigation due to the high seismic hazard of the area next to the Pacific coast. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) can provide useful, real-time information on the condition of these buildings. In SHM, the implementation of automatic tools for feature extraction of modal parameters is a crucial step. This paper proposes a methodology for the automatic identification of the structural modal parameters. An innovative and multi-stage approach for the automatic dynamic monitoring is presented. This approach uses the Data-Driven Stochastic Subspace Identification method complemented by hierarchical clustering for automatic detection of the modal parameters, as well as an adaptive modal tracking procedure for providing a clear visualization of long-term monitoring results. The proposed methodology is first validated in data acquired in an emblematic sixteenth century historical building: the monastery of Jeronimos in Portugal. After proving its efficiency, the algorithm is used to process almost 5000 events containing data acquired in the church of Andahuaylillas, a sixteenth century adobe building located in Cusco, Peru. The results in these cases demonstrate that accurate estimation of predominant modal parameters is possible in those complex structures even if relatively few sensors are installed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Adapted from [6]

Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ni YQ, Ye XW, Ko JM (2010) Monitoring-based fatigue reliability assessment of steel bridges: analytical model and application. J Struct Eng 136(12):1563–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martinez-Luengo M, Kolios A, Wang L (2016) Structural health monitoring of offshore wind turbines: a review through the statistical pattern recognition paradigm. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 64:91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Faravelli L, Ubertini F, Fuggini C (2011) System identification of a super high-rise building via a stochastic subspace approach. Smart Struct Syst 7:133–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lombillo I, Blanco H, Pereda J, Villegas L, Carrasco C, Balbás J (2016) Structural health monitoring of a damaged church: design of an integrated platform of electronic instrumentation, data acquisition and client/server software. Struct Control Health Monitor 23(1):69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramos L, Marques L, Lourenço PB, De Roeck G, Campos-Costa A, Roque J (2010) Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: two case studies. Mech Syst and Signal Process 24:1291–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramos L, Aguilar R, Lourenço PB, Moreira S (2013) Dynamic structural health monitoring of Saint Torcato church. Mech Syst Signal Process 35:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gentile C, Saisi A, Cabboi A (2015) Structural identification of a masonry tower based on operational modal analysis. Int J Archit Herit 9(2):98–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Foti D, Diaferio M, Giannoccaro N, Mongelli M (2012) Ambient vibration testing, dynamic identification and model updating of a historic tower. NDT E Int 47:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aras F, Krstevska L, Altay G, Tashkov L (2011) Experimental and numerical modal analyses of a historical masonry palace. Constr Build Mater 25:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramos L, Aguilar R, Lourenco P (2011) Operational modal analysis of historical constructions using commercial wireless platforms. Struct Health Monit 10:511–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brencich A, Sabia D (2008) Experimental identification of a multi-span masonry bridge: the Tanaro Bridge. Constr Build Mater 22:2087–2099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ciocci MP, Sharma S, Lourenço PB (2018) Engineering simulations of a super-complex cultural heritage building: ica Cathedral in Peru. Meccanica 53(7):1931–1958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Varum H, Tarque N, Silveira D, Camata G, Lobo B, Blondet M, Figueiredo A, Rafi MM, Oliveira C, Costa A (2014) Structural behaviour and retrofitting of adobe masonry buildings. In: Costa A, Guedes JM, Varum H (eds) Structural rehabilitation of old buildings. Building pathology and rehabilitation, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 37–75

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Karanikoloudis G, Lourenço PB (2018) Structural assessment and seismic vulnerability of earthen historic structures. Application of sophisticated numerical and simple analytical models. Eng Struct 160:488–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Neu E, Janser F, Khatibi AA, Orifici AC (2017) Fully automated operational modal analysis using multi-stage clustering. Mech Syst Signal Process 84:308–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Elyamani A, Caselles O, Roca P, Clapes J (2017) Dynamic investigation of a large historical cathedral. Struct Control Health Monitor 24:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saisi A, Gentile C, Ruccolo A (2018) Continuous monitoring of a challenging heritage tower in Monza, Italy. J Civil Struct Health Monit 8(1):77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gentile C, Guidobaldi M, Saisi A (2016) One-year dynamic monitoring of a historic tower: damage detection under changing environment. Meccanica 51(11):2873–2889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cabboi A, Gentile C, Saisi A (2017) From continuous vibration monitoring to FEM-based damage assessment: application on a stone-masonry tower. Constr Build Mater 156:252–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ubertini F, Comanducci G, Cavalagli N, Pisello AL, Materazzi AL, Cotana F (2017) Environmental effects on natural frequencies of the San Pietro bell tower in Perugia, Italy, and their removal for structural performance assessment. Mech Syst Signal Process 82:307–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Azzara RM, De Roeck G, Girardi M, Padovani C, Pellegrini D, Reynders E (2018) The influence of environmental parameters on the dynamic behaviour of the San Frediano bell tower in Lucca. Eng Struct 156:175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ubertini F, Cavalagli N, Kita A, Comanducci G (2018) Assessment of a monumental masonry bell-tower after 2016 Central Italy seismic sequence by long-term SHM. Bull Earthq Eng 16(2):775–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lorenzoni F, Caldon M, da Porto F, Modena C, Aoki T (2018) Post-earthquake controls and damage detection through structural health monitoring: applications in l’Aquila. J Civil Struct Health Monit 8(2):217–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ranieri C, Fabbrocino G (2015) Development and validation of an automated operational modal analysis algorithm for vibration-based monitoring and tensile load estimation. Mech Syst Signal Process 60(61):512–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ranieri C, Fabbrocino G (2010) Automated output-only dynamic identification of civil engineering structures. Mech Syst Signal Process 24:678–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peeters B, De Roeck G (1999) Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis. Mechan Syst Signal Process 13(6):855–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Reynders E, Houbrechts J, De Roeck G (2012) Fully automated (operational) modal analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 29:228–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Magalhães F, Cunha A, Caetano E (2009) Online automatic identification of the modal parameters of a long Span Arch Bridge. Mech Syst Signal Process 23(2):316–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zonno G, Aguilar R, Castañeda B, Boroschek R, Lourenço PB (2017) Laboratory evaluation of a fully automatic modal identification algorithm using automatic hierarchical clustering approach. Procedia Eng 199:882–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cabboi A, Magalhães F, Gentile C, Cunha A (2016) Automated modal identification and tracking: application to an iron arch bridge. Structural Control Health Monitor 24:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  31. Masciotta M-G, Roque JCA, Ramos LF, Lourenço PL (2016) A multidisciplinary approach to assess the health state of heritage structures: the case study of the Church of Monastery of Jerónimos in Lisbon. Constr Build Mater 116:169–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Carden EP, Brown JM (2008) Fuzzy Clustering of stability diagrams for vibration-based structural health monitoring. Comput-Aided Civ Inf Eng 23(5):360–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pappa RS, Elliott KB, Schenk A (1992) A consistent-mode indicator for the eigensystem realization algorithm. Nasa Tech Memo 107607:1–10

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Allemang RJ, Brown DL (1982) A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis. In: Proceedings of the 1st international modal analysis conference, Orlando: Union College Press, Vol. 1, pp. 110–116

  35. Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  36. Marques R, Ivancic S, Briceño C, Aguilar R, Perucchio R, Vargas J (2014) Study on the seismic behaviour of St. Peter the Apostle Church of Andahuaylillas in Cusco, Peru. In: 9IMC-9th International Masonry Conference, Guimarães, Portugal

  37. Ivancic SR, Briceno C, Marques R, Aguilar R, Perucchio R, Vargas J (2010) Seismic assessment of the St. Peter Apostle Church of Andahuaylillas in Cusco, Peru. In: Proceeding of SAHC: 9th international conference on structural analysis of historical construction, 14–17 october 2014

  38. Kinemetrics. (2016). Obsidian 8x. https://kinemetrics.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/datasheet-obsidian-4x-8x-12x-24x-36x-accelerograph-kinemetrics.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present work was developed thanks to the funding provided by the program Cienciactiva from CONCYTEC in the framework of the Contract no. 222–2015. Complementary funding was also received from the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú PUCP and its funding office DGI-PUCP (project 349-2016). The first author gratefully acknowledges ELARCH program for the scholarship in support of his PhD studies (Project Reference number: 552129-EM-1-2014-1-IT-ERA MUNDUS-394 EMA21).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Aguilar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zonno, G., Aguilar, R., Boroschek, R. et al. Automated long-term dynamic monitoring using hierarchical clustering and adaptive modal tracking: validation and applications. J Civil Struct Health Monit 8, 791–808 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0306-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0306-3

Keywords

Navigation