Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regional Techniques for Thoracic Wall Surgery

  • Regional Anesthesia (CJL McCartney, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Anesthesiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Regional anesthesia of the thoracic wall has rapidly progressed with refinement of existing techniques and the evolution of novel fascial plane techniques. This article aims to provide a narrative review of the key advancements in the last 5 years.

Recent Findings

Noteworthy developments include ultrasonography for the performance of thoracic epidural and paravertebral blockade, evidence indicating that thoracic paravertebral blockade carries similar analgesic efficacy to thoracic epidural analgesia, but with a superior side effect profile, and the description of multiple novel fascial plane techniques, including paraspinal thoracic plane blocks, intercostal-paraspinal plane blocks, the pectoral blocks, and the serratus plane block.

Summary

Ultrasound continues to change the practice of regional anesthesia, with integration into time-honored techniques such as epidural or paravertebral blockade. The established gold standard—the thoracic epidural—is being challenged, with a move towards paravertebral blockade. Fascial plane blocks hold promise for the future, but require further clinical trials for validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Romero A, Garcia JEL, Joshi GP. The state of the art in preventing postthoracotomy pain. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;25(2):116–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chin KJ, Perlas A, Chan V, Brown-Shreves D, Koshkin A, Vaishnav V. Ultrasound imaging facilitates spinal anesthesia in adults with difficult surface anatomic landmarks. Anesthesiology. 2011;115(1):94–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Salman A, Arzola C, Tharmaratnam U, Balki M. Ultrasound imaging of the thoracic spine in paramedian sagittal oblique plane: the correlation between estimated and actual depth to the epidural space. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36(6):542–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kessler J, Moriggl B, Grau T. The use of ultrasound improves the accuracy of epidural needle placement in cadavers. Surg Radiol Anat SRA. 2014;36(7):695–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Auyong DB, Hostetter L, Yuan SC, Slee AE, Hanson NA. Evaluation of ultrasound-assisted thoracic epidural placement in patients undergoing upper abdominal and thoracic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016.

  6. •• Krediet AC, Moayeri N, van Geffen G-J, Bruhn J, Renes S, Bigeleisen PE, et al. Different approaches to ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block: an illustrated review. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(2):459–74. Excellent, detailed review of USG TPVB, with superb illustrations.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Norum HM, Breivik H. Learning from the past for the present: paravertebral blocks for thoracic surgery are not without risk. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28(7):544–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. • Pace MM, Sharma B, Anderson-Dam J, Fleischmann K, Warren L, Stefanovich P. Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blockade: a retrospective study of the incidence of complications. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(4):1186–91. A retrospective study of 1427 USG TPVBs in 856 patients, with only six complications, including: symptomatic bradycardia and hypotension (n=3), a vasovagal episode (n=1), and possible local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) (n=2). In particular, there were no instances of accidental pleural puncture or pneumothorax (8)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu J, Buggy D, Fleischmann E, Parra-Sanchez I, Treschan T, Kurz A, et al. Thoracic paravertebral regional anesthesia improves analgesia after breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled multicentre clinical trial. Can J Anaesth J Can Anesth. 2015;62(3):241–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mejdahl MK, Andersen KG, Gärtner R, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Persistent pain and sensory disturbances after treatment for breast cancer: six year nationwide follow-up study. BMJ. 2013;346:f1865.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heesen M, Klimek M, Rossaint R, Imberger G, Straube S. Paravertebral block and persistent postoperative pain after breast surgery: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(12):1471–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andreae MH, Andreae DA. Regional anaesthesia to prevent chronic pain after surgery: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(5):711–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Terkawi AS, Tsang S, Sessler DI, Terkawi RS, Nunemaker MS, Durieux ME, et al. Improving analgesic efficacy and safety of thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery: a mixed-effects meta-analysis. Pain Physician. 2015;18(5):E757–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ibarra MML, S-Carralero G-CM, Vicente GU, Cuartero del Pozo A, López Rincón R, Fajardo del Castillo MJ. Chronic postoperative pain after general anesthesia with or without a single-dose preincisional paravertebral nerve block in radical breast cancer surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2011;58(5):290–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baidya DK, Khanna P, Maitra S. Analgesic efficacy and safety of thoracic paravertebral and epidural analgesia for thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;18(5):626–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ding X, Jin S, Niu X, Ren H, Fu S, Li Q. A comparison of the analgesia efficacy and side effects of paravertebral compared with epidural blockade for thoracotomy: an updated meta-analysis. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2014 5 [cited 2017 Feb 26];9(5). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010440/

  17. Jardim Júnior AP, Erdmann TR, dos Santos TV, Brunharo GM, Filho CTB, Losso MJ, et al. Comparison between continuous thoracic epidural and paravertebral blocks for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracotomy: systematic review. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2013;63(5):433–42.

  18. Scarfe AJ, Schuhmann-Hingel S, Duncan JK, Ma N, Atukorale YN, Cameron AL. Continuous paravertebral block for post-cardiothoracic surgery analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-Thorac Surg. 2016;50(6):1010–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. • Yeung JHY, Gates S, Naidu BV, Wilson MJA, Gao SF. Paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural for patients undergoing thoracotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:CD009121. Cochrane review comparing TPVB against TEA for thoracotomy surgery. It concluded that TPVB provided similar analgesia to TEA, but with an improved side effect profile.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Teeter EG, Kumar PA. Pro: thoracic epidural block is superior to paravertebral blocks for open thoracic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(6):1717–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cowie B, McGlade D, Ivanusic J, Barrington MJ. Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blockade: a cadaveric study. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(6):1735–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Costache I, Sinclair J, Farrash FA, Nguyen TB, McCartney CJL, Ramnanan CJ, et al. Does paravertebral block require access to the paravertebral space? Anaesthesia. 2016;71(7):858–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jüttner T, Werdehausen R, Hermanns H, Monaca E, Danzeisen O, Pannen BH, et al. The paravertebral lamina technique: a new regional anesthesia approach for breast surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23(6):443–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pfeiffer G, Oppitz N, Schöne S, Richter-Heine I, Höhne M, Koltermann C. Analgesia of the axilla using a paravertebral catheter in the lamina technique. Anaesthesist. 2006;55(4):423–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Voscopoulos C, Palaniappan D, Zeballos J, Ko H, Janfaza D, Vlassakov K. The ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block. Can J Anaesth J Can Anesth. 2013;60(9):888–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zeballos JL, Voscopoulos C, Kapottos M, Janfaza D, Vlassakov K. Ultrasound-guided retrolaminar paravertebral block. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(6):649–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Murouchi T, Yamakage M. Retrolaminar block: analgesic efficacy and safety evaluation. J Anesth. 2016;30(6):1003–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. • Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(5):621–7. First report of the ESPB, with a description of the ESPB in four patients, and cadaveric data.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chin KJ, Forero M, Adhikary SD. Reply to Dr Ueshima and Dr Murouchi. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42(1):124–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Continuous erector spinae plane block for rescue analgesia in thoracotomy after epidural failure: a case report. A A Case Rep. 2017; Epub ahead of print.

  31. Shelley CL, Berry S, Howard J, De Ruyter M, Thepthepha M, Nazir N, et al. Posterior paramedian subrhomboidal analgesia versus thoracic epidural analgesia for pain control in patients with multiple rib fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(3):463–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Truitt MS, Mooty RC, Amos J, Lorenzo M, Mangram A, Dunn E. Out with the old, in with the new: a novel approach to treating pain associated with rib fractures. World J Surg. 2010;34(10):2359–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bryskin RB, Robie DK, Mansfield FM, Freid EB, Sukumvanich S. Introduction of a novel ultrasound-guided extrathoracic sub-paraspinal block for control of perioperative pain in Nuss procedure patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2016.

  34. Roué C, Wallaert M, Kacha M, Havet E. Intercostal/paraspinal nerve block for thoracic surgery. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(1):112–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Elsharkawy H, Saifullah T, Kolli S, Drake R. Rhomboid intercostal block. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(7):856–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Blanco R, Parras T, McDonnell JG, Prats-Galino A. Serratus plane block: a novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(11):1107–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Blanco R. The “pecs block”: a novel technique for providing analgesia after breast surgery. Anaesthesia. 2011;66(9):847–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim 2012;59(9):470–475.

  39. Blanco R. A reply. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(10):1173–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pérez MF, Duany O, de la Torre PA. Redefining PECS blocks for postmastectomy analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(6):729–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. • Mayes J, Davison E, Panahi P, Patten D, Eljelani F, Womack J, et al. An anatomical evaluation of the serratus anterior plane block. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(9):1064–9. Cadaveric data detailing how the SPB acts—on the lateral cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hards M, Harada A, Neville I, Harwell S, Babar M, Ravalia A, et al. The effect of serratus plane block performed under direct vision on postoperative pain in breast surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2016;34:427–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hetta DF, Rezk KM. Pectoralis-serratus interfascial plane block vs thoracic paravertebral block for unilateral radical mastectomy with axillary evacuation. J Clin Anesth. 2016;34:91–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Durant E, Dixon B, Luftig J, Mantuani D, Herring A. Ultrasound-guided serratus plane block for ED rib fracture pain control. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;19.

  45. Kunhabdulla NP, Agarwal A, Gaur A, Gautam SK, Gupta R, Agarwal A. Serratus anterior plane block for multiple rib fractures. Pain Physician. 2014;17(5):E651–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Madabushi R, Tewari S, Gautam SK, Agarwal A, Agarwal A. Serratus anterior plane block: a new analgesic technique for post-thoracotomy pain. Pain Physician. 2015;18(3):E421–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Okmen K, Okmen BM, Uysal S. Serratus anterior plane (SAP) block used for thoracotomy analgesia: a case report. Korean J Pain. 2016;29(3):189–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Broseta AM, Errando C, De Andrés J, Díaz-Cambronero O, Ortega-Monzó J. Serratus plane block: the regional analgesia technique for thoracoscopy? Anaesthesia. 2015;70(11):1329–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Font MC, Navarro-Martinez J, Nadal SB, Munoz CG, Galiana-Ivars M, Montero PC. Continuous analgesia using a multi-holed catheter in serratus plane for thoracic surgery. Pain Physician. 2016;19(4):E684–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tan YR, Quek KHY. Tackling the axillary blind spot with PECS II. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(2):230–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Purcell N, Wu D. Novel use of the PECS II block for upper limb fistula surgery. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(11):1294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bashandy GMN, Abbas DN. Pectoral nerves I and II blocks in multimodal analgesia for breast cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(1):68–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kulhari S, Bharti N, Bala I, Arora S, Singh G. Efficacy of pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(3):382–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Li N-L, Yu B-L, Hung C-F. Paravertebral block plus thoracic wall block versus paravertebral block alone for analgesia of modified radical mastectomy: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0166227.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Wahba SS, Kamal SM. Thoracic paravertebral block versus pectoral nerve block for analgesia after breast surgery. Egypt J Anaesth. 2014;30:129–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ueshima H, Kitamura A. Blocking of multiple anterior branches of intercostal nerves (Th2-6) using a transversus thoracic muscle plane block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(4):388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. de la Torre PA, García PD, Alvarez SL, Miguel FJG, Pérez MF. A novel ultrasound-guided block: a promising alternative for breast analgesia. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34(1):198–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Del Buono R, Costa F, Agrò FE. Parasternal, pecto-intercostal, pecs, and transverse thoracic muscle plane blocks: a rose by any other name would smell as sweet. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(6):791–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Raza I, Narayanan M, Venkataraju A, Ciocarlan A. Bilateral subpectoral interfascial plane catheters for analgesia for sternal fractures: a case report. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(5):607–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ohgoshi Y, Ino K, Matsukawa M. Ultrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block. J Anesth. 2016;30(5):916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Takahashi H, Suzuki T. Anterior thoracic medial block for administering postoperative analgesia in the internal mammary area. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(5):660–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Chin KJ. An anatomical basis for naming plane blocks of the anteromedial chest wall. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42(in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ki Jinn Chin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Kim Wild and Ki Jinn Chin declare they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki Declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Regional Anesthesia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wild, K., Chin, K.J. Regional Techniques for Thoracic Wall Surgery. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 7, 212–219 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-017-0212-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-017-0212-y

Keywords

Navigation