PaperVariability of forces applied by experienced therapists during spinal mobilization
References (14)
- et al.
The reliability of selected techniques in clinical arthrometrics
Australian Journal of Physiotherapy
(1985) - et al.
Low back of mechanical origin: randomised comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment
British Medical Journal
(1990) Monitoring aspects of the development of undergraduate student skills in manual techniques
- et al.
Aspects of therapist reliability in manual examination of lumbar intersegmental motion
- et al.
Inter and intratherapist reliability of passive accessory movement technique
New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy
(1991) - et al.
Instrumentation of a mobilisation couch for dynamic load measurement
Journal of Medical Engineering Technology
(1995)
Cited by (72)
Intraclinician Variability in Force Application During Anteroposterior Mobilization of the Ankle Joint
2022, Journal of Chiropractic MedicineCitation Excerpt :This has the potential for leading a researcher to find smaller clinical effects than if a larger dose were applied. The mean peak force applied during ankle mobilization (65 ± 5 N) is consistent with that reported in spinal mobilization (55-158 N),9,14 but is approximately one-quarter to one-third of those reported by Resende et al6 and Venturini et al,15 in which peak forces on the order of 160 to 200 N were observed during a grade IV Maitland's AP ankle mobilization technique. The discrepancy in the magnitude of the peak force observed between studies may reflect several methodological differences.
Investigation of reaction force magnitude and orientation during supine thoracic thrust manipulation applied to intervertebral and costovertebral regions.
2020, Musculoskeletal Science and PracticeReaction Force Magnitude and Orientation During Supine Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation: An Exploratory Analysis and Reliability of Preload and Impulse Phase
2020, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological TherapeuticsQuantifying Lumbar Mobilization With Inertial Measurement Unit
2020, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological TherapeuticsInstrumented Measurement of Spinal Stiffness: A Systematic Literature Review of Reliability
2018, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological TherapeuticsCitation Excerpt :Even though the manual assessment of stiffness often is done in clinical practice, many studies have found that it has poor intra- and interrater reliability.13-15 Some reasons are examiner variability in the magnitude16 or the direction17 of the applied force and the variation in individual perceptions of stiffness.18 Maher et al investigated a reference-based protocol, where examiners received a reference stiffness stimulus to rate the stiffness more objectively.
Effect of Sacroiliac Joint Mobilization on the Level of Soft Tissue Pain Threshold in Asymptomatic Women
2018, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics