Systematics of gastrointestinal nematodes of domestic ruminants: advances between 1992 and 1995 and proposals for future research

doi:10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00099-X

Veterinary Parasitology

Volume 72, Issues 3–4, November 1997, Pages 225-245

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00099-X Get rights and content

Abstract

The systematics of trichostrongyloid nematodes of ruminants provides a foundation for diagnostic and responds to the need to identify eggs in feces, free-living larvae from pastures or fecal cultures and larval or adult nematodes collected from hosts. These needs are associated with diagnostic problems or research projects. Difficulties in identifying all developmental stages of trichostrongyloid nematodes of domestic ruminants still severely limit the effective diagnosis and control of these parasites. Phylogenetic hypotheses as the basis for predictive classifications have been developed only for the subfamilies of the Trichostrongylidae. This report briefly describes recent progress in the development of improved tools for identification, phylogenetic analyses and predictive classifications. It also describes future research needed on the identification and classification of trichostrongyloid nematode parasites of domestic ruminants. Nematodes included are species of the superfamily Trichostrongyloidea known to be important pathogens of domestic ruminants. The information summarized is presented by nematode developmental stage and by taxonomic groups. Eggs: While eggs of some trichostrongyloid nematode parasites of ruminants can be readily identified to their genus (Nematodirus), and some to species (e.g. Nematodirus battus), most of the important pathogens (including the Ostertagiinae and Haemonchinae) cannot be identified morphologically or morphometrically even to family level. However, DNA technology has been developed for determining not only the presence of specific pathogens in eggs from fecal samples, but also for estimating the percentage of the total eggs that each pathogen comprises. This new method will make possible a rapid determination of which individual animals in a herd should be treated. Larvae: The most commonly-used method for identifying infective larvae is time-consuming (several weeks), unreliable for estimating intensities of individual species as components of mixed populations and requires highly trained specialists. Available identification keys for larvae are not well illustrated and need to be augmented. Adults: Recent advances in the identification of adult trichostrongyloids and their systematics are organized by taxonomic group. Genera included are Ostertagia, Haemonchus, Cooperia, Trichostrongylus and Nematodirus. Recently, the first phylogenetic analysis of the Trichostrongylidae family established monophyly for the family. A similar analysis of the Molineidae is needed. Ostertagia: Several studies of polymorphism summarized the phenomenon and listed 19 polymorphic species in five genera. Two studies of DNA differences within and among polymorphic species of Ostertagiinae supported earlier hypotheses that the species pairs represent polymorphic species. A phylogenetic analysis of the Ostertagiinae and generic concepts are needed. Haemonchus: A key to three species of Haemonchus provides, for the first time, morphological characteristics for the microscopical identification to species of individual adult nematodes of either sex. The Food and Drug Administration is now requiring that results of drug trials include identification of Haemonchus to species. Cooperia: Studies using random amplified polymorphic DNA methods showed a high degree of variation within and among C. oncophora/C. surnabada, but supported a polymorphic relationship for the species pair. A phylogenetic analysis of the Cooperiinae is needed. Trichostrongylus: Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms (RFLPs) of genomic DNA of two strains of T. colubriformis indicated a high degree of intra- and inter-strain DNA polymorphism. However, other studies demonstrated expected species level differences between T. colubriformis and T. vitrinus using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) methods. Sequences of the second Internal Transcribed Spacer Region (ITS-2) ribosomal repeat showed sequence differences of 1.3–7.6% among five well-defined species of Trichostrongylus. This provides a standard for species level differences within the Trichostrongylidae. Nematodirus: The origin of N. battus in the British Isles is still a mystery. Recently, DNA studies have provided evidence that populations on both coasts of the United States originated from Canada. A phylogenetic study of Nematodirus is in progress. Modern systematic methods have not yet been applied to the development of classifications for all subfamilies and most genera of the Trichostrongyloidea. Additional factors complicating these problems are a lack of knowledge of the parasites of wild bovids and cervids, the international transport of wild and domestic hosts and environmental changes that may alter the parasite fauna in a modern farm setting.

References (54)

P. Berghen et al.
Evaluation of pepsinogen, gastrin and antibody response in diagnosing ostertagiosis
Vet. Parasitol.
(1993)
M.J. Callaghan et al.
Characterization of a tandemly repetitive DNA sequence from Haemonchus contortus
Int. J. Parasitol.
(1994)
A.J.D. Campbell et al.
Differences in a ribosomal DNA sequence of Strongylus species allows identification of single eggs
Int. J. Parasitol.
(1995)
C.M. Christensen et al.
Ostertagia, Haemonchus, Cooperia, and Oesophagostomum: construction and characterization of genus-specific DNA probes to differentiate important parasites of cattle
Vet. Parasitol.
(1994)
R.J. Dobson et al.
The survival of Ostertagia circumcincta and Trichostrongylus colubriformis in faecal cultures as a source of bias in apportioning egg counts to worm species
Int. J. Parasitol.
(1992)
N. Gasnier et al.
Species and morphs in the Ostertagiinae: an allozyme study of seven species
Int. J. Parasitol.
(1993)
W.N. Grant
Genetic variation in parasitic nematodes and its implications
Int. J. Parasitol.
(1994)
W.N. Grant et al.
Extensive DNA polymorphism within and between two strains of Trichostrongylus colubriformis
Int. J. Parasitol.
(1994)
H. Hoste et al.
Differences in the second internal transcribed spacer (ribosomal DNA) between five species of Trichostrongylus (Nematoda: Trichostrongyloidea)
Int. J. Parasitol.
(1995)
J.R. Lichtenfels et al.
The systematics of nematodes that cause ostertagiasis in domestic and wild ruminants in North America; an update and a key to species
Vet. Parasitol.
(1993)

A.J. Lymbery

Finding genetic markers for complex phenotypic traits in parasites

Int. J. Parasitol.

(1996)

L.A. Stevenson et al.

Differentiation of Haemonchus placei from H. contortus (Nematoda: Trichostrongylidae) by the ribosomal DNA second internal transcribed spacer

Int. J. Parasitol.

(1995)

V.H. Suarez et al.

Morphological polymorphism in the nematode Teladorsagia circumcincta in relation to age of larvae, infection mode and lamb characteristics in experimental conditions

Int. J. Parasitol.

(1995)

D.R. Thomas et al.

A key to the identification of arrested gastrointestinal nematode larvae of sheep in Britain

Vet. Parasitol.

(1993)

D.S. Zarlenga et al.

Cloning and characterization of ribosomal RNA genes from three species of Haemonchus (Nematoda: Trichostrongyloidea) and identification of PCR primers for rapid differentiation

Exp. Parasitol.

(1994)

N.J. Barton et al.

Detection of Libyostrongylus douglassi in ostriches in Australia

Aust. Vet. J.

(1993)

M.S. Blouin et al.

Host movement and the genetic structure of populations of parasitic nematodes

Genetics

(1995)

J. Boomker et al.

Trichostrongylus angistris n. sp. from the red duiker Cephalophus natalensis A. Smith, 1834 and a redescription of Trichostrongylus minor Monnig, 1932

Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res.

(1986)

M.J. Callaghan et al.

A middle-repetitive DNA sequence element in the sheep parasitic nematode Trichostrongylus colubriformis

J. Parasitol.

(1994)

C.M. Christensen et al.

Identification of a Haemonchus placei-specific DNA probe

J. Helminthol. Soc. Wash.

(1994)

F.W. Douvres

Keys to the identification and differentiation of the immature parasitic stages of gastrointestinal nematodes of cattle

Am. J. Vet. Res.

(1957)

J. Drózdz

Studies on the helminths and helminthiases in Cervidae III: historical formation of the helminthofauna in Cervidae

Acta Parasitol. Pol.

(1967)

J. Drózdz

Polymorphism in the Ostertagiinae Lopez-Neyra, 1947 and comments on the systematics of these nematodes

Syst. Parasitol.

(1995)

M.C. Durette-Desset

Keys to the genera of the superfamily Trichostrongyloidea. No. 10

M.C. Durette-Desset et al.

Nomenclature des Strongylida au-dessus du groupe-famille

Ann. Parasitol. Hum. Comp.

(1993)

J.R. Georgi et al.

Diagnostic morphometry: identification of helminth eggs by discriminant analysis of morphometric data

J. Helminthol. Soc. Wash.

(1989)

L.M. Gibbons et al.

A key for the identification of genera of the nematode family Trichostrongyloidea Leiper, 1912

J. Helminthol.

(1982)

Cited by (50)

Advances in diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematodes in livestock and companion animals
2022, Advances in Parasitology
Diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematodes in livestock and companion animals has been neglected for years and there has been an historical underinvestment in the development and improvement of diagnostic tools, undermining the undoubted utility of surveillance and control programmes. However, a new impetus by the scientific community and the quickening pace of technological innovations, are promoting a renaissance of interest in developing diagnostic capacity for nematode infections in veterinary parasitology. A cross-cutting priority for diagnostic tools is the development of pen-side tests and associated decision support tools that rapidly inform on the levels of infection and morbidity. This includes development of scalable, parasite detection using artificial intelligence for automated counting of parasitic elements and research towards establishing biomarkers using innovative molecular and proteomic methods. The aim of this review is to assess the state-of-the-art in the diagnosis of helminth infections in livestock and companion animals and presents the current advances of diagnostic methods for intestinal parasites harnessing (i) automated methods for copromicroscopy based on artificial intelligence, (ii) immunodiagnosis, and (iii) molecular- and proteome-based approaches. Regardless of the method used, multiple factors need to be considered before diagnostics test results can be interpreted in terms of control decisions. Guidelines on how to apply diagnostics and how to interpret test results in different animal species are increasingly requested and some were recently made available in veterinary parasitology for the different domestic species.
Cracking the nodule worm code advances knowledge of parasite biology and biotechnology to tackle major diseases of livestock
2015, Biotechnology Advances
Citation Excerpt :
For instance, more than 1.3 billion people are infected with strongylids, such as Necator americanus and/or Ancylostoma duodenale (hookworms), which feed on blood in the small intestine (Hotez et al., 2013), causing adverse effects on human health, particularly in children. Other strongylids infect livestock and cause substantial production losses due to subclinical infections and clinical disease (Cantacessi et al., 2012; Lichtenfels et al., 1997), with billions of dollars spent annually on treatments to control these worms. In addition to their socioeconomic impact, various strongylid nematodes have developed resistance against the main drug classes commonly used to treat the diseases that they cause (Gilleard, 2006).
Many infectious diseases caused by eukaryotic pathogens have a devastating, long-term impact on animal health and welfare. Hundreds of millions of animals are affected by parasitic nematodes of the order Strongylida. Unlocking the molecular biology of representatives of this order, and understanding nematode–host interactions, drug resistance and disease using advanced technologies could lead to entirely new ways of controlling the diseases that they cause. Oesophagostomum dentatum (nodule worm; superfamily Strongyloidea) is an economically important strongylid nematode parasite of swine worldwide. The present article reports recent advances made in biology and animal biotechnology through the draft genome and developmental transcriptome of O. dentatum, in order to support biological research of this and related parasitic nematodes as well as the search for new and improved interventions. This first genome of any member of the Strongyloidea is 443 Mb in size and predicted to encode 25,291 protein-coding genes. Here, we review the dynamics of transcription throughout the life cycle of O. dentatum, describe double-stranded RNA interference (RNAi) machinery and infer molecules involved in development and reproduction, and in inducing or modulating immune responses or disease. The secretome predicted for O. dentatum is particularly rich in peptidases linked to interactions with host tissues and/or feeding activity, and a diverse array of molecules likely involved in immune responses. This research progress provides an important resource for future comparative genomic and molecular biological investigations as well as for biotechnological research toward new anthelmintics, vaccines and diagnostic tests.
The specific diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematode infections in livestock: Larval culture technique, its limitations and alternative DNA-based approaches
2014, Veterinary Parasitology
Citation Excerpt :
However, the same limitations for the culture and identification of L3s exist for L1s and L2s (Lichtenfels et al., 1997), L1s provide even fewer morphological features and only a very limited number of identification keys for L1s exist. In conclusion, although regarded as a standard diagnostic procedure, the technique of LC and larval differentiation has the disadvantage that it requires a 7 day incubation period to allow development of egg to L3, does not allow cold-storage of samples, is prone to bias as a result of variation in LC conditions and animal factors, cannot readily be automated, and the morphological identification/differentiation, based on available publications, requires substantial expertise and training (Johnson et al., 1996; Lichtenfels et al., 1997) yet remains imperfect. Based on a critical appraisal of the literature and the described limitations, we suggest that LC is useful to get an approximation of genera present in a mixed egg population and to confidently separate some genera (e.g., H. contortus vs Te.
The specific diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematode infections in ruminants is routinely based on larval culture technique and on the morphological identification of developed third-stage larvae. However, research on the ecology and developmental requirements of different species suggests that environmental conditions (e.g., temperature and humidity) for optimal development to occur vary between the different species. Thus, employing a common culture protocol for all species will favour the development of certain species over others and can cause a biased result in particular when species proportions in a mixed infection are to be determined. Furthermore, the morphological identification of L3 larvae is complicated by a lack of distinctive, obvious features that would allow the identification of all key species.
In the present paper we review in detail the potential limitations of larval culture technique and morphological identification and provide account to some modern molecular alternatives to the specific diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematode infection in ruminants.
Advances in the diagnosis of key gastrointestinal nematode infections of livestock, with an emphasis on small ruminants
2013, Biotechnology Advances
Citation Excerpt :
This technique has the advantage of being rapid, since the time required for the development of the L1 stage is short; however, the same issues in relation to culture conditions and identification apply to L1s and L2s as to L3s (Lichtenfels et al., 1997). Although routinely used in most parasitology diagnostic laboratories, the technique of LC coupled to larval differentiation by microscopy is time-consuming, laborious to perform, suffers from inaccuracy (see Johnson et al., 1996; Lichtenfels et al., 1997) and cannot readily be automated. In addition to conventional copro-diagnostic methods, various immunological and biochemical methods have been assessed or established, aimed at the specific diagnosis of infection.
Parasitic nematodes (roundworms) of livestock have major economic impact globally. In spite of the diseases caused by these nematodes and some advances in the design of new therapeutic agents (anthelmintics) and attempts to develop vaccines against some of them, there has been limited progress in the establishment of practical diagnostic techniques. The specific and sensitive diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematode infections of livestock underpins effective disease control, which is highly relevant now that anthelmintic resistance (AR) is a major problem. Traditional diagnostic techniques have major constraints, in terms of sensitivity and specificity. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief background on gastrointestinal nematodes (Strongylida) of livestock and their control; to summarize conventional methods used for the diagnosis and discuss their constraints; to review key molecular-diagnostic methods and recent progress in the development of advanced amplification-based and sequencing technologies, and their implications for epidemiological investigations and the control of parasitic diseases.
Next-Generation Molecular-Diagnostic Tools for Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Livestock, with an Emphasis on Small Ruminants. A Turning Point?
2013, Advances in Parasitology
Citation Excerpt :
This technique has the advantage of being rapid, since the time required for the development of the L1 stage is shorter; however, the same limitations for the culture and identification of L3s exist for L1s and L2s (Lichtenfels et al., 1997). In conclusion, although regarded as a standard diagnostic procedure, the technique of LC coupled to larval differentiation has the disadvantage of being time consuming and laborious, cannot readily be automated, and the morphological identification/differentiation, based on available publications, requires substantial expertise and training (Johnson et al., 1996; Lichtenfels et al., 1997). In addition to commonly used coprodiagnostic methods, a number of biochemical and immunological approaches have been developed that aim at the specific diagnosis of infection.
Parasitic nematodes of livestock have major economic impact worldwide. Despite the diseases caused by these nematodes, some advances towards the development of new therapeutic agents and attempts to develop effective vaccines against some of them, there has been limited progress in the development of practical diagnostic methods. The specific and sensitive diagnosis of parasitic nematode infections of livestock underpins effective disease control, which is now particularly important given the problems associated with anthelmintic resistance in parasite populations. Traditional diagnostic methods have major limitations, in terms of sensitivity and specificity. This chapter provides an account of the significance of parasitic nematodes (order Strongylida), reviews conventional diagnostic techniques that are presently used routinely and describes advances in polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods for the specific diagnosis of nematode infections. A particular emphasis is placed on the recent development of a robotic PCR-based platform for high-throughput diagnosis, and its significance and implications for epidemiological investigations and for use in control programmes.
Genetic characterization of the blood-sucking nematodes Libyostrongylus dentatus and Libyostrongylus douglassii supports their different evolutionary history
2013, Veterinary Parasitology
Libyostrongylus sp. are nematodes that infect ostriches. Libyostrongylus douglassii was first described in ostriches from several countries in the world. Later Libyostrongylus dentatus was morphologically identified in ostriches in the USA and Brazil, and mixed infection is common in the latter country. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the ribosomal DNA gene is used for genetic variability assessment and phylogenetic reconstruction for many organisms. Through genetic analysis the status of different species morphologically defined was confirmed and a molecular method was developed to differentiate both species. ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2 regions of L. douglassii and L. dentatus were characterized. Regarding complete ITS region, the K2-p genetic distance between the species was 0.060 (SE 0.008) and the intra-specific distance was 0.002 (SE 0.001) for L. dentatus and 0.006 (SE 0.002) for L. douglassii. NJ and MP phylogenetic analysis of ITS1 and ITS2 regions indicated that both species belong to the Trichostrongylidae family, and are evolutionarily different, suported by high bootstrap value. Based on ITS DNA polymorphisms, a molecular approach was designed to detect both species. These results are the first molecular characterization of L. douglassii and L. dentatus, and provide new tools for the identification of these parasites of veterinary importance.

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text