Articles
Sputum culture conversion as a prognostic marker for end-of-treatment outcome in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a secondary analysis of data from two observational cohort studies

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00036-3Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Sputum culture conversion is often used as an early microbiological endpoint in phase 2 clinical trials of tuberculosis treatment on the basis of its assumed predictive value for end-of-treatment outcome, particularly in patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis. We aimed to assess the validity of sputum culture conversion on solid media at varying timepoints, and the time to conversion, as prognostic markers for end-of-treatment outcome in patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis.

Methods

We analysed data from two large cohort studies of patients with MDR tuberculosis. We defined sputum culture conversion as two or more consecutive negative cultures from sputum samples obtained at least 30 days apart. To estimate the association of 2 month and 6 month conversion with successful treatment outcome, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs with random-effects multivariable logistic regression. We calculated predictive values with bivariate random-effects generalised linear mixed modelling.

Findings

We assessed data for 1712 patients who had treatment success, treatment failure, or who died. Among patients with treatment success, median time to sputum culture conversion was significantly shorter than in those who had poor outcomes (2 months [IQR 1–3] vs 7 months [3 to ≥24]; log-rank p<0·0001). Furthermore, conversion status at 6 months (adjusted OR 14·07 [95% CI 10·05–19·71]) was significantly associated with treatment success compared with failure or death. Sputum culture conversion status at 2 months was significantly associated with treatment success only in patients who were HIV negative (adjusted OR 4·12 [95% CI 2·25–7·54]) or who had unknown HIV infection (3·59 [1·96–6·58]), but not in those who were HIV positive (0·38 [0·12–1·18]). Thus, the overall association of sputum culture conversion with a successful outcome was substantially greater at 6 months than at 2 months. 2 month conversion had low sensitivity (27·3% [95% confidence limit 16·6–41·4]) and high specificity (89·8% [82·3–94·4]) for prediction of treatment success. Conversely, 6 month sputum culture conversion status had high sensitivity (91·8% [85·9–95·4]), but moderate specificity (57·8% [42·5–71·6]). The maximum combined sensitivity and specificity for sputum culture conversion was reached between month 6 and month 10 of treatment.

Interpretation

Time to sputum culture conversion, conversion status at 6 months, and conversion status at 2 months in patients without known HIV infection can be considered as proxy markers of end-of-treatment outcome in patients with MDR tuberculosis, although the overall association with treatment success is substantially stronger for 6 month than for 2 month conversion status. Investigators should consider these results regarding the validity of sputum culture conversion at various timepoints as an early predictor of treatment efficacy when designing phase 2 studies before investing substantial resources in large, long-term, phase 3 trials of new treatments for MDR tuberculosis.

Funding

US Agency for International Development, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Intramural Research of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Introduction

Sputum culture conversion is frequently used as an early microbiological endpoint in phase 2 clinical trials of tuberculosis treatments on the basis of its assumed predictive value for end-of-treatment outcome, particularly in patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis. In December, 2012, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved bedaquiline—the first anti-tuberculosis drug developed in more than 40 years—for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, on the basis of an accelerated procedure using time to sputum culture conversion and conversion status at 6 months as surrogate microbiological markers of end-of-treatment outcomes.1 In November, 2013, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended conditional marketing authorisation for another new therapeutic drug, delamanid, for treatment of MDR tuberculosis, on the basis of a dossier using the surrogate microbiological marker of sputum culture conversion status at 2 months. Although ample scientific literature exists about 2 month sputum culture conversion as a proxy marker for treatment outcome in patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis,2, 3 the validity of 2 month and 6 month conversion status as proxy markers for treatment outcome in patients with MDR tuberculosis has not been clearly shown.4 Nevertheless, the FDA and EMA recognised these markers as suitable indicators of treatment success in these patients, and marketing authorisation followed.5

We used data from two large cohort studies to assess the validity of time to sputum culture conversion and 2 month and 6 month conversion status as prognostic markers for end-of-treatment outcome in patients with MDR tuberculosis, and to identify optimum timepoints for when sputum culture conversion can be considered as a marker for final treatment outcome.

Section snippets

Study design and patients

The Preserving Effective TB Treatment Study (PETTS) and the DOTS-Plus Pilot Projects Case-Based Study (CBS) designs and patient populations have been previously reported.6, 7, 8 Briefly, PETTS was a prospective cohort study of consecutively enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with pulmonary MDR tuberculosis who started treatment with second-line drugs between Jan 1, 2005, and Dec 31, 2008, in nine countries (Estonia, Latvia, Peru, the Philippines, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, and

Results

The two datasets included 3529 patients, of whom 2043 (58%) had positive sputum cultures at the start of treatment, documented MDR tuberculosis without additional resistance to both fluoroquinolones and injectable drugs, and one of the treatment outcomes specified by WHO (figure 1). The appendix shows characteristics of the study population.

Sputum culture conversion was initially recorded in 1738 (85%) of the 2043 patients, but 340 (20%) patients had at least one subsequent positive culture

Discussion

In patients with MDR tuberculosis, time to culture conversion and conversion at 6 months were significantly associated with end-of-treatment outcomes. Sputum culture conversion at 2 months was significantly associated with end-of-treatment outcomes in patients without known HIV infection, but not in those who were HIV positive. The overall association of sputum culture conversion with outcome was substantially greater at 6 months than at 2 months. The 2 month marker of culture conversion had

References (27)

  • FDA news release

  • DA Mitchison

    Assessment of new sterilizing drugs for treating pulmonary tuberculosis by culture at 2 months

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1993)
  • RS Wallis et al.

    Biomarkers for tuberculosis disease activity, cure, and relapse

    Lancet Infect Dis

    (2009)
  • C Lienhardt et al.

    Methodological issues in the design of clinical trials for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: challenges and opportunities

    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis

    (2010)
  • Briefing information for the June 3, 2009 meeting of the Anti-Infective Drugs Advisory Committee

  • T Dalton et al.

    Prevalence of and risk factors for resistance to second-line drugs in people with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in eight countries: a prospective cohort study

    Lancet

    (2012)
  • V Gammino et al.

    Bacteriologic monitoring of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients in five DOTS-Plus pilot projects

    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis

    (2011)
  • EV Kurbatova et al.

    Predictors of sputum culture conversion among patients treated for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis

    (2012)
  • Guidelines for the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis: emergency update

  • SD Ahuja et al.

    Multidrug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis treatment regimens and patient outcomes: an individual patient data meta-analysis of 9153 patients

    PLoS Med

    (2012)
  • JC Johnston et al.

    Treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    PLoS One

    (2009)
  • EW Orenstein et al.

    Treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Lancet Infect Dis

    (2009)
  • R Harbord et al.

    A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

    Biostatistics

    (2007)
  • Cited by (121)

    • Acquired rifamycin resistance among patients with tuberculosis and HIV in new York City, 2001–2023

      2024, Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text