Research reportThe effects of FG 7142 on sensory-specific satiety in rats
Introduction
Offered a choice between two equally palatable and familiar foods, one of which has been ingested to satiety, laboratory subjects select the other food for further ingestion. The sensory properties of the ingested food are said to have undergone satiety. Sensory-specific satiety is well documented. It has been observed in subjects from various animal species, including people, when they choose between any of a range of recently ingested foods and a relatively novel one, and when they choose between two foods identical in terms of their micronutrient (e.g., fat or protein) composition but differing in their flavor. Sensory-specific satiety is one of the mechanisms by which a diet containing different foods increases ingestion relative to one lacking that variety. Hence, it may be a contributor to the prevalence of obesity in a society where a range of high-calorie and high-fat foods are relatively cheap and readily available. Sensory-specific satiety may also be one of the mechanisms by which omnivores solved the problem of obtaining adequate nutrition from a range of different foods. This satiety could bias selection and ingestion of other foods in advance of complete metabolic satiety and, hence, allows extraction of nutrients from these other foods.
A food subjected to sensory-specific satiety does not just elicit less ingestion: such a food is also impaired in its ability to act as a reward for instrumental responses and as an unconditioned stimulus (US) for Pavlovian conditioned responses [6]. Indeed, the devaluation of a food by pre-feeding is a standard technique used to assess the role of response–reward or conditioned stimulus (CS)–US associations in the control of instrumental and Pavlovian responses [1], [2]. Moreover, a recently ingested food also loses its ability to elicit oro-facial responses indicative of “liking”. Taste reactivity measures in rats have shown that an oral infusion of a recently ingested flavor elicits less positive ingestive reactions (tongue protrusions, paw licking) than does infusion of a different flavor [3], [13]. This decline in hedonics is transient, with its peak occurring in the period shortly after ingestion [10], [16]. A recently ingested food elicits few, if any, aversive reactions (e.g., headshake, gaping) and does not produce an aversion to that food, indicating that ingestion produces a transient reduction in oro-facial responses indicative of liking. Such findings have led to the view that a recently ingested food suffers a transient loss in hedonics. This loss suppresses further ingestion of that food and promotes the selection of a different food whose palatability is largely intact.
GABA plays a critical role in the regulation of feeding behaviour [12], [14]. Drugs, e.g., benzodiazepines, which facilitate activity at the GABA A receptor site, stimulate feeding in both deprived and non-deprived rats. This stimulation is likely due to the effects of these drugs on food hedonics as they increase both the preference for palatable solutions (e.g., sucrose) over water and the liking reactions elicited by an oral infusion of a palatable solution. Conversely, inverse agonists – which reduce activity at this site – depress ingestion of palatable food. For example, FG 7142 (N-methyl-β-carboline-3-carboxymide) reduces intake [8] and the duration of feeding bouts [4]. This effect of FG 7142 on ingestion is thus likely due to a reduction in food hedonics, but to the best of our knowledge, this remains unknown. Moreover, this effect of FG 7142 was observed in rats exposed to a single palatable food, but, again to the best of our knowledge, the effects of the drug have not been assessed in a sensory-satiety paradigm where the palatability of one but not another food has been reduced.
The present experiments studied the effects of FG 7142 on the hedonic responses to a palatable solution that has or has not been recently ingested. As noted, ingestive responses (e.g., tongue protrusions and paw licking) to an orally infused solution are one measure of positive hedonics. Another measure can be obtained from the distribution of licking responses to a solution. Licks are generated in bursts separated by pauses whose duration is used to form sequences and reveal the number of licking ‘bouts’ or clusters that occur across a meal [5]. The size and number of these lick clusters provide an index of hedonics [5], [7]. For example, increased concentrations of sucrose produce corresponding increases in the number of bursts and hence in the size of the clusters [5] whereas bitter tasting solutions decrease cluster size [17]. We used this measure of hedonics. In three experiments, rats drank one of two palatable, familiar solutions and were then offered the same or the other solution. The aim of Experiment 1 was to demonstrate sensory-specific satiety. More specifically, the aim was to show that rats drank less of the same solution and exhibited fewer clusters than they did of the other solution, and that they reduced licking more rapidly to the same than the other solution. Experiments 2 and 3 followed the initial drinking bout with an injection of either FG 7142 or vehicle in order to assess the effects of the drug on intake and the size of the clusters elicited by subsequent exposure to the recently ingested or the relatively novel solution. We expected that rats injected with FG 7142 would drink less of the other solution and show fewer clusters than rats injected with vehicle, that is, we expected the drug to reduce intake and the hedonic reactions elicited by the relatively novel solution.
Section snippets
Subjects
Subjects were experimentally naïve male Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus) in each experiment. They were obtained from a commercial supplier (Animal Resources Centre, Perth, Australia) and weighed between 450 and 550 g. They were housed eight per cage in plastic boxes (22 cm high × 65 cm long × 40 cm wide) located in a climate controlled colony room on a 12 h light (7.00 a.m.–7.00 p.m.)–dark cycle. Approximately 1 week after arrival rats were handled 2 min per day for four consecutive days. During this time
Experiment 1
The aim of this experiment was to demonstrate sensory-specific satiety. Rats were exposed to a solution (sucrose or ensure) and then tested with that or the other solution. The mean intakes of sucrose and ensure on the initial exposure were 18.6 ml (range 16–23 ml) and 19.4 ml (range 17–25 ml), respectively. Fig. 1 shows the test results. The upper panel shows the intake (Fig. 1A), clusters (Fig. 1B), and licks per cluster (Fig. 1C). Intake of the same solution was significantly less than of the
Discussion
These experiments used the licking response of rats to study sensory-specific satiety. In Experiment 1, rats were familiarized to two palatable solutions, one consisting in sucrose flavored water and the other in a vanilla flavored commercial product (ensure). On test, they ingested one of these solutions and shortly after were offered either the same or the other solution. When offered the other solution, rats drank more, exhibited a greater number of clusters (drinking bouts separated by an
References (16)
Modulation of taste affect by hunger, caloric satiety, and sensory-specific satiety in the rat
Appetite
(1991)- et al.
Midazolam-induced Hyperphagia and FG7142-induced anorexia: behavioural characteristics in the rat
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behaviour
(1986) - et al.
The time course of sensory-specific satiety
Appetite
(1989) Neurotransmitters in key neurons of the hypothalamus that regulate feeding behaviour and body weight
Physiology and Behaviour
(2007)- et al.
Oral exposure and sensory-specific satiety
Physiology and Behaviour
(2006) - et al.
The effect of lesions of the insular cortex on instrumental conditioning: evidence for a role in incentive learning
Journal of Neuroscience
(2000) - et al.
The effect of lesions of the basolateral amygdala on instrumental conditioning
Journal of Neuroscience
(2003) - et al.
Analysis of the microstructure of the rhythmic tongue movements of rats ingesting maltose and sucrose solutions
Behavioural Neuroscience
(1992)
Cited by (4)
GABAergic signaling by AgRP neurons prevents anorexia via a melanocortin-independent mechanism
2011, European Journal of PharmacologyCitation Excerpt :From this perspective, gliosis could elicit neurotrophic actions that attenuate hyperexcitability of post-synaptic neurons and thereby facilitate the establishment of a compensatory circuitry that restores appetite. Pharmacological studies suggest that both central GABAA and GABAB receptor signaling exert prominent influences on feeding in various brain regions (Berridge, 2009; Cooper, 2005; Duke et al., 2006; Martire et al., 2010; Pecina and Berridge, 1996; Stratford and Kelley, 1997). A class of benzodiazepine agonists, which acts through a specific binding site on GABAA receptors, induces hyperphagia by enhancing food and taste palatability in every mammalian species studied (Cooper, 2005).