Medicine in focus
Hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis: The (myo)fibroblastic cell subpopulations involved

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2005.08.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Fibrosis, defined as the excessive deposition of extracellular matrix in an organ, is the main complication of chronic liver damage. Its endpoint is cirrhosis, which is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. The accumulation of extracellular matrix observed in fibrosis and cirrhosis is due to the activation of fibroblasts, which acquire a myofibroblastic phenotype. Myofibroblasts are absent from normal liver. They are produced by the activation of precursor cells, such as hepatic stellate cells and portal fibroblasts. These fibrogenic cells are distributed differently in the hepatic lobule: the hepatic stellate cells resemble pericytes and are located along the sinusoids, in the Disse space between the endothelium and the hepatocytes, whereas the portal fibroblasts are embedded in the portal tract connective tissue around portal structures (vessels and biliary structures). Differences have been reported between these two fibrogenic cell populations, in the mechanisms leading to myofibroblastic differentiation, activation and “deactivation”, but confirmation is required. Second-layer cells surrounding centrolobular veins, fibroblasts present in the Glisson capsule surrounding the liver, and vascular smooth muscle cells may also express a myofibroblastic phenotype and may be involved in fibrogenesis. It is now widely accepted that the various types of lesion (e.g., lesions caused by alcohol abuse and viral hepatitis) leading to liver fibrosis involve specific fibrogenic cell subpopulations. The biological and biochemical characterisation of these cells is thus essential if we are to understand the mechanisms underlying the progressive development of excessive scarring in the liver. These cells also differ in proliferative and apoptotic capacity, at least in vitro. All this information is required for the development of treatments specifically and efficiently targeting the cells responsible for the development of fibrosis/cirrhosis.

Introduction

The processes of liver repair and of fibrogenesis resemble a wound healing process. When injury and the associated acute inflammation response result in moderate cell necrosis and extracellular matrix damage, tissue repair normally takes place. In this process, dead cells are replaced by normal tissue, with regeneration of specialised cells by proliferation of the surviving ones, formation of a granulation tissue, and tissue remodelling with scar formation. The specific regenerative capacities of the liver generally allow it to reconstitute itself entirely following acute, moderate lesions. However, chronic injuries to the liver do not always heal as effectively and fibrosis is the main complication of the many known chronic liver diseases. Various types of chronic injury, due to alcohol abuse, viral hepatitis (especially Hepatitis B and C), drugs, metabolic diseases (mainly due to overload of iron or copper), autoimmune destruction of hepatocytes or bile duct epithelium, and congenital abnormalities may lead to liver fibrosis (for review, see Bataller & Brenner, 2005).

The liver parenchyma is divided into functional units called lobules. The lobules are polygonal, generally hexagonal, and each is 1–2 mm in diameter and composed of a labyrinth of interconnected hepatocyte plates separated by endothelium-lined sinusoids. Each lobule is crossed by a central structure, the centrolobular vein. The hepatocyte plates radiate out from the centrolobular vein to the perimeter of the lobule; the portal triads (portal vein, hepatic artery, and bile ductule), and the surrounding connective tissue are typically found at the angles of the polygon (Fig. 1a and b).

Liver fibrosis is defined as the abnormal accumulation of extracellular matrix in the liver. Its endpoint is cirrhosis, which is responsible for a significant morbidity and mortality. Cirrhosis is an advanced stage of fibrosis, characterised by the formation of regenerative nodules of liver parenchyma separated by fibrotic septa. Three major mechanisms are involved in the generation of cirrhosis: cell death, aberrant extracellular matrix deposition (fibrosis), and vascular reorganisation. Fibrous septa connecting the portal tracts and hepatic veins form, leading to portovenous and arteriovenous shunting, and effective bypassing of the parenchymal nodules. This results in vascular thrombosis of the medium-sized and large portal veins and of the hepatic veins and the progression of parenchymal extinction to full-blown cirrhosis. Parenchymal extinction is the loss of continuous hepatocyte layers due to fibrosis of the parenchymal stroma (Wanless, 2002). In most cases, significant lesions are observed only after months or years of injury. However, they may appear more rapidly in congenital liver diseases, such as biliary atresia. Liver fibrosis is reversible, whereas cirrhosis is generally irreversible (Benyon & Iredale, 2000; Bioulac-Sage et al., 2000). Prevention of the progression of fibrosis to cirrhosis is therefore a major clinical goal. Unfortunately, current treatments of the underlying diseases responsible for liver damage are only partly successful in preventing this progression. The poor prognosis of cirrhosis is aggravated by the frequent occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma, which may also develop, albeit much more rarely, in normal or only slightly fibrous livers.

The accumulation of extracellular matrix observed in fibrosis and cirrhosis is due to the activation of fibroblasts, which acquire a myofibroblastic phenotype. Myofibroblasts are absent from normal liver. They are produced by the activation of precursor cells, such as hepatic stellate cells (for review, see Lotersztajn, Julien, Teixeira-Clerc, Grenard, & Mallat, 2005). It has been suggested that liver fibrogenic cells are heterogeneous, as the portal fibroblasts present in portal tracts may also play a major role in liver fibrogenesis (Dranoff et al., 2002, Kinnman et al., 2003, Knittel et al., 1999b; Tang, Tanaka, Marumo, & Sato, 1994; Tuchweber, Desmoulière, Bochaton-Piallat, Rubbia-Brandt, & Gabbiani, 1996). In this review, we will identify the various fibrogenic cell subpopulations involved in liver fibrogenesis, and discuss the mechanisms underlying myofibroblastic differentiation and extracellular matrix deposition in various liver disease. Finally, we will evaluate the possibility of tissue remodelling, which may render fibrosis and cirrhosis reversible in some cases.

Section snippets

Definition of the myofibroblast

Inflammation occurs in response to tissue damage, with the formation of a provisional matrix favouring cell migration and proliferation in the lesion. Granulation tissue, facilitating the replacement of the injured tissue, then develops. This tissue displays fibroblast proliferation, angiogenesis, and extracellular matrix deposition. During tissue repair and granulation tissue formation, fibroblasts acquire the smooth muscle features characteristic of myofibroblasts (for review, see Serini &

The hepatic stellate cell

Hepatic stellate cells, which account for about 5–8% of cells in the normal liver, are characterised by a perisinusoidal distribution in the Disse space and long processes extending along and around sinusoids, between the hepatocyte plates (Fig. 1a and b). Electron microscopy has shown that the nucleus-to-nucleus distance between two adjacent hepatic stellate cells is ∼40 μm. Eight to 10 hepatic stellate cells lie along each sinusoid, between the centrolobular vein and the portal tract. The

(Myo)fibroblastic markers in the liver

Many markers have been used to identify the fibroblastic cells involved in liver fibrosis (Cassiman, Libbrecht, Desmet, Denef, & Roskams, 2002; Knittel et al., 1999a, Knittel et al., 1999b). Hepatic stellate cells express classical mesenchymal markers, such as desmin in rats, α-smooth muscle actin in activated hepatic stellate cells, and vimentin in humans and rats. They also display neural/neuroendocrine features such as silver staining, neural-cell adhesion, glial fibrillary acidic protein,

Physiopathology of various “liver fibrotic diseases”

As suggested by Ramadori and Saile (2004b), different types of disease may lead to different patterns of fibrosis during disease progression. Fibrosis may be portal or central. As described below in three examples, different fibrogenic cells may predominate in different types of fibrosis.

Reversibility of fibrosis/cirrhosis

Apoptosis leads to a decrease in the number of cells during the transition between skin granulation tissue and scar (Desmoulière, Redard, Darby, & Gabbiani, 1995). This observation has now been extended to other organs. In the liver, myofibroblasts derived from hepatic stellate cells undergo apoptosis during the spontaneous resolution of rat liver fibrosis induced by CCl4 treatment (Iredale et al., 1998). The activated hepatic stellate cells are a major source of tissue inhibitor of

Conclusion

It is increasingly accepted that in the liver, as in many other organs (e.g., the kidney with the mesangial cells and the interstitial cells), different fibrogenic cell populations are involved in repair processes leading, in situations of chronic injury, to an excessive deposition of extracellular matrix. Further studies are required to characterise these cell populations in more detail, and for the definition of specific markers.

There is currently no effective treatment specifically

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by Région Aquitaine. Christelle Guyot holds a fellowship from Région Aquitaine.

References (101)

  • N. Fausto et al.

    The role of hepatocytes and oval cells in liver regeneration and repopulation

    Mechanisms of Development

    (2003)
  • S.J. Forbes et al.

    A significant proportion of myofibroblasts are of bone marrow origin in human liver fibrosis

    Gastroenterology

    (2004)
  • S.L. Friedman

    Molecular regulation of hepatic fibrosis, an integrated cellular response to tissue injury

    Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (2000)
  • M.D. Gaca et al.

    Basement membrane-like matrix inhibits proliferation and collagen synthesis by activated rat hepatic stellate cells: Evidence for matrix-dependent deactivation of stellate cells

    Matrix Biology

    (2003)
  • A. Geerts

    On the origin of stellate cells: Mesodermal, endodermal or neuro-ectodermal?

    Journal of Hepatology

    (2004)
  • B. Hinz et al.

    Mechanisms of force generation and transmission by myofibroblasts

    Current Opinion in Biotechnology

    (2003)
  • B. Hinz et al.

    Mechanical tension controls granulation tissue contractile activity and myofibroblast differentiation

    American Journal of Pathology

    (2001)
  • A. Hoofring et al.

    Three-dimensional reconstruction of hepatic bridging fibrosis in chronic Hepatitis C viral infection

    Journal of Hepatology

    (2003)
  • R. Issa et al.

    Spontaneous recovery from micronodular cirrhosis: Evidence for incomplete resolution associated with matrix cross-linking

    Gastroenterology

    (2004)
  • C.A. Jahoda et al.

    Hair follicle dermal sheath cells: Unsung participants in wound healing

    Lancet

    (2001)
  • W.H. Kim et al.

    Growth inhibition and apoptosis in liver myofibroblasts promoted by hepatocyte growth factor leads to resolution from liver cirrhosis

    American Journal of Pathology

    (2005)
  • N. Kinnman et al.

    PDGF-mediated chemoattraction of hepatic stellate cells by bile duct segments in cholestatic liver injury

    Laboratory Investigation

    (2000)
  • N. Kinnman et al.

    Hepatic stellate proliferation is an early platelet-derived growth factor-mediated cellular event in rat cholestatic liver injury

    Laboratory Investigation

    (2001)
  • N. Kinnman et al.

    The myofibroblastic conversion of peribiliary fibrogenic cells distinct from hepatic stellate cells is stimulated by platelet-derived growth factor during liver fibrogenesis

    Laboratory Investigation

    (2003)
  • T. Knittel et al.

    Rat liver myofibroblasts and hepatic stellate cells: Different cell populations of the fibroblast lineage with fibrogenic potential

    Gastroenterology

    (1999)
  • S. Lepreux et al.

    Cellular retinol-binding protein-1 expression in normal and fibrotic/cirrhotic human liver: Different patterns of expression in hepatic stellate cells and (myo)fibroblast subpopulations

    Journal of Hepatology

    (2004)
  • D. Lorena et al.

    Fibrillin-1 expression in normal and fibrotic rat liver and in cultured hepatic fibroblastic cells: Modulation by mechanical stress and role in cell adhesion

    Laboratory Investigation

    (2004)
  • F.R. Murphy et al.

    Inhibition of apoptosis of activated hepatic stellate cells by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 is mediated via effects on matrix metalloproteinase inhibition: Implications for reversibility of liver fibrosis

    Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (2002)
  • M. Pinzani

    Hepatic stellate (ITO) cells: Expanding roles for a liver-specific pericyte

    Journal of Hepatology

    (1995)
  • S. Pol et al.

    Reversibility of Hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis

    Human Pathology

    (2004)
  • T.E. Quan et al.

    Circulating fibrocytes: Collagen-secreting cells of the peripheral blood

    International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology

    (2004)
  • G. Ramadori et al.

    Portal tract fibrogenesis in the liver

    Laboratory Investigation

    (2004)
  • G. Ramadori et al.

    Inflammation, damage repair, immune cells, and liver fibrosis: Specific or nonspecific, this is a question

    Gastroentorology

    (2004)
  • L. Rubbia-Brandt et al.

    Hepatic stellate cells reversibly express α-smooth muscle actin during acute hepatic ischemia

    Transplantation Proceedings

    (1997)
  • B. Saile et al.

    IGF-I induces DNA synthesis and apoptosis in rat liver hepatic stellate cells (HSC) but DNA synthesis and proliferation in rat liver myofibroblasts (rMF)

    Laboratory Investigation

    (2004)
  • P. Sancho-Bru et al.

    Genomic and functional characterization of stellate cells isolated from human cirrhotic livers

    Journal of Hepatology

    (2005)
  • N. Sedlaczek et al.

    Proliferating bile duct epithelial cells are a major source of connective tissue growth factor in rat biliary fibrosis

    American Journal of Pathology

    (2001)
  • G. Serini et al.

    Mechanisms of myofibroblast activity and phenotypic modulation

    Experimental Cell Research

    (1999)
  • P.A. Slott et al.

    Origin, pattern, and mechanism of bile duct proliferation following biliary obstruction in the rat

    Gastroenterology

    (1990)
  • N. Sohara et al.

    Reversal of activation of human myofibroblast-like cells by culture on a basement membrane-like substrate

    Journal of Hepatology

    (2002)
  • F. Sztark et al.

    Perisinusoidal cells in patients with nomal liver histology. A morphological study

    Journal of Hepatology

    (1986)
  • K. Uchio et al.

    Cellular retinol-binding protein-1 expression and modulation during in vivo and in vitro myofibroblastic differentiation of rat hepatic stellate cells and portal fibroblasts

    Laboratory Investigation

    (2002)
  • R. Abe et al.

    Peripheral blood fibrocytes: Differentiation pathway and migration to wound sites

    Journal of Immunology

    (2001)
  • Z.A. Andrade et al.

    Myofibroblasts in schistosomal portal fibrosis of man

    Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

    (1999)
  • R. Bataller et al.

    Liver fibrosis

    Journal of Clinical Investigation

    (2005)
  • L. Beljaars et al.

    Targeting hepatic stellate cells for cell-specific treatment of liver fibrosis

    Frontiers in Bioscience

    (2002)
  • R.C. Benyon et al.

    Is liver fibrosis reversible?

    Gut

    (2000)
  • E. Bhunchet et al.

    Role of mesenchymal cell populations in porcine serum-induced rat liver fibrosis

    Hepatology

    (1992)
  • P. Bioulac-Sage et al.

    Perisinusoidal and pit cells in liver sinusoids

  • P. Bioulac-Sage et al.

    Cirrhosis: Forever?

    Gastroentérologie Clinique et Biologique

    (2000)
  • Cited by (218)

    • Myofibroblast-specific YY1 promotes liver fibrosis

      2019, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      To gain further understanding of the molecular origin for YY1-dependent regulation of fibrogenic activity and fibrosis, qPCR-based expression analysis of various profibrogenic factors was performed to substantiate the effects of YY1 deficiency on myofibroblasts. Transcript expression levels of transform growth factor beta (TGF-β), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), all of which can serve as autocrine drivers of hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation, invasion, proliferation, or transdifferentiation to myofibroblasts [18], were significantly decreased in the liver from PostnMCM/+;YY1flox/flox mice than that from WT mice after CCL4 and tamoxifen-diet treatment (Fig. 3A). Consequently, expression of the myofibroblast markers, α-SMA and collagen Iα (Fig. 3B and C) was significantly reduced in the liver from PostnMCM/+; YY1flox/flox mice than those in WT.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text