Elsevier

Brachytherapy

Volume 13, Issue 4, July–August 2014, Pages 343-351
Brachytherapy

Dose accumulation during vaginal cuff brachytherapy based on rigid/deformable registration vs. single plan addition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2013.11.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To compare dose summation using a single plan (SP) approach for vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VBT) against dose summation after a rigid or deformable registration for each VBT fraction, in women with early stage endometrial cancer receiving postoperative VBT.

Methods and Materials

A retrospective analysis of 19 patients who received VBT as the sole adjuvant treatment was undertaken. For the purposes of the study, every VBT fraction was re-segmented and re-planned under the same conditions. CT-planning images were registered, initially following a rigid method and then using deformable registration. The transformation vectors were reused to warp the dose files, followed by the dose summation. Three dose accumulation scenarios were studied: (1) an SP approach, (2) a rigid dose warping summation (RDWS), (3) a deformable dose warping summation (DDWS). Each scenario was analyzed for 3 and 5 fractions to evaluate the effect of fractionation. D0.1cc, D1cc, D2cc, D5cc, D5%, and Dmean values were compared for organs at risk, such as the rectum and bladder.

Results

No statistical significances were observed in rectal parameters between SP and RDWS or between SP and DDWS. Significant SP, RDWS and DDWS Dmean, D0.1cc, and D2cc metric differences for the 5 fractions bladder scenario were observed (p = 0.0242, 0.0196, and 0.0242, respectively).

Conclusions

A multi-image planning procedure for a VBT course leads to limited differences between different summation methods. SP is an effective and acceptable surrogate for absorbed doses in organs at risk.

Introduction

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed in women and is the most common female genital tract malignancy worldwide (1). Early-stage EC treatment involves surgery (total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without pelvic lymph node dissection) followed by adjuvant radiotherapy in selected cases. Prospective randomized studies have shown that radiotherapy (RT) reduces the risk of pelvic relapse but does not improve the overall survival in patients with early EC [2], [3]. The PORTEC-2 trial demonstrated that patients with intermediate-risk EC can be safely treated with postoperative brachytherapy in the absence of whole pelvis external beam radiotherapy, decreasing toxicity (4). The vaginal cuff remains the most common site of relapse. Subsequently, there has been a shift away from external beam irradiation and an increase in the use of vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VBT) in these patients.

With the adoption of three-dimensional (3D) image-based planning, there has been concern regarding the movement of pelvic organs, as well as interfraction variation between implants. The cervical cancer literature suggests the benefit of individualized plans for each brachytherapy fraction [5], [6], [7]. Evidence for image-based planning with each VBT fraction is not as clear, with some reports suggesting an absence of benefit (8). Although their study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of repeated organs at risk (OARs) dose–volume histogram (DVH) calculations in multi-fractionated treatments, ours involved analyzing the different dose accumulation methods.

Deformable registration and dose accumulation is an important field of research in radiotherapy [9], [10]. Dose summation with fractionated VBT should be considered to ascertain the dose distribution around the implant and OARs as accurately as possible. Variations in organ position, shape, and volume can cause discrepancies between planned and delivered doses. These anatomic changes could be heightened by brachytherapy applicators. Applying standard procedures to calculate the total does not factor in anatomic deformations, given that only the first fraction doses are taken into account, or at best, treatment fractions are rigidly registered. Deformable registration may overcome these limitations, improving both anatomic alignment and dose accumulation.

We analyzed the variation in dose to the rectum and bladder according to three accumulation strategies: single plan (SP), rigid registration, and b-spline deformable registration (Fig. 1). As there is no current consensus on the optimal number of fractions to be delivered, each type of accumulation strategy was calculated, mimicking a 3 or 5 fractions treatment.

Section snippets

Patient data

Brachytherapy CT scans of 19 consecutive patients, who had received postoperative 3D HDR-VBT, with single-channel vaginal cylinders for EC, and who had at least five brachytherapy CT scans available for review, were retrospectively studied. Eighteen patients had exclusive postoperative VBT for early stage EC (Ia, one patient; Ib, 13 patients; Ic, four patients) and one patient had salvage VBT. The median age was 68 years. Brachytherapy was performed with the largest diameter cylinder that

Rectum parameters

No statistically significant differences were observed when RDWS and DDWS were compared with the SP approach. Results were similar in both the 3 and 5 dose fractions. Table 1 shows the raw dose values expressed as a median and an interquartile range based on each dose summation scenario. Variation in the DDWS values was lower than the RDWS values compared with the SP doses. All the same, the median registered metrics differed from the SP summation procedure between a −5.54% and 10.72%. On

Discussion

The results shown for dose deformation and dose accumulation do not support a customized dosimetric plan for each fraction. Under optimal circumstances, VBT is delivered using a customized plan with each fraction, although the American Brachytherapy Society stated that this may not be necessary assuming a fixed geometry of the implant for every insertion based on the first fraction (17). The results presented here demonstrate small dosimetric differences between the simple SP approach and the

Conclusions

Despite the current uncertainties in the field of dose-deformation and dose-accumulation, we believe that our results support the use of a SP approach rather than a customized CT-based plan for each VBT fraction, given the slight differences observed between the SP approach and the two dose summation methods used. Our data are consistent with previously published results produced with different experimental methodologies.

We are of the opinion that the SP approach should become the standard

Acknowledgment

We would like to express our gratitude to the reviewers and editor for the extremely helpful comments and guidance in the revision.

References (36)

Cited by (31)

  • A Machine Learning Model Predicts the Outcome of SRS for Residual Arteriovenous Malformations after Partial Embolization: A Real-World Clinical Obstacle

    2022, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    The embolic agents were delineated on T1 contrast-enhancement images. The dosimetry data, including the minimum dose, maximum dose, and mean dose, were calculated for the embolic agents and planning target volume (PTV) using a built-in toolkit, Slicer-RT, in 3D Slicer.23-25 The resolution of the T1 contrast-enhancement sequence was 512 × 512 mm, and the slice thickness was 2.00 mm.

  • Image registration, contour propagation and dose accumulation of external beam and brachytherapy in gynecological radiotherapy

    2020, Radiotherapy and Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    When performing deformable dose accumulation of EBRT and BT, it is expected that each voxel irradiated by EBRT is matched with the corresponding voxel irradiated by BT. This assumption is generally violated due to various reasons such bowel gas, bladder filling, and the presence of BT applicator and vaginal packing [29,54–59], which may induce significant uncertainties and implausible registration [57]. There is a lack of straightforward metrics to evaluate DIR errors.

  • Geometric and dosimetric evaluation of the differences between rigid and deformable registration to assess interfraction motion during pelvic radiotherapy

    2019, Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    They may therefore under or over-estimate target coverage and OAR sparing. A previous study has evaluated dose accumulation using rigid and non-rigid deformable registration strategies in 19 patients receiving 3 or 5 fraction brachytherapy to the vaginal vault for EC [22]. They also found a statistically significant difference in the delivered dose to the bladder, but in comparison to our results they did not find a significant difference in the dose delivered to the rectum.

  • The influence of the image registration method on the adaptive radiotherapy. A proof of the principle in a selected case of prostate IMRT

    2018, Physica Medica
    Citation Excerpt :

    All registrations used the first CT (CT1) as the reference volume, and subsequent CTs (CT2 and CT3) were taken as the moving volumes. The registration procedure has been described elsewhere [3,4]. In brief, after a rigid image registration (RIR) using the mutual information (MI) as the cost function, the moving volume was used for the initialization of the deformable image registration (DIR).

View all citing articles on Scopus

Conflict of interest: None.

Part of the study was presented in Chicago, USA (December 1–6, 2013) at the 99th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA).

View full text