Elsevier

Composite Structures

Volume 176, 15 September 2017, Pages 860-876
Composite Structures

Multiobjective Best Theory Diagrams for cross-ply composite plates employing polynomial, zig-zag, trigonometric and exponential thickness expansions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.055Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper presents Best Theory Diagrams (BTDs) for plates considering all the displacement and stress components as objectives. The BTD is a diagram in which the minimum number of terms that have to be used to achieve the desired accuracy can be read. Maclaurin, zig-zag, trigonometric and exponential expansions are employed for the static analysis of cross-ply composite plates. The Equivalent Single Layer (ESL) approach is considered, and the Unified Formulation developed by Carrera is used. The governing equations are derived from the Principle of Virtual Displacements (PVD), and Navier-type closed-form solutions are adopted. BTDs are obtained using the Axiomatic/Asymptotic Method (AAM) and genetic algorithms (GA). The results show that the BTD can be used as a tool to assess the accuracy and computational efficiency of any structural models and to draw guidelines to develop structural models. The inclusion of the multiobjective capability extends the BTD validity to the recognition of the role played by each output parameter in the refinement of a structural model.

Introduction

Composite laminated plates are increasingly common in many engineering applications, such as aerospace, mechanical, marine and civil structures. In fact, composite plates have many favorable mechanical properties, e.g. high stiffness, and low density. The high demand for the use of composite material structures calls for research of efficient and accurate numerical techniques to predict the structural and dynamical behavior of laminated composites.

Classical plate theories (CPT) neglect transverse shear and normal stresses [1], [2]. An extension of this model to multi-layered structures is referred to as the Classical Lamination Theory (CLT) [3], [4]. Due to the increasing use of thick laminated plates in structures, Reissner and Mindlin [5], [6] included transverse shear effects in their well-known First-Order Shear Deformation Theory (FSDT). Although the FSDT is simple to implement and apply for both thick and thin laminated plates, the accuracy strongly depends on shear correction factors and the nonexistence of complicated stress gradients [7]. The limitations of the FSDT weaken or disappear with Higher-order Shear Deformation Theories (HSDT). The HSDTs assume quadratic, cubic, higher-order variations or non-polynomial terms to improve the displacement field along the thickness direction [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Further enhancements are useful if local effects are important or accuracy in the calculation of the transverse stresses is required. The zig-zag models [15], [16] and mixed variational tools [17] can deal with these phenomena.

Plate modeling has two main approaches, the Equivalent Single Layer (ESL) and the Layer-Wise (LW) models [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Theories based on the ESL assumption offer reduced computational complexity; however, they struggle to model the zig-zag effects typical of laminates. LW theories have quasi-three-dimensional predictive capabilities; however, the computational effort can increase significantly.

The present paper makes use of ESL models and includes non-polynomial terms to Maclaurin expansions. Different non-polynomial kinematics models have been proposed in the literature. Shimpi and Ghugal [12] proposed a LW trigonometric shear deformation theory for the analysis of composite beams. Arya et al. [13] developed a zig-zag model using a sine term to represent the non-linear displacement field across the thickness in symmetrically laminated beams. Mantari and co-workers have recently proposed various extensions to non-polynomial plate models, including ESL and LW trigonometric models [23], [24], HSDTs based on Trigonometric-Exponential terms [25], [26], hybrid Maclaurin-trigonometric models [27], [28], and a generalized hybrid formulation for the study of functionally graded sandwich beams [29], [30]. Thai et al. [31] presented a new first-order shear deformation theory for the bending, free vibration and buckling analysis of functionally graded sandwich plates, which was extended to a generalized formulation by Thai et al. in Ref. [32]. A new simple four-unknown shear and normal deformations theory for static, dynamic and buckling analyses of functionally graded material of isotropic and sandwich plates was proposed recently by Thai et al. [33]. Nguyen et al. [34] developed a unified framework on HSDTs for laminated composite plates. The Carrera Unified Formulation (CUF) has been recently employed to develop non-polynomial structural models [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40].

The refined models employed in this paper are based on the CUF. According to CUF, the governing equations are given via the so-called fundamental nuclei whose form does not depend on either the expansion order nor on the choices made for the base functions to generate any structural model [41], [42], [43]. In the CUF framework, Carrera and Petrolo [44], [45] introduced the Axiomatic/Asymptotic Method (AAM) to develop reduced models whose accuracies are equivalent to those of full higher-order models. The AAM has been applied to several problems, including: static and free vibration of beams [44], [46], metallic and composite plates [45], [47], shells [48], [49], LW models [50], [51], advanced models based on the Reissner Mixed Variational Theorem [52], piezoelectric plates [53], and thermomechanical problems [54].

The AAM has led to the BTD [55]. The BTD allows one to determine the minimum number of expansion terms – i.e. unknown variables – required to meet a given accuracy; or, conversely, the best accuracy provided by a given amount of variables. To construct BTDs with a lower computational cost, a genetic algorithm was employed by Carrera and Miglioretti [56]. In particular, BTDs were built by minimizing the number of the expansion terms and the error on an output parameter, such as a displacement or stress component. Petrolo et al. [57] presented BTDs for ESL and LW composite plate models based on Maclaurin and Legendre polynomial expansions of the unknown variables along the thickness. Recently, Carrera et al. have extended the BTD to multifield problems [58].

The present work presents a method to develop BTDs considering multiple objectives simultaneously; in particular, the three displacement components and the six stress ones. The BTDs are therefore the Pareto fronts of the optimization of the expansions to minimize the error on each displacement and stress component. A Maclaurin expansion with zig-zag terms and a hybrid Maclaurin, zig-zag, trigonometric and exponential expansion are considered. The non-polynomial terms in the latter are selected according to Filippi et al. [39].

The present paper is organized as follows: a description of the adopted formulation is provided in Section 2; the governing equations and closed-form solution is presented in Section 3; the AAM is presented in Section 4; the BTD for multiple output parameters is introduced in Section 5; the results are presented in Section 6, and the conclusions are drawn in Section 7.

Section snippets

Carrera Unified Formulation for plates

The geometry and the coordinate system of the multilayered plate are shown in Fig. 1, where x and y are the in-plane coordinates while z is the thickness coordinate. The integer k denotes the layer number. In the framework of the CUF, the displacement components of a plate model isu(x,y,z)=Fτ(z)·uτ(x,y)τ=1,2,,N+1where u is the displacement vector (ux,uy,uz). Fτ are the expansion functions. uτ (uxτ,uyτ,uzτ) is the vector of the displacements variables. In the ESL case, Fτ functions can be

Governing equations and Closed-form solution

Geometrical relations enable to express the in-plane εpk and the out-of-plane εnk strains in terms of the displacement u,εpk=εxxk,εyyk,εxykT=(Dpk)uk,εnk=εxzk,εyzk,εzzkT=(Dnpk+Dnzk)ukwhere Dpk, Dnpk and Dnzk are differential operators whose components are:Dpk=x000y0yx0,Dnpk=00x00y000,Dnzk=z000z000z

Stress components for a generic k layer can be obtained using the constitutive law,σpk=Cppkεpk+Cpnkεnkσnk=Cnpkεpk+Cnnkεnkwhere Cppk, Cpnk, Cnpk and Cnnk are:Cppk=C11kC12kC16kC12kC22kC

Axiomatic/Asymptotic method

The introduction of higher-order terms in a plate model offers significant advantages in terms of improved structural response prediction at the expense of higher computational costs. The axiomatic/asymptotic method (AAM) allows us to lower the computational cost of a model without affecting its accuracy. A typical AAM analysis has the following steps:

  • (1)

    Parameters such as geometry, boundary conditions, loadings, materials, and stacking sequences are fixed.

  • (2)

    A set of output parameters is chosen,

Best Theory Diagram

The construction of refined models through the AAM allows one to obtain a diagram in which each refined model is associated with the number of active terms and the error on a given displacement or stress output variable on a reference solution. Best models are those that, for a given error, require the minimum number of variables; or, for a given number of variables, provide the best accuracy. Best models represent a Pareto front of an optimization problem in which the objectives are the

Results and discussion

A bisinusoidal load was applied to the top surface of the simply supported laminated plate,p=pz·sinmπxasinnπybwhere a=b=0.1m, pz=1kPa, and m,n = 1. The reduced models were developed considering the displacements ux, uy, uz, and the stresses σxx, σyy, σzz, τxy, τxz, and τyz. The following dimensionless quantities were defined for the displacements and stresses:ux=uxE2k=1·h2pz·a3,uy=uyE2k=1·h2pz·a3,uz=uz100·E2k=1·h3pz·a4,σxx,yy=σxx,yypz·(a/h)2,σzz=σzzpz,τxy=τxypz·a/h2,τxz,yz=τxz,yzpz

Conclusion

Best Theory Diagrams (BTDs) for cross-ply laminated plates considering multiple output parameters have been presented in this paper. The BTD is a curve in which, for a given problem, the most accurate plate models for a given number of unknown variables can be read. In this work, BTDs consider multiple objectives simultaneously; in particular, the three displacement components and the six stress ones. The BTDs are therefore the Pareto fronts of the optimization of the expansions to minimize the

References (62)

  • J.L. Mantari et al.

    Free vibration and buckling of laminated beams via hybrid Ritz solution for various penalized boundary conditions

    Compos Struct

    (2016)
  • J.L. Mantari et al.

    A simple and accurate generalized shear deformation theory for beams

    Compos Struct

    (2015)
  • J. Yarasca et al.

    Hermite-Lagrangian finite element formulation to study functionally graded sandwich beams

    Compos Struct

    (2016)
  • Huu-Tai Thai et al.

    Analysis of functionally graded sandwich plates using a new first-order shear deformation theory

    Eur J Mech A Solids

    (2014)
  • Chien H. Thai et al.

    Generalized shear deformation theory for functionally graded isotropic and sandwich plates based on isogeometric approach

    Comput Struct

    (2014)
  • Chien H. Thai et al.

    A simple four-unknown shear and normal deformations theory for functionally graded isotropic and sandwich plates based on isogeometric analysis

    Compos Struct

    (2016)
  • T.N. Nguyen et al.

    On the general framework of high order shear deformation theories for laminated composite plate structures: a novel unified approach

    Int J Mech Sci

    (2016)
  • J.L. Mantari et al.

    Static analysis of functionally graded plates using new non-polynomial displacement fields via Carrera Unified Formulation

    Compos B

    (2016)
  • E. Carrera et al.

    Laminated beam analysis by polynomial, trigonometric, exponential and zig-zag theories

    Eur J Mech A Solids

    (2013)
  • M. Filippi et al.

    Analysis of laminated composites and sandwich structures by trigonometric, exponential and miscellaneous polynomials and a MITC9 plate element

    Compos Struct

    (2016)
  • E. Carrera et al.

    MITC9 shell finite elements with miscellaneous through-the-thickness functions for the analysis of laminated structures

    Compos Struct

    (2016)
  • E. Carrera et al.

    Computations and evaluations of higher-order theories for free vibration analysis of beams

    J Sound Vib

    (2012)
  • D.S. Mashat et al.

    Axiomatic/asymptotic evaluation of multilayered plate theories by using single and multi-points error criteria

    Compos Struct

    (2013)
  • E. Carrera et al.

    Results on best theories for metallic and laminated shells including Layer-Wise models

    Compos Struct

    (2015)
  • M. Petrolo et al.

    Evaluation of mixed theories for laminated plates through the Axiomatic/Asymptotic method

    Compos B

    (2015)
  • E. Carrera et al.

    Selection of appropriate multilayered plate theories by using a genetic like algorithm

    Compos Struct

    (2012)
  • Abdullah Konak et al.

    Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: a tutorial

    Reliab Eng Syst Saf

    (2006)
  • A.L. Cauchy

    Sure l’equilibre et le movement d’une plaque solide

    Excercies Matematique

    (1828)
  • S.D. Poisson

    Memoire sur l’equilibre et le mouvement des corps elastique

    Mem l’Acad Sci

    (1829)
  • G. Kirchhoff

    Über das Gleichgewicht und die Bewegung einer elastishen Scheibe

    J Angew Math

    (1850)
  • Love AEH the mathematical theory of elasticity

    4th ed.

    (1927)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Computational semi-analytical method for the 3D elasticity bending solution of laminated composite and sandwich doubly-curved shells

      2020, Engineering Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      LW apraoches give better results for interlaminar displacements and stresses but requires higher computational cost than ESL. In the framework of Unified Formulation, several researches have formulated different displacement fields based on non-polynomial [50–55]: trigonometric, hyperbolic and exponential shear strain shape functions obtaining remarkable results. Tornabene and Brischetto [56,57] obtained closed-form solution of shell composites using the GDQM [42].

    • A comparative review between Genetic Algorithm use in composite optimisation and the state-of-the-art in evolutionary computation

      2020, Composite Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      If they are then small changes to the variables relate to small changes in the objectives and the space is easy to interpret for an engineer. Finding the Pareto front reflects best practice in multi-objective optimisation with 61 papers illustrating the final Pareto fronts [15,24,31,36,46,74–129]. Of these 55 papers perform multi-objective optimisation and 8 papers utilise a weighted average approach to generate Pareto fronts, including two papers which present both methods across different problems, preferring the weighted sum approach for the 3 objective problem.

    • Best non-polynomial shear deformation theories for cross-ply single skin and sandwich shells

      2020, Engineering Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      The graphical representation of AAM method is presented using the Best theory diagram (BTD) [30] which, for a given problem, the computational cheapest mathematical model for a given accuracy can be read. Yarasca and co-authors [31,57] presented an effective N-objective optimization method using genetic algorithm considering displacement and stresses as output parameters. BTD were given considering Maclaurin, high order zig-zag, trigonometrical, exponential and hyperbolic expansion terms in order to study the importance of such expansion functions in the structural response.

    • New methodology for the construction of best theory diagrams using neural networks and multi-objective genetic algorithm

      2019, Composites Part B: Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hence, refined models that accurately predict multiple outputs are obtained in a single procedure. The BTDs presented in Refs. [24–29] were build using a closed-form solution. If a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is used the required computational cost is significant, especially for layer-wise models.

    • An adaptable refinement approach for shell finite element models based on node-dependent kinematics

      2019, Composite Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      Apart from commonly used Taylor series and Lagrange polynomials, the adoption of trigonometric, exponential, and hyperbolic series, as well as Legendre and Chebyshev polynomials, has also been discussed [10,11]. A best-theory diagram was suggested to choose the most suitable theory for specific structural analyzes [12–14]. This variable kinematic approach has been extended to multi-field problems [15–17].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text