Elsevier

Hearing Research

Volume 202, Issues 1–2, April 2005, Pages 141-153
Hearing Research

Effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials evoked by electric pulse trains

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2004.10.001Get rights and content

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials in response to electric pulse trains. Subjects were adult guinea pigs, implanted with a minimally invasive electrode to preserve acoustic sensitivity. Electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAP) were recorded from the auditory nerve trunk in response to electric pulse trains both during and after the presentation of acoustic white noise.

Simultaneously presented acoustic noise produced a decrease in ECAP amplitude. The effect of the acoustic masker on the electric probe was greatest at the onset of the acoustic stimulus and it was followed by a partial recovery of the ECAP amplitude. Following cessation of the acoustic noise, ECAP amplitude recovered over a period of approximately 100–200 ms.

The effects of the acoustic noise were more prominent at lower electric pulse rates (interpulse intervals of 3 ms and higher). At higher pulse rates, the ECAP adaptation to the electric pulse train alone was larger and the acoustic noise, when presented, produced little additional effect. The observed effects of noise on ECAP were the greatest at high electric stimulus levels and, for a particular electric stimulus level, at high acoustic noise levels.

Introduction

Electric stimulation of the auditory nerve by a cochlear implant is the method of choice for the treatment of severe and profound hearing loss. Clinical criteria for cochlear implantation have become more relaxed over the last decade, and many patients with residual hearing have been receiving cochlear implants (NIH Consensus Statement, 1995). Studies by Turner and Gantz, 2001, Turner et al., 2003 and Gstoettner et al. (2004) have demonstrated that hair cells can remain functional in patients following cochlear implantation. Therefore, there is a possibility that residual acoustic sensitivity can influence responses of the auditory nerve fibers to electric stimuli delivered by the cochlear implant. A systematic understanding of possible interactions between acoustic and electric stimuli at the level of the auditory nerve may facilitate improvements of stimulation paradigms in individuals with residual hearing.

Previous work in our laboratory addressed the effects of functional hair cells on the response properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. It was found that presence of functional hair cells – even without acoustic stimulation – could affect the response of the auditory nerve to electric stimuli (Hu et al., 2003). Specifically, electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) growth functions in response to single electric pulses had smaller saturation (maximum) amplitudes and more shallow slopes in acoustically sensitive ears compared with deafened ears. In addition, it was demonstrated that viable hair cells could affect the adaptation and refractory properties of the auditory nerve, as evidenced by compound action potential recordings in response to electric pulse trains. The observed effects were attributed to increased stochastic activity of the auditory nerve fibers associated with spontaneous release of neurotransmitter by functionally active hair cells.

Preliminary studies in our laboratory have investigated effects of acoustic stimuli on the auditory nerve response to simultaneous electric stimulation. This interaction has been addressed using measures based both on ECAP (Miller et al., 2000) and single fiber (Miller et al., 2003a) responses. When presented simultaneously, wideband acoustic noise can decrease the amplitude of ECAP response to single electric pulses. Analysis of single-fiber data showed that this effect was associated with an increase of fiber discharge rate, an increase in spike jitter, a decrease in vector strength, and reductions in amplitude of individual spikes (Miller et al., 2003a). Based on these results, it was hypothesized that ECAP decrements can indicate an acoustically driven desynchronization of responses of the auditory nerve fibers to pulsatile electric stimuli.

While the aforementioned studies demonstrated acoustic–electric interactions, they provided little information about the time course of the observed effects of acoustic stimuli. As most cochlear implants present information to the auditory nerve as trains of amplitude modulated electric pulses, it is important to consider the temporal properties of acoustic–electric interaction.

Studies of electric pulse train responses in deafened animals have demonstrated that the auditory nerve response can undergo significant changes over the course of the pulse-train stimulus. Short-term adaptation to electric pulse trains that occurred over tens of milliseconds (Javel, 1990, Haenggeli et al., 1998, Matsuoka et al., 2000) as well as long-term cumulative effects that spanned over seconds (Haenggeli et al., 1998, Abkes et al., 2003) have been described. Furthermore, the magnitude and time course of adaptation to electric pulse trains can be affected by the presence of viable hair cells (Haenggeli et al., 1998, Hu et al., 2003). Response of the auditory nerve fibers to an acoustic stimulus may also undergo changes over time (Westerman and Smith, 1984).

The major goal of the present study was to provide a detailed description of the time course of changes in the auditory nerve compound action potential in response to electric pulse trains in the presence of broadband acoustic noise. Changes in ECAP amplitude observed during stimulation with acoustic noise (simultaneous effects) and following cessation of the noise stimulus (post-stimulatory effects) are described across different stimulus parameters. Level, duration and rate of stimulation may all affect response adaptation of the auditory nerve fibers to these stimuli (Haenggeli et al., 1998, Matsuoka et al., 2000). As adaptation may affect the time course of acoustic–electric interaction, we examined it by varying the levels of acoustic and electric stimuli, as well as the duration of acoustic and the rate of electric stimulation.

Portions of this study have appeared previously in abstract form (Miller et al., 2003b, Nourski et al., 2003a, Nourski et al., 2003b).

Section snippets

Animal preparation

Twelve adult guinea pigs (weight range 450–620 g) free from middle ear infection were used in acute experimental sessions. Initial anesthesia was accomplished with a combination of ketamine (40 mg/kg), xylazine (7.5 mg/kg) and acepromazine (0.5 mg/kg), administered intramuscularly. A single dose of atropine sulphate (0.05 mg/kg) was given subcutaneously to reduce musocal secretion. After anesthesia was induced, the right external jugular vein was surgically exposed and a catheter was inserted

General characteristics

Fig. 2 demonstrates an example of ECAP amplitudes in response to electric pulse trains presented at a 4 ms IPI with or without simultaneous acoustic noise. In the upper panel (Fig. 2(a)), response amplitudes to individual pulses of the train are plotted as a function of time after the onset of the acoustic stimulus. Responses to the electric pulse train presented alone (filled circles) provide a control condition for evaluating effects of the acoustic noise. It can be seen that the response

Effects of acoustic noise across stimulus parameters

The results presented in this paper provide evidence that electric and acoustic stimuli, when presented simultaneously, can functionally interact at the level of the auditory nerve. Acoustic noise can produce simultaneous as well as post-stimulatory effects on the auditory nerve responses to electric pulses. The principal result of this interaction is a decrease in the ECAP response amplitude in the presence of the acoustic stimulus (wideband noise). This is consistent with our previous

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by NIH contract N01-DC-2-1005.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (19)

  • Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing

    2020, Hearing Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, the strength of masking seems to be smaller in the electrophysiological experiment, which indicates additional central masking effects. In animals, stronger ECAP reduction was observed for larger stimulus levels of electric stimulation (Nourski et al., 2005). The observed response reduction in the electrophysiological measurement could thus decrease towards the threshold levels used in the psychoacoustic experiments.

  • Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing

    2018, Hearing Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Particularly, a high acoustic level and a resulting broad stimulation of the few remaining hair cells may result in a desynchronization of auditory nerve fibers, thus reducing the otherwise highly synchronous electrically evoked responses and leading to prolonged threshold elevation. This effect is observed in normal hearing guinea pigs that show a reduction of electrically evoked spike rates due to previously presented acoustic stimulation (Nourski et al., 2005). Furthermore, it is possible that more central mechanisms in the auditory system result in electric-acoustic forward masking.

  • Electric-acoustic interactions in the hearing cochlea: Single fiber recordings

    2015, Hearing Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    High-frequency electric stimulation in the adapted state may occlude some electroacoustic interactions (Litvak et al., 2001; Nourski et al., 2005). Low frequency sinusoids achieve sustained responses without the adaptation observed at higher frequencies (Matsuoka et al., 2000; Nourski et al., 2005). The most effective stimulation (in terms of lowest thresholds and highest response rates) was obtained with electrical sinusoids of frequencies around 100 Hz (Dynes and Delgutte, 1992; Hartmann et al., 1984; Kiang and Moxon, 1972; Moxon, 1971; van den Honert and Stypulkowski, 1987).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text