Elsevier

Heart Rhythm

Volume 18, Issue 12, December 2021, Pages 2128-2136
Heart Rhythm

Clinical
Atrial Fibrillation
Diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer to detect left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.08.027Get rights and content

Background

There is conflicting evidence about the use of biomarkers to diagnose left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer to detect left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Methods

We searched 4 electronic databases from inception to December 16, 2020. The reference standard was left atrial thrombus detected by transesophageal echocardiography. Study quality was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. We used a bivariate model to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The optimal cutoff and predictive values were also estimated.

Results

Eleven cross-sectional studies involving 4380 patients were included. The median prevalence of left atrial thrombus was 12%. In 7 studies, the pooled sensitivity of D-dimer at 500 ng/mL was 50% (95% CI 26%–74%) and the pooled specificity was 88% (95% CI 76%–95%). The pooled sensitivity of age-adjusted D-dimer was 36% (95% CI 14%–66%) and the pooled specificity was 99% (95% CI 96%–99%) in 2 studies. The optimal cutoff of D-dimer was 390 ng/mL in 10 studies with a pooled sensitivity of 68% (95% CI 44%–85%) and a pooled specificity of 73% (95% CI 54%–86%). The positive and negative predictive values were 21.8% and 95.4%, respectively. The risk of bias was low or unclear for all domains. Concerns about applicability were low for almost all studies.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis suggests that D-dimer has the potential to be useful to rule out left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac rhythm disturbance worldwide. AF is associated with increased morbidity and mortality mostly related to thromboembolic events.1 Compared with patients with sinus rhythm, those with AF have a 5-fold increased risk of ischemic stroke.1 Cardioembolic stroke is one of the most feared complications of AF because it is related to significant disability.

AF is characterized by a disorganized atrial electrical activity, resulting in an ineffective contraction and blood stasis, especially in the left atrial appendage.2 The left atrial appendage is the main source of thrombus in patients with valvular and nonvalvular AF. The other 2 components of Virchow’s triad for thrombogenesis (endocardial injury and hypercoagulability) also play a key role in the thrombus formation in these patients.3 In summary, these mechanisms lead to a prothrombotic state in AF.

In patients with AF, the thrombus usually originates in the left atrial appendage and is accurately detected by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Currently, the CHA2DS2-VASc score is widely used to predict the thromboembolic risk associated with AF.2 However, there is no laboratory test to aid the diagnosis of left atrial thrombus (LAT). Plasma fibrin D-dimers are degradation products of cross-linked fibrin by the endogenous fibrinolytic system, which appear to be a useful parameter for assessing the degrees of hypercoagulability.4 Plasma levels of D-dimer are routinely measured to rule out the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis or acute pulmonary embolism.4 A correlation between D-dimer levels and the presence of LAT in patients with AF has been described in previous studies with conflicting results.5, 6, 7 Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of D-dimer levels to detect the presence of LAT in patients with AF.

Section snippets

Methods

This review is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies statement8 and was registered in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42021250147).

Study selection

Our electronic search retrieved 2591 articles. After the removal of duplicates, 1438 articles were screened by title/abstract, and of those, 1385 were excluded. After a full-text assessment of 53 remaining articles, 42 were excluded because of other populations (n = 18), conference abstract (n = 16), no full text (n = 6), commentary (n = 1), and systematic review (n = 1). Finally, 11 articles5, 6, 7,14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 were selected (Figure 1).

Study characteristics

The main characteristics of the 11

Discussion

We found that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer at 500 ng/mL to detect LAT in patients with valvular and nonvalvular AF were 50% and 88%, respectively. The optimal cutoff of D-dimer was 390 ng/mL with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 68% and 73%, respectively. The negative predictive value of D-dimer was high using different cutoffs (390 and 500 ng/mL) and age-adjusted D-dimer. Subgroup analyses showed a high specificity across subgroups.

D-dimer is a degradation product

Conclusion

Our study shows that plasma levels of D-dimer were higher in patients with AF and LAT than in patients without thrombus. The optimal cutoff D-dimer was 390 ng/mL with a pooled sensitivity of 68% and a pooled specificity of 73%. D-dimer at 390 and 500 ng/mL showed high negative predictive values to exclude LAT. Thus, D-dimer has the potential to be useful in clinical practice to rule out LAT avoiding TEE, particularly in patients with low thromboembolic risk.

References (31)

  • A.A. Khan et al.

    The prothrombotic state in atrial fibrillation: pathophysiological and management implications

    Cardiovasc Res

    (2019)
  • A. Almorad et al.

    D-dimer blood concentrations to exclude left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation

    Heart

    (2020)
  • S. Rafla et al.

    The role of D-dimer in the diagnosis of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation

    J Cardiovasc Dis Res

    (2020)
  • D. Tarnowski et al.

    Comparison of diverse platelet activation markers as indicators for left atrial thrombus in atrial fibrillation

    Platelets

    (2018)
  • M.D.F. McInnes et al.

    Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement

    JAMA

    (2018)
  • Cited by (3)

    Funding sources: The authors have no funding sources to disclose.

    Disclosures: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

    View full text