Which mechanisms of azithromycin resistance are selected when efflux pumps are inhibited?
Introduction
Diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. rank among the main aetiological causes of diarrhoea [1]. The clinical manifestations of shigellosis vary from simple watery diarrhoea to full-blown dysentery that frequently requires antibiotic treatment [2], whilst E. coli usually produces a self-limiting illness. However, in the case of E. coli infections, use of antimicrobial agents such as ampicillin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin may sometimes be required owing to the duration or severity of symptoms [3], [4]. Levels of antimicrobial resistance to the aforementioned agents have progressively increased worldwide in recent years [3], [4], making it necessary to search for alternatives.
In Peru, as in other South American areas, infantile diarrhoea has particular relevance in peri-urban and rural areas [5]. Previous studies have shown high levels of antibiotic resistance in diarrhoeagenic pathogens in the country [4] as well as its extension to commensal micro-organisms [6]. In this regard, antibiotic resistance is a severe health problem worldwide that can lead to inefficacy of antimicrobial agents and therapeutic failure [7]. Thus, the possible development of antimicrobial resistance should be closely monitored. Furthermore, a better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie this resistance is necessary to find therapeutic alternatives.
Azithromycin (AZM) is an antimicrobial agent belonging to the macrolide family that has mainly been used to treat infections caused by Gram-positive micro-organisms [8]. However, it has been shown that this antimicrobial agent possesses good activity against various Gram-negative micro-organisms [9]. In fact, AZM currently plays a relevant role in the treatment of Campylobacter spp., and its use has been recommended in the treatment of other diarrhoeagenic bacteria such as E. coli and Shigella spp. [10]. Unfortunately, despite the absence of an established breakpoint, recent reports have described the presence of AZM resistance both in E. coli and Shigella spp. [4], [11].
To date, different molecular mechanisms involved in the development of resistance to AZM have been described. The most important are probably those encoded on mobile elements, such as ere(A), ere(B), mef(A), mef(B) and others [11]. However, other mechanisms, such as punctual mutations in the rplD, rplV and 23S rRNA genes, have also been described [12], [13]. In addition, the potential of macrolides to act as a substrate of some chromosomal efflux pumps has been reported [14]. In a previous study with in vitro AZM-resistant mutants, we saw that the efflux pumps inhibitable by Phe-Arg β-naphthylamide (PAβN) were the principal mechanism of acquired resistance [15]. Thus, the aim of this study was to obtain in vitro AZM-resistant E. coli and Shigella spp. mutants when inhibiting the action of efflux pumps with PAβN, analysing the frequency of mutation, stability and cross-resistance with other agents and establishing which mechanisms of AZM resistance are selected. Furthermore, the potential of combining an efflux pump inhibitor with AZM to minimise the emergence of AZM resistance was evaluated.
Section snippets
Bacterial strains
Four clinical isolates of E. coli and three Shigella spp. (one Shigella flexneri, one Shigella boydii and one Shigella sonnei) were isolated from faecal samples collected from children with diarrhoea under 5 years of age in Lima (Peru), identified by conventional microbiological and biochemical methods and assessed by amplification of the uidA and ipaH genes [16], [17]. In the case of Shigella spp., identification to species level was performed by serotyping (Probac, São Paulo, Brazil). These
Frequency of mutation
All selected mutant strains showed the same REP-PCR pattern as their parental isolate (data not shown), being considered as reliably derived AZM-resistant mutants.
The frequency of mutation ranged between <6.32 × 10−10 and 5.22 × 10−7 for E. coli and between <5.32 × 10−10 and 1.69 × 10−7 for Shigella isolates (Table 1). The E. coli mutants showed a 2- to 128-fold increase in the MIC of AZM with respect to the parental isolates, with one strain (Ec 2.7) reaching a MIC of 256 mg/L (Table 2). Meanwhile, the
Discussion
The ability of an antimicrobial agent to select resistance is a relevant factor that affects its utility and may diminish its useful life. Along this line, several studies have been designed to analyse and characterise clinical isolates and in vitro mutants of different micro-organisms [15], [21]. In the present work, the ability of AZM to select resistant mutants of Shigella spp. and E. coli in the presence of an inhibitor of some efflux pumps, and which mechanisms responsible for this
References (25)
- et al.
Recombineering reveals a diverse collection of ribosomal proteins L4 and L22 that confer resistance to macrolide antibiotics
J Mol Biol
(2009) - et al.
Pathogenic Escherichia coli
Nat Rev Microbiol
(2001) - et al.
A multicentre study of Shigella diarrhoea in six Asian countries: disease burden, clinical manifestations, and microbiology
PLoS Med
(2006) - et al.
Antimicrobial susceptibility and mechanisms of resistance in Shigella and Salmonella isolates from children under five years of age with diarrhea in rural Mozambique
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
(2009) - et al.
High frequency of antimicrobial drug resistance of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in infants in Peru
Am J Trop Med Hyg
(2009) - et al.
Frequency and pathotypes of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in Peruvian children with and without diarrhea [in Spanish]
Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica
(2011) - et al.
Levels of quinolone resistance and other antimicrobials in non-pathogenic Escherichia coli strains in children from the periurban area of Lima, Peru [in Spanish]
Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica
(2012) Antibiotic resistance in developing countries
J Infect Dis
(1985)- et al.
Comparison of two dosages of azithromycin for three days versus penicillin V for ten days in acute group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis
Pediatr Infect Dis J
(2002) - et al.
Spectrum and mode of action of azithromycin (CP-62,993), a new 15-membered-ring macrolide with improved potency against Gram-negative organisms
Antimicrob Agents Chemother
(1987)
Clinical practice. Bacterial diarrhea
N Engl J Med
Reduced azithromycin susceptibility in Shigella sonnei, United States
Microb Drug Resist
Cited by (8)
Azithromycin resistance levels and mechanisms in Escherichia coli
2019, Scientific ReportsDecreased Susceptibility to Azithromycin among Clinical Shigella Isolates from China
2017, Microbial Drug Resistance